KABUL, Afghanistan, Sept. 6, 2009

Afghan Officials Toss Votes Due to Fraud

Allegations of Vote-Rigging Lead Election Commission to Reject Ballots from Hundreds of Polling Sites

  •  (AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

  • Photo Essay Election Day in Afghanistan

    Despite Taliban threats, Afghans head to the polls for the country's second presidential election

(CBS/AP)  Afghan election officials say they have thrown out votes at 447 voting sites across the country because of fraud allegations.

The head of the Independent Election Commission Daoud Ali Najafi couldn't say how many votes are affected.

The latest election results show President Hamid Karzai creeping closer to the important 50 percent threshold with 48.6 percent. Top challenger Abdullah Abdullah has 30.7 percent. The count is based on results from 74 percent of the country's polling stations.

The country's election commission has slowly been releasing results from the Aug. 20 vote. But hundreds of allegations of fraud have slowed the work.

Results won't be finalized until later this month after fraud allegations are investigated.

The election commission has so far published only partial results of the Aug. 20 vote, and says it has excluded ballots where it suspects fraud.

Yet results on its web site already include a remarkable number of figures that end in zeros.

Karzai's main opponent Abdullah Abdullah says this is proof of fraud on a massive scale.

At a news conference on Saturday, Abdullah's aides passed out lists of more than 100 polling centers where they said a check of the official results online would show numbers that are obviously bogus.

"Here in these links you see that one hundred percent of the vote has gone to one candidate, and that candidate is famous enough - I don't think you would like me to name him but if you do, it is Mr. Karzai, yeah," said Karzai's main rival, Dr. Abdullah Abdullah. He displayed the polling station result that reflected votes only for President Karzai but zero for any other candidate.

"I request the election commission not to announce the provisional result any more because it is fraudulent and some of these accounts require investigation. It is not just a violation; it is more than a violation by the IEC member in those polling stations."

At one polling station in a school in the Zerok district of Paktika province, exactly 400 votes were cast, all for Karzai. At a mosque in Kandahar's Sayed Bosa village, Karzai received all 4,085 votes cast. Of the mosque's eight polling stations, two reported Karzai with exactly 500 votes, two with 510, three with 520 and one with 515.

These and other round numbers pop out of tables published on the election commission's Web site.

Allegations of fraud have delayed official results from the election, now more than two weeks old, and threaten to wreck confidence in a vote that had been a centerpiece of U.S. President Barack Obama's regional strategy.

"We have insecurity in this county, we have bad government we have corruption we have narcotic, we have a war, we have insurgency. On top of that if a leadership is imposed upon the people based on fraudulent election, what will happen?" Abdullah told the Kabul news conference, saying such circumstances are "a recipe for instability."

IEC spokesman Noor Mohammad Noor said the election commission stood by the numbers on its web site and referred complaints to a separate Electoral Complaints Commission, known as the ECC.

Karzai's staff were not available for comment.

The partial results so far show Karzai leading but falling just short the outright majority (50% plus one) needed to win in a single round of voting.

Most of the ballots have yet to be counted in the south, the heartland of Karzai's support base and also the part of the country where Abdullah says most fraud took place.

The remaining southern results could swing the election for Karzai in a single round, but Abdullah says he will reject the outcome if fraudulent results are not excluded.

Western officials say fraud can still be corrected by the complaint commission, which is led by a Canadian and has the authority to set aside ballots it suspects were stuffed. The watchdog says it is probing more than 2,000 complaints, including more than 600 serious enough to affect the results.

© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
by salmoc44 September 7, 2009 1:20 AM EDT
We brought them American style "Democracy". Now, they just need a Supreme Court to decide who they want the winner to be and they'll have the American model.
Reply to this comment
by kevjustice September 6, 2009 10:40 PM EDT
Think of all the millions of taxpayer dollars wasted here.
Reply to this comment
by dougrdoug September 6, 2009 10:28 PM EDT
Democracy can't be forced on people. They have to want it like the Greeks and Romans did and the settlers of America did. Still there were many Americans left out of the democratic process. It is only worse in Afghanistan. America will be like Russia in one respect. America will have to leave Afghanistan because it is to wild to tame.
Reply to this comment
by kevjustice September 6, 2009 9:56 PM EDT
In vietnam during the 60's there were similiar "free elections" that were not so free.
Reply to this comment
by jwesel1 September 6, 2009 5:09 PM EDT
This whole election is a farce. The only vote that should be conducted is whether US and NATO forces be allowed to be in Afghanistann. But no one will be willing to face the truth.
Reply to this comment
by hermitdave September 6, 2009 2:55 PM EDT
Sounds like the DIEBOLD people are involved in the Afghan vote. Now it can go to the Afghan supreme court and Karzi will win just like George Bush did. Wonder if Turd Blossom is Karzis campaign manager?
Reply to this comment
by sandy19731 September 6, 2009 7:40 PM EDT
Billions of dollars (or equivalents) are traded over computers every day by the banking industry with virtually no mistakes and we still can't get a computerized voting machine to be accurate. Diebold needs to Die. My local ATM machine is more accurate than a Diebold voting machine.
by HansHansHansHans September 6, 2009 1:50 PM EDT
100% of the votes just for one candidate? That happened in Germany when Hitler was the loved one. Bad start for a new Afghanistan. The cheating should be checked thoroughly or, better, a new voting should be ordered to do away with distrust as that seems to be the reason for all this trouble.
Reply to this comment
by ibsteve2u September 6, 2009 1:29 PM EDT
Is it just me, or is the coding for the comment display on CBS's website like...the worst on the web?
Reply to this comment
by sandy19731 September 6, 2009 1:09 PM EDT
You can do that??
- Al Gore
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo September 6, 2009 11:49 AM EDT
"Afghan Officials Toss Votes Due to Fraud"
----
Acorn officials are evaluating if they should contest on behalf of the disenfranchised voters...
Reply to this comment
by boatdocster September 6, 2009 11:24 AM EDT
And the 2004 election - Ohio and its entire voting record shipped out of state to a GOP computer tech, shipped back in to the state where Bush wins despite voter polling showing Kerry ahead.

When the Federal government supeonas the GOP tech guy, he dies in a highly suspicious private plane crash.

ATM's keep track of our money to the penny. You would think we could vote online and get that right as well!!!
Reply to this comment
by ibsteve2u September 6, 2009 1:18 PM EDT
"The state run press..."

Let me see...the Republicans had firm control of Ohio...lollll...so much so that they were trading Workman's Compensation funds for old coins...
by ibsteve2u September 6, 2009 1:27 PM EDT
by SouthernForever September 6, 2009 12:10 PM EDT "You actually believe the polling statistics? You shoulda learned that the state run press always fudges the polling data, for pete's sakes."

lolll..."The state run press"?

Let me see...at the time, the Republicans were firmly in control of Ohio; so much so, that they were selling off Workman's Compensation funds for a bunch of relatively valueless old coins...

lolll....
by Benton09 September 6, 2009 11:01 AM EDT
They must have learned from the 2000 U. S. election.
Reply to this comment
by roach9703 September 6, 2009 10:48 AM EDT
The ability to resolve these issues in a credible fashion has enormous strategic implications.
Reply to this comment
See all 16 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: