February 14, 2011 11:43 AM

Ahmadinejad Skirts Nuclear Issue in Speech

(CBS/AP)  Updated 8:49 p.m. EDT

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says his country is ready to shake all hands "that are honestly extended to us."

Speaking at the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday, he announced Iran's commitment to participate in building durable peace and security worldwide for all nations while defending the country's legitimate and legal rights.

This appeared to be a reference to Iran's nuclear program, which was not mentioned in his speech.

Ahmadinejad portrayed Iran as a defender of poor developing countries, lashing out at unbridled capitalism which he said has reached the end of the road and will suffer the same fate as Marxism. The U.S. delegation walked out.

Read more of CBSNews.com's coverage of the U.N. General Assembly:

Obama: U.S. Can't Fix the World Alone
Ahmadinejad to U.S.: View Iran as Friend
U.N. Chief Addresses World Leaders
Gadhafi Hijacks Spotlight at U.N.
Will Obama and Iranian Leader Cross Paths?
Obama to Mideast Leaders: Time to Do More
Mark Knoller: Obama Frustrated, Impatient with Mideast Peace Process
Washington Unplugged: Don't Expect Much from U.N. Summit
U.N. Climate Summit Leaves Large Carbon Footprint
Photo Essay: World Leaders Talk Climate Change
Obama's U.N. Debut: A Dizzying Agenda

The Iranian leader's sometimes-rambling speech also touched on the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, where he said foreign forces spread "war, bloodshed, aggression, terror and intimidation"; the U.N. Security Council, which he said needs to be reformed; and the recent "glorious and fully democratic election" in Iran.

Ahmadinejad did not specifically mention the issue of the country's nuclear program. Tehran has recently ratcheted down its rhetoric on the nuclear issue, echoing President Barack Obama's call for eliminating nuclear weapons, but it has shown no sign of ending what the U.S. considers a clandestine effort to develop a nuclear weapon.

In his address to the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday, Obama stuck to his two-pronged approach to Iran - acknowledging its right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy while warning of unspecified penalties if it veers onto the weapons path. (Read Obama's remarks in full.)

"We must insist that the future not belong to fear," he said.

Meanwhile, with a diplomatic wink and nod, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev opened the door Wednesday to backing potential sanctions against Iran as a reward to President Barack Obama's decision to scale back a U.S. missile shield in Eastern Europe.

While U.S. and Russian officials denied a flat-out quid pro quo, Medvedev said Obama's pivot on the missile program long loathed by Moscow "deserves a positive response." Obama himself has said his missile decision created Russian good will.

"We believe we need to help Iran to take a right decision," Medvedev said as the two leaders met on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly.

The prospect of a unified U.S.-Russian stance on new sanctions would put Iran under added pressure to yield some ground on its nuclear program. Ahmadinejad has taken a softer tone on many matters since arriving in New York for the U.N. meetings, emphasizing his interest in improving relations with the United States and expressing an openness to include nuclear matters on the negotiations agenda.

He has given no sign, however, that his country is willing to bargain away its nuclear program, which he insists is for peaceful purposes only.

Obama's chief Russia adviser, Mike McFaul, told reporters after the meeting with Medvedev that there was no deal with Moscow on missile defense. But, pressed further, he said: "Is it the case that it changes the climate? That's true, of course. But it's not cause-and-effect."

A member of the Russian delegation, speaking on condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the Russians, said Moscow's final position on the question of imposing further sanctions would be determined, to a large extent, by Medvedev's consultations here.

The U.S. and Russia are among six countries that will hold talks in Europe next week with Iran over its nuclear ambitions. Obama wants to reserve the possibility of pursuing tougher sanctions if those meetings lead to no restraint by Iran in the weeks ahead. And yet Russia, which has strong economic ties with Tehran, has stood in the way of stronger action against Iran in the past.

In remarks to reporters with Medvedev at his side, Obama said both agree that negotiations with Iran are still the best approach.

"We also both agree that if Iran does not respond to serious negotiations and resolve this issue in a way that assures the international community that it's meeting its commitments, and is not developing nuclear weapons, then we will have to take additional actions and that sanctions, serious additional sanctions, remain a possibility," Obama said.

Medvedev told reporters that the intent is to move Iran in the right direction and to ensure that it does not obtain nuclear weapons.

"Sanctions rarely lead to productive results but in some cases are inevitable," he said through an interpreter.

Medvedev also mentioned that his government welcomed Obama's decision last week to scrap a Bush administration plan for a missile defense system to be based in Poland and the Czech Republic. He gave no indication that his remark about the sanctions on Iran was a diplomatic payoff for Obama's missile defense move.

The public rhetoric Wednesday on Iran's nuclear program suggested little improvement in the long-shot outlook for a diplomatic breakthrough next week when the U.S. will, for the first time, fully participate in European-led talks with Iran.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was meeting Wednesday with her counterparts from Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany to prepare for the Oct. 1 meeting in Geneva.

In his speech Obama did not mention the Geneva talks, which fulfill a campaign pledge to engage adversaries. He framed the Iran issue as central to his broader push to strengthen international limits on the spread of nuclear weapons.

Obama singled both Iran and North Korea, which has made more progress than Iran in becoming a nuclear power, as countries that now are at a crossroads.

"Those nations that refuse to live up to their obligations must face consequences," Obama said.

The risk for Obama, in the case of Iran, is that the government will use the new talks to stall for time even as international patience wears thin. That is essentially what has happened with North Korea, which agreed at one stage to dismantle its nuclear weapons facilities but then balked and has since defied the will of the U.N. by conducting underground nuclear tests and test-launching missiles.

Obama came into office promising a more vigorous diplomatic effort with Iran, which also stands accused by the U.S. of supporting international terrorism, undermining Mideast peace efforts and secretly supplying arms to insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Obama has not ruled out the eventual use of military force to stop Iran, but his focus now is on diplomacy.

In the meantime, Iran is expected to continue expanding its capacity for enriching uranium, the building block of a nuclear weapon. Still, Ahmadinejad said Iran has no interest in nuclear weapons and favors a push for global nuclear disarmament.

"We are not pursuing a nuclear weapons program," he said in the AP interview Tuesday night at his New York hotel.

The Iranian leader insisted that it is the United States that bears the greatest burden in nuclear disarmament. The U.S., he noted, possesses thousands of weapons, is the only country in history to have used them in war and refuses to promise never to initiate another nuclear attack.

Iran, he said, is "the wrong address" for delivering international pressure to pull back.

Obama, however, indicated that Iran needs to clarify its intentions and the nature of its nuclear work by cooperating more fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. agency that is supposed to monitor nuclear programs to ensure they are not used to make weapons.

Countries that refuse such cooperation make the rest of the world less safe, Obama said.

"In their actions to date, the governments of North Korea and Iran threaten to take us down this dangerous slope," he said.

Diplomacy remains the preferred path to changing that direction, he added.

"But if the governments of Iran and North Korea choose to ignore international standards; if they put the pursuit of nuclear weapons ahead of regional stability and the security and opportunity of their own people; if they are oblivious to the dangers of escalating nuclear arms races in both East Asia and the Middle East - then they must be held accountable," he said.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by finklestein September 24, 2010 4:47 PM EDT
A-dinnerjacket, who is a dictator forced on Iranians by Khameini where the real power lies, is only saying what German intelligence chief Andreas Von Bulow has been saying for years, that 911 was a demolition, which it clearly was and is as simple as high school physics. Each tower had a massive steel core backbone made of 35,000 tons of steel, enough to build an aircraft carrier. It is physically impossible for a small amount of kerosene (which is what jet fuel is) and fire-retardant office junk to release the heat-energy anywhere close to what's required to make steel soft. If it is you had better throw away your wood stove.

The fires were cool and confined to a small number of floors. The black smoke is evidence of cool, oxygen-starved fires burning at no more than 500 degrees F, probably more like 300, and only a small number of floors were affected. Also the people seen standing in the windows near the fires could not have withstood forge-like temperatures. They would have been shriveled.

If the official story is true, then it has revolutionized the foundry business, which relies on large quantities of coal and forced, pressurized air to bring steel to malleable temperatures. Now we can build a hollow tower, throw in a little kerosene and office furniture, old computers from the junk yard and voila, steel becomes soft.

If you scale down the 35,000 tons of core backbone steel to 100 pounds (think of two of those 45 lb. plates at the gym,) then the weight of a 767, fully-fueled, scales down to the weight of an empty aluminum Coke can, with a half-fluid ounce of kerosene in it. The kinetic energy of the mostly aluminum jet hitting the steel was insignificant, like a gnat hitting a tree. Steel is 3x denser than aluminum, and the planes shredded on impact which is why we don't see large, intact pieces of wing or fuselage coming out the opposite sides, just some heavier parts like the engines (which are a titanium alloy) and the landing gear. It was like hitting a cheese grater. Extensive calculations are available, here:

http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/ProfMorroneOnMeltingWTCsteel.pdf

But the calculations you need to see that the official story is untrue would basically fit on the back of an envelope.

Combine this with the fact that WTC7 was not even hit, but fell dead-level at free-fall speed, the war games scheduled for that morning which were perfectly designed to confuse the air defenses (Operation Vigilant Guardian and Vigilant Warrior), the impossibility of the aerial stunt performed by drop-out pilot Hani Hanjour into the Pentagon (a 7,000 corkscrew dive pulling out without singeing the lawn) which top gun military pilots have called "impossible," the magic passports of hijackers which survived incineration (even though no one else's did), and a hundred other unlikely things, and you have to be in serious denial to believe the Official Magic Show.

Steel beams weighing 3 or 4 tons do not eject themselves laterally at 70mph to embed themselves in adjacent buildings if the only force acting in the fall of a tower is gravity. Only high explosives can do that.

But yes, A-be-dinner-jacket is a jerk, and he is regularly shouted down by students for his idiotic Holocaust remarks, to the credit of Iranians most of whom can't stand him. That's why bombing Iran is such a bad idea. It will kill many innocent people who despise DinnerJacket and strengthen the hand of those very hardliners.

Christians for 911 Truth summary:
http://www.cf911truth.org/

On WTC7 (not even hit), "This is an orange":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk
Reply to this comment
by GuyfromUSA September 24, 2009 7:25 AM EDT
this guy denies that the holocuast ever happened. He will avoid the nuclear question and you liberals want to sit down and talk... Good luck... You'll wait until it's too late... As usual them wonder what happened..
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10000 September 24, 2009 6:05 AM EDT
AHMADINEJAD REVEALS A FEW EMBARRASSING TRUTHS

The Ahmadinejad interview is a definite coup for CBS, and hopefully will promote constructive dialogue (however indirect) between policy chiefs in Iran and this country.

Nonetheless, immediately after hijacking Iran's effort at an election, this is a bad time for a global public relations blitz by Ahmadinejad and his conservative backers. Ahmadinejad's visit confirms either an amazing optimism or a passionate belief in the power of sheer bluff.

Ahmadinejad does have a few points in his favor. Although the US delegation walked out during his address, Ahmadinejad's criticism of Wall Street was accurate. We Americans should applaud anyone who takes the trouble to lay blame where it belongs-- as so many of us already have about the corporate "casino" of Wall Street and the GOP-sponsored DEregulation promoting its rampant excesses at our expense.

Ahmadinejad's points about Wall Street corporate abuses also had international implications. Developed nations have used their World Bank / IMF leverage over the years to export predatory corporate policy which sabotaged local agriculture and made third world countries into client states.

As much as to say, judge corporate capitalism by what it has done and is doing-- not by the glossy handouts from the American Enterprise Institute, Cato, Hoover and Stanford, and lavish testimonials from their all-expense-paid patrons in congress.
Reply to this comment
by newsmaster September 24, 2009 2:57 AM EDT
In order to defeat evil (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) you have to defeat supporters of evil. The InterContinental Barclay Hotel in New York is sheltering the evil Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during his time in New York. Express your outrage. Call +1.212.755.5900 or email barclay@interconti.com. Call them everyday, several times a day, until they get the point.


In order to defeat evil (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) you have to defeat supporters of evil. The InterContinental Barclay Hotel in New York is sheltering the evil Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during his time in New York. Express your outrage. Call +1.212.755.5900 or email barclay@interconti.com. Call them everyday, several times a day, until they get the point.


In order to defeat evil (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) you have to defeat supporters of evil. The InterContinental Barclay Hotel in New York is sheltering the evil Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during his time in New York. Express your outrage. Call +1.212.755.5900 or email barclay@interconti.com. Call them everyday, several times a day, until they get the point.
Reply to this comment
by fariborzzak September 24, 2009 2:54 AM EDT
It is IRAN's obvious RIGHT to have nuclear KNOWLEDGE.I vote for Ahmadinejad in last election and I am proud of my vote.
Reply to this comment
by presjfk September 23, 2009 10:45 PM EDT
I don't like Iran's government and I don't like Ahmadinejad. He is a hypocrite but listen to his speech and try to pick out the mistakes and distortions and there is little that he said that is factually incorrect.
Reply to this comment
by 6591Hou September 23, 2009 10:43 PM EDT
The League of Nations had no teeth and neither does the UN, the only use of force that the UN sanctioned was the Korean War and it was so bungled through endless and pointless negotiation (i.e. the shape of the table etc.) that the UN has never again repeated the exercise. Since Korea the third world has gained the majority voice and rendered the ability to engage in meaningful diplomacy as a world body moot. This has not been lost on the remaining thugs and dictators, they pursue their ambitions knowing that sanctions (the most severe of possible UN actions) don't work and eventually countries will circumvent them in order to pursue their own economic gain (i.e. France cutting deals with Iraq, Scotland cutting deal with Libya, Russia with Iraq and Iran etc.).
World superpowers are done, the world doesn't want leadership or security as much as it wants cash. As long as we lay out billions of dollars in foreign aid other countries listen to us, when that well runs dry they turn their backs on us and go after the next cash cow - which apparently will be China.
Iran will try to be the next regional superpower in the Middle East, Venezuela will do the same for South America - their neighbors will try to politely cut their own deals and avoid overt conflict.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10000 September 24, 2009 6:49 PM EDT
earth562-- AIPAC meeting has been cancelled. Sorry to let you know so late, but we just got word Ahmadinejad already has left the building. No-- repeat-- no signs are needed.
by snowylynne September 23, 2009 9:32 PM EDT
He wasn't born 'til 1956.BUT the Holocost hapened......
Reply to this comment
by curiously1 September 23, 2009 9:24 PM EDT
He is softening his tone ! Interesting, isn't it? Just as Russia and the U.S appear to have reached an agreement !

The thugs are scared !
Reply to this comment
by tmittelstaed September 23, 2009 7:30 PM EDT
Iran is sitting on top of a giant amount of oil, they have a tremendous amount of solar energy pouring down on their country, the idea that they somehow "need' nuclear reactors for civilian power generation is a joke. The only reason they want reactors is that they want the bomb. Iran has seen how the world has treated Pakistan, and North Korea when those nations developed nuclear weapons - and the world has basically done nothing.

Furthermore it wasn't but 4 days ago that Dr. Abdu Qadeer Khan's letter to Simon Henderson was published which was written in 2003, and it states that Musharraf ordered the sale of nuclear weapon designs to North Korea, Iran and Libya.
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook