September 30, 2009 7:39 PM

2016 Olympics: Chicagoans Split on Games

(CBS/AP)  The mayor, the president and Oprah Winfrey may hope to return to Chicago from Copenhagen with the 2016 Olympic Games, but some around town hope the International Olympic Committee deems the Second City the second city.

As in second to Rio de Janeiro. Or Tokyo. Or Madrid.

The opposition is not as visible as the "We Back the Bid" signs plastered across town. But in a city all too familiar with stories of public corruption and problems with public services, there is serious concern the games can only mean more troubles - and bills - for residents.

"I know it's going to cost us money somehow," said Joseph Patrick, a 51-year-old stay-at-home dad. "The government doesn't have a job (so) the only place they can get money is from us."

Opposition is becoming more vocal as the IOC prepares to vote Friday. Michelle Obama arrived in Copenhagen Wednesday to lend her substantial presence to the city's lobbying effort.

But back home, a new Web site - Chicagoansforrio.com - is the talk of the town and features the game "Match the Olympic host with its estimated budget overrun." About 170 protesters marched outside City Hall on Tuesday night, many insisting that no matter what organizers say, the games will push people from their homes, lead to more corruption and raise taxes.

"I don't believe anything the city and the 2016 committee says," said Larry Rivkin, who grew up in Chicago.

At least one person was later arrested for trying to interfere with workers erecting Olympic symbols in a downtown plaza.

Meet the 2016 Olympic City Contenders
2016 Olympics' First Event - Lobbying
Obama's Olympic Pitch Draws GOP Complaint
Tokyo Pitches a "Green Olympics"

Obama to Front Chicago's Olympics Bid
Rio's 2016 Olympic Bid Gets Boost

It's not that the bid does not enjoy wide support. Laid-off laborer Dennis Ries, 45, said the Olympics would bring jobs. Resident Molly Mason, 53, sees the games enhancing tourism and public transportation.

"There's no downside, only upside," Mason said.

Others note protests routinely accompany Olympic bids.

"The Olympics always galvanizes all sorts of opposition," said A.D. Frazier, chief operating officer for the 1996 Atlanta Games.

In Chicago, though, the opposition seems to be getting stronger.

A poll released this month by the Chicago Tribune showed residents almost evenly split, with 47 percent in favor of the bid and 45 percent against; that's a drop from the 2-1 support the newspaper found in a February poll.

The 2016 bid committee said its own poll last week shows support from 72 percent of Chicagoans. But even that segment has concerns.

Seconds after saying the games in Chicago would be "thrilling," Susan Blaine was wondering what tens of thousands more riders will do to an already overwhelmed public transportation system.

"A Cubs game turns my commute to chaos," said Blaine, 51. "You're belly button to belly button."

For others, concerns about taxes have only intensified since Mayor Richard Daley flip-flopped in April, telling the IOC he'd sign a contract promising the city would take full financial responsibility for the games after long maintaining he wouldn't.

"For a lot of people that was definitely a major moment, when they said, `Wait a minute, we're going to be ... on the hook financially for a very large amount,"' said Anna Tarkov, who writes The Daily Daley blog and opposes the bid.

Organizers have tried to allay such fears, but it can be a tough sell at a time of headline-grabbing corruption cases, the biggest one involving former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich - a Chicagoan accused of trying to sell President Barack Obama's vacant U.S. Senate seat to the highest bidder.

"I just think that the history of corruption sets the stage for a brutal series of events like misuse of funds and insider dealings," said Brian Hayes, 53, of Chicago.

Frazier, of the Atlanta Games, doesn't think the opposition matters to the IOC.

"They will probably be disappointed if there wasn't anything," he said.

Members of a group called No Games Chicago hope he's wrong. They're headed to Copenhagen to tell the IOC that Chicago is in such financial straits that it cannot afford the games and is such a hotbed of political corruption that it doesn't deserve them.

"We are bringing materials to back up our claim that Chicago is not fit to host the games," said Tom Tresser, an organizer for the group.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment
by hungry1968-16 September 30, 2009 1:17 PM EDT
by MsBlunt September 30, 2009 11:54 AM EDT

I say let the folks that will benefit, if any, build their own olympic village. Chicagoans seem to think this is not a real good idea.







We had the World University Games here in Buffalo back in 1993, and it was a total disaster.

Numerous businesses went out of business, because they supplied food, water, hotel rooms, etc, etc and were never reimbursed by the games.

We were told what a great and wonderful benefit and addition it would be to the area, how it would help our national "standing", how it would help our local businesses, etc, etc, and it ended up being a complete and total loss.

Based on our experience, Chicago would deem itself lucky if they DO NOT get the games.
Reply to this comment
by stillwaters6 September 30, 2009 12:54 PM EDT
TOP 5 REASONS RIO SHOULD GET IT:

5. The OCEAN is better than the Lake

4. They have never hosted one before.

3. Less Likely to get shot or hit with a 2 X 4 by some imates

2. The Exchange rate: The dollar goes further in RIO than Chicago

1. PRETTY YOUNG THINGS AT THE BEACH. What a site to behold.


GO RIO! GO OCEAN!
Reply to this comment
by m7two September 30, 2009 12:37 PM EDT
HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR THIS???? WE ARE BROKE AMERICA! B-R-O-K-E!!
Who is going to invest in this project during this global economic slide? We have MUCH BIGGER ISSUES! Lets take care of domestic things like safety and security of our schools AND HONOR STUDENTS! Or lets spend money on how to be a good neighbor or ethics! We need values much more than the Olympics!
Reply to this comment
by vuenbelvue September 30, 2009 11:48 AM EDT
Sidney, Australia spent $6.5 to 7 billion dollars building their olympic village. Factor in the years and Chicago that may rise to anyone's guess in 2016. I don't live in Chicago so I have no care and if alive in 2016 probably won't watch it.
Reply to this comment
by pigsinlipstick September 30, 2009 11:44 AM EDT
I SEE THE RIGHT WING WHACK JOBS ARE TYPING FOR KARL ROVE AGAIN TODAY,


LETS FACE IT, THE DEMOCRATS IN CHICAGO WILL WANT


THE ONE MILLION JOBS THAT


THE OLYMPICS WILL BRING TO THE AREA,



THE REPUBLI'CON's ON THE OTHER HAND WILL WANT TO DO ANYTHING THEY CAN



TO MAKE 'THEIR' NEW PRESIDENT LOOK BAD AND FOR OUR COUNTRY TO FAIL,


SO-- 'CON'SERVATIVES WILL BE AGAINST THE OLYMPIC'S,



MINDLESS LEMMINGS, 'THAT' IS WHAT I SEE,


CONTROLLED BY


CORPORATE GREED
Reply to this comment
by pigsinlipstick September 30, 2009 2:47 PM EDT
what you are is a corporate shill and a swift boat liar,

tell rove/cheney to bite me when they pay you on friday
by ROBACA September 30, 2009 5:39 PM EDT
Temp jobs. The Olympics do not provide long term employment. Then what to do with all the buildings, pools, etc erected that will cost an astronomical amount. Have you really thought ahead?
by moonbeam91 September 30, 2009 11:23 AM EDT
Right-on! If only the Obamas could really do some work. The kind they were elected to do. But then again they only like to take credit when the hard work has been done by others. And in this instance, olympics, it is so nice to again go on a trip, take their friends & stick us with the bill. Business as usual, Chicago style! Do remember the huge check Michelle 'earned' & only worked a few hours a week! Do remember that shortly after Barack became senator the said co. Michelle worked at rec'ed a large amount of money & Michelle was compensated with a very nice large bonus. Had that happened with Hillary or Laura they would have been run out of town or in jail.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook