October 6, 2009 12:50 PM

Iran Talks Conclude with Cautious Optimism

(CBS/AP)  Updated 6:50 p.m. EDT

Iran and six world powers ended a landmark meeting Thursday with an agreement to take a new stab at overcoming years of mistrust generated by Tehran's nuclear program and meet again this month for wide-ranging discussions on the two sides' concerns.

Adding to the optimism generated by the decision to hold follow-up talks was a rare bilateral meeting between the senior U.S. and Iranian delegates to the meeting. In addition, diplomats said Iran will open its newly disclosed nuclear plant to U.N. inspectors, probably within a few weeks.

In comments late Thursday, President Barack Obama on Thursday called the talks "a constructive beginning" but said that Iran must match its promises of cooperation with deeds.

Now that Iran has agreed to open it's the newly disclosed enrichment facility to international inspectors, it "must grant unfettered access" to those inspectors within two weeks, Mr. Obama said.

"Talk is no substitute for action," Mr. Obama said. "Our patience is not unlimited." He added said that if Iran follows through with concrete steps "there is a path to a better relationship" with the United States and the international community.

(Read more in CBSNews.com's Political Hotsheet blog.)

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, speaking in Washington shortly after the talks ended, called the day productive but sounded a pragmatic note, as well.

"I will count it as a positive sign when it moves from gestures and engagements to actions and results," she said. "That's a necessary pathway and I think we're on it. We've always said we would engage. But we're not talking for the sake of talking," she said, adding, "Today's meeting opened the door, but let's see what happens."

At the same time that the talks were taking place in Switzerland, "Iran's foreign minister was at U.N. headquarters in New York, saying that diplomacy needs more time, that the talks are constructive, and that Iran wants a summit-level meeting with world leaders," reports CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk from the U.N.

But the foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, "Stonewalled any questions about Iran's non-compliance on nuclear issues and about the recent disputed elections," Falk reports.

U.S. Deputy State Department spokesman Robert Wood said Undersecretary of State William Burns used the meeting with chief Iranian delegate Saeed Jalili "to reiterate the international community's concerns about Iran's nuclear program.

"He addressed the need for Iran to take concrete and practical steps that are consistent with its international obligations and that will build international confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of its program.

"While the focus of the discussion was on Iran's nuclear program, both sides had a frank exchange on other issues, including human rights," said Wood.

The encounter appeared to be concrete proof of President Barack Obama's commitment to engage Iran directly on nuclear and other issues — a sharp break from the policy under the Bush administration.

More broadly, the meeting suggested that Obama was putting his concept of U.S. foreign policy into action, with its emphasis on negotiating even with the nations that are most hostile to the United States.

CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer reported before the meeting that that the most tangible indicator of success would be a scheduled follow-up round of negotiations by the same parties.

Senior EU envoy Javier Solana confirmed that the seven nations did indeed plan to meet again.

And they appear to have got much more than that, including an unprecedented 45 minute one-on-one talk between the head of the U.S. delegation William Burns - and Iran's head nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, Palmer reports.

Solana also said Iran had pledged to open its newly revealed uranium enrichment plant to International Atomic Energy Agency inspection soon.

"The major breakthrough from the first diplomatic talks in decades between Iran and the U.S., is that the Iranian government will allow international inspectors into the newly discovered nuclear facility in Qom," Falk said.

Iran also agreed to a deal that would send most of its enriched uranium - already theoretically enough to make a bomb - out of the country for reprocessing in Russia and France. It would return to Iran in a different form for medical use, Palmer reports, with the whole process supervised by the IAEA.

Iran's disclosure of the new plant had threatened to poison the atmosphere of the talks, with the West saying Tehran only revealed it because it feared it would found out. Uranium enrichment can make both nuclear fuel and the fissile core of nuclear warheads.

Solana said Iran had pledged to "cooperate fully and immediately with the IAEA," and said he expected Tehran to invite agency inspectors looking for signs of covert nuclear weapons activity to visit "in the next couple of weeks."

At the United Nations, Mottaki confirmed the plant would be opened to inspectors.

"The letter from the IAEA to the Islamic Republic of Iran, in response to the information we have provided in this respect, and with regard to the new facilities that are under construction, indicate the fact that the agency has appreciated Iran's move and dialogue for arranging a visit by the IAEA official is under way," Mottaki said.

The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — the U.S., Russia, China, Britain and France — plus Germany hope to persuade Tehran to freeze the enrichment program.

CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk wrote in the World Watch blog Wednesday that China's seemingly endless need for oil - and their massive investment in Iran's oil infrastructure - may end up blocking any meaningful economic sanctions against Tehran.

Going into Thursday's talks, one of the top U.S. goals was to get the Iranians to commit to a second round of talks within a couple of weeks in order to keep the dialogue in a compact timeframe. The U.S. assumption was that if Iran was willing to engage seriously on the nuclear issue, a positive sign would be its agreement to have a second meeting shortly.

A senior Obama administration official told Palmer ahead of the talks that an eventual deal could include an Iranian enrichment program inside Iran, provided that it was well-monitored by international nuclear authorities.

Palmer, who has covered Iran extensively in recent years and traveled to the country on multiple occasions, says the Iranians genuinely seem interested in engaging the international community in these talks. "They don't want to be the ones to adjourn and walk out. They are too aware of pressure at home."

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 61 Comments
by rexrox2 October 2, 2009 1:39 PM EDT
"A Babe in the Woods". China and Putin are dead set against sanctions. This has a snowball's chance in hell. While the world watches the latest Obama Naivete play out, Iran moves inextricably closer to becoming a Nuclear Terrorist State. Most folks growned, as Obama's GREENESS, with diplomacy and international etiquette were on display earlier in the year,(England gets Obama's Speeches and Books on Tape, and declaring that he doesn't speak "Austrian"),I think most people now are becoming increasingly enraged and frightened by this man. Our soldiers are being killed at an alarming rate in Afghanistan,(many say due to the shortage of people), and he dithers to change his New Plan for Afghanistan(end of March),"A War That Must Be Won". His weakness was furher exposed, if there were any doubts, by his pathetic presentation to the Olympic Committe, and it's equally pathetic result,CHICAGO IS FIRST OUT OF OLYMPICS. People are still saying things like, THE YOUTH IN IRAN PROBABLY LIKE OBAMA MORE THAN THE MULLAHS. He really "stood up for them" after their election,(meddling??) I just hope all this doesn't produce some tragedy of global proportions.
Reply to this comment
by NewYork-Joey October 2, 2009 12:20 PM EDT
by jwesel1 October 2, 2009 10:14 AM EDT
One should appreciate Iran as the only non-aligned country to stand up to world powers and not scared of "Either you are with us or against us" tactics.
__________________________

Why would you "appreciate" a rogue terrorist dictatorship, who thumbs their nose at the rest of the civilized world ??? why should we "appreciate" a radical terrorist republic of Iran ??? are you from Iran ?
Reply to this comment
by NewYork-Joey October 2, 2009 12:18 PM EDT
by salmoc44 October 2, 2009 11:08 AM EDT
The Iranian President is weak in Iran, by design. Do any Cons actually know that Ahmadinejad isn't really the leader of Iran? It seems not.
____________________

Ahmadinejad IS the "leader" or President, according to the recent election.....there is however a Supreme Spiritual Leader - Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei who has the last say.

In reality, the Ayatollah really makes the final decision.
Reply to this comment
by NewYork-Joey October 2, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
by democracy1 October 2, 2009 6:58 AM EDT
First of all, learn how to write a coherent sentence in English
_____________

Have some compassion, obviously he has difficulties in English, as many in this country do.
Reply to this comment
by pensacola8-2009 October 2, 2009 5:30 AM EDT
The Iranian president doesn't want to appear weak or be compared to Saddam Hussein, who was capture, tried and executed by his own people.

The defiance we see is a cultural exhibition of power with roots tracing all the way back to prehistoric times when a full show of force was present during a negotiation.

We have to remember that Iran is between two nations that are currently occupied by the USA.
Reply to this comment
by democracy1 October 2, 2009 6:54 AM EDT
Good point. A lot of people seem to be too caught up in their own "power issues" to take a momentary calm step back to realize this, They'd rather jump the gun and sey off WWIII.
by armik80 October 2, 2009 4:56 AM EDT
Stop appeasement policy toward fundamentalist & terrorist regime of Iran now.obama's talks with regime Are very dangers to whole world?that makes iran's gov to be sure that they can have atoumic bomb. Stop it now. Iranian are dying very day and being killed by this gov and you are talking about ?Cautious Optimism? shame, shame, shame on appeasement and friend ship with terrorist gov of Iran.help & support NCR to bring peace & freedom to the whole mid east.
Reply to this comment
by democracy1 October 2, 2009 6:58 AM EDT
First of all, learn how to write a coherent sentence in English! Secondly, the US is not going to jump the gun and set off WWIII just to satisfy Israel and the rabid right. That is NOT appeasement (look up the word in the dictionary). Get a grip!
by armik80 October 2, 2009 4:22 AM EDT
first of all regime in iran is not represent the majority of iranian,no legitimacy. so who is paying the price of talks with terrorist gov of iran? of course iranian ppl & opposition? this talk only give time to regime for more killing and press the ppl.any one who shacke hand with them is part of this coappration to do so. at same time that meeting in geneva was going on, iranian popet factions in iraqi gov attacked the 36 iranian hostages in iraq.this is the resault of talks. iranian will not allways accept such agreement betveen west & mullahs.
Reply to this comment
by TrishaL59 October 1, 2009 11:36 PM EDT
CBS News: And they appear to have got much more than that, including an unprecedented 45 minute one-on-one talk between the head of the U.S. delegation William Burns - and Iran's head nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, Palmer reports.


Well Republicans/NeoAIPACONS got to be toooorrrrmented seeing this young and bright Democrat president, OBAMA, getting such success with the arch-foes evilistic Iranians as they used to be described by the tale telling Zionists/AIPACONS. Barack will be the one president overturning the rightwing way of rumbling their warrrr Drrrummms. Forever. America does not believe the war mongers anymore! Amen.
Reply to this comment
by SocietysNightmare October 1, 2009 9:19 PM EDT
The US nor Israel can continue to police the Middle East. In fact, no nation has the right to dictate to another. I applaud the courage of the Iranian government. The US is perceived internationally as a bully. Russia invaded Georgia, and the world stood and watched. North Korea is still developing their program despite world opposition. But we as a nation want to target Iran. A nation that is not as technologically advanced. Home of the brave ...... right.
Reply to this comment
by msimamaji October 1, 2009 8:49 PM EDT
Three cheers for Obama!

Here are a few facts that apparently a lot of people have forgotten

The current regime of the mullahs in Iran has declared war against Iran's young - and demographically Iran is a very young country. Obama probably has a lot more appeal than the mullahs. A society that hates its young cannot survive.

Secondly, according to articles I read last year in the Los Angeles Times, Iran's economy is in serious trouble. I can even remember reading reports about gasoline riots breaking out in Iran. Obama's decision to impose economic sanctions are likely to cause a replay of those events. Although Iran can try to show off it's military might by firing missiles right and left, the Iranian government cannot escape a cold economic reality. Military spending is an excellent way to bankrupt an economy.

In addition, no one considers the risks of nuclear energy - not to Israel, but to Iran. We have no guarantee that Iran's nuclear facilities are safe. I realize that the Russians have been assisting Iran's nuclear endeavors and that should be further cause for alarm. Remember Chernobyl.

Furthermore, nuclear energy is a very expensive form of power. In most cases, nuclear energy cannot survive without massive government subsidies. Iran's government is already broke. Where will it get the subsidies? Even Iran's neighbors across the Persian Gulf, the famous oil sheikdoms, have realized that the petro-party is over, and they now investing heavily in solar, not nuclear, energy. What does this tells about the competence of Iran's leaders?

Obama's policy on Iran shows that Obama is a bona-fide baller that would put Michael Jordan to shame. To be sure, we do not know if this policy will preclude military action. But it is a welcome relief to "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran."
Reply to this comment
See all 61 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook