October 14, 2009 9:13 AM

Health Reform Expected to Clear Hurdle

(CBS/AP)  President Obama's plan to remake the nation's health care system is about to take its biggest step yet toward becoming reality.

The pivotal Senate Finance Committee was poised to approve sweeping legislation Tuesday requiring nearly all Americans to purchase insurance and ushering in a host of other changes to the nation's $2.5 trillion medical system.

Much work would lie ahead before a bill could arrive on Mr. Obama's desk, but action by the Finance Committee would mark a significant advance, capping numerous delays as Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., held marathon negotiating sessions - ultimately unsuccessful - aimed at producing a bipartisan bill.

Four other congressional committees acted before August to pass health legislation, so for months all eyes have been on the Finance Committee, the remaining one. It's also the panel whose moderate makeup most closely resembles the Senate as a whole. And the committee's centrist legislation is seen as the best building block for a compromise plan that could find favor on the Senate floor.

CBSNews.com Special Report: Health Care

With Democrats holding a 13-10 majority on the committee the outcome of Tuesday's vote is not in doubt. The big question mark is whether moderate Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine will become the first Republican to support a health overhaul bill. The legislation that passed the other House and Senate committees did so without a single Republican vote. On Monday, Snowe still wasn't saying.

With Finance Committee passage, Mr. Obama's top domestic priority will have advanced farther than former President Bill Clinton's effort ever did. The Clinton health plan never made it through all the congressional committees with jurisdiction.

The final days before Tuesday's long-anticipated vote were rocky. After playing nice for months, the health insurance industry released a report contending that the legislation would cause hefty increases in health insurance premiums.

Democrats and their allies scrambled Monday to knock it down. "Distorted and flawed," said White House spokeswoman Linda Douglass. AARP's senior policy strategist, John Rother, called it "fundamentally dishonest."

The White House insists the bill would bring health insurance costs down. However, Paul Ginsburg, a non-partisan analyst at the Center for Studying Health System Change, told CBS News Chief White House Correspondent Chip Reid the insurance companies do have a point.

Watch Chip Reid's Evening News report

"If people aren't mandated to buy insurance, then you will get a situation where people stay uninsured until they get sick," Ginsburg told Reid.

The drama threatened to overshadow the vote on the 10-year, $829-billion plan that Baucus has touted as the sensible solution to America's problems of high medical costs and too many uninsured.

The bill includes consumer protections such as limits on co-pays and deductibles and relies on federal subsidies to help lower-income families purchase coverage. Insurance companies would have to take all comers, and people could shop for insurance within new state marketplaces called exchanges.

Medicaid would be expanded, and though employers wouldn't be required to cover their workers, they'd have to pay a penalty for each employee who sought insurance with government subsidies. The bill is paid for by cuts to Medicare providers and new taxes on insurance companies and others.

Unlike the other health care bills in Congress, Baucus' would not allow the government to sell insurance in competition with private companies, a divisive element sought by liberals.

Last-minute changes made subsidies more generous and softened the penalties for those who don't comply with a proposed new mandate for everyone to buy insurance. The latter change drew the ire of the health insurance industry, which said that without a strong and enforceable requirement not enough people would get insured, and premiums would jump for everyone else.

America's Health Insurance Plans commissioned a study to prove just that, alleging the bill would add thousands of dollars to a typical policy. It was timed just ahead of the vote on Baucus' bill but the industry was already looking ahead to negotiations on a final package to bring to the Senate floor.

Once the Finance Committee has acted, the dealmaking can begin in earnest with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., working with White House staff, Baucus and others to blend the Finance bill with a more liberal version passed by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

A major question mark is whether Reid will include some version of a so-called public plan in the merged bill. Across the Capitol, House Democratic leaders are working to finalize their bill, which does contain a public plan, and floor action is expected in both chambers in coming weeks. If passed, the legislation would then go to a conference committee to reconcile differences.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 133 Comments
by msaharley October 14, 2009 1:14 PM EDT
I would like everyone to have the ability to go into a free Navy medical clinic in the basement of the congress building, just like our congress representative can. I also would like to get a raise like congress just passed to give themselves. They are so out of touch. How can they be fairly deciding on our healthcare, we cannot vote on it and our represtatives and senators take so many contributions from the Insurance, wall street and drug companies that they cannot be fair to the public. I see that all the Health care insurance companies are now investing in mortgage companies again and I just found out that when a congressman retires, he can take home any left over contributions........ and they do not have to pay taxes on the money.
Reply to this comment
by MB476947 October 13, 2009 11:30 PM EDT
It's weird..I used to be a pretty middle of the road voter, but the Republicans have become this weird combo of bible-thumping, angry, scared and remarkably manipulative politicians. I don't know that I could vote Republican again...they geninely scare me. Even if I liked the politician him/herself, I think I would have to think twice about the affect the party would have (fund raising, etc) on the person. There's no word for it except disturbing!
Reply to this comment
by mav3803 October 13, 2009 10:11 PM EDT
hey , who do you think is paying for this ,its not free , wake up , plus look at canada , u pay by what u make , but get the same care as everyone else, i sad to say voted for obama , like i say sad , only 53%voted for him ,, most to end the war , thats what i voted for , and he lied putting more kids over there , russia could not do it , there went broke , so obama wants too try it , any how not every one wants heatlh care refrom , maybe 30% at most , plus he lied it will cover everyone even the ones that r not suppose to be here , any how wake up it well cost alot out of pocket . and more taxes ,,
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 October 13, 2009 2:49 PM EDT
13 Ayes, 10 Nays!!!
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 October 13, 2009 2:32 PM EDT
by Mortarman29 October 13, 2009 2:25 PM EDT
Actually, I am not ignoring it! As I have said repeatedly, I WANT this to happen. It will hasten our fall...and hasten our ability to return this government to our people.







Translation: "I hate America, and want Obama to fail and our economy to collapse. Then the neo cons that started our free fall can re-assume power, and ignore all of our problems again."
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 October 13, 2009 2:29 PM EDT
by NewYork-Joe-5 October 13, 2009 2:17 PM EDT
That's how sick you have become....now MSNBC is "informative" to you....wow You really don't have a clue, do you ?







Unreal.

MSNBC is broadcasting LIVE coverage of the senate hearings, and you somehow believe that LIVE broadcast is tainted, because MSNBC is broadcasting it on the internet?

I have NO RESPONSE for your comment. It's so far beyond stupid, I don't even know how to respond.




I'm assuming that if you're watching a baseball game on NBC, and your favorite team loses, it's NBC's fault for broadcasting the game, correct?
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman October 13, 2009 2:24 PM EDT
But back to the health care reform.

For those opposed to a govt plan: Explain how our health care is better served by private corporations that are solely concerned with making maximum profit?
Reply to this comment
by Mortarman29 October 13, 2009 2:22 PM EDT
Trout, as I said...I will back the Founders and back the Constitution everyday of the week. They founded this country, they wrote the Constitution, and wrote volumes about what it meant. They stated why they put these restrictions in. Then, all of a sudden, about 90 years ago, we begin an earnest push to ignore and go exactly the opposite way that the Founders intended.

Those guys were very smart guys. They had stduied governments throughotu history. They were students of human nature. And they thus came up with a government that would keep us from tyranny, keep us from the worse abuses that happened in EVERy government in history.

You chose to ignore these guys at your own peril. They predicted that if we went the way we are, what would happen. And it is ALL coming true.

But, there are still two obstructions that this onslaught must still breech. The first is the sovereign states of this nation. They created the Federal government, they wrote what they said Washington could do and what it couldnt do. They kept the rest of their powers to themselves. And they are beginning to reassert themselves.

The last obstruction to the Federal government will be the people themselves. As this government continues its onslaught, a very vocal minority will begin pushing back. Remember, most of the people in the 1700s didnt want revolution or war with their government. Only about 1/3rd pursued it (and thank God they did!).

It will be those 1/3rd that will be the ultimate protectors of our liberty.
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman October 13, 2009 2:20 PM EDT
by Mortarman29 October 13, 2009 2:11 PM EDT
They amuse you? Interesting! Again, you ignore the Founders at your own peril.



Not interesting, merely amusing :)
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman October 13, 2009 2:09 PM EDT
by slownewsday_5 October 13, 2009 2:05 PM EDT
Don't bother, trout - I spent three hours schooling Mort on this one day, until he finally admitted that there's a reason for precedent, even in Constitutional issues.

He's nothing but hot air.




LOL ....

The strict constitutionalists always amuse me :)
Reply to this comment
by Mortarman29 October 13, 2009 2:11 PM EDT
They amuse you? Interesting! Again, you ignore the Founders at your own peril.
by Mortarman29 October 13, 2009 2:12 PM EDT
And by the way, Slow has a problem with coherent sentences so it really is impossible for him to school anyone!!
See all 133 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook