McChrystal Calls for New Afghan Strategy

Top U.S. Commander Submits War Review to Pentagon, NATO; Calls for Revised Strategy, Renewed Commitment

(AP)  The commander of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan said Monday in an assessment of the war that a new strategy was needed to fight the Taliban, while NATO officials disclosed he is expected to separately request more troops.

Increasing U.S. forces is a hot-button issue that could ignite furious debate in Washington on the U.S. military's future in an increasingly unpopular war. Some Democratic senators have increased calls for a timeline to draw down troops.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal sent his strategic review of the Afghan war to the Pentagon and NATO headquarters on Monday. U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates ordered the 60-day review to size up the rapidly deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan as Taliban attacks rise and U.S. deaths spiral upward.

"The situation in Afghanistan is serious, but success is achievable and demands a revised implementation strategy, commitment and resolve, and increased unity of effort," McChrystal said in a statement Monday.

A NATO statement said McChrystal's assessment seeks to implement President Barack Obama's strategy "to reduce the capability and will" of insurgents and extremists, including al Qaeda, and support the growth and development of Afghan security forces and Afghan governance.

McChrystal did not ask for more troops but is expected to do so in a separate request, two NATO officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the matter.

The U.S. already has some 62,000 troops in Afghanistan - a record number - and will have 68,000 by the end of the year. In total there are more than 100,000 U.S. and NATO troops in the country.

The deaths of two U.S. forces Monday in the south - the country's most violent region - underscored the spiraling violence those troops face. The deaths brought to 47 the number of U.S. forces killed in Afghanistan in August - the deadliest month of the almost-eight year war for American troops.

Thousands of U.S. forces moved into the Afghan south this summer after Obama ordered 21,000 more troops to the country this year, forces who helped protect the country's Aug. 20 presidential election. McChrystal, who took over command in Afghanistan on June 15, delayed the release of the review so that it would not interfere with the vote.

New vote tallies released Monday showed President Hamid Karzai with a strong lead over top challenger Abdullah Abdullah. Karzai had 45.8 percent of votes counted, while Abdullah had 33.2 percent. Ballots have been counted from almost half of the country's voting stations, meaning results could still change dramatically. Karzai will need 50 percent of the votes to avoid a two-man runoff.

Hundreds of allegations of fraud and voter intimidation threaten to mar the election, and female turnout was low. Voters who cast ballots faced retaliatory attacks from militants who told Afghans not to vote. Results are not expected to be finalized until mid- or late September, after officials work through the fraud allegations.

In an example of the extreme threats that voters faced, an Afghan man said Monday that Taliban militants cut off his nose and both ears as he tried to vote.

"I was on my way to a polling station when Taliban stopped me and searched me. They found my voter registration card," Lal Mohammad said from a hospital bed in Kabul. He said they cut off his nose and ears before beating him unconscious with a weapon.

"I regret that I went to vote," Mohammad said, crying and trying to hide his disfigured face. "What is the benefit of voting to me?"

The U.S. strategy in Afghanistan hinges on increasing the number of Afghan soldiers and police so U.S. forces can one day withdraw. Some 134,000 Afghan troops are to be trained by late 2011, but U.S. officials say that number will need to be greatly increased, an expansion that will be paid for by U.S. funds.

Afghanistan has long been seen as the "good" war by many in the United States, especially in comparison with U.S. efforts in Iraq, where U.S. troops are now drawing down. But some Democratic senators are beginning to question whether U.S. goals in Afghanistan are achievable, and when U.S. troops will be brought home.

[woeisme1]

The new strategy should be: Pack it up boys. We're out of here. End this stupid and wasteful conflict now.

[notblue]

Hungry, after America OUSTED THE RULING TALIBAN in record time with few casualties. how many troops did Bush withdraw. You state he cut and ran, show wwith evidence, articles, statisitics to back your cut and run statement. THe fact he we never left afghanistan, we never reduced the number of troops and now they will be increased, it is true the democratically elected government has failed to take the raines, but nobody cut and ran, that is tired move.on soundbite used on the sheep last november.

Look at little Stanny, he's got his little uniform on with colourful patches and emblems, is that not impressive? What a small personage, but he'll probably huff and puff and blow all the bad people away, eh Stanny? Go to it cherry.

[trapbreaking]

by hungry1968-1 - You're cliaming that Obama started the problems in Iraq and Afghanistan

I made no such claim. However, remember the Afghanistan War Resolution pass in the U.S. House by a vote of 431 to 1, and 100 to 0 in the U.S. Senate.

.

[trapbreaking]

All presidents, soon as they become the Commander in Chief, ask themselves, "What is the use of having the most powerful military in the world if you can't put a few puppets in power somewhere."

Obama, after Iraq and Afghanistan there is always North Korea and Iran. I know you would never attack your buddy Chavez, but think about South America too. And fun can be had by all.

.

[hugomutt1576]

Posting of McChrystal in Afghanistan was loudly touted as part of New Strategy of Barack Obama.Now,McChrystal says we need a new strategy to win in Afghanistan.The fact is we are absolutely clueless there and playing for time.And the greatest illusion in this game is that Pakistan has realized its folly of supporting the Taliban and is now fighting on our side.Those guys actually hate our guts as before and are just waiting for those billions the Congress is sending their way.

[wyodutch]

As Benjamin Franklin so wisely observed... Guests and fish begin to smell after a time.

Obviously, the Afghanis have had enough of our over-ripe carp aroma.

[kevjustice]

U.S. imperialism is the enemy of the world.

[kevjustice]

U.S. imperialism causes jihad. You need to look up the definition of jihad in wikipedia.

[melchg07]

With such a small amount of troops its hard to say that we've been fighting a 'war' in Afghanistan for 8 years...we've had a 1/5 of the number of soldiers there in comparison to Iraq while at the same time Afghanistan has about 1/3 more land area to cover.

We are finally starting to make push in Afghanistan and now people want to call it quits......not to mention that Pakistan has finally realized that the Taliban is a threat and have started pushing back in their country as well.

[nextgenman09]

Here we are, living with the RINOtard legacy of Failure.

[wyodutch]

Ah yes... No General ever has a situation that he claims can't be fixed by more dollars and more troops.

Problem is, Stanley isn't dealing with Panama or Granada. He's neck deep in Afghanistan... where the people have a long history of handing the occupiers their heads on a platter.

[User_00000000002945496845]

New strategy: declare Islam the US national religion. Problem solved.

[User_00000000002945496845]

by Ms_enza August 31, 2009 12:37 PM EDT
I have discovered the statements that Generals make on the battlefield rarely carry the wisdom of those in the book they write after they retire...

_____________________________________________

Really? Care to give any examples? Also, why the ellipsis at the end of your comment. Is that supposed to be meaningful in any way?