By

Sharyl Attkisson /

CBS/ September 29, 2009, 11:30 PM

Official: Kabul Embassy Hazing Covered Up

Smoke is visible from Tie Siding, Wyo., as a wildfire burns northwest of Fort Collins, Colo., on Saturday, June 9, 2012. The cause of the fire is not yet known. (AP Photo/Laramie Daily Boomerang, Andy Carpenean)

Smoke is visible from Tie Siding, Wyo., as a wildfire burns northwest of Fort Collins, Colo., on Saturday, June 9, 2012. The cause of the fire is not yet known. (AP Photo/Laramie Daily Boomerang, Andy Carpenean) / Andrew Carpenean

For the first time Monday, a Wackenhut executive, Samuel Brinkley, publicly answered to the scandal at the U.S. embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan. Wackenhut owns ArmorGroup, which provides the 450-member private security force that guards the 1,000 people who work at the embassy.

At least five insiders claim they blew the whistle on dangerous practices as far back as 2007, notifying top company executives and State Department officials. All subsequently lost their jobs. In all, 20 security guards have contacted the whistleblower group Project on Government Oversight (POGO) in recent weeks with more complaints.

Wackenhut's Brinkley testified under oath today before members of the Commission on Wartime Contracting. He repeatedly denied knowing anything about allegations of serious security lapses or alleged forced sexual hazing of recruits by guards and supervisors until mid-August. Commission member Chris Shays took Brinkley to task for once he acknowledged knowing about lurid photos and parties.

Shays called it "a coverup."

Brinkley replied, "That's unfair."

"No it isn't unfair," Shays retorted. "You can deny it, but that's what it comes across to me."

It's been nearly two weeks since CBS News first reported on the photographs and allegations. Just last week, somebody at the guard camp in Kabul put up a poster showing a rat with a quote from the mobster movie Goodfellas: "Never rat on your friends and always keep your mouth shut."

Shays showed the poster at the hearing and addressed Brinkley.

"That would explain, Mr. Brinkley, why your management folks don't know much. There's this kind of sickness, cancer, in your organization." Shays added. "You don't seem to be outraged at all that this happened!"

Brinkley answered, "I am outraged. I am embarrassed. I am humiliated. We take this very, very seriously."

The panel also criticized an official from the State Department who insisted security at the embassy was never in jeopardy. Undersecretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy said much of the behavior was isolated to the camp where the guards are housed so, he said, State Department officials had no evidence of a problem.

Images of alleged hazing (Graphic Content)
Shocking Hazing at U.S. Embassy in Kabul
Graphic Content: Additional video of Kabul hazing
Alcohol Banned at U.S. Embassy in Kabul
Letter to Sec. Clinton describing abuses (.pdf)

Commissioner Linda Gustitus answered by stating "finding no evidence seems to me like maybe you weren't looking for it." In retrospect, Kennedy told commissioners, the State Department should have assigned an officer to the housing compound. "It clearly establishes that we failed to assign an officer to live on that compound to monitor what was going on," Kennedy said.

While much of the questioning focused on the recent hazing, evidence in photos and videotapes, the commissioners did little to delve into specifics of voluminous witness and email evidence showing an extensive dialogue on security issues two years ago, including lurid and inappropriate behavior by recruits.

CBS News has reviewed e-mails and interviewed high-ranking company whistleblowers. In one exchange, an ArmorGroup official advised managers that the way the company intended to handle one staffing concern wasn't "legal" or "right," but was the way to "skate" past employment lawyers. In another exchange between ArmorGroup's Director of Operations James Gordon and a State Department official, Gordon warned of ongoing staffing shortages that could prove dire in an attack, saying, "If one person gets sick or slips on a banana peel, the whole thing falls apart like a cheap suit."

The State Department's reply: "Lock up the banana supply."

Today's hearing did not explore in any detail allegations that some security guards were patronizing brothels that exploited women sold into sexual slavery, so-called human trafficking. According to company whistleblowers, one recruit specifically expressed his desire to "purchase a Chinese woman" for $20,000, put her on the street, and turn a profit within a month. The incident was reported to company officials and the State Department and the employee was terminated. However, Gordon told CBS News that any attempt at a broader investigation into the problem was "pathetic."

Panel members did dig into an incident in which embassy guards, who are not authorized by contract nor are they trained to do off-embassy surveillance, dressed in costumes as Afghan nationals and went out on the streets of Kabul.

Commissioners said the "mission" could have put the military or embassy guards at risk by venturing from their defined tasks. To conduct the mission, ArmorGroup guards allegedly took night vision goggles and other equipment from the U.S. embassy leaving the embassy "night blind." When Commissioners asked Wackenhut's Brinkley whether the State Department knew about or authorized the mission, Brinkley first balked at answering, then said that his information was that the State Department did approve the mission. He stressed that the investigation is ongoing and he hadn't been able to confirm that information.

In all, Commissioner Chris Shays likened the damage that could be caused by shocking photos of wild parties, lewd behavior and costumed guards to that of Abu Gharib.

Since the photos became public, twelve embassy guards have been fired or have resigned. The State Department, which twice renewed ArmorGroup's contract amid serious violations, says it will review the way it uses private contractors to guard overseas embassies.

Commissioner Guistitus today commented that she was struck by the fact that "if there weren't pictures, this would all still be going on."
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
  • Sharyl Attkisson On Twitter »

    Sharyl Attkisson is a CBS News investigative correspondent based in Washington. All of her stories, videos and blogs are available here.

11 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gregH789 says:
Contracting it is the new spoils system, a way for your elected officials to get around the Civil Service act and use government money and jobs as rewards and campaign dollars. Obama is doing it, Bush did it. Clinton was the first offender when he used contractors in Bosnia.

These contractors are so politically connected with their donations and "revolving door" job opportunities for both parties that it takes video and murder to get the government to even do these mock hearings. I was a DoD Civil Service employee for 25 years and thought it was the most corrupting practice ever introduced. It fouls every government endeavor.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hower4 says:
What?????? It takes 450 security guards to protect 1000 American embassy staff? I thought America had won the war!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
timdgrim says:
Terminate ALL war zone contractors and use our military and give THEM a raise. Start the draft up again, no exemptions, and see how long this occupation lasts.
reply
antoniof123 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The sad part is that these exectives will not face any crimal actions that will result in more then a fine.

Thank you Republicans for the culture of corruption you brought us.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
docpeter1953 says:
From the above article, "Wackenhut's Brinkley testified under oath today before members of the Commission on Wartime Contracting. He repeatedly denied knowing anything about allegations of serious security lapses or alleged forced sexual hazing of recruits by guards and supervisors until mid-August. Commission member Chris Shays took Brinkley to task for waiting two weeks to alert the State Department once he acknowledged knowing about lurid photos and parties.

Shays called it "a coverup."

Brinkley replied, "That's unfair."

"No it isn't unfair," Shays retorted. "You can deny it, but that's what it comes across to me."

_______________________

Shays has it all wrong. If there would have been a cover up non of these "guards" would have been "caught" standing around with their pants down.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
woeisme1 says:
by tincup356 September 14, 2009 7:49 PM EDT
And Obama keeps them sucking off the payroll of wasted money for the lie wars.

--------------------
There must be something more to this story. Why has Obama kept them on is beyond me.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dprice123-2009 says:
After the Jessica Lynch,Pat Tillman and this hazing debacle. I would suggest to all the people who have supported these two wars to think long and hard at the polling booth next time. Both the GOP and Democrats no longer represent the views of the average American.
reply
bajajohn1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well, I'll agree with your comment about the Republicans. If substanital and serious contract issues were not present, one would have seen these swine fired by this administration. Bushniks and Cheneynik rednecks is all they hired. Bet they went around setting their fart on fire to see the blue flame.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tincup356 says:
And Obama keeps them sucking off the payroll of wasted money for the lie wars. What is more important,,,,going bankrupt chasing ghost terrorists and occupying other countries when we DON"T need to be there, or stopping the lie wars , coming home and saving our OWN country?We are only saving the enemy money by taking the war to them, and then not fighting it seriously, We went to Iraq because they said there were weapons of mass destruction,,,there were none, so now we stay there rebuilding what we blew up, while our OWN COUNTRY falls apart,,,, and then there is Afghanistan, where people have been told we are going after Bin Laden,,,,WHY?,,,,Most people who believe the 911 lies will say because of 911.....if that is true, then WHY,,,,has Bin Laden NEVER been charged with ANYTHING connected to 911?...SO YES they are LIE wars, with only ONE purpose,,,to feed the GREEDY appetite of the defense LOBBY ROBBERS.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jsf14 says:
Without the photos, the understaffing, language problems, etc would be continuing. And what was that bit about human trafficking a day or two ago?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
woeisme1 says:
Arrogance. No wonder Rumsfeld hired these thugs.
reply
See all 11 Comments