September 25, 2009 7:48 PM

US, UK, France Tell Iran to Open Nuke Site

By
CBSNews
(CBS/ AP)  Updated at 1:50 p.m. ET

President Barack Obama and the leaders of Britain and France are publicly demanding that Iran open up a secret nuclear fuel facility to international inspectors.

Led by Obama at the site of the G-20 summit in Pittsburgh, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown joined the United States Friday in chastising Tehran for operating the facility covertly.

Obama said the site "deepens a growing concern" that Iran has failed to live up to its international obligations. He said that Iran "is breaking rules that all nations must follow, endangering the world non-nuclear proliferation regime ... and the security of the world."

The United States, the United Kingdom, and France have presented detailed evidence demonstrating that Iran has been building the covert site for several years, Mr. Obama said, and they expect the International Atomic Energy Agency to immediately investigate.

Iran has a right to peaceful nuclear energy, Mr. Obama said, but the size and configuration of this facility is inconsistent with a peaceful program.

"We remain open to serious, meaningful engagement with Iran" President Obama said. The revelation of the second facility, he said, adds new urgency to the Oct. 1 meeting of the five permanent U.N. Security Council members and Germany with Iran. "Obligations must be kept, and treaties will be enforced," Mr. Obama said.

Brown called Iran's nuclear program "the most urgent proliferation challenge the world faces today." He said the level of deception from the Iranian government and the scale of its breach of international standards "will shock and anger the international community" and harden the resolve of world powers to enforce stricter sanctions against Iran.

"The international community has no choice today but to draw a line in the sand," he said.

Sarkozy added that Iranian leaders must not be given too much time before action is taken against their nuclear program.

"If by December there is not an in-depth change... sanctions will have to be taken," he said.

Iran revealed the existence of its second plant in a letter sent Monday to International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei.

The letter stated that the enrichment level would be up to 5 percent, and Iran told the agency that no nuclear material has been introduced into the facility, according to IAEA Spokesperson Marc Vidricaire.

"Iran assured the agency in the letter that 'Further complementary information will be provided in an appropriate and due time,'" Vidricaire said.

In response, the IAEA has requested Iran to provide specific information and access to the facility as soon as possible.

"This will allow the Agency to assess safeguards verification requirements for the facility," Vidricaire said.

Iranian officials had previously acknowledged having only one plant - one under IAEA monitoring - and had denied allegations of undeclared nuclear activities. Iran is under three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions for refusing to freeze enrichment at that plant.

A senior U.S.official familiar with the intelligence on the Iranian nuclear facility describes it as "heavily protected and heavily disguised," CBS News White House correspondent Peter Maer reports. The official said the U.S.has been aware of the secret plant for "several years," and the administration wanted to use the intelligence for "building a case" against Iran. The intelligence might have stayed quiet if the Iranians had not learned that its secret was "compromised."

The administration provided a detailed briefing to the IAEA yesterday.

Another official describes next week's Geneva meeting with Iran involving the U.S., China, Germany, Russia, Britain and France as "a critical opportunity for Iran" to demonstrate a willingness to cooperate, Maer reports. The official says the coming weeks will see the U.S.and the other countries pursue a policy of "engagement and pressure" that could be followed by tougher sanctions.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel called the revelation "a grave development."

She told reporters that Germany, Great Britain, France and the United States had consulted and agreed to a joint response. Merkel spoke separately from her counterparts because she had been in an already-scheduled meeting with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.

She said "we will see" about the reactions of Russia and China, which also are part of the group of six but always more reluctant to take a firm line on Iran.

The senior administration official said Obama told Medvedev about the Iranian facility during their meeting earlier this week in New York. The Chinese are "just absorbing these revelations," the official said.

During Medvedev's talks with Obama, he opened the door to backing potential new sanctions against Iran, speaking just days after Obama's decision to scale back a U.S. missile shield in Eastern Europe that Russia strongly opposed. He followed with stronger statements Thursday, saying Russia would support international sanctions if other efforts failed. He said the U.S. and Russia must push Iran to make its nuclear program open and transparent.

On Friday in Pittsburgh, the Russian leader said the facility is "a source of serious concerns." He called on Tehran to act quickly to win the trust of the international community and "demonstrate readiness for full-scale cooperation," according to a statement quoted by the Russian news agency ITAR-Tass.

Beijing urged Iran to cooperate, but a senior Chinese official batted down the idea of punishing Tehran. "I think that all the issues can only be solved through dialogue and negotiation," Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei said.

A senior U.S. official called the revelation of the site a "victory" because it sets back Iran's nuclear weapons program, CBS News White House Correspondent Mark Knoller reports.

Administration officials believe the disclosure about the secret plant will enhance the diplomatic leverage of the U.S. and its allies in dealing with the Iranian regime.

However, in an interview with Time magazine, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad warned Mr. Obama not to press Tehran on the issue.

"If I were [President] Obama's adviser, I would definitely advise him to refrain making this statement because it is definitely a mistake," he said. "It would definitively be a mistake."

Claiming that Iran works within the framework of the IAEA, Ahmedinejad said Mr. Obama's pressure "simply adds to the list of issues to which the United States owes the Iranian nation an apology over. Rest assured that this will be the case. We do everything transparently."

Ahmadinejad took a softer tone on many matters while in New York for the U.N. meetings, emphasizing his interest in improving relations with the United States and expressing an openness to include nuclear matters on the negotiations agenda.

Watch: Couric Questions Ahmadinejad on Nuclear Program

Still, he gave no sign that his country was willing to bargain away its nuclear program.

"We have not actually changed our mind," Ahmadinejad told CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric in an exclusive interview before his address to the U.N. "Our nuclear program will be pursued in accordance to international law."

CBS/ AP
Add a Comment See all 163 Comments
by stevex47 September 25, 2009 11:39 PM EDT
This secret nuke plant was started during BOOSH and cheney. Obama found it and will deal with it, unlike boosh.

Mission Accomplished.
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace September 25, 2009 7:42 PM EDT
Hey areuforreal,
I guess Israel never violated the nonproliferation treaty. I guess we all know exactly how many nuclear warheads Israel got and where exactly they are located.

If America is not fair to the Arabs, then why would you expect the Arabs to be fair?
Reply to this comment
by areuforreal September 25, 2009 7:57 PM EDT
Putting words in my mouth? Not a good idea. When I need you to speak for me I will let you know. You have been like a troubled child who needs to be the center of attention in class,if you do not like the present course that the class is on you throw a tantrum just to turn things your way. Teachers have a number of solutions for disruptive children like you. One way is to ignore the disruption. I have chosen another of the ways and that is point out to you that you are off topic in hopes that you will join the discussion in a reasonable fashion. That ploy does not seem to work, so I am afraid that I must ignore you because some of the other tactics are not feasible in this setting. Good day Lovegetpeace I wish you well.
by areuforreal September 25, 2009 8:21 PM EDT
by lovegetpeace September 25, 2009 7:42 PM EDT
Hey areuforreal,
I guess Israel never violated the nonproliferation treaty. I guess we all know exactly how many nuclear warheads Israel got and where exactly they are located.

If America is not fair to the Arabs, then why would you expect the Arabs to be fair?

Israel is not the topic here Iran is. But just to inform you as to what I believe, I believe Israel has probably violated the nonproliferation treaties though I cannot give specific examples. I also believe that Israel has spied against their biggest supporters (the U.S.) on more than 1 occasion. I do not believe in the blind support of Israel, yet I do think that they have the right to defend themselves from rocket attacks and other types of aggression visited upon them by some Arabs. I do not have anything against Arabs. I have known a few Arabs and found them to be friendly caring people and have fond memories of these individuals. Now that that is said read my next comment concerning something else that I believe to be true.
by lovegetpeace September 25, 2009 7:33 PM EDT
Hey areuforreal,
I suppose you look the other way to avoid saying Israel is violating the nonproliferation treaty.

If America is not fair to the Arabs, then why are Arabs expected to be fair with America?
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace September 25, 2009 6:49 PM EDT
Folks,
This blog is very boring. Nobody is capable of challenging my intellectual mind.

Take care...bye.
Reply to this comment
by jskul September 25, 2009 5:43 PM EDT
who is supplying iran with all their petroleum products? They cant produce enough for themselves. That is where sanctions would really bite.
Reply to this comment
by underdogus09 September 25, 2009 5:21 PM EDT
Russia has warned the world anyone who attacks Iran will be the same thing as attacking Russia.....
Reply to this comment
by G-I_Jesus September 25, 2009 5:17 PM EDT
Just In: Stalling Tactics Work

If Israel stalls the world peace by building Jewish settlements in Palestine territory then why can't Iran stall world peace by hiding the progress of their nuclear weapons program?
Reply to this comment
by underdogus09 September 25, 2009 5:02 PM EDT
Take notice who is building the nuclear plant for Iran, it is Russia....
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace September 25, 2009 5:02 PM EDT
Hey earth562,

So why do you defend terrorist states and Arab despots ?

I gather your sitting in a cafe in Gaza City typing away "unamerican "_____________________\

-Why do you defend Israel?

-With the word UnAmerican, I was hoping not to touch one of your weak nerves.
Reply to this comment
by ibsteve2u September 25, 2009 3:53 PM EDT
The righties who are shrieking war and chair-dancing as you crow about yet another opportunity to send human beings - to include our own Americans - off to die?

You're disgusting. You really should drop that claptrap about being Christians.

Oh - and enlist. Serve your country. The hippies who spit on me because I wore a uniform were just ignorant...but you chickenhawk armchair warriors?

You're despicable.
Reply to this comment
by democracy1 September 25, 2009 4:03 PM EDT
Amen to that!!!
by velma179 September 26, 2009 4:34 PM EDT
by ibsteve2u September 25, 2009 3:53 PM EDT

As a "hippie" who was slapping the face of those truly ignorant spitters... I would like to apologize to you for that sad and oh-so-wrong "welcome home" you guys got.
I had friends who died in Viet Nam and some who wish they would have.

Thank you for your service -- please let me send a SALUTE!

Otherwise, I totally agree with your comments on today's "chickenhawk armchair warriors".
See all 163 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook