September 22, 2009 11:14 AM

How To Remake New Orleans

By
CBSNews
(The New Republic)  Amy Liu is deputy director of the Metropoitan Policy Program at Brookings.

The fourth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina falls this weekend.

Usually, a fourth anniversary is not a landmark. But this one is notable for the many leadership transitions afoot.

First, the election of President Obama has heightened hopes for a new federal direction in the Gulf Coast. Thus far, he has been low-key, even skipping out on a visit to the area this anniversary-for the first time in three years-instead pointing to his administration's accomplishments to improve the business of recovery, such as accelerating infrastructure repairs.

But to fully break from the past, more needs to be done-especially to make sure that the recession does not rollback the recovery gains made to date. While federal investments in public infrastructure repairs have helped buoy the New Orleans economy, the recession has dampened the housing market, stalling efforts to replace or repair the tens of thousands of homes destroyed by the storm. Further, more work is needed to boost incomes and opportunity in the region, convert a massive inventory of blighted properties into marketable use, and strengthen the safety and sustainability of the region through comprehensive coastal restoration and protection.

At the core, Obama and his team must show that the $40 billion-plus in taxpayer dollars spent on long-term Gulf Coast recovery is not being wasted to simply return New Orleans back to its old normal.

Indeed, prior to Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans was beset with challenges facing many older cities. It had the second highest concentration of poverty among the 50 largest American cities. It possessed a weak economy, with shrinking high-paying industries and expanding low-wage, hospitality jobs. Also, the metro area was growing in unsustainable ways, with the city losing jobs and residents as development shifted outward into suburban parishes and onto precious wetlands.

The opportunity is that the federal recovery dollars already flowing to schools, housing, health care facilities, and roads and transit can be accompanied by an overhaul of policies and systems underlying them so that New Orleanians, and our nation, get better outcomes and performance. It is not enough to simply get the money out the door quickly. Our aim should be for a city and region that is more inclusive, economically robust, and environmentally sustainable than before the storm.

No doubt, some bold innovations are underway, such as the total revamping of the public school system and the installation of a first-ever inspector general to remove the cloud of corruption and distrust that hangs over locally-elected officials.

But, these efforts must be the norm, not the exception. To that end, in the next twelve months, the administration must go beyond "disaster recovery" and work with state, local, and private sector allies to facilitate some transformative initiatives to boldly put the city on the path to reinvention. The pressure is on for Obama (and New Orleanians) to demonstrate that, at the five-year crossroad, New Orleans is not trending toward the status quo.

Specifically, the administration should not treat New Orleans as that special disaster case, but as a priority city where it can test a number of its signature initiatives. From modernizing the nation's infrastructure to boosting green industries to linking school reform with the transformation of distressed neighborhoods-and the launch of a new urban and metropolitan agenda-Obama can apply his desire for bottoms-up solutions to a city and region that is teeming with renewed assets, a committed citizenry, and strong philanthropic support.

But this is an upward battle if Obama does not have a good local partner.

Fortunately, Mayor Nagin's term is coming to an end. Nagin has been a disaster (excuse the pun) and his recovery czar resigned earlier this summer with little fanfare and few accomplishments. With a primary coming up next February and a run-off election in March, New Orleans will have an opportunity to choose a leader with vision and experience who can hold up his or her end of the bargain in a federal-state-local partnership to deliver on the promise of recovery.

With all these stars aligning, let's not squander this post-disaster moment to remake a great American city.



By Amy Liu:
Reprinted with permission from The New Republic.

The New Republic
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by antonebraga September 2, 2009 10:05 AM EDT
This should help understanding:
What do you expect in case of an insured loss? Are You Disaster Ready? (hurricane, tornado, earthquake, flood, fire, etc.). President Obama gave his telling response: http://www.disasterprepared.net/whitehouse.html
Reply to this comment
by Rosewood614 August 31, 2009 12:04 PM EDT
How dare people suggest that we "relocate" the city of New Orleans! Using this kind of logic I would suggest we "relocate" San Francisco or Los Angeles also because they are "earthquake prone." Simply ridiculous. My family has been in New Orleans for 11 generations. We have never received, nor asked for Federal money. We have always relied on our own hard work and that of family and friends to rebuild. When insurance came along, we took out a policy and maintained it. The city flooded because inadequate levees failed and were breached. New Orleans has it's own unique identity and most of us will continue to rebuild as necessary, WITHOUT FEDERAL DOLLARS. Our friends, families and communities will stay firm and honor our committment to one another during times of need, a testament to those who shed blood for our land throughout the centuries.
Reply to this comment
by lcr999 August 31, 2009 5:15 PM EDT
You sit behind levees built and rebuilt by Federal Dollars. And infrastructure build and rebuilt by Federal Dollars. No amount of engineering is going to keep water out of New Orleans for the next 50 years. SF and LA have building codes to mitigate much of the damage possibility; but New Orleans continues to build below sea level. The only rational policy would be to forbid building of residential and business structures below the flood line.
by lcr999 August 31, 2009 5:20 PM EDT
Well, I will admit that the people who build their homes in the wild fire zones in the hills outside of LA and Santa Barbara don't deserve to be bailed out either. Bill them for the full cost of fighting the fires, or just let them burn.
by MarkFolse August 31, 2009 7:15 AM EDT
This article is full of misconceptions that I am amazed to find still current.

New Orleans did not suffer from a natural disaster resulting in part of global sea level rise. It flooded from the failure of its levee protection system at below its designed specification.

The cap on federal flood insurance is below the current replacement cost of homes in this market (and would be so in most major cities) and many people did not carry flood insurance because the government-issued flood zone maps indicted they did not need to becaue they were protected by levees. The so-called insurance companies (with the government's approval) walked in and declare almost all damage flood damage (three feet of water took off that roof? Of courrse it did), so most people got not insurance settlement except by recourse to lawsuit. The (badly mismanaged) Road Home program gave a maximum award of $150,000. Try calling your local contractor and asking how big a house he can build you for $150,000. (Most people did not get that amount)

The city has largely been rebuilt by the people themslelves: by their own hands, by cashing out their 401ks and maxing out their credit cards, and by volunteers from all across the nation.

We were the victims of an engineering failure tracable to the negligence of the US Army Corps of Engineers, and yes we would expect compenstation from them for our full loss.

Many of you say you grow weary of our commplaints. I grow weary of people spreading the same lies they hear on the radio from people with political agendas who know nothing of the facts of New Orleans.

If you want to talk about corruption, let's talk about Misissippi where the well-connected Haley Barbour gave debris removal contracts to his business partners at rates that shocked emergency managers in Florida, and they have poured all of their recovery money into land redevelpment leaving tens of thousands still displaced, so this isn't just about New Orleans.
Reply to this comment
by MPHgrad August 31, 2009 7:51 AM EDT
Thank you!! Haley Barbour is certainly a mess & the poverty in MS is testament to him. This is about corruption and corruption of the worst kind--taking advantage of people and situations to capitalize politically.
by 1notrub11 August 30, 2009 8:28 PM EDT
I have to agree with most of the comments in this blog thus far. You build something, that even a fraction of the time, is at risk of being underwater and you deserve what you get. It reminds me of the folks who some time back complained that they could not afford flood insurance (I think it was in Missouri), even though they built their homes on a known flood plain.
If you want to spend your own money rebuilding it the way it was, fine. Just don't use mine.
Reply to this comment
by sickofkatrina August 30, 2009 7:43 PM EDT
I do not want to hear one more freaking word about Katrina and the so called "recovery" FOUR YEARS LATER!!!! This is the biggest joke in the history of America. That city is up and running and has been since they decided to hold Mardi Gras in the immediate aftermath of the storm. The priority should have been rebuilding the place, but it wanted to show America it was still partytime in the Big Easy. Those people refuse to help themselves, refuse to clean up their homes and neighborhoods, refuse to take responsibility for anything other than to point fingers at the Federal government and blame anyone but themselves and their corrupt city and state officials. Ray Nagin is a laughingstock and a JOKE and those idiots in New Orleans put him right back in charge. The millions of taxpayer dollars have been flowing but somehow get diverted, misused, and misspent by all of the bloodsucking thieves who claim to be prideful New Oleanians. Not one peep comes from Mississippi or the Midwest where devastating storms(including Katrina)ruined lives and caused similar damage, but on a much smaller scale. Those people CLEANED THEIR OWN **** UP!!!!!! This article makes me sick. How dare anyone in this country try to blame anybody but the citizens and their leaders for the mess that is New Orleans FOUR FREAKING YEARS LATER!!! Get your ***** out in the streets and clean the freaking place up. Quit blaming George Bush and others for a natural disaster that hit 48 months ago and get some pride!! Think of all of the wonderful and incredible things that have happened in this world over the last four years and then think about the same tired voices in New Orleans singing the same tired song day after day after day. It's downright pathetic.
Reply to this comment
by TomMariner August 30, 2009 7:01 PM EDT
Venice is a city underwater. It became so powerful hundreds of years ago that we study it as a "City / State" -- the center of commerce, art, politics. It is now one of the world's great tourist destination.

Instead of fighting the sea by spending trillions of dollars trying to rebuild ***** that keep out the sea, use the $1,000,000 per family we have spent so far to construct peninsulas where everyone has a million dollar waterfront property rather than a basic dwelling.

But I am guessing that if politicians did not have New Orleans to either yell at the other guys or show up to demonstrate how caring they are, they would have to invent it.

But whatever we do, put it back -- it is a unique part of Americana that is valuable enough to restore.
Reply to this comment
by TomMariner August 30, 2009 7:07 PM EDT
Interesting automatic edit to my comment -- the "*****" after "rebuild" is a word that is a synonym for a Levee and are a name used in Holland for their sea walls, as in "finger in the ....". Evidently it also has meaning as a derogatory meaning for a woman who is involved with another woman.

Hadn't really made the connection, but wow, are we in the middle of computerized political correctness or what?
by MPHgrad August 31, 2009 7:47 AM EDT
I agree with you. The political correctness and over zealous effort to not offend are ridiculous.
by Grand_Master_G August 30, 2009 5:03 PM EDT
The analysis is trite and superficial: As soon as the electorate votes out the current mayor, we could really make progress.

Try this analysis: A new President was elected so the bureaucratic grid-lock of the past 4 years, since the disaster in 2001, can now be replaced with competency.
Reply to this comment
by Grand_Master_G August 30, 2009 5:00 PM EDT
The analysis is trite and superficial: As soon as the electorate votes out the current mayor, we could really make progress.

Try this analysis: A new President was elected so the bureaucratic grid-lock of the past 4 years, since the disaster in 2001, can now be replaced with competency.
Reply to this comment
by lcr999 August 30, 2009 3:14 PM EDT
There are plenty of other cities that are less corrupt and more efficient. And that aren't a pending natural disaster. New Orleans was a disaster before Katrina. Spend the money elsewhere.

I am a member of several professional societies who have scheduled their annual conferences in New Orleans in recent years. I refuse to participate.
Reply to this comment
by plaasjaapie August 30, 2009 2:18 PM EDT
New Orleans has had a culture of dependency, crime and near poverty that is centuries old. Pandering to it creates just another black hole for public money just like Obama created by buying Chrysler and GM for their bloody unions using tax revenues.
Reply to this comment
See all 20 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook