January 8, 2011 11:33 AM

Estate Deal Possible in Jackson Case

(AP)  Katherine Jackson's attorney says a judge's ruling that she can challenge the administrators of her son's estate could result in a deal that will determine control of the singer's gargantuan assets.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff determined in a ruling released Friday that Michael Jackson's mother can argue against keeping the men currently administering her son's estate without being disinherited. Those arguments would have to be laid out in further motions that the judge will decide on.

Jackson's mother had sought a favorable ruling from Beckloff that she could contest the authority of attorney John Branca and music executive John McClain to guide the pop singer's fortune. The men were named the executors of the estate, which could be worth more than $500 million, in Michael Jackson's 2002 will.

Beckloff's ruling clears the way for further arguments and possibly a hearing on whether the men were best suited to control Jackson's considerable estate. The pair have already brokered deals for a movie, books, museum show and various memorabilia that are expected to generate tens of millions of dollars.

Katherine Jackson's legal team, however, has sought to challenge one or both of the men's authority. A key roadblock was whether a challenge would be deemed a contest to Michael Jackson's will. A provision of the singer's private trust - which gives his mother 40 percent of his assets - calls for anyone that challenges the will to be disinherited.

"She will never lose her inheritance," her attorney, L. Londell McMillan, wrote in a written statement after Beckloff's ruling. "We now hope to resolve the outstanding administration matter, without further costly litigation, in the best interests of the beneficiaries which are Mrs. Jackson and her grandchildren."

Most of Katherine Jackson's arguments for why she should be allowed to challenge Branca and McClain's authority have been sealed, but Beckloff noted in his ruling that they raised several issues, including whether Michael Jackson was under "undue influence" when he signed his 2002 will.

Katherine Jackson's attorneys may challenge Branca or McClain's fitness as administrators, or they may seek a member of Jackson's family or trusted adviser to become a co-administrator. Katherine Jackson's attorneys have noted that her son chose to have three men serve as executors of his estate, although one dropped out after the singer's will was signed.

Attorneys for Branca and McClain did not challenge Katherine Jackson's petition for a ruling. If her attorneys were to opt to formally challenge the authority of one or both of the men, then Beckloff would convene a hearing and hear testimony.

Katherine Jackson's attorneys have not objected to most of the deals Branca and McClain have negotiated to date, although they raised concerns about a deal involving concert promoter AEG Live for a memorabilia exhibit. Other deals include a $60 million agreement with Columbia Pictures to create a movie using footage of Jackson's final rehearsals for a series of London comeback concerts. The film will be released in theaters for a limited time beginning in late October, and the agreement allows special additions to be produced for DVD sales.

Beckloff ruled over Katherine Jackson's objections that the exhibit of her son's items - including some of his possessions from Neverland Ranch - could go forward.

Michael Jackson's music and merchandise has sold briskly since his death on June 25.

The singer died in considerable debt, a fact underscored by creditor's claims that continued to be filed in his estate case. This week, two claims filed by Jackson's former hairdresser and a law firm totaled more than $243,000, and the singer was involved in several pending civil lawsuits when he died.

Attorneys for Branca and McClain have repeatedly said they consider Jackson's estate solvent. Experts predict that it could eventually grow to be worth more than another music superstar who died unexpectedly - Elvis Presley.

Katherine Jackson and her three grandchildren are the only three people named to receive money from the estate. They stand to receive a combined 80 percent stake of the singer's estate; the remaining share is slated to go to unnamed charities.

The estate is currently paying more than $86,000 a month to support Jackson's mother and children, who range in ages from 7 to 12. Katherine Jackson has been named the permanent guardian of the children as was called for in the 2002 will.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by pickaguitar1 September 21, 2009 9:33 AM EDT
RIP Michael


You are not alone.
Reply to this comment
by bubbadubba September 20, 2009 10:21 AM EDT
I am so glad to read about this. This the top story of the day.
I was losing sleep over Michael Jackson's estate and who would get his money.
All I think about is Michael Jackson and his family.
My life revolves around the Jacksons and the woman that manufactured babies for Michael.
NOT!
Reply to this comment
by flolake September 20, 2009 3:10 AM EDT
As if they haven't in the past, the Jackson family are truly showing their true color(s) with the latest ruling from Judge Mitchell Beckloff.

If care is not taken, the wad will probably wind up in the patriarch's back pocket.

Congratulations on America's most publicly greedy and chronically late family...
Reply to this comment
by skicky September 20, 2009 1:05 AM EDT
were did he find that hairdresser,he sure like too spend money
on himself and his face,if like children soo much why did he
build a hospital for them ,he sure like too sleep with them !!!
his promoter is milking it for all he can, he has not even had
hit in this century!! People donate your money to a worthy
cause then that loser !!!
Reply to this comment
by knowdalaw September 19, 2009 8:49 PM EDT
When it comes to money, the Jackson family will finally ADMIT that Michael was a Drug Addict. How quickly money changes things. How quickly the Jackson's can show their greed when it comes to more money. humph...humph...humph
Reply to this comment
by TheVarsityClub September 20, 2009 10:25 AM EDT
Point, game, set and match. Nice job.
by sallychicago September 19, 2009 6:55 PM EDT
The best thing the judge did was assign an attorney for the children. Otherwise, their inheritance would be squandered. Katherine is going to take care of the rest of the (slacker) family, her sons & daughters and grandchildren, but doling out her share to them. They should not be able to touch the childrens' money.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook