August 25, 2009 9:15 PM

What the Growing Deficit Really Means

By
Anthony Mason
(CBS)  Here's the bottom line on America's ballooning budget deficit:

"It means you're ultimately going to be paying higher taxes," said Chief Economist with MKM Partners Michael Darda.

The total national debt, according to one study, amounts to $184,000 for every man, woman and child in the country. It's like a massive mortgage we're all paying interest on, reports CBS News correspondent Anthony Mason.

The U.S. is still a $14 trillion economy. But the nation's debt is now more than 50 percent of the country's economic output - the first time that's happened since World War II.

"The debt of the United States is growing so rapidly, we are viewed by the rest of the world as profligate, imprudent and incapable of managing our own affairs," said Peter Morici, an economist with the University of Maryland.

The government has been spending borrowed money to fight the recession and to finance wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The deficit is expected to continue to grow $9 trillion over the next decade as we face the swelling cost of entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare.

"We'll either need wrenching, wrenching spending cuts, a boom in the economy or a new funding source or some combination to get this fiscal house back in order," Darda said.

Income tax hikes alone won't be enough, said Darda. We may need a national sales tax.

"We're all going to have to have a stake in this game," Darda said. And we're all going to have to pay a little bit more and probably get a little bit less."

The U.S. Economy needs an injection of borrowed money to help stimulate a recovery. But long term, the rising debt payments on all those loans could land us back in another economic crisis.



CBS News anchor Katie Couric asked Mason more about the economy:


Couric: Lots of economic news today, but let's go back to Ben Bernanke if we could, Anthony. He gets to keep his job, but it sure won't be easy for him, will it.

Mason: Be careful what you wish for. He's had his pedal to the medal trying to get the economy up to speed. When do you take your foot off the accelerator? Too soon it could backslide into another recession, too long and it could overheating - we ignite inflation into other problems so timing is everything.

Couric: Let's end on a positive note. How encouraged should we be by this rise in housing prices?

Mason: These are promising numbers. Eighteen of 20 metro areas showed home prices up for the second straight month. Las Vegas and Detroit - they're still struggling severely. But Dallas and Denver showed price gains for the fourth straight month now. Overall, the numbers remain weak but the hope here is that these are the first signs of a return. Remember, house prices were critical in this whole recession they'll be critical to a recovery.

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 102 Comments
by devilfly1 August 26, 2009 9:04 PM EDT
The Key to Economy is to use the term (ABE) Attitude Before Economy based on a penny, which Abraham Lincoln's appearance on it.

Skip the dogmatic and intelligence conversation. It does not go anywhere.

We are burying ourselves with a crap deficit anyway.

Too much drama Shakespeare, which it needs to trigger out.
Reply to this comment
by widollar August 26, 2009 10:36 AM EDT
Big egos of the political leaders and big wars started and maintained by them equalls "big out of control debts" for the citizens of that country, and a much lower standard of living for the middle class.
Reply to this comment
by babooph August 26, 2009 8:06 AM EDT
Sure hope the rich do not have to pay -all the jobs they supply as maids,poolboys & lawn cutters,are the only future the old middle class may have for their kids.The only time the rich did so well in the past was prior to the deepression [25% unemployment then-hope they let us do better now].
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 August 26, 2009 8:43 AM EDT
If you don't have a job, look around. There are plenty to be found. Sure they don't pay 20 bucks an hour, but they do pay. If you are too important to work for minimum wage, you are too important for others to help you.

Everyone that takes a minimum wage job then has money. This money goes into the economy, thus producing more jobs (higher paying ones). You don't do anyone a favor (including yourself) by taking in unemployment while sitting on the computer blogging and complaining. Get out and support yourself, thus doing your part for the economy.
by babooph August 26, 2009 1:57 AM EDT
Notice both parties QUICKLY vote for massive debt for two stupid losing wars -WITH NO END!!!!BUT BOTH parties unite to stop spending for health care !!!!The phoney propaganda system lets them get away with "govt cannot handle healthcare"--THE US MILITARY IS NOT A PRIVATE COMPANY & IS RUN BY THE GOVT__DUUUHHH.Lets give the military to the banks then?
Reply to this comment
by johnhouse August 26, 2009 1:37 AM EDT
I am hopeful for people like Dr. Bernacke and Mr. Geithner. Recent market growth seemed more like cycles of speculation. When has a personal portfolio actually increased in value.

If we can put money in businesses that are growing by giving customers what they want, leave it there and in five years have greater value, we have hope. The savings, taxation and growth in income will come.

Prior to the Bush Bust, we saw banks growing by charging outrageous fees to captive consumers, products of deteriorating quality, and so called cost cutting that had more in common with cannibalization than business organization. If the current administration can make incentives for productivity instead of the Republican era speculation and manipulation.

We need to earn money by doing what is worth doing and by using what we make to pay for what we need. Short term, we have to borrow, long term, we must earn.
Reply to this comment
by robham777 August 25, 2009 10:20 PM EDT
by Solarrays247 August 25, 2009 10:14 PM EDT

Yeah, well we should have thought about this eight years ago when we embarked on an illegal war in Iraq for oil!

Why don't we just use some of that oil money to get out of this predicament.
Reply to this comment
by Solarrays247 August 25, 2009 10:14 PM EDT
"The debt of the United States is growing so rapidly, we are viewed by the rest of the world as profligate,..."


Yeah, well we should have thought about this eight years ago when we embarked on an illegal war in Iraq for oil! It's kinda late for this now, doncha' think?
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 August 26, 2009 12:16 AM EDT
A GOP congress.
by the_Candor August 26, 2009 12:32 AM EDT
"Yes, why did Bill Clinton start that lie about WMD, which Hillary then repeated when she voted for that war?"-cheerup91
what!! that lie came from Bush's torture chamber.
by ubrew12 August 25, 2009 10:09 PM EDT
The national debt has grown 10-fold in the past 30 years and is forecast to double again in the next ten. The burden of paying for that debt will enslave working Americans for generations to come, effectively, forever.

We can all agree on that, at least.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 August 26, 2009 12:26 AM EDT
Import tariffs are far more likely under a DNC administration than a GOP one. After all, GOP are all about the 'invisible hand' and 'free markets', including free international markets. They are the zero tariff group, NOT the DNC. I expect import tariffs to increase, under Obama. Vote in a GOP'er, and they will decrease again. However, understand that moving to import tariffs is an admission that your domestic market is noncompetitive. The GOP'ers are right in the 'steady-state' case, that international markets should, by and large, be free. Let the micronesians make coconut butter, if that is where it is cheapest to make it. Closing your domestic markets to international competiton is only permissible if you REALLY think that gov't intervension in a market will make YOU competitive in the LONG term, OR when your economy is SOOOO fvcked up (like now) that you need a breather from international competition just to get your house in order. NOW is the right time for tariffs. Obama may be unwilling to go for them because the international wealthy basically OWN this U.S. society, including WallStreet and Wash DC, and so its a bit of a difficulty going to a set of policies that will impoverish your greatest benefactors.

I believe that U.S. policy is largely governed by the international wealthy, including the Saudi's and Israeli's. And they have no interest in import tariffs, under ANY administration, GOP or DNC.
by the_majesty August 25, 2009 10:04 PM EDT
If ubrew12 is against a national sales tax.
It must be the best way to go.
Reply to this comment
by robham777 August 25, 2009 10:00 PM EDT
by ubrew12 August 25, 2009 9:30 PM EDT

a house-of-cards economy that TANKED just as Obama was taking office

So really since it was not his fault he should feel free to take the country further down the path to destruction.
Reply to this comment
See all 102 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook