No, There's Been No Olympic Armageddon
Bob Schieffer Says Obama's Failure to Help Win the Olympics for Chicago Was Not the End of the World
-
Play CBS Video Video Obama Doesn't Bring Home The Gold Bob Schieffer takes a look at the week in which President Obama's tried to bring the Olympics to Chicago.
-
A Chicago 2016 supporter reacts during the announcement from the International Olympic Committee that the Second City came in fourth in bids to host the Summer Games. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green)
From what I heard all week, a lot of people thought it might if the President flew to Copenhagen and failed to bring home the Olympics.
Well, he went. He asked. He failed.
It was not even close.
So he came home. Washington spent most of the week, gnashing its teeth about whether he should have gone. Republicans accused him of dereliction of duty. Some in his own party shuddered at the possible humiliation of it all.
Frankly, it didn't seem all that big a deal to me. I said at one point that if a trip to Copenhagen took his presidency over the side, then it wasn't much of a presidency.
If he wanted to give his hometown a boost, why not? Chicago is part of America, last time I looked.
Anyway, he's back. Nothing happened.
When I drove in this morning, the Washington Monument was still standing. The problems that were here when he left are still here - no better, no worse but so bad, my guess is the great Copenhagen gambit will soon be forgotten.
Still, let us mark a moment of sympathy for the unfortunate White House staffer who told the President, "If you'll just fly all night to Copenhagen and then fly back, we're sure to get the Olympics for Chicago."
No, I wouldn't want to be that person.
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- CBSNews.com on Digg

- Shieffer on Nobel Prize is either ignorant of its history and Obama's record thus far, OR a Propagandist for (see Princeton President's comments along the same line. Is CBS an AIPAC Organ ?
- Reply to this comment
- Mr. Schieffer, nice fallback position (kinda Plan'B'??).
Think you missed the whole point. - Reply to this comment
- Ya know, I'm not surprised that Chicago didn't make the final cut - especially with Rio in the running. Personally, I'm GLAD it's in South America - the Olympics have NEVER been there before, ever. Rio is one of the party spots of the world, and it will be awesome to see the party they'll put on FOR the world!!
What IS upsetting is that Chicago finished FOURTH. - Reply to this comment
- Chicago is the armpit of America. They stood no chance at all against the brilliant presentation of Rio. Rio had history and a beautiful city going for it. Not even an American president could overcome those advantages.
I suspect that, before it is over, though. Rio and Brazil will regret having gone to the trouble. I cover that subject on http://brazilbrat.blogspot.com/ - Reply to this comment
- What is the primary issue with Mr. Obama, and his travels - not just to Copenhagen, but to all of the photo op's, the speeches, etc..
I do believe that Ms. Obama and Ms. Winfrey, as acting on behalf of the president and the people of the City of Chicago and the United States would have been sufficient to the cause.
What is inappropriate, and what this president fails to grasp, is the cost of these trips to the taxpayers. These costs are extraordinary if you look at what it takes logistically, with man power and support equipment, to move this president point to point.
When he travels overseas, it is not one aircraft. There is a support aircraft that follows carrying the equipment necessary to move this, and his security teams, safely within the country he is visiting. You have, over open water (as well as land) fighter support aircraft. You have AWACS on station monitoring all traffic within hundreds of miles around AF-1. With that comes surface vessels, an air craft carrier, all on high alert and on station to defend AF-1 against surface to air missle attack.
When he's on the ground, you have Secret Service, often a squad of Marines as perimiter security and aircraft security at the air port.
All of this, necessary as it is, comes at extreme cost. In these times of EXTREME economic difficulty is it unreasonable to ask the POTUS to be more conscious of his spending and how it impacts the people?
Can you, as a private citizen, imagine having to close streets, shops, pulling police officers to crowd control - just to have your wife go to a fresh foods market in Washington DC. How could you afford to pay the bill? But each and every time this president, or his wife, leaves the Whitehouse, this is what happens.
I am not saying that they need to be house bound, what I am saying is be more responsible in their choices and selection of where they go, how often, and at what cost to the people paying the bill.....
As for the Olympics bid loss, it is what it is. The IOC is one of the most corrupt organizatoins on the globe, and what Rio paid them, versus what will be gained by Rio will not be known until 2017. Quite frankly, with the world in its present state, a lot of us will not be alive to care by then. - Reply to this comment
- If he didn't go they would have said...if only he went... he did go... and they say he shouldn't have gone... it's a no win. I'm glad he went.... now it's over and let's move on to healthcare and get the plan done.
- Reply to this comment
- Oh Well
Chicago is not going to get the Olympics. Time to Move On and get Over IT ! - Reply to this comment
- South America deserves this much more than America. They have been repeatedly victimized by the United States killing their elected officials, manipulating their elections and having our big corporations economically raping and pillaging their people.
We have become the terrorists of the world, bombing 4 countries and breeding religious wackos in the Midwest. - Reply to this comment
- Have anybody thought of the fact that Brazil was the better chose and the last time I checked Obama wasn't the only world leader there.
- Reply to this comment
- Bob, you are pimping for Obama.
- Reply to this comment




