WASHINGTON, Aug. 27, 2009

CDC Distances Itself from Flu Gloom

Health Officials Say Worst-Case Estimates for H1N1 Infections and Deaths Won't Likely Materialize

  • A hand sanitizer machine is seen at the student recreation center at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth, Texas, on Aug, 25, 2009.

    A hand sanitizer machine is seen at the student recreation center at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth, Texas, on Aug, 25, 2009.  (AP Photo/Mike Fuentes)

  • Photo Essay Swine Flu

    Epidemic's effects are seen around the world

(CBS/ AP)  U.S. government health officials are urging Americans not to panic over estimates that up to 90,000 people might die in the United States from swine flu this year.

"Everything we've seen in the U.S. and everything we've seen around the world suggests we won't see that kind of number if the virus doesn't change," Dr. Thomas Frieden, head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in a C-SPAN interview taped Wednesday.

While the swine flu seems quite easy to catch, it so far has not been more deadly than the flu strains seen every year during the cold months: many people have only mild illness. Also, close genetic tracking of the new virus as it circled the globe during the past five months so far has shown no sign that it is mutating to become more virulent.

Still, the CDC has been preparing for a worst-case flu season as a precaution - in July working from an estimate slightly more grim than one that made headlines this week - to make sure that if the virus should suddenly worsen or vaccination plans should fall through, health authorities would know how to react.

On Monday the White House released a report from a group of presidential advisers that included a scenario where anywhere from 30 per cent to half the 300 million Americans could catch what doctors call the "2009 H1N1" flu; the extrapolation said death possibilities ranged from 30,000 to 90,000. In a regular flu season, up to 20 per cent of the population is infected and 36,000 die.

"We don't think that's the most likely scenario," CDC flu specialist Dr. Anne Schuchat said of the presidential advisers' high-end tally.

What's really expected this year? CDC will not speculate, finding a numbers game pointless as it tries to balance getting a largely complacent public to listen to its flu instructions without exaggerating the threat.

Along with how the virus itself continues to act, the ultimate toll depends on such things as vaccinations beginning as planned - currently set for mid-October - and whether the people who need them most get them.

CBS News medical correspondent Dr. Jennifer Ashton reports that the Obama administration is pushing health officials to see if the immunization program can be accelerated.

Under the current plans, people who get their first shots in mid-October wouldn't actually be fully immunized until around Thanksgiving, after booster shots, reports Ashton. She calls the government's goal of immunizing some 195 million Americans by the end of the year, considering manufacturers' capacity to produce the drugs, "definitely ambitious".

CDC also is working to help hospitals keep the not-so-sick from crowding emergency rooms and to properly target anti-flu drugs to the most vulnerable.

What is likely: A busy flu season that starts earlier than usual, Schuchat told The Associated Press. This new H1N1 strain never went away during the summer, infecting children at camps during midyear schools in particular. Already clusters of illnesses are being reported at some schools and colleges around the country.

© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by erasmus111 August 28, 2009 1:53 PM EDT
by toldyouso29 August 28, 2009 5:47 AM EDT
....and some will just spout...


Now that would be you. Doesn't matter if anyone is reading it, you just feel the need to spew it. Always know one thing when I see your name. There will be a dozen or more long winded posts right behind it.



"--the idea of no one reading my post is not even a blip."


Hahahaha! Yeah, I can see your mouth moving non-stop. No ones listening but it just keeps on flappin'. What? Do people at home get tired of listening to you, so you have to come on here and let it all out?


"...and try to find a boyfriend and complain about the USA-"


Now how would I get a boyfriend on CBS? I don't need a boyfriend.

And as for complaining about the USA, you guys do enough complaining, whining.....all on your own.
Reply to this comment
by HGOODGUY August 28, 2009 10:25 AM EDT
Up to 90,000 people are supposed to die. As of now nobody has.
You people are just not trying!!!
Reply to this comment
by Resin-Smoker August 27, 2009 8:41 PM EDT
We could do with a good epidemic... Too many people around as it is.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 August 27, 2009 8:35 PM EDT
by toldyouso29 August 27, 2009 3:05 PM EDT

And you should know this: a flu vaccine is not a guarantee that the flu will not be caught. It is NOT a specific virus per se. It is a cocktail made up of a gamble of what the coming flu might contain. The fact is, you could get this shot and still get the swine flu....



Blah, blah, blah. And you are telling me this WHY? I do already know this.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 August 27, 2009 8:45 PM EDT
toldyouso29

You are wasting your time going into your long winded, neverending crap, because most people don't read it. Plus a lot of people won't even comprehend what you are saying. A lot don't WANT to comprehend what you are saying.
by toldyouso29 August 28, 2009 5:47 AM EDT
Catch a clue, little Canadian interloper--we write because we can--no blog ever promised us a readership--some will read and learn and some will just spout and try to find a boyfriend and complain about the USA--the latter would be of your ilk--so be it--all of it is irrelevant to the postings and on my care-o-meter--the idea of no one reading my post is not even a blip. LOL
by erasmus111 August 27, 2009 8:27 PM EDT
by AmericaDotCom August 27, 2009 7:22 PM EDT
We're not like Canadians, we DO know how to wash.


Yeah? Then how come you've got so many more people getting the flu?
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso29 August 27, 2009 3:44 PM EDT
So , if you can understand why we vaccinate (to introduce diseases in a weak or killed state to give the body a heads up) then you can understand these facts:

1. Vaccines do not prevent a disease from infecting a body. You may be exposed anyway. It just prevents (hopefully) the disease from being able to take hold and make you appreciably sick. When it enters, it is immediately recognized and destroyed --often without the person ever knowing they were really ill. That is the good side of vaccines

2. We are all being hypersensitized and more prone to allergies now than any other time in history with asthma and other autoimmune diseases up by over 200% since 1980. What does this mean? It means it is easier for a lot of us to have an overreaction in our body.

3. Most people do not realize that to die due to a disease may mean the body did not react fast enough (because it failed to recognize a disease as threatening ) OR the body killed itself by attacking itself.

4. When a person is filled with fluid (edema) in their cells and lungs there is a huge chance that this is evidence of an allergic reaction. You can literally drown in your own fluids. Mucous is nothing more than the debris from the fire fight between your body and something else. Sometimes it just might be between your body and your body. (Macrophages are a kind of killer protection cell we have that eats other cells or bacteria or viruses) Macrophages also eat the dead or dying macrophages too.

Yep. It's a war out there or rather, in your body--just be careful in buying into a certain strategy, you understand the terrain, the limits and the dangers of the strategies and for God's sake--stop giving all of your power, trust or livelihood to others who you think know more than you do--get informed, every year Doctors and hospitals and others put their patients in harm's way--in the most severe and fatal cases, the patient trusted the doctor and did not bother to ever question or challenge what was going on around them. Everybody tries to make their profession more exalted and harder than it is--everyone should understand the general ideas of why vaccines work, why antibiotics work (or don't) what allergies are and what medicines can do and cannot do inside all of that.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso29 August 27, 2009 3:21 PM EDT
THINGS PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE 'FLU.

1. there are thousands of viruses that cause influenza and they mutate daily

2. EAch year, epidemiologists and virologists track the flu and decide what vaccines will be made based on the liklihood of a certain group attacking the most. They usually choose 3 kinds to go into a 'flu cocktail.

3. The 'flu usually kills those with compromised immunities, like the very young, the very old and those with poor immunity.

4. compromised immunity, means for some reason (usually illness like HIV or autoimmune diseases) your body cannot marshall up the normal defenses to the level that can protect you.

5. autoimmune disease means your body is marshalling up the normal defenses mistakenly and is actually attacking and trying to destroy itself.

6. If you are "allergic" to something-it could kill you if the autoimmune response is great enough (asthma and arthritis, fibromyalgia, severe peanut, shellfish, mushroom allergies are all allergic response maladies)

7. You don't show an allergic reaction the FIRST time you come in contact with a substance or disease. You get an allergic reaction --either the next time you come in contact or after you reach a saturation point--

8. The first time you come in contact with a substance either naturally (food products, pollen, disease) your body catalogs the 'markers' on a molecule of the foreign substance and tells your immune control center "the next time something that has a marker like this come in--attack it" This is why you don't get an allergic response the first time. The first time, the body is trying to find out if a substance is bad or good and how huge a response to make to fight it the next time it shows up--so it just waits--if the substance starts harming the body, then the body catalogs the antigens or markers and remembers it for the next time.

9 In the case of diseases, esp ones that make you really sick, the body launches a huge attack right away to fight the disease or what it thinks is a disease. It releases all kinds of cellular killers and chemicals that are supposed to overwhelm the enemy.


10. If the body is right and it is an enemy, then it attacks and kills immediately. When diseases kill a person, it is usually because the body is too weak to fight back, does not recognize the disease or accidentally attacks the wrong thing.

Vaccines work by introducing a foreign substance into the body in a weakened state or a killed state. The body reacts by cataloging the marker--then when the real disease comes, it is ready to attack right away and not wait.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso29 August 27, 2009 3:30 PM EDT
So vaccines basically are used to give a healthy body a 'heads up" so that it does not wait too long to attack a new disease. When viruses kill it is because the body either waited too long to mount a defence or did not realize that the substance was bad or was too weak to mount a defense and did not have enough of an army to do so. BUT...

and this is very important for those who rush to vaccinate to know--there is a down side. (I worked for companies who made vaccines) IF for some reason, a disease changes, the body will not recognize the new marker and it will wait and react just like it usually does when it does not have a catalog for that disease.

The other problem is--if for some reason the body overreacts. IN that case, when the disease comes, the body releases its army but the body goes hog wild attacking itself, or eating up its own cells --sort of like a berserker. IF this happens then the body can be killed not by the disease but by the macrophages and other necrotizing cells that are supposed to be the body's defenses. Many Scientists believe that in the 1918 flu, the flu somehow activated a hyper response and when it returned, instead of simply fighting the virus, the body began to attack its own lung tissue, bronchioles, etc and people literally drowned in the mucous and debris from their own cells being lysed (killed) if this is the case--then the vaccine would be the wrong thing to do. This would explain the true horror of the 1918 flu--it did not kill the old or the very young. The major group to die were the healthy 15 to 30 year olds. These people might have gotten the flu in the spring (a milder version came out in the spring of 1918) then when it came out again, all these young people got hit with their own bodies freaking out and killing them. Science does not know if this happened because no corpse would have retained the evidence of a hyperimmune response. But if it did, then giving the vaccine would hypersensitize you and leave people a sitting duck for when it struck again.

The idea is, that those who got the more virulent strain for the first time in 1918 survived, and those who were exposed in the spring then again in the fall died--NOT because the flu was more virulent, but because it released some chemical that confused the antibody response.
by toldyouso29 August 27, 2009 2:58 PM EDT
The CDC must be trying to hype stuff for more funding. They should distance themselves from Sebelius's remarks that keeping kids out of school will not stop the spread of the flu--it would slow it most certainly--they should tell the truth and just admit that the economic slow down due to parents staying home instead of going to work due to no day care is what they are really concerned about--not the kids. Quarantine eventually isolates diseases. In every major epidemic it is eventually implemented with success.

The CDC should just shut up--90K dying of the flu is no different than the 130K or so who die of the flu every year--now is not the time for a new kind of yellow terrorism alert score in the form of virus alerts. We are not falling for it.
Reply to this comment
by MorganBarber44 August 27, 2009 1:25 PM EDT
May this flu will pick up where it left off in 1918. All part of nature. Humanity gets too destructive, the Earth needs to heal itself with a thorough cleansing.
Reply to this comment
by HGOODGUY August 28, 2009 10:22 AM EDT
How about it takes your family first???
by erasmus111 August 27, 2009 1:00 PM EDT
by TheMasses2002 August 27, 2009 12:23 PM EDT
I will just keep my hands away from my piehole, nose and ears and wash regularly.


Uh-huh, I'll bet. If everyone would do that little thing, that would be great. It would be a lot better to not have to get that vaccine, but people just do not wash their hands.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 August 27, 2009 12:52 PM EDT
by catlmi1 August 27, 2009 7:58 AM EDT
I received the vaccine for Swine flu in the seventies and remember well the panic and dire warnings from government, media, and health agencies. What happened then ? Not a frikkin' thing. Someday, someone in the media and these other agencies will realize that they've cried 'wolf' once too often. This is just the 'crisis de jour'.


Well you didn't get a vaccine for this particular swine flu, because it hasn't been seen before. That's what the worry is, because no one would have ANY ammunities for it.

And I wonder who would be whining if they didn't warn people it could get worse and it did? YOU, I bet.

The way I see it, the CDC can't win, can they? If they warn people of what might happen, people get upset. If they don't warn people, they will be REALLY upset. I think that I would rather be warned so that at least I'm prepared incase things do get bad. If they don't then that will be great, but at least I would be prepared for the worst case scenario.

Personally, I would be more worried about them NOT warning me, considering they let that fool with TB fly out of the country to contaminate everyone else and didn't say anything.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso29 August 27, 2009 3:05 PM EDT
The word is immunities not ammunities. And you should know this: a flu vaccine is not a guarantee that the flu will not be caught. It is NOT a specific virus per se. It is a cocktail made up of a gamble of what the coming flu might contain. The fact is, you could get this shot and still get the swine flu. there are HUNDREDS of different influenza strains for pigs, humans and birds. Every year a gamble is made of which viruses to combine in a vaccine. The problem with this is not only that it has never been seen before, but that the combo we see may not be the only one. YOu could get this shot and still be in trouble or be in MORE trouble. The reason is once exposed to this vaccine, your body may become hypersensitized which means if exposed after the vaccine, you have a hyperallergic reaction. In the 1918 flu, people would have a sniffle and a bit of a sore throat and 45 minutes later, they would be dead, their lungs chock full of mucous and fluid. Many scientist think this was actually not caused by the flu but by a second hit of the flu and an autoimmune response. IN other words, the people had the milder version of the flu in the spring and when their body got the second version in the fall, it recognized it but overreacted to the point that it went into anaphylactic shock.

What does all of this scientific mumbo jumbo mean to the lay person? it means that getting the vaccine could be a death sentence--if it is like the 1918 flu--the first exposure (either the illness or the vaccine) would hypersensitize your body. The next exposure would invade and your body would overreact possibly killing you in a matter of minutes. The sad news would be that everyone that got the vaccine did so because they had no idea of what virology is, how viruses mutate and work and why in the case of a virus that jumps species, it may be better to weather the storm by getting the disease than a vaccine which could make it worse.
by andylance1 August 27, 2009 12:31 PM EDT
OMG - it looks like someone at the White House forgot to order the CDC to spread fear and panic. Heads will roll. The administration is in a position where they feel they have to justify the billions of dollars they spent on the swine flu vaccine.

In all likelihood we have much more reason to fear the vaccine than the flu. The worst case scenarios are flooding the media giving Drudge an excuse to run extra big banner headlines. It seems like the White House has hired a bunch of out-of-work Hollywood screen writers to prepare us for the next Apocalypto.
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses2002 August 27, 2009 12:23 PM EDT
I won't get the vaccination.
W H O knows what's in it?
I will just keep my hands away from my piehole, nose and ears and wash regularly.

And no cougars for me ms_spam!
Reply to this comment
by hologram5 August 27, 2009 11:32 AM EDT
Take a look for yourselves, they don't have a clue and cannot answer a straight question for anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0px7ImJC9mM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Einfowars%2Ecom%2Fwearechange%2Dconfronts%2Dthe%2Dcdc%2Dover%2Dvaccines%2Dvoluntary%2Dof%2Dmandatory%2F&feature=player_embedded
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage August 27, 2009 10:46 AM EDT
The World Health Organization of the U.N. is the one that have been working night and day fear-mongering to promote this illness this Fall!

National organizations have just been 'going along' with this mindlessness and not saying anything that would contradict the alarmist statements from W.H.O.!

So, why are they playing it down, now?! They've 'hedging their bets'!

One of two things is going to happen, either it won't materialize into a deadly pandemic AS they've been claiming---in which case, they'll look like incompetent, criminal FOOLS, OR, this vaccine is going to harm and kill a lot of people (and they KNOW it!)---in which case, they want to be able to claim it's a total surprise to them (even though, it's not!)

In the latter case, NO LAW RELEASING MEDICAL PERSONNEL FROM PERSONAL LIABILITY, is going to protect those doctors, nurses, aids, or helpers
who administer this 'vaccine' if it DOES HARM!

I find this law to be totally ALARMING! If the vaccine is safe, it shouldn't be needed! It would only be needed if it WEREN'T safe!

I hope this is NOT the case!
Reply to this comment
See all 20 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: