February 1, 2011 1:03 PM

Obama: No Quick Decision on Afghan War

By
Stephen Smith
(AP)  President Barack Obama said Wednesday there will be no quick decision on whether to send more U.S. troops into the widening war in Afghanistan, saying "my determination is to get this right."

The president's comments came one day after Adm. Mike Mullen, his top military adviser as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, endorsed an increase in U.S. forces as likely necessary to battle a deepening insurgency. The U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, also has delivered a grim assessment of the war and is expected to follow up soon with a request for thousands of additional troops.

"I'm going to take a very deliberate process in making those decisions," said Mr. Obama, taking questions from reporters as he sat in the Oval Office with visiting Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. "And so I just want to be absolutely clear, because there's been a lot of discussion in the press about this: There is no immediate decision pending on resources," Mr. Obama said.

The president has already ordered 21,000 more troops to Afghanistan, increasing the U.S. commitment there to 68,000 by year's end. Yet violence in Afghanistan has soared to record levels. More U.S. troops — 51 — died in Afghanistan in August than in any other month since the U.S.-led invasion in October 2001.

Mr. Obama faces mounting pressure on what do next, both from an anxious and war-weary public and from members of his own Democratic Party. He said he will follow his plan of doing a broad assessment of military, diplomatic, civilian and development efforts in Afghanistan before deciding his next steps.

"One of the things that I'm absolutely clear about is you have to get the strategy right and then make determinations about resources," Mr. Obama said.

"You don't make determinations about resources — certainly you don't make determinations about sending your men and women into battle — without having absolute clarity about what the strategy is going to be."

Asked if U.S. and NATO forces were winning the war in Afghanistan, Mr. Obama did not answer directly.

But he said it is clear that "we have lacked as clear of a strategy and a mission as is necessary in order to meet our overriding objectives."

Mr. Obama described that as disrupting the al Qaeda terrorist network so that it cannot launch attacks on the U.S. and its allies. "That has not yet occurred," he said.

Harper said the Taliban in Afghanistan does not constitute a viable alternative government, and in that sense progress had been made. But he said "we are concerned about the strength of the insurgency" and in Afghanistan's ability to take long-sought, day-to-day responsibility for its own security.

Canada, which has 2,500 troops in Afghanistan, plans to withdraw them in 2011.

Both Harper and Mr. Obama also sought to inject perspective into tensions over cross-border economic protectionism.

The two countries share the largest trading partnership in the world, but Canada remains deeply concerned about so-called Buy American provisions in the $787 billion economic stimulus package approved by Congress early this year.

"There is no prospect of any budding trade wars between our countries," Mr. Obama said.

Harper agreed but made a point of noting concern over trade snags. "These are important irritants," he said. "They are having some real impacts."

The two leaders also offered an upbeat take on the global economic recovery heading into next week's talks of G-20 nations in Pittsburgh.

"We both agree that although we are not out of the woods yet, that we've seen signs of stability," Mr. Obama said.

AP
  • Stephen Smith

    Stephen Smith is a news producer and sports editor for CBSNews.com

Add a Comment See all 32 Comments
by TNisgoodenoughforme September 18, 2009 1:48 PM EDT
"We both agree that although we are not out of the woods yet, that we've seen signs of stability," Mr. Obama said.
What? Where is the stability? Mr. Obama, have you spoking to your men & women over there fighting?
Reply to this comment
by jrj073000 September 17, 2009 1:18 AM EDT
I'm sure these guys (http://adwido.com/view_content?vkey=26347e43b14b46bb600370af2e38d5f1) are excited to hear this...
Reply to this comment
by reality42 September 16, 2009 9:25 PM EDT
Obama's a jack ass along with the Corrupt America media
Reply to this comment
by mzilikazi-2009 September 16, 2009 8:51 PM EDT
Anybody ever seen the old movie Canadian Bacon? There seems to be a lot of truth in the movie IMO even though I don't always see eye to eye with the producer.

Just this afternoon I heard a guest on a talk radio show trying to stir up fear in listeners with the old story about threats of electromagnetic pulse blasts. Just a month ago it was cyber attacks that were going to do us all in. It seems there is almost no end that the people who make their living out of war will go to in attempting to create enough fear to justify military industrial spending.

Please don't get me wrong. I think we need a strong military and I think we need to be watchful against terrorism but I do not think that we need corporate lobbyists, wealthy executives, bankers and generals controlling the destiny of our sons and daughters soley for the sake of profits.

If threats are real then take care of business quietly but there is no need for excessive fearmongering just to sell more weapons, oil, services or "stimulate" the economy. It is just plain unhealthy, dishonest and downright greedy.
Reply to this comment
by FrankDenise September 16, 2009 6:50 PM EDT
How many things did this man promise that he hasnt followed through with so far????I mean he spoke to us like he really felt all our pain and our feelings and he went back to Politics as Usual in Washington..That is why there will never be any real change here in America....There is No honesty in our governement,just another smokescreen to keep us down and guessing...He knew America was so desperate for change and he said everything we wanted and needed to hear..Another stroke job from the boys in Washington..What happen to Joe the Plummer and regular people like that???Funny we never hear from him anymore...Simple reason...Dont need him..Obama accomplished his mission..He got elected..I pray for a better and more health America for my daughter when she grows up.What is she gonna be faced with in another 15 years when she is ready to start living on her own????I feel America really doesnt care
Reply to this comment
by decotoguy September 16, 2009 5:18 PM EDT
As I have said before,the President Obama has no control of this nation...or the governing of this nation...
This WAR,which I call"Vietnam 2000" is a GRAVE SIN,the bush and his people knew, that warring with the people of Afghanistan and Iraq is
against all MORALS.The want for POWER is greater than the want for GOD...
America hang on,you are in for a wild ride.....(stay the course)..on the up side the"economy is getting better".....
Reply to this comment
by spaceatoms September 16, 2009 5:00 PM EDT
Again, its a lot of talk, and as much as I like Obama, he must be realistic; I don't know how he believes he can solve this when all the other Presidents got it wrong. So far we still have war on two fronts and Wall Street is going back up and the same silly games will be played out by the wealthy as stocks climb; this isn't exactly as he planned for in his election campaign; its going to be a long four years. For the good of the country, stocks should have been stale for at least 5 years and not 3 months and maybe it would have opened up some eyes, but no, still its a game except now its going to be worse.
Reply to this comment
by signseeker1717 September 16, 2009 4:46 PM EDT
Maybe some of you weren't listening during the campaign. President Obama did NOT say he would bring the troops home from Afghanistan immediately; he said we needed to get out of Iraq FIRST (which we are), where we shouldn't have been in the first place (true) and focus our resources on Afghanistan (which we have). That has all taken place. Now he's going on to the next step: assessment of the situation to determine if we need to send more troops or just blow the whole thing off. Do we really want the Taliban to have free rein in the region, and possibly get their hands on Pakistan's nuclear weapons? Give the terrorists an entire country to use as a BASE (not just a hideout) to attack the western nations (besides 9/11, there have also been bombings in England and Spain)? That's why NATO is there too; this isn't just regional security, it's GLOBAL. Yes, I think he needs to think it over very carefully before he makes a decision, NOT shoot (or disarm) from the hip. There's a lot more here at stake than many seem to realize...
Reply to this comment
by jefleshman September 17, 2009 2:38 AM EDT
I about fainted. A clear and logical well thought out post. You dont see those too often. Thank you Signseeker. I disagree with your assessment of what Pres Obama said during his run for office. But your overall thought is spot on. Thank you for the post.
by KSSterling September 16, 2009 3:34 PM EDT
It is clear that during the campaign, promises were made by candidates without full knowledge of the facts and reality of the war. Now that President Obama has inherited this same knowledge that governed Bush's actions in office, he has clearly come to different conclusions than those of which he had determined prior to his inauguration.
p.s. is there a reason why Obama is referred to as "Mr. Obama" throughout this article rather than "President" or "President Obama"?
Reply to this comment
by GuyfromUSA September 16, 2009 3:18 PM EDT
Here's the answer.. Pull out of Irag now like he promised. Add troops to Afghanistan and blow that country back to hell.
Reply to this comment
See all 32 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook