October 14, 2009 8:35 AM

Poll: More Wary of Obama on Health Care

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  President Obama's approval rating on health care has dropped six points since July to 40 percent, and now more Americans, 47 percent, disapprove of his handling of health care, according to a new CBS News poll taken between Aug 27 - 31.

As the president's poll numbers sink on the issue, two-thirds of Americans remain confused about the health reform proposals on the table.

Meanwhile, Mr. Obama's overall approval (56 percent) and handling of the economy (53 percent) are not much changed from last month. (Read more here.)

Americans are not only skeptical of Mr. Obama's handling of health care, but also of the effectiveness of reform. Americans are more apt to say the middle class and small business would be hurt, not helped, by the plans currently under consideration.

Still, the public continues to say the health care system does need reform, and that things will worsen if nothing is done. Americans strongly support government regulations on insurance companies, including cost controls and mandates for covering all applicants.

CBSNews.com Special Report: Health Care

Anger and Skepticism

As angry protests erupted over health care at town hall meetings over the month of August, Americans in general became angrier on the issue.

One-third call themselves dissatisfied with the way the Obama administration is handling health care, and another 17 percent describe themselves as angry about it. Thirty-four percent are satisfied, and just 11 percent are enthusiastic.

Who is most angry? Conservatives (33 percent), Republicans (36 percent) and Americans age 65 and over (21 percent) are some of the most likely to say they are angry about the Obama administration's approach to health care reform. Meanwhile, in the president's own party, Democrats are more likely to be satisfied (55 percent) than to be enthusiastic (21 percent).

(CBS)
The bulk of the public does not think current reform proposals would help them. Forty-six percent say they'd have no effect on them personally and another 31 percent thinks they'd hurt. Just one in five thinks they would help.

Nor do Americans think other groups in society would benefit from reform. More think the current reform proposals would hurt rather than help the middle class (the class most Americans say they're part of), seniors, and a key part of the U.S. economy, small businesses.

Specifically, Americans predict Congress' reform plans will cause costs to go up, quality of care to get worse, and the availability of doctors to decline. No more than one in five think Congress' current plans would make any of those areas better.

And there are also concerns about the financial impact of reform. While about half of Americans still feel reform is possible without increasing the deficit or raising middle-class taxes, more than four in 10 think that is not possible.


No Specific Complaints or Preferences

Despite the heated rhetoric from both sides of the aisle that has occurred over the last month, many Americans cannot volunteer anything they especially like or dislike about the proposals.

Asked if there's anything they like, 40 percent cannot name anything, the most-cited response; the second-most at 27 percent is that coverage would expand.

At the same time, many Americans cannot name something they especially dislike about reform. The most common specific answer, at 12 percent, is the threat of too much government.

(CBS)
Most Americans have heard or read something about the protestors who have attended recent town hall meetings concerning health care reform. Among those who have heard about them, nearly half (49 percent) say the protestors do not reflect the views of most Americans, but 41 percent say they do.

Republicans (66 percent) think the protestors reflect the opinions of Americans as a whole, while Democrats do not (73 percent).

More CBS News Polls Released Today:

Obama Approval Rating Dips Slightly
Public Split on Limiting Executive Pay
Two-Thirds Confused by Health Reform
Obama's Ratings on Afghanistan Drop


Policy Options

Support for the so-called "public option" -- a government-administered health insurance plan - still finds majority support, though that support has been steadily dropping since June. In this poll, 60 percent favor it, with 34 percent opposed.

Support dropped the most among Republicans, from 49 percent in July to 35 percent now.

There is widespread approval for some other policy options. For instance, 72 percent approve of allowing the government to set limits on the amount that health insurance companies could charge people for premiums, co-pays and other out-of-pocket expenses.

Seven in 10 also approve of providing subsidies to low income people to help them purchase health insurance from private insurers.

And most Americans - nearly eight in 10 -- continue to approve of requiring insurance companies to cover anyone who applies for health insurance regardless of whether or not they have a pre-existing medical condition.

Search the CBS News Poll Database

Despite increasing skepticism about current plans, Americans agree on the need for reform, and think that in the absence of reform the health care system will deteriorate. Fifty-four percent think that if there are no government reforms, the health care system will get worse. Just 6 percent think it will get better on its own.

And as has been the case for many years, more than four in five Americans see the U.S. health care system as needing major changes - at the least. That view is held by Americans of all demographic groups.


The Politics of Health Care Reform

Even though the president's approval rating on health care has taken a hit, half of Americans still think he has better ideas than Republicans on reforming the nation's health care system. Twenty-three percent think Republicans have better ideas.

Looking ahead to the potential impact of health care reform on the 2010 elections, there are indications that a vote by a member of Congress in support of current proposals could end up being slightly more of a negative than a positive. One-third say the issue of health care would have no effect.

One-third of registered voters say they would be less likely to vote for their member of Congress if he or she supported the health care reforms now being proposed, while 29 percent would be more likely to vote for their representative if he or she supported the reforms.

PDF: Read the Complete Poll



This poll was conducted among a random sample of 1097 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone August 27-31, 2009. Phone numbers were dialed from random digit dial samples of both standard land-line and cell phones. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups is higher.

This poll release conforms to the Standards of Disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 188 Comments
by jsdurk September 10, 2009 8:37 PM EDT
I'll buy into the President's health plan when ALL three branches of the federal government buy into the plan for their families and themselves. No exceptions, no perks, no special rules, etc.

Now we also need to get these people into Social Security system like us regular folks, no exceptions, no perks, no special rules, etc.

What's good for the gander is good for the goose.

And if they have time how about an uncomplicated tax system that any high student would understand.
Reply to this comment
by Confidential416 September 4, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
I completely agree with takenough. I couldn't have said it better and it bears repeating!
The public option would be paid by the primiums of the insured people much like Social Security which is an insurance! For those that are against any public option because of government intrusion, would they do away with: Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, Unemployment, and Public Education? These and many more programs are government programs. How many senior citizens are willing to give up Social Security, Medicare, Food Stamps and Medicaid? They are getting back more than what they put in! Also, it is nice to have that Unemployment benefit when you are laid off. Would you give it up? The news media have been very bias in favor of the anti-health reform lobby. They were instrumental in spreading falsehoods and outright lies. And are bias when it comes to reporting events. If the event is about the anti-health lobby, it gets plenty of coverage. If it is about the pro-health care reform, it gets little or none.
Reply to this comment
by devilfly1 September 3, 2009 9:28 PM EDT
Highmark Inc. is a $5 billion health insurance company created from the consolidation of Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Blue Shield. The company contracted with KPMG Consulting Inc. to create an electronic billing and accounts-receivable system. Highmark claims that KPMG abandoned the two-year, $12 million project after it missed deadlines and experienced cost overruns from mistakes. Highmark claims KPMG was more than a year behind schedule and attempted to charge an additional $8 million to complete the first phase of the project. KPMG spokesman John Schneidawind responded that "We've been able to deliver on our part of the project, but through much of the engagement, Highmark hasn't done its part to ensure a successful implementation of the payment system on time and on budget." Highmark claims that KPMG failed to "satisfactorily" complete the database design detailed application architecture, and software design specifications. Consequently, developers began coding even through the design was not stabile. Highmark states that KPMG admitted that "much of the coding work performed during the summer of 2000 was useless and would have to be redone," which would result in 8,000 additional hours of development time.


Sources: Adapted from Lucas Mearian, "Insurer Sues, Claims KPMG Mismanaged Billing Project, Computerworld, November 12,2001 and Lucas Merain, "Highmark sues KPMG over Failed IT Project," Computerworld, November 7, 2001

What do you think of Reality Bytes?
Reply to this comment
by Gumbercules54 September 2, 2009 5:23 PM EDT
IMHO: * the Federal Government of the USA has no constitutional responsibility or authority to guarantee everybody health insurance. (If I am wrong on any of this please show me where and explain.)
* the Federal Government does not and has not ever had to make money, or be responsible, or work in the black because it gets it's money from the tax payers and will tax somebody whenever it needs more. The public option can ruin private insurers because the private sector has to make money. This is not to say that private insurers are angels and care anymore that the government whether I live or die.
* Emotionally...yes. Everybody should be taken care of somehow. Nobody should have to live in poor health. Everybody should be able to get great medical care in a timely fashion. But, this is supposed to be a country of laws and a constitution. I am definitely against any more intrusive federal government interferance in private industry. There are, or were regulations already. This also means any politicians who have been bought through campaign contributions or gifts, etc.
*If you can not tell...I do not trust a word that comes out of any politicians mouth. If it is not a straight out lie, it has been "spun" to some degree to avoid pointing out any possible problems.
Reply to this comment
by curiousQ September 2, 2009 2:41 PM EDT
I don't care what any of the propaganda machines are churning out... (or the posters here who seem to like calling people names like "ugly" or "idiots"... yuck!!!... your debate technique is lacking.)

I have personally seen enough examples of sloppy and incoherent handling of Medicare claims to say I DO NOT WANT GOVERNMENT to handle my healthcare. Simple as that....

Where do I get off coming to such a decision? Well.. I work with Medicare liens (aka medical bills).... and they are not pretty. Just today, I received a reply on a lien issue I formally disputed. Medicare placed a lien on a work compensation insurer for $80K due to DIABETES treatments... Explain to me how a person injures their Lumbar Spine at work, but somehow work comp should cover diabetes treatments? It took over 6 months of back and forth with them before they finally bill the actual amount - a whopping $236.47. That's right - only two hundred and thirty six dollars worth of the lien was justified. Furthermore, the IRS performed an audit on Medicare's spending back in 1999 - they told Medicare to stop erroneously paying claims or they will be shut down because they were wasting 100's of millions in taxpayer dollars yearly! They weren't checking on the claim payments - people were getting double settlements from Medicare and their private insurers. Claimants got $200K from Medicare to pay their medical bills and the extra $200K went to their new boats, cars, etc. Although I do have a job thanks to their incompetence...

Not that I feel sorry for the private insurers... It seems many are just scams that need to be prosecuted as a crime would be. Some of the stories are just too tragic.

I feel a better reform plan is needed... more defined and thought out, no loopholes. Congress needs to hire lawyers to review these bills... the lawyers should be held legally responsible for explaining the bills clearly and completely. After which, a checklist of major factors in the bill should be drafted, and each factor should be signed off by the congress member as clearly understood. Congress should not be allowed to sign a bill they do not understand. They have too much money to feign lack of resources to have it clarified by a third party. I find it ridiculous that we do not hold politicians accountable for signing bills they later say they do not agree with because they didn't fully understand it. Their shock at such a thing is just insulting to every American's intelligence. And when they pretend to feel sorry for americans with high premiums and low coverage, or none at all... I have to laugh.. I doubt there is one of them who didn't receive at least some of the money we spend on health insurance premiums via campaign contributions.

Oh and here's a link regarding Medicare's recent style of "Reimbursement" collections:

http://www.physicianspractice.com/index/fuseaction/articles.details/articleID/1342.htm
Reply to this comment
by aghast101 September 2, 2009 2:21 PM EDT
I believe they all wrong. I will never vote for a liberal again.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob September 2, 2009 1:00 PM EDT
dear-one September 2, 2009 12:46 PM EDT
Let?s Get One Thing Absolutely Straight; Insurance Company Health Care Is NOT
Sustainable!!!... The Choice Is Eventual Insolvency or Economic Health (REVENUE)!!!...
In My Opinion, the Only Real Huge Question Is Funding of the H.C. System, We All Need!!!...
I Recommend that the Most Fair, And Reasonable, H.C. Funding Would Be With
SIN Taxes, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Fat Pills, and Marijuana (Cannabis, Production & Sale)!!!...




With a little reasonable regulation private health insurance is easily sustainable. Wht is not sustainable is the socialist ideal of tax the crap out of people to pay for someone elses health care.
Reply to this comment
by dear-one September 2, 2009 12:46 PM EDT
Let?s Get One Thing Absolutely Straight; Insurance Company Health Care Is NOT
Sustainable!!!... The Choice Is Eventual Insolvency or Economic Health (REVENUE)!!!...
In My Opinion, the Only Real Huge Question Is Funding of the H.C. System, We All Need!!!...
I Recommend that the Most Fair, And Reasonable, H.C. Funding Would Be With
SIN Taxes, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Fat Pills, and Marijuana (Cannabis, Production & Sale)!!!...
Reply to this comment
by ABM_21 September 2, 2009 12:37 PM EDT
So the 'protestors' are doing a great job of scaring the hell out of the public. Republicans ought to be ashamed of themselves. Rather than honestly debate the issues, they resort to scare tactics. How sad...
Reply to this comment
by endurorob September 2, 2009 12:08 PM EDT
Poll: More Wary of Obama on Health Care




People better be wary of Obama's planned indoctrination speech to the school children on September 8th.
Reply to this comment
See all 188 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook