June 26, 2010 7:45 AM

Where Are the Hurricanes?

By
CBSNews
(AP)  It may be tempting the weather gods just to point this out, but this has been a dud of a hurricane season so far.

Only two hurricanes have formed in the Atlantic over the past three months, and neither hit the U.S. - a somewhat unusual lull.

"I'm glad that I didn't have to go out and get anything - yet," said Lissette Galiana, who was shopping at a Wal-Mart in suburban Miami on Friday, around what is usually the very peak of the Atlantic hurricane season. "There's always a chance."

Forecasters attribute the calm to a weak El Nino, the periodic warming of the central Pacific Ocean. It is producing strong upper-level winds out of the west that are shearing off the tops of thunderstorm clouds that can develop into hurricanes.

Of course, the season has nearly 2½ months to go, and forecasters and emergency planners are warning people not to let their guard down, noting that powerful hurricanes have hit in the fall, including Wilma, which cut an unusually large swath of damage across Florida in October 2005.

"It's less active, but there's still possibility of a hurricane strike," said Gerry Bell, a hurricane forecaster at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Climate Prediction Center in Washington.

NOAA's forecast just before the June 1 start of the Atlantic season called for nine to 14 named tropical storms, with four to seven of them becoming hurricanes.

No tropical storms took shape until Aug. 15, when Ana formed. Five more have developed since then, including Claudette, which hit the Florida Panhandle. Two of those tropical storms strengthened into Hurricanes Bill and Fred.

Bill never came ashore in the U.S. but churned up waves blamed for at least two deaths - one in Maine, the other in Florida. Fred, meanwhile, weakened to a tropical storm Friday while it was still far out over the Atlantic.

By mid-September of last year, there had been nine tropical storms, five of them hurricanes, including Ike, which plowed into Galveston Island, Texas, on Sept. 13, Gustav, which pounded Louisiana on Sept. 1, and Dolly, which slammed South Texas in late July.

In 2005, Hurricane Katrina smashed New Orleans in late August, and Hurricane Rita, the 17th named storm of the season, howled ashore near the Texas-Louisiana line on Sept. 24.

But no hurricanes at all struck the U.S. in 2000, 2001 or 2006. And during a less active period from 1970 to 1994, there were six seasons when no hurricanes hit this country.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency advises coastal residents to maintain kits of emergency supplies and other items that might be needed in a storm.

Venus Witherspoon of Miami keeps a disaster kit packed all year with candles, batteries, flashlights, canned food, a radio and about 10 gallons of water. She has maintained it since Wilma four years ago.

"You never know when you're going to need it," said the 54-year-old state employee. "The things you keep in there don't perish. I might drink the water, but then I replace it. I can always use the candles."

Like a lot of other Floridians, Witherspoon considers a disaster kit just part of the cost of living on the coast.

"I didn't have to use it last year," she said, "so I had it for this year."

AP
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by Rjoline September 23, 2009 6:25 PM EDT
I'm sure it?s a result of global warming, I mean climate change. Either that or it's because Obama is president, after Katrina was Bush's fault.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 September 13, 2009 10:37 AM EDT
It could be that it is going to be an El Nino year in the Pacific. It is a global atmosphere and all the interactions take banks of super computers just to begin to model it all. Whether we are adding to the problem with 100 years of huge fossil fuel combustion is yet to be totally proven, but we should all know that fossil fuels are a finite supply, so the more renewable we use efficiently the more fossil fuel reserves we will have for later and the less fossil CO2 that has been sequestered by nature will end up in the atmosphere.
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo September 12, 2009 9:44 PM EDT
"Forecasters Attribute Dud of a Season So Far to a Weak El Nino"
----
The global warming chorus better work fast to figure out how to sell this as a man influenced change.
Reply to this comment
by docpeter1953 September 14, 2009 8:51 AM EDT
It is all the blow-hards on sites like this one and their cumulative hot air exhaust leading to man made global warming.

See, it is easy to sell this "man influence".

Now if we could only get everyone to pass gas at the same time and capture that I can fill my CNG car and go to work.
by lloydbest1 September 12, 2009 10:44 AM EDT
A quiet Atlantic hurricane season does not necessarily mean quiet everywhere else. Jimena, for example, spun up to Cat 5 briefly before cooler heads...er....water spiked her guns.

And before Jimmyc1955 and woeisme get too involved in a "We're warming up/no we're not" arguement I need to point out that regardless of what the climate is doing and regardless of where it might go; our path going forward as a society should be the same...

We need to reduce our dependence on natural resources, cut back on our tendency to use our atmosphere as a dumping ground for gasses known to have a heat retaining effect and learn to "live smaller".
Better that we adopt a policy of voluntary simplicity now while we still have something left and time to get used to the new economy - than to be forced to live under the yoke of INvoluntary poverty later when we do run out. We will. Count on it.
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 September 11, 2009 10:19 PM EDT
No - all scientist do not agree there is global warming, and many climatologists have proven that CO2 has absolutely no impact on global temperatures.

Polar caps have been coming back since the low in 2007 and polar bears total population is actually rising.

You have to start checking your facts more carefully rather than reading headlines.

Co2 and global warming
http://www.oism.org/pproject/GWReview_OISM600.pdf

Polar Ice Caps

http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/20090908_Figure2.png

Polar Bear populations

http://www.thepoliticalclass.com/2009/06/polar-bear-expert-barred-by-global-warmists-polar-bear-population-on-the-rise-according-to-scientist---not-declining-as-the.html

Be careful of sites and reports that cherry pick data that suits their needs. Global temps and CO2 are classic examples. Ice cores from Greenland have shown many periods in history where CO2 was much higher than now with cooler temperatures
Reply to this comment
by displeased September 13, 2009 11:34 AM EDT
Since you're into reading, try reading about Venus and how the CO2 rich atmosphere generates the strongest green house effect in the solar system, leading to an isothermal temperature of about 460 degrees. Haven't you heard of the Earth's carbon cycle? Try reading up on that too. You'll find atmospheric CO2 DOES impact the climate.
by cbs4111 September 13, 2009 11:15 PM EDT
Venus? You've got to be kidding, right? Venus has about 970,000 parts per million of CO2, the Earth now has 385. That means that Venus's atmosphere is about 97% CO2 (with the rest being Sulfuric Acid, Chlorine, and other Greenhouse gasses). The Earth's has 0.0038% CO2. Our entire oil reserves will be completely used up before the Earth could reach 0.008%. 0.008 is a far cry from 0.97 so somehow, after all the oil is used up, we will have to continue to increase by another factor of 120 to get to Venus's level. And even if we somehow did (we don't even have enough coal to do that so maybe you're thinking that we might build a pipeline to Venus?), we still wouldn't be as hot as Venus; Venus is much closer to the Sun, so the energy from the sun is 1.84 times that at the Earth (almost twice).

Wow, I hope you didn't read this nonsense about Venus from any source that purports to know something about global warming. You know, JimmyC is completely correct, the CO2 alarmists have been scientifically discredited - it's only a matter of time until news outlets like CBS will pick up on it.
See all 4 Replies
by woeisme1 September 11, 2009 9:38 PM EDT
Global warming is real. ALL scientists agree we are in a warming trend. And yes. I believe man is contributing to it. He has to be. But I don't make the claim that man is necessarily to blame for it.
Reply to this comment
by Htos1 September 13, 2009 11:22 PM EDT
Why is Greenland called Greenland?Oh yeah,we're just now getting back to normal(read-year w/o a summer)
by woeisme1 September 11, 2009 9:35 PM EDT
Good. I like El Nino. I live on Florida's east coast.
Reply to this comment
by akeagleinak September 11, 2009 9:16 PM EDT
Isn't it interesting that there were no comments from the "Chicken Littles" that were predicting a particularly bad hurricane season this year due to global warming? Nor were those supposed "experts" even asked their opinions.

Guess it just wasn't controversial enough a story.
Reply to this comment
by roach9703 September 11, 2009 7:06 PM EDT
The story of Fred is not necessarily over. It is being effected by local conditions that it may move out of in the next three days. If it moves westward, we might be talking about Fred next week.
The sudden intensifying of a semi-tropical system off Delaware this week is a warning of other possible events later in this season.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 September 13, 2009 4:06 PM EDT
SSSSSHHHHHHHHH!!!!!! whatsamatta you! you wanna jinx us?
No more hurricane stories pleeze!!!!! I am going to be here at the beach for three more weeks. I'd rather surf at the beach, not three miles inland on a 'storm surge'...
by rainbowroosie September 13, 2009 7:39 PM EDT
They are hiding from global warming!!!!!
See all 17 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook