October 10, 2009 9:32 AM

Obama: Partisans Endanger Health Reform

(AP)  President Barack Obama said Saturday he's seeing "unprecedented consensus" behind overhauling health care, though he acknowledged continued partisan gridlock in Congress.

"The historic movement to bring real, meaningful health insurance reform to the American people gathered momentum this week as we approach the final days of this debate," Mr. Obama said Saturday in his weekly radio and Internet video address.

The consensus "includes everyone from doctors and nurses to hospitals and drug manufacturers" - even Republican governors and former GOP lawmakers, President Obama said.

Special Report: Health Care Reform

Mr. Obama's consensus, however, does not extend to congressional Republicans. GOP senators remain united in their opposition to the Democrats' health care package, as are most Republicans in the House.

The president, instead, noted that California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, former Senate Majority Leaders Bob Dole and Bill Frist, all Republicans, and former Health and Human Service Secretaries Louis Sullivan and Tommy Thompson, who both served in Republican administrations, have all come out in favor of overhauling health care, even though they differ on some specifics.

"These distinguished leaders understand that health insurance reform isn't a Democratic issue or a Republican issue, but an American issue that demands a solution," President Obama said.

Democrats have made significant strides since Labor Day, when they returned to the Capitol after an August spent absorbing attacks from noisy conservative critics over health care.

A health care bill soon to emerge from the Senate Finance Committee is the only one judged to meet Mr. Obama's conditions for expanding insurance coverage without raising the federal deficit, while also slowing the rise in medical costs.

Yet the president said he recognized the issue remains divisive among members of Congress.

"There are some in Washington today who seem determined to play the same old partisan politics, working to score political points, even if it means burdening this country with an unsustainable status quo," Obama said. That "status quo" includes rising health care costs, diminishing coverage and arbitrary decisions by big insurance companies, he said.

Speaking for the Republicans, Sen. George LeMieux of Florida acknowledged deep problems with the health care system, but cautioned "the solution should not be worse than the problem we are trying to solve."

"We in the Congress have a duty to tackle this problem, but the solution we settle upon should not be rushed," LeMieux said in the GOP's weekly address. Democrats maintain Republicans are simply trying to delay action.

Lemieux said the Democrats' approach:

• Will cost $1.8 trillion over 10 years, more than twice the cost being discussed by Democrats.

• Adds a new tax burden by penalizing those who do not buy health insurance.

• Denies millions of people the choice of health plans that best suit their needs by forcing them onto Medicaid.

• Takes about $500 billion out of Medicare.

"Taking money from a program already in financial trouble is not responsible," LeMieux said. "It's not fair to our seniors who paid into the program, and it's not fair to our children and grandchildren who will be burdened with massive debt obligations."
By Associated Press Writer Will Lester

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 30 Comments
by gboyd41 October 12, 2009 12:49 AM EDT
Nothing to worry about, the POTUS has a plan to provide health care. The doctors who are currently in practice can easily be replaced by foreign doctors. I hope you can understand what they say!
Reply to this comment
by msimamaji October 11, 2009 12:37 PM EDT
44,000 people a year. According to a recent report published by the Harvard Medical School, that's the number of people who die each year because of our for-profit medical system. And many of these people did have health insurance. That's a 9/11 a month.

Babies fare badly in our dysfunctional health care system. According to the stats I obtained from the 2009 CIA Fact book, our infant mortality rate is twice as high as the infant mortality rate of Sweden or France. According to Statesmaster.com, Washington DC has the highest infant mortality rate in the country. So as Senators, like George LeMieux, are collecting bribes from the health insurance lobby, babies are dying

Yet Senator George LeMieux could care less .

Bear in mind that Senator LeMieux donated $ 2,400 to Governor Charlie Crist's campaign fund, so he literally "bought" his seat. With that in mind how much money is LeMieux going to get from health insurance companies, and big pharma?

If you want an indication of what we can expect, let's look at Mitch McConnel's record, which you can get from Center for Responsive Politics.

Senator Mitch McConnell gets $ 2 million in political campaign contributions from the health sector. He gets $ 1 million from lobbyists. His top political donor is Kindred Health Care. Among the other top 20 campaign donors are Humana Inc, Blue Cross, and GalaxoSmithKline

The top 6 contributors for Charles Grassley include Blue Cross, 2nd place: Select Medical Group, 3rd place; and Amgen. Throughout Grassley's career he has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the industries health insurance industry, health products, and pharmaceuticals.

I would also like to call your attention to an article I picked up from the Huffington Post by by Arthur Delaney, (October 5, 2009)
According to this article, Anthem blue Cross/blue Shield is suing the state of Maine because they want to raise their premiums by 18.5%. That would mean that the average citizen of Maine will spend $ 13,000 a year in insurance and in out-of-pocket deductibles.

And lest I forget, Medicare Advantage is a cash cow for Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats. It enables them to raid Medicare for campaign contributions. Obama's call for an investigation of Medicare is long overdue, and it's little wonder that Republicans like George LeMieux are fighting Obama tooth and nail.

Bottom line

Are you ready to spend $ 13,000 to $ 20,000 for your health insurance? Is it OK for people like George LeMieux to pick your pocket for campaign contributions every time you or your employer pays your insurance premium? Are you willing to give up your Medicare so that politicians like Le Mieux can buy shiny new jet planes.

That will be the wave of the future unless we get health insurance reform with a "robust" public option, such as allowing people buy insurance from Medicare.

The GOP does not care about you or your health; all they want is your money. It's surprising how many people still don't get it.
Reply to this comment
by doc_holliday76 October 11, 2009 9:59 AM EDT
by brian1920:
"Doctors do not favor the public option and many will leave the profession if a public option is passed."
---------------------------------------





Seems as if the LIES and DECEPTIONS by the rabid rightwad, fringe extremists get worse by the day, compounded by foxnewsus propagandus!


Medical News: 63% of Physicians Favor Public Option - in Public ...Sep 14, 2009 ... "Given the enormity of the current effort to reform healthcare and its ... Physicians were asked which options they most support: a public ...
www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/HealthPolicy/15962

Most doctors favor public and private option in President Barack ...Sep 15, 2009 ... Most doctors, particularly family doctors, favor health care reform that includes both a public and private option, a New England Journal of ...
www.nydailynews.com/.../health/.../2009-09-15_most_doctors_favor_having_a_public_option_in_president_barack_obamas_health_care.html

Doctors on Coverage ? Physicians' Views on a New Public Insurance ...Sep 14, 2009 ... Physicians are critical stakeholders in health care reform and have been ... majority support for a public option, with percentages in favor ...
healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=1790

Most U.S. doctors want public-private mix: poll | Special Coverage ...Sep 14, 2009 ... BOSTON (Reuters) - Most US doctors favor having both public and private options in a reformed healthcare system, a survey published ... Family doctors were more likely to favor reform than surgeons and other specialists. ...
www.reuters.com/...HealthcareReform/idUSTRE58D67120090914
Reply to this comment
by gboyd41 October 11, 2009 4:27 AM EDT
Upcoming announcement; POTUS up for Nobel for Medicine!
Reply to this comment
by dibbs977 October 10, 2009 10:44 PM EDT
I am a 64 year old Registered Nurse with over 40 years of nursing experience. We need reform and change. The medical system needs to be there for the patients and not for the doctors. Government can help us a lot. Even though Democracy is not perfect, it is still the best way in the world---and no one has ever come up with anything better. Certainly not free enterprise---which if left unchecked would despoil all our natural resources and turn all of us into slaves. Stop fighting Obama and the government---and do your part to offer rational input into the national health debate. This is a very important issue which needs intellectural, sober attention and stop radical rantings which get in the way of rational discourse. I added my age, because I want younger people to know that there are many of us "older" folks who have a young attitude.
Reply to this comment
by dibbs977 October 10, 2009 10:33 PM EDT
Many people do not want government control---because it will block their making big, easy money by exploiting the rest of us. They use the radical fringe---by stirring them up about hating big government, gays and abortion etc.---but in truth, that is not what it is about---IT IS ABOUT MONEY. The sad part is the the radical right--for the most part--are not the wealthy. They are the people the wealthy exploit to get money. The Right support the very people who are hurting them---because they are so fearful about change and can easily be manipulated. But we must change or we will all demise. There could be a book, one day, entitled, "The Rise and Fall of the United States." If we do not progress, we could fail. Obama can lead us to sanity and security. Support Obama! I believe in President Obama.
Reply to this comment
by robham777 October 10, 2009 8:51 PM EDT
It really does not matter what the fringe believes or does not. The fact is that no Republican will support any bill which expands the role of government in to what has traditionally been the domain of the private sector. I believe that government will not control cost, any real efforts to do this will meet with staunch opposition, and will actually compound the problem. The truth is that reform with the public option will probably become a reality within the next few months, and we will just have to wait and see if the new legislation actually does anything other than enhance the cost and reach of government.
Reply to this comment
by jschmidt27 October 10, 2009 5:36 PM EDT
BTW- since CBS seems unable to fix the duplicating of responses when some responds to an entry, I suggest we just respond with the person tag and have 1 entry.
Reply to this comment
by jschmidt27 October 10, 2009 5:12 PM EDT
funny he didn't say Pelosi, Reid, Waxman, Harkin, Rockefeller were too partisan for insisting on the public option. If the Dems were serious about inclusion they would have accepted some Republican ideas that were cut from the bills in committee. The tort reform idea according to the CBO saves 59 billion. But will the Dems include that? I doubt it since lawyers own the Dems
Reply to this comment
by skepticalJM October 10, 2009 3:42 PM EDT
We have free schools for all our children, that everyone even the unmarried pay for in taxes; we even have free transportation for kids to get there, yet America is too poor to give free health care to all its citizens? What is more important? We are either a nation that looks after each other, or a pack of thieves, stealing from each other. Which is it Americans?
Reply to this comment
by robham777 October 10, 2009 3:58 PM EDT
Those free schools cost on average double per student than do most private schools.
See all 30 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook