October 7, 2009 1:13 PM

CIA: Anti-Cuba Militant was a Snitch

(AP)  Recently released CIA files from the mid-1960s show Cuban exile and accused terrorist Luis Posada Carriles informed on violent Miami-based efforts to attack Fidel Castro's fledgling Cuban government even as he was deeply involved in helping them.

In the files, the CIA also appeared confident that Posada was a moderate force who would not embarrass the agency or the United States.

"A15 is not a typical kind of 'boom and bang' individual. He is acutely aware of the international implications of ill-planned or overly enthusiastic activities against Cuba," Posada's CIA handler, Grover T. Lythcott, wrote in a July 26, 1966, memo, using a code name for the Cuban exile.

Lythcott went on to stress that Posada had informally exercised his influence to discourage exile activities that would embarrass W.O. Lady, a code name for the U.S.

Another declassified memo describes Posada as very loyal to the U.S., of "good character, very reliable and security conscious."

But Posada would later be accused of masterminding the bombing of a Cuban airliner in 1976, hotel bombings in Havana in 1997 and other alleged crimes. He currently faces charges of immigration fraud in Texas, including lying about involvement in the Havana attacks. He declined to comment.

Cuban Militant May Be Deported From U.S.

The documents were made public on the 33rd anniversary of the airliner bombing that killed 73 people. Posada is still wanted in Venezuela and Cuba in connection with that case. The files come from a group of CIA papers declassified between 1998 and 2003 and made public Tuesday by Peter Kornbluh of the independent, non-governmental National Security Archive. Kornbluh obtained them under a Freedom of Information Act request.

In the early 1960s, the CIA directly trained and funded efforts to overthrow Castro's government. But the CIA had backed off its efforts in the wake of the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, the Cuban Missile Crisis and the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Kornbluh said he was amazed at the CIA's failure in its assessment of Posada, noting the numerous terrorism-related accusations against him. Posada was convicted in a 2000 plot against Castro in Panama but was later pardoned. Previously, he had escaped from prison in Venezuela while awaiting a retrial in the airliner case. He sneaked into the U.S. in 2005 and was arrested on immigration fraud charges after he gave a press conference in Miami.

"In the last three years since Posada has been in the U.S., he has been one of the most embarrassing former assets that they've ever had," Kornbluh said.

Other memos detail Posada's report on alleged bomb plots planned by several early exile groups.

Jorge Mas Canosa, who went on to found the Cuban American National Foundation in the 1980s and became one of the most influential lobbyists in Washington through the Clinton administration, is described in one document as possessing 125 pounds of the explosive Pentolite. The memos also describe proposed sabotage of ships off the coast of Veracruz, Mexico, which Mas Canosa organized and planned to finance. It is unclear from the documents whether the plot ever took effect.

Francisco J. Hernandez, the current president of the Foundation, worked closely with Mas Canosa for years. He said the documents described actions by his friend he found difficult to believe.

"The fact of the matter is that Jorge was never a man who believed in terrorism," Hernandez said.

"Yes, in those years, he believed in taking the war of liberation to Cuba, but not to kill innocent people," Hernandez said, adding, "It's shame that 40 some years later at a time when he cannot defend himself, these allegations come."

Posada has called Mas Canosa a great friend. And in a 1998 interview, he said Mas Canosa had financed many of his activities over the years. He later recanted, saying he named Mas Canosa to protect others because the Cuban exile leader had passed away the previous year.

Following that interview and a subsequent 2005 interview with immigration officials in Texas, Posada has maintained that his English is faulty, and that he misunderstood questions directed at him in English.

In a declassified 1965 document, Posada's handler writes that, "He speaks and understands English."

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by mary-miami October 26, 2009 5:40 PM EDT
The best thing for Cuba is to be a commonwealth of the United States like Puerto Rico. When there be multi-party elections in Cuba, there should be an option asking the island people to choose Yes or No do they want to be "annexed" to the U.S. This way they will have freedom and rights afforded by the American constitution. This will effectively stop illegal migration from the island. Miami is the second largest Cuban city. The first is in Havana. Many Cuban Americans are native born Americans and others have been raised there and are naturalized Americans who speak perfect English. It makes sense to have Cuba be American territory.
Reply to this comment
by tmittelstaed October 7, 2009 4:50 PM EDT
Luis Posada Carriles is an idiot. He could have simply remained in Panama and kept his mouth shut, and his Cuban files would have remained classified. Sneaking into the US in 2005 was a stupid risk, but even then I'm sure he would have been left alone - if he had simply kept a low profile.
Reply to this comment
by mejordelahistoria October 7, 2009 2:25 PM EDT
I guess we no longer have the moral ground on pardoning airline bombers, since we are no different than the Libyans.
Reply to this comment
by book_of_wally October 7, 2009 3:55 PM EDT
God is on our side, not theirs! </sarcasm>
by mjlewis6 October 7, 2009 1:27 PM EDT
Posada and Canosa....Nothing new under the sun..regarding another era.

Neither shall we find the Rebozo briefcase in the Potomac or apply some kind of phrenologic diagrams to measure the head of Richard Nixon or truly understand the War of the Generals to pursue a full-fledged military adventurism in Viet Nam instead of going back into Cuba during the Johnson Administration. The sad fact is that if you want to win a war....YOU GO FULL GUNS UNTIL IT IS OVER....and you don't pay resident regimes to fight proxy wars against your enemy because it then becomes a self-interest of that country to let the rebels live as long as the corrupt regime gets paid to keep fighting.
Sound familiar? Afghanistan and Pakistan. Pipe dreams about Cuba and freedom fighters. If they want liberty....they will fight for it.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 October 7, 2009 2:16 PM EDT
An even sadder fact is that Cuba and Vietnam, just like Iraq and Afghanistan, are both none of the US' business, there was no valid reason to pursue "war" in any of those countries.

If you want to win a war, first determine what the war is about, if there is a legitimate threat invading your own land and people, then winning is about eliminating the threat.

Otherwise, don't even start, any reason other than legitimate self-defense from an actual invasion, is guaranteed to fail.
by brianbwb-2009 October 7, 2009 4:27 PM EDT
To LambieKai

Nope, it was not our business.

Had we realized that at the start, our hostility towards them would not have pushed the Cubans to seek an ally just as powerful as we, who openly declared ourselves their enemy, and tried, as the article points out, to kill them and overthrow their government. Who has Cuba ever invaded? Who have they ever nuked, or lied about, in order to foment genocide of the inhabitants?

You post like the typical far right neo, demonizing others for their responses and resistance to our transgressions against them.

As for the Russians, I say that given the cold war and all, they are wise to be suspect about a proven rogue hostile government putting missiles a few hundred miles from their border. 1963 was 46 years ago.

Al Qaeds is US son, they were created, funded, organized, armed and trained by the CIA, and so it is our own asset that "attacked" us. That makes them indeed our business.

But it is our internal problem, the rest of Afghanistan and their Taliban situation is not.

What you think we should be doing is as irrelevant, illegal and even more incorrect than your opinions of where I live.

Everything I have posted in response to your post is backed by public information, freely available, from declassified government documents, not some partisan website.

Let us see you do the same.
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook