September 1, 2009 10:33 AM

Same-Sex Marriages Begin in Vermont

(AP)  After 17 years together, Bill Slimback and Bob Sullivan couldn't wait another minute to get married. So they didn't.

With Vermont's new law allowing same-sex marriage only a minute old, they tied the knot in a midnight ceremony at a rustic lodge, becoming one of the first couples to legally wed under a law that took effect at midnight Monday. Vermont is one of five states that now allow same-sex couples to marry. Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire and Iowa are the others.

Dressed in suits, saying their vows under a large wall-mounted moose head, the two Whitehall, New York, men promised their love, exchanged rings and held hands during a modest 17-minute ceremony. Moose Meadow Lodge co-owner Greg Trulson, who's also a Justice of the Peace, presided.

"It feels wonderful," said Slimback, 38, an out-of-work Teamster who is taking Sullivan's last name as his own. "It's a day I've been long waiting for, and a day I truly honestly thought would never come."

Slimback said he and Sullivan, 41, have long wanted to cement their relationship with a wedding, but since they couldn't legally marry in New York they chose to wed even before Vermont's gay marriage era officially dawned.

Vermont, which invented civil unions in 2000 after a same-sex couple challenged the inequality of state marriage statutes, was a mecca for gay couples who to that point had no way to officially recognize their relationships.

Since then, other states have allowed gay marriage, as did Vermont, which in April became the first state to legalize gay marriage through a legislative decree and not a court case.

Some couples - including many who obtained civil unions in Vermont - plan to return to the state to get married. But most are in no rush. City and town officials say only a handful of licenses had been issued to same-sex couples in anticipation of Tuesday's start.

"We've waited a long time to do this - basically, our whole lives," Slimback said Monday. "We've been waiting for a chance to actually solidify it," he said. He and Sullivan said they never wanted to obtain a civil union because they believe that's a kind of second-class recognition.

Westboro Baptist Church, an anti-gay group that claims U.S. combat deaths are God's punishment for America's tolerance of homosexuality, planned to picket Tuesday in Montpelier, Vermont's capital.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
by HOLIDAYKEYWEST September 1, 2009 7:47 PM EDT
HOORAY!!! FOR THE PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE A UNION OF TWO PEOPLE SHOULD BE RECOGNIZED AS BEING LEGAL REGARDLESS OF GENDERS. It's going to take time for the idea to settle in but acceptance is inevitable. Next step? That gays will be allowed to adopt. You must fight for what you believe in. Don't back down and hold your heads up high. Congratulations to those who have taken advantage of the permissions granted by the state of Vermont!

HOLIDAYKEYWEST.COM
Reply to this comment
by underdogus09 September 1, 2009 7:09 PM EDT
America is doomed...
Reply to this comment
by AttentionDeficit September 1, 2009 7:38 PM EDT
Why is America doomed? For not listening to the evangelical freaks?
by mensarino September 1, 2009 5:04 PM EDT
dumb-----Why don't you try not acting on your "urge" and see how you like it?
Reply to this comment
by dmb35 September 1, 2009 4:27 PM EDT
God help us all. Just because you hvae the urge doesn't mean you should act upon it.
Reply to this comment
by mensarino September 1, 2009 4:17 PM EDT
Illuminated---No,I am a straight grandfather,married to the same woman for 40 years.I am simply not a bigot.Your message is sick and twisted.No god worth having would be so petty.It is to your discredit that you would believe such garbage......and that is why you are not illuminated.
Reply to this comment
by SkirtLifter September 1, 2009 3:53 PM EDT
by DaVicar5 September 1, 2009 3:19 PM EDT
by cs4466 "Actually I'm cheering on Vermont. Flaming is something else entirely."


Why would you cheer Vermont? They obviously are living their lives contrarty to what the rest of the Country deems normal?
______________
lol ... you said normal. Contrary to the country's subjective perspective of normal, like you really care?
Reply to this comment
by mensarino September 1, 2009 3:12 PM EDT
Da vicar---You are correct,you would be on the ride----lol
Reply to this comment
by mensarino September 1, 2009 3:11 PM EDT
Illuminated---If there was ever an ill-fitting nickname, it is yours.
Reply to this comment
by Illuminated1 September 1, 2009 3:55 PM EDT
Don't like the message, so attack the messenger.
At least I'm not in the dark.......I bet you're gay...
by mensarino September 1, 2009 3:09 PM EDT
daffy----Absolutely correct,but these yahoos wouldn't understand the way our government works in a thousand lifetimes.They know that it is inevitable that gay marriage is allowed nationwide and they can't stand it.I just love their anguish over this----lol
Reply to this comment
by Illuminated1 September 1, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
Now my real feelings about gay marriage....
I am against it.
The title married, marriage etc...have been acknowledged to be between men and women.
Domestic partnership should be enough to cover all the needs homosexuals need for complete legal status.
If homosexuals want a plaque to hang showning legality between themselves then get a domestic partnership license delcaring legitimacy as marriage.

I know the homosexuals don't want to accept this, but they must as society dictates or be cast as second class.

My real worries are now, if gay men marry, what will happen to the homos in jail wanting their civil rights.
They are going to want to marry.....
Then there is the military.........The term friendly fire will take on new meaning....lol
Reply to this comment
by Illuminated1 September 1, 2009 3:46 PM EDT
In case you haven't read the law, you need a license to get married.
My interpretation of it is not as important as the courts and especially what the people say it is. In California, it was voted no 2 times.....I say the people have spoken, and it is the homos that wont accept what society has said is legal.
See all 52 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook