Sept. 11, 2009

How Many Troops Should Be in Afghanistan?

President Obama's Own Party Balks at Sending More Deployments, Prefers Training Afghan Army and Police

  • As President Obama considers sending more troops to Afghanistan, his own party is balking.

    As President Obama considers sending more troops to Afghanistan, his own party is balking.  (CBS)

(CBS)  Paying tribute to the victims of Sept. 11, President Obama urged Americans not to lose faith in the mission it sparked.

"Let us renew our resolve against those who perpetrated this barbaric act and plot against us still," Mr. Obama said.

But as Mr. Obama considers sending more troops to Afghanistan, his own party is balking. Friday, the Senate Armed Services Chair Carl Levin implored him not to order more deployments, but to focus instead on training the Afghan army and police, reports CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes.

"We need a surge of Afghan security forces," Levin said.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi sent a similar message to the president.

"I don't think there is a great deal of support for sending more troops to Afghanistan in the country or in the Congress," Pelosi said.

The misgivings in the President's own party reflect a growing national pessimism amid record casualties there.

A recent CBS News poll found approval for the president's handling of the war has sunk to 48 percent - down 8 points since April.

"We need to have the Afghan security forces demonstrate that they have primacy, that they can control the situation on the ground," said Karin Von Hippel, a senior fellow with the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Twenty-one thousand additional U.S. troops will deploy there this year - 4,000 of them tasked with training Afghans, driving total troop levels up to a new high: 68,000.

Levin says sending more than that will just provoke the enemy.

"Creating a bigger U.S. military footprint provides propaganda fodder for the Taliban," Levin said.

Republican Sen. John McCain shot back that arbitrarily capping U.S. troop levels would be "catastrophic."

Worried that a Democratic uprising could embarrass the president, the Senate majority leader called for patience.

"I think the thing I am going to do is recommend to my caucus is let's just take it easy," said Harry Reid.

The White House says a decision on troop levels is many weeks away and that the president is mulling over recommendations from the top general in Afghanistan and other military leaders.


©MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 45 Comments
by Leebo515 October 18, 2009 4:01 PM EDT
Excuse me if im being dumb, but im only 16. i say they ASK THE TROOPS if any more troops should be sent to Afghanistan. i mean they are the people that are there everyday risking THEIR LIVES to protect us! and we are gonna ask some government people who are only fighting with WORDS! they arent the ones risking their lives in a god forsaken desert, while losing friends and fellow soldiers. i might just be some dumb teenager but i think the troops have earned some kind of say in the war in Afghanistan
Reply to this comment
by brucearnold September 27, 2009 9:58 PM EDT
On 9/11/01, the all-powerful bankers behind New World Order globalization unleashed their oil and money hungry military-industrial dogs of war to orchestrate the fall of 3 (not 2) WTC towers--the third, not struck by a plane, housing 3 floors of damning SEC records. On that day, we lost 3000 lives (with 1000s more to follow) plus 4 commercial airliners (with all on board) ... and stood by helplessly as something (not wide enough to be a 757) bored a hole in the side of the Pentagon. Yet even today, two elections and a new administration later, our Big Brother government expects us to believe that all of that masterfully-plotted and perfectly-timed destruction was accomplished by 15 Saudis and 4 of their cousins using nothing more than box cutters and big balls. If you believe that, or if you believe we have been told anything close to the Truth about 9/11, then I ask you to Google "911 truth" and "911 peak oil", and objectively evaluate what you find at websites like AE911Truth.org.
Reply to this comment
by chekitout September 13, 2009 2:26 PM EDT
Just one more tid-bit for ya'all,----if you support obama,(I wont capitalize his name because he deserves no respect)think about ALL the campaign speeches,"I'm going to stop these wars", peace, love, happiness, oooh vote for me I'll change everything,..he's sending more troops and breaking promises every week,I wonder how many of you liberals that voted for him because you got sucked into his lies are NOW relizing what a mistake you made...I remember during the campaign all the obama bumper stickers, in my area obama stickers are now a rare thing to see, I'm guessing they were all taken off in embarassment....if I voted for THAT GUY I wouldn't tell anybody either.
Reply to this comment
by chekitout September 13, 2009 2:06 PM EDT
Anybody back here would just be giving an opinion or an un-educated guess, only the Commanders and people serving over there know that answer. It would only take about half as many if they would bar all media and journalists and let the Marines, Soldiers, and Airforce start kicking but from one side to the other and take no prisioners and it would be over by Halloween.
Reply to this comment
by bubbadubba September 12, 2009 9:52 AM EDT
What a dumb question " How many troops should be in Afghanistan?"
First it needs to be specified which troops they are headlining about, Afghan troops? Taliban troops? NATO troops? Pakistani troops?.
So if the sloppy headline meant US or NATO troops, the answer is NONE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA.
What is this, "are you smarter than a fifth grader" that question is too easy.
Reply to this comment
by Hosheen September 12, 2009 8:30 AM EDT
Easy answer. Zero! Iraq and Afghanistan have accomplished nothing but to serve as a giant recruiting program for the Taliban and other terrorists. All paid for by the USA along with total medical coverage for everyone in both countries while the USA has no health care plan. How stupid is that, "W" and BHO?
Reply to this comment
by steve54z September 12, 2009 7:51 AM EDT
How many Children died in Afghanistan? The Rebels intentionally kill them with vest bombs, land mines, and vehicle explosions. Others were placed under American missiles for propaganda purposes. These heinous Felons are bizarre wretches who deserve life in prison or killed by NATO bullets. Barack Obama should continue with sending technology to Afghanistan. The Criminals resort to ignorant and paranoid tactics like schizophrenic apes.
Reply to this comment
by Swine_Flu_Virus September 12, 2009 7:21 AM EDT
"Let us renew our resolve against those who perpetrated this barbaric act and plot against us still," Mr. Obama said.

I voted for change. That meant bringing a halt to the fear-mongering, trillion dollar waste on fraudulent wars like Iraq ----- a country even Bush admitted had no links to 911 ------ and our relentless pursuit of the statistically overblown threat of the "boogieman" terrorist.

Thus far, there's been little but "pocket" change.

The Afghanistan war is primarily about war profiteering. According to THE INTELLIGENCE DAILY: "As of March 2009, there were 68,197 DOD contractors in Afghanistan, compared to 52,300 uniformed personnel. Contractors made up 57% of DOD's workforce in Afghanistan. This [IS] the highest recorded percentage of contractors used by DOD in any conflict in the history of the United States . . .?

It is for them ----- and the 100 or so multinational corporations whose financial interests and profit margins our troops are sacrificing their lives to protect ---- that we are in Afghanistan.
Reply to this comment
by linggy September 12, 2009 6:22 AM EDT
I voted for Obama and peace! First came Gates! Now comes more and more war!
Please republicans (Palin?) give us an anti_war libertarian and we'll finally get some peace and prosperity!
Reply to this comment
by jodiver September 12, 2009 4:55 AM EDT
Does anyone even remember that the Russians tried this before and after years of failure in Afghanistan pulled out. We can learn by the mistakes of others and this type of war is unwinable by the modern military machine. Pull out now - it's going to happen eventually and we wont be in a better situation then than we are now.
Reply to this comment
by DoubleHappiness88 September 12, 2009 3:29 AM EDT
How Many Troops Should Be in Afghanistan?

ZERO!
Reply to this comment
by babooph September 12, 2009 3:09 AM EDT
Bush went in do to Bin Ladin not being "turned over"to him-he sent our troops in to get him & the Taliban-HE FAILED FULLY-as always in his life-this time he took the whole US with him !!!!Accept his failure & bring our troops home.
Reply to this comment
by fariborzzak September 12, 2009 2:48 AM EDT
Do U think we have enough money to pay for Afghanistan war or do u think we have enough kid to be killed in Afghanistan?
Reply to this comment
by jefleshman September 12, 2009 5:15 AM EDT
dichrom

normally I wouldnt comment but that was funny thank you for the laugh. Not to long ago the same was said for Bush and Cheny so I thought it was funny. I needed a chuckle over here in Afghanistan.
by hermitdave September 12, 2009 2:11 AM EDT
ZERO--there was no reason what so ever to attack a innocent country to try and capture a former CIA operative. The attack and slaughter of innocent Afghan women and children was for one reason. Make a ton of money for the MIMC and give the spoiled rich kid a chance to play CIC. The amazing thing is that the Cheney crime family got away with it. They owe a dept of gratitude to some of the dumbest humans on the face of the earth. Who by the way continue to fight intelligence as hard as they can.
Reply to this comment
by HGOODGUY September 11, 2009 11:48 PM EDT
How many troops???
NONE AND NOW!!!
Reply to this comment
by jefleshman September 12, 2009 5:59 AM EDT
HGOODGUY

I had my fun please refer to the texts above.
by Johnaragsdale September 11, 2009 10:45 PM EDT
Our drone strikes have killed many men, women and children thereby incubating insurgents and building hatred toward us. And of course their drug yeald is thriving.

After eight years of waste, not worth one American life. We should have left years ago.
Reply to this comment
by jefleshman September 12, 2009 5:19 AM EDT
John

And our medical, agricultural, engineers and security forces have made the Afghan life better and welcomed. Whereas the Taliban continue to destroy and waste innocent life.

Your grade on your response F go back to school you need to study
by gomzee69 September 11, 2009 10:37 PM EDT
I can't believe what I'm reading.

Especially on the anniversary of 9/11.

How many soldiers should be sent to Afghanistan? As many as it takes to end Al Queda and the Taliban.

Is America really THIS devided?
Reply to this comment
by jefleshman September 12, 2009 5:50 AM EDT
gomzee69

I agree. No this is not what America or the world thinks. Only the 1% who want it to be so get the media attention. remember people who agree do not protest! Hmmmmm so many anti war protests going on arent there. ANSWER: NO

Grade: A because this person obviously doesnt forget the real reason and doesnt try to make it political!
by jrj073000 September 11, 2009 10:04 PM EDT
I'm leaning towards none. But it's essential to keep them in mind while they are there.

http://adwido.com/view_content?vkey=e5d9a61eaa8efa8a5f74354996f6b638
Reply to this comment
by timdgrim September 11, 2009 9:40 PM EDT
How many troops should be on the U. S.-Mexico border? As many as it takes.
Reply to this comment
by tincup356 September 11, 2009 9:47 PM EDT
NONE, they could solve all the border violence problems very easily,,,repeal the prohibition of Marijuana, the violence would end as the cartels would be out of business, and Americans could make those hefty profits off marijuana, not to mention millions of newly created jobs......congress has sent enough jobs OUT of the country,,,we need to get them back,,,and legalized marijuana would do it.
by jefleshman September 12, 2009 5:47 AM EDT
timdgrim

That is a great point of discussion but on a different forum. I would like to here your solution though.

GRADE: B+ for thinking outside the box!
by kevjustice September 11, 2009 9:24 PM EDT
Is this the best that FOX noise can do....the dreaded ACORN TAPES. This is almost the equivalent of Bushies unprovoked invasion of another country or the collapse of our economy under Republican watch. I heard when they tried the same thing in another ACORN office they were reported to the police.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 September 11, 2009 9:41 PM EDT
Well, you know how Alzheimer's disease works, the "Geriatrics Opposed to Peace" at Fuxnooze still haven't figured out that the election is over, they are still campaigning for McSame/Failin.
See all 45 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: