October 6, 2009 8:58 PM

Battle of Wanat - Inside the Ambush

By
David Martin
(CBS)  After nearly 15 months of relentless combat in Afghanistan, the soldiers of 2nd Platoon Charlie Company are filling their last sand bags. They shot video of themselves just 12 days before they were supposed to go home.

The outpost they are building is at a village called Wanat - deep in a remote and isolated Afghan valley surrounded by the mountain passes insurgents use to infiltrate from sanctuaries in Pakistan, as CBS News National Security Correspondent David Martin reports.

CBS News Special Report: The Road Ahead

Watch David Martin's Exclusive Report

Just four days later it would come dangerously close to being overrun by an estimated 200 Taliban fighters.

Apache helicopter pilots recorded video on gun camera tapes obtained by CBS News -- a furious fire fight, buildings in flames, and the only officer still alive on the ground calling for help.

"Be advised, we're in a bad situation . . . Need you to come in hot immediately," said the soldier on the ground.

The enemy is so close the Apaches will have to lay down their canon fire within 10 meters of the American position.

The soldier on the ground said, "I know it's high risk, but we need to get these guys off of us."

The pilot responded, "You got to be kidding me."

More Taliban are shooting down on them from those buildings. The Apaches make run after devastating run. They also come in firing their cannons, but the Taliban keep shooting back.

A desperately needed medevac tries to get in through the maelstrom, but instantly becomes a target.

Medevac pilot: "We're taking fire. We just got hit in the lower belly just to the north side of the aircraft."

The Apaches clear away a landing zone for the medevac.

More on the Medevac Unit Involved in the Battle of Wanat
Soldier's Last Letter from Afghanistan
"I was Just Starting to Live My Life"
9 U.S. Troops Killed in Afghan Attack

Finally reinforcements arrive, and the tide of battle turns.

The battle took place a year ago in a valley that is now controlled by the Taliban. And it has triggered an investigation into why the 49 men of 2nd platoon were left so exposed so deep in enemy territory.

For much of its tour, the platoon was under incessant attack. Hunkered down at a base that was surrounded by high ground and could only be supplied by helicopter. Lt. Jonathon Brostrom set up a camera to record an assault on that base. When he was home on leave, he showed it to his father, retired Army Colonel David Brostrom.

"I was frankly shocked. They were getting attacked and probed every day, heavy attacks by enemy forces," said David Brostrom.

Brostrom's platoon and the other units fighting up and down the valley sometimes called in air strikes on houses from which they were taking fire.

"My son showed me that I said, you know, you just lost that village," said David Brostrom.

"We dropped 861 bombs with few questions asked," a senior commander is quoted as saying in a draft report for the Army Lesson's Learned Center obtained by CBS news.
(CBS)

They also fired white phospherous artillery at what they believed was a Taliban campfire. The rounds which were never intended to be used against personnel.

They were supposed to be protecting the population but according to the report the people "whose homes were being leveled and . . . Neighborhoods . . . Turned into battlefields . . . Saw no . . . Improvement in their lives and no real evidence of security."

Brostrom said, "You know, son, you need to get out of there." And he said, 'we are. We're moving to another location.'"

The new location - at Wanat - was supposed to be less exposed. But it was still in enemy territory.

David Dzwik was the sergeant of the platoon - 49 American and 24 Afghan soldiers. "I knew the mission had the potential of being quite hazardous," he said.

It was July and they were short of basic necessities. "The second day we were extremely low on water," said Dzwik. "When you start running out of water it's very hard to continue working through the heat of the day."

They had to take frequent breaks from preparing their defenses. Villagers knew what was about to happen.

Dzwik said, "a couple people came from the village, came up and said the enemy was going to attack."

Despite signs of an impending attack, unmanned surveillance drones which had been watching over the platoon were diverted to a higher priority mission.

A camera pointed at the sky recorded the first burst of machine gun fire.

"All hell broke loose," said Dzwik.

The first apache helicopters got there an hour and five minutes later.

Three-fourths of the Americans were killed or wounded.

"I pride myself on being able to push forward and kind of go through to do the job," said Dzwik. "For the first time in my career I actually stopped dead in my tracks when I came across the scene up there."

The Apache helicopter video shows American soldiers lying dead on the ground. One of them is David Brostrom's son.

"What did my son and what did those other sons die for?" asked Brostrom. "You have to do the investigation so this doesn't happen again."

Many of the soldiers on the videos are no longer alive. Nine were killed at Wanat.

Nine soldiers dead holding a piece of terrain which two days later the U.S. abandoned to the enemy.

Washington Post: After the Battle, Unrest Remains

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
  • David Martin

    David Martin is CBS News' National Security Correspondent.

Add a Comment See all 73 Comments
by Bstn02152 May 29, 2011 8:20 PM EDT
GOD BESS each and everyone of these troops my heart goes out to their families

Shame on the military for not protecting these young men and for not taking responsibility and especially for blaming a 24 yr old!
Reply to this comment
by jmichael81 October 13, 2010 6:24 AM EDT
These guys are true American heroes. Thank you for your sacrifice, and preserving the American way of life. None of you will be forgotten!
Reply to this comment
by steveh352 March 13, 2010 9:17 PM EST
What biased, liberal "soldiers are cannon fodder" reporting, did I miss the reporter saying how many probable kills, how many awards for valor? Surely the soldiers did a few things right, not that you will ever hear this reporter/CBS/MSNBC/CNN say anything glowing about soldiers.
Now the CPT in charge of the base is getting a letter of reprimand for his role. We as a people and a Army want instant gratification at no cost. A historical review would be hard pressed to find a small unit action of comparable duration, violence, and numbers of adversaries involved, with so low a US loss. I know... hollow comfort to the families of the fallen.
How silly the Army is looking with a high award one week and a punishment the next.
For those without friends and family in the fight please go rent "Band of Brothers" and watch all the success and failures that infantry combat entails. Then after viewing that, maybe even watching the interviews of the old real soldiers, feel free to comment on the kids in combat. What I am hearing is a bunch of taxpayer/civilian's highly educated and passionate, but grossly uninformed and defeatist when it comes to Afghanistan.
And why were so few soldiers at that site, with too little air support? The "Peace Dividend" and the "Clinton years" cut the heart out of the Army Infantry, and ground support airframes retired and not replaced. Added to the pressures of a fight in Iraq that might have not been necessary. Just wanted to remind how weak parts of the defense establishment became. Bush/Rumsfeld are to be faulted in not rebuilding/growing the military while engaged in combat operations something we were able to do in WW2, Korea, and partially in Vietnam also.
Reply to this comment
by spyblimp October 16, 2009 8:34 AM EDT
It's 2009 and we are the United States of America. We sent Men to the moon and we can see a penny from outer space..........but we cannot locate over 100 Taliban fighters that are approaching our remote outpost with plans to kill our soldiers. I don't get it....
We have the capabilities to identify the approaching Taliban with our heat sensors and camera capabilities. We do it all the time looking for people lost in the woods.
We don't need airplane type drones to do this, we need blimp or balloon types. They would hover over our posts, above enemy STA missile range (1 mile?) and just stay their and spy and look (24/7). Balloons have the advantage that they can stay and look all the time. I read our drone plane were diverted to another mission and were not keeping surveillance over the out post the time the Taliban attacked. The balloons would not have been diverted. The balloons can be deployed by the base and monitored by the base.

Why can't the USA create this?? If it is in the works lets use it! It's obvious to me that we do not have this technology. Why NOT!!!

That's all... I'm disgusted. We can not win this war without surveillance tools like drone aircraft and drone balloons.

CBS... Please investigate this weakness in our military and make a report (60 minutes)on this failure of the "best" in the world"

PAUL Connecticut
Reply to this comment
by RedWings_ninety_one October 9, 2009 11:57 AM EDT
We never should've been in Iraq in the first place. I bet that if President Bush had never went in to finish "Daddy's War," the situation in Afghanistan would be a very different one.
Reply to this comment
by jellolion October 9, 2009 2:10 AM EDT
just like the french in dien bien phu. this is going to end in disaster.
Reply to this comment
by canalstreet1 October 8, 2009 1:59 PM EDT
If we don't have enough troops, why are our commanders in Afghanistan sending our forces on conventional patrols where they can be ambushed? The Pentagon seems hidebound to tactics that just don't work against insurgencies. We learned that hard lesson Vietnam. Or did we? Wouldn't it make more sense to adjust the strategy to the troop levels that currently incountry now? For example, why not concentrate on infiltration, quick-strike Special Forces raids on Taliban weapons depots and training camps, while intensifying Predator Drone attacks on key targets?
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti October 7, 2009 1:51 PM EDT
This is a tragic and unnecessary quagmire to benefit the American rich corporations. Bring them home NOW before it ruins us (maybe too late already).
Reply to this comment
by justdatrooth October 7, 2009 12:48 PM EDT
Obama spends more time comforting the GITMOS than he does seeing that our troops are protected.

Speaking of which...he has 3 months to fully resolve all Gitmo cases and get the thing closed...or will he break that promise too?
Reply to this comment
by Prusaunt October 7, 2009 9:35 AM EDT
My comment was left for all those that are worried about the civilians in Afghanistan. Also count those civilians we lost on 9-11. It's time for us to win this war.
Reply to this comment
See all 73 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook