Sept. 13, 2009
Obama on Health Care Bill: "I Own It"
Tells 60 Minutes in White House Interview He Will Be Ultimately Responsible For Legislation
-
Play CBS Video Video President Obama Steve Kroft interviews the president at an important time in his presidency at the White House.
-
Video Obama: Heckling The President The President on getting heckled, Congressman Wilson, and the culture of partisanship.
-
Video Obama: Paying The Price Can the country afford health care reform?
-
President Barack Obama, on Friday, Sept. 11, 2009, in the Blue Room of the White House. (CBS)
With concessions to intransigent Republicans, reinforcement for wavering Democrats, and even a few specifics for skeptical citizens, the president hoped to resuscitate plans for an overhaul of the medical system.
And when 60 Minutes correspondent Steve Kroft spoke with him Friday at the White House he seemed confident he had succeeded.
Transcript of President Obama's 60 Minutes interview
STEVE KROFT: Before you made this speech there was a sense, clearly in the press and among people in Washington, that this program was in trouble.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Right.
KROFT: That the healthcare reform…
OBAMA: Right.
KROFT: …healthcare reform was in trouble.
OBAMA: Right.
KROFT: Do you think you changed some minds? Do you think you picked up some votes this week?
OBAMA: Well, here's a conversation I had with one of my advisors early on in this process: he said, 'I've been in this town a long time. I think this is the year we're gonna get healthcare done. But I guarantee you this will be pronounced dead at least four or five times before we finally get a bill passed.'"
KROFT: You're not getting much support from the Republicans and you've got some problems with people in your own party. Do you have enough votes to get a healthcare bill passed right now?
OBAMA: I believe that we will have enough votes to pass not just any healthcare bill, but a good healthcare bill that helps the American people, reduces costs, actually over the long-term controls our deficit. I'm confident that we've got that. Now, you're right.
So far we haven't gotten much cooperation from Republicans. And I think there're some who see this as a replay of 1993-94. You know, young president comes in, proposes healthcare. It crashes and burns and then the Republicans use that to win back the House in the subsequent election. And I think there are some people who are dusting off that playbook. In terms of the Democratic Party, they all understand we have to make this happen. We're not gonna get a better opportunity to solve our healthcare issues than we have right now. And that's why I'm confident that in the end we will get this done.
KROFT: One of the things that you said when you ran for president was that one of your talents was to be able to get people in a room with divergent opinions who were…yelling and screaming at each other. Get them to sit down and come to an agreement. Have you tried that on healthcare?
OBAMA: Yeah. Well, we tried very early on.
KROFT: Why hasn't it worked?
OBAMA: Well, I think right now, you've got just a political environment where there are those in the Republican Party who think the best thing to do is just to kill reform. That that will be good politics. And then there are some people who sincerely wanna see somethin' done, but have very different views and what I've tried to do is to make sure those in the latter category who don't just wanna kill something but actually wanna get somethin' done, that we are bringing them in and as open to their ideas as possible.
So for example, you know, tort reform. That's not something that historically has been popular in my party. But on Wednesday I specifically said that I think we can work together on a bipartisan basis to do something to reduce defensive medicine. Where doctors are worrying about lawsuits instead of worrying about patient care.
Produced by Frank Devine and Michael Radutzky
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 147 Comments
- I find it interesting that most people who speak out in disagreement towards the current administration are assumed to have agreed with the last one - that is not necessarily the case. I would warn people to concentrate on issues as opposed to "taking sides" - that is the only way to true democracy, which, I am sorry to say, we have not really seen in this country yet.
- Reply to this comment
- Dream on Joe NY.
You dont even know what socialism is. If public health care means "Socialism" then every single industrialized country besides the United States is "socialist" and by the way guess what..They all spend FAR less per person on health care and .... not a single one of them has anthing like the 45 million uninsured that we have. As a result they have SMALLER deficits not bigger ones and practically no povety to speak of AND more civil liberties. Well is that what you mean by "Socialism" Joe?
I hope I did not violate the rules of engagement here. - Reply to this comment
- A previous post that I wrote has apparently been deleted. I have read the rules of engagement and can´t figure out what was wrong or insulting. I mean it was spirited; the only real invective however was reserved for certain figures of the right wing media who engage in far worse attacks on primetime television EVERY DAY. So are why are we not allowed to do unto others as they have reapeatedly done unto us?
I am not protesting against CBS and how they run the forum; I am all for civility; it is just kind of frustrating when the other side is allowed to do whatever they want, generate their vicious sound bites all over the place, stir up destractions like this whole congressman Wilson rubbish when they want to destroy Obamas message... but we progressives are abandoned and exposed with neither shield nor sword--where are the progressive O´reileys, Limbaughs and Becks fighting fire with fire? Why is only the right allowed to use the power of ridicule and attention getting confrontationalism?
Where precisely is the line in this forum that we should not cross? - Reply to this comment
- A previous post that I wrote has apparently been deleted. I have read the rules of engagement and can´t figure out what was wrong or insulting. I mean it was spirited; the only real invective however was reserved for certain figures of the right wing media who engage in far worse attacks on primetime television EVERY DAY. So are why are we not allowed to do unto others as they have reapeatedly done unto us?
I am not protesting against CBS and how they run the forum; I am all for civility; it is just kind of frustrating when the other side is allowed to do whatever they want, generate their vicious sound bites all over the place, stir up destractions like this whole congressman Wilson rubbish when they want to destroy Obamas message... but we progressives are abandoned and exposed with neither shield nor sword--where are the progressive O´reileys, Limbaughs and Becks fighting fire with fire? Why is only the right allowed to use the power of ridicule and attention getting confrontationalism?
Where precisely is the line in this forum that we should not cross? - Reply to this comment
- just checking in to see how it's going with the health care system "I own"-Your President
- Reply to this comment
- There is no reason to apoligize.He speaks the truth.The president is wondering why everyone is in a bad mood.He is the one making us
angry...trying to push his ideas and agendas on us. Haven't we stated clearly that we do not like his health care plan? - Reply to this comment
- I'm not sure which is worse - if you didn't agree with Bush then you were declared unpatriotic, if you don't agree with Obama then you are labeled a racist.
And please don't bother trying to say that one side is being worse than the other, anyone who read the message boards here or other sites saw plenty of Bush-bashing from day 1. Disrespecting the president has been a popular form of entertainment ever since the internet came into being.
The lack of civility in our public political discourse is a great reflection of the fact that our two-party system is full of politicians and not statesmen (Please don't admit it if you don't understand the difference).
The goal is supposed to be to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness - not to score points on some political scoreboard against opposing parties in a game that never ends. The two-party system has lost it's focus, it's direction. - Reply to this comment
- Are you kidding me keystonebull? A liar? You are confusing our current President with the one who flew off in January. If you are all so worried about our freedoms and our rights in this country why are you all so complacent when it comes to the Patriot Act? READ THAT. Not just what Fox News tells you but really read it. That would make our founding fathers roll over in their graves.
Americans have all develop ADD and we all want a quick fix; we are addicted to a quick fix--it doesn't exist.
Just experiment with looking at issues from different perspectives--there might be something that makes sense to you that "the other side" is saying--be independent enough to try it. - Reply to this comment
- Obama should resign. Everyone knows now that he is a liar and a big one at that. I don't think anyone believes anything he says. Resign Obama and maybe we can get someone we can believe in. Obama is full of Pelosi.
- Reply to this comment
- So much for Freedom & the pursuit of Happiness
- Reply to this comment
- Iron fist in a velvet glove, Mr. President. This business about a "model of deportment" is okay for a start. But the velvet glove without the iron fist is merely empty, floppy, soft, and warm. By now you should have learned. Not all people are amenable to reason. It is distressing that you are not learning. The Bush refusal to admit a mistake was understandable given the limitations of an incurious man. But you are educated. You have an open mind. It is perhaps a similar kind of stubbornness, that you are refusing to learn.
- Reply to this comment
- The President and his main squeeze Axelrod better wake up and smell the coffee:
http://crosssection.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/health-care-vote-is-high-noon/ - Reply to this comment
- The President and his main squeeze Axelrod better wake up and smell the coffee:
http://crosssection.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/health-care-vote-is-high-noon/ - Reply to this comment
- Ample evideence exists daily on this blog that fringers are unstable. Thanks for confirming that the fringe is a group of haters, narcissists, sociopaths, hate mongers, fear mongers, sociopaths, anarchists, militia types,paranoics, conspiracy nuts, racists, fear mongerers and self delusional. The clear and overriding observation is that the fringe is a group of narcissists who consider themselves to be superior human beings and are devoid of compassion or empathy or basic humanity. These are tenets of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Also, the clear and obvious show of disrespect to congress people shows that these folks do not operate within the norms of societal behavior. A sociopathic personality is one who does not recognize or does not care about normal standards of social behavioral norms. So, again, ample evidence exists daily on these blogs as to the true and clearly observable fact that the fringe in America needs psychological help and are clueless as to their conditions.
- Reply to this comment
-
- reveal5: - - - your diatribes, lame dissertations, aspersions, intolerance, hateful blathering,deriding and demeaning diminish any message you may try to put across to anyone that does not agree with your left-wing notions ..... but notice not many bloggers (ordinary folks or paid) acknowledge you - - I should not have, either.
- YES WE CAN!
- Reply to this comment
- It's a crying shame that President Barack Obama is putting so much time and effort into making America a better place to live, while his opponents (racist or not) are putting so much time and effort into seeing him fail. I cannot understand all these people (and I know they are truly a small minority), who seem to have so much invested in negative politics. Instead of offering viable alternatives or, perhaps, better alternatives to President Obama's plans, these people do nothing but sit around like birds of prey waiting to swoop down on every opportunity to make sure nothing good is done for our country. Certainly, these people can't be stupid enough (maybe they are) to believe that negativism will give them some kind of political gain in the future. Knowing that people like this always lose in the end gives me some hope for the future. And, I believe that the 2010 elections will once again result in a beating for those so ignorant that they hope our President fails at every effort to improve our lives.
- Reply to this comment
- anyone notice that CBS is just ignoring the fact that over a million people showed up in DC this weekend to protest the public option and govt' spending?
I guess if it makes Obama look bad it is not news. - Reply to this comment
-
- There was only a million. Can you imagine how may would show up if the left we able to organize lik the right has?
The national mall would not be albe to hold the tens of million that would show to support it.
The trillion it will cost to implement healthcare reform is only a small percentage of our gross domestic product...at least thats what the conservatives told us while Bush doubled the national debt.
Now when Obama wants to spend some money to address a significant domestic issue its to expensive.
I just want to ask a favor. If you believe that spending trillions on Iraq (it will cost that by the time we are done with it!) is more important than reforming our healthcare options with less money, then move to Iraq and let the rest of us make our country better!
- Get a grip right wingers. Best estimates were 60000 to 70000 participants at the Wash DC protest. Self delusion is an obvious tenet of right wing ideaology. If you don't know the facts, pretend. If a media story does not agree with your preconceptions, it is some sort of conspiracy. If facts and actual information don't suit your purpose, ignore the facts and make things up. This is the fringe. This is why commentators across the political spectrum are describing the fringe as insane. You folks create your own view of reality as you go along and ignore any factual information that does not support your self delusion.
- There was only a million. Can you imagine how may would show up if the left we able to organize lik the right has?
- I used to enjoy 60 mins. They seemed to find the truth by asking hard questions and real journalism. No more. The interview with BHO was a puff piece. No real answers, no real tough questions, Example: how do you paid for government run health care with expanding the program to 40 million plus people? Will you demand tort reform? If not why? Tort reform has worked in Tex and Calif why would it not work across the nation. Why ,by law, are their only a few (7-15 depending on the state) private health care insurance companies operating in each state? Why can't I buy insurance in another state?
My point is 60 mins has failed again. No hard questions. No truth. I have blocked CBS on my TV. I have no plans to view the CBS news until they become the muckrakers of the past. - Reply to this comment
- great superficial interview stevie. I also want to congratulate 60 minutes on their undercover interview of acorn exposing their corrupt practices. You will of course be called racists, liberals, right wing nut cases, however I am sure you will ignore all criticism and continue to push your own agenda as always. I will miss you when cbs discontinues all news programming and sends katie, stevie and my other idiols home with nothing but their millions. sincere best wishes
- Reply to this comment
- Obama on Health Care Bill: "I Own It"
ALONG WITH SEVERAL VEHICLE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES... - Reply to this comment

