August 23, 2009 12:03 PM

Social Security Checks Shrink for Millions

By
CBSNews
Blank US Social Security checks over social card

Blank US Social Security checks over social card (AP / CBS)

(AP)  Millions of older people will face shrinking Social Security checks next year, the first time in a generation that payments would not rise.

The trustees who oversee Social Security are projecting there won't be a cost of living adjustment (COLA) for the next two years. That hasn't happened since automatic increases were adopted in 1975.

By law, Social Security benefits cannot go down. Nevertheless, monthly payments would drop for millions of people in the Medicare prescription drug program because the premiums, which often are deducted from Social Security payments, are scheduled to go up slightly.

"I will promise you, they count on that COLA," said Barbara Kennelly, a former Democratic congresswoman from Connecticut who now heads the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "To some people, it might not be a big deal. But to seniors, especially with their health care costs, it is a big deal."

Cost of living adjustments are pegged to inflation, which has been negative this year, largely because energy prices are below 2008 levels.

Advocates say older people still face higher prices because they spend a disproportionate amount of their income on health care, where costs rise faster than inflation. Many also have suffered from declining home values and shrinking stock portfolios just as they are relying on those assets for income.

"For many elderly, they don't feel that inflation is low because their expenses are still going up," said David Certner, legislative policy director for AARP. "Anyone who has savings and investments has seen some serious losses."

About 50 million retired and disabled Americans receive Social Security benefits. The average monthly benefit for retirees is $1,153 this year. All beneficiaries received a 5.8 percent increase in January, the largest since 1982.

More than 32 million people are in the Medicare prescription drug program. Average monthly premiums are set to go from $28 this year to $30 next year, though they vary by plan. About 6 million people in the program have premiums deducted from their monthly Social Security payments, according to the Social Security Administration.

Millions of people with Medicare Part B coverage for doctors' visits also have their premiums deducted from Social Security payments. Part B premiums are expected to rise as well. But under the law, the increase cannot be larger than the increase in Social Security benefits for most recipients.

There is no such hold-harmless provision for drug premiums.

Kennelly's group wants Congress to increase Social Security benefits next year, even though the formula doesn't call for it. She would like to see either a 1 percent increase in monthly payments or a one-time payment of $150.

The cost of a one-time payment, a little less than $8 billion, could be covered by increasing the amount of income subjected to Social Security taxes, Kennelly said. Workers only pay Social Security taxes on the first $106,800 of income, a limit that rises each year with the average national wage.

But the limit only increases if monthly benefits increase.

Critics argue that Social Security recipients shouldn't get an increase when inflation is negative. They note that recipients got a big increase in January - after energy prices had started to fall. They also note that Social Security recipients received one-time $250 payments in the spring as part of the government's economic stimulus package.

"Seniors may perceive that they are being hurt because there is no COLA, but they are in fact not getting hurt," said Andrew G. Biggs, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank. "Congress has to be able to tell people they are not getting everything they want."

Social Security is also facing long-term financial problems. The retirement program is projected to start paying out more money than it receives in 2016. Without changes, the retirement fund will be depleted in 2037, according to the Social Security trustees' annual report this year.

President Barack Obama has said he would like tackle Social Security next year, after Congress finishes work on health care, climate change and new financial regulations.

Lawmakers are preoccupied by health care, making it difficult to address other tough issues. Advocates for older people hope their efforts will get a boost in October, when the Social Security Administration officially announces that there will not be an increase in benefits next year.

"I think a lot of seniors do not know what's coming down the pike, and I believe that when they hear that, they're going to be upset," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont who is working on a proposal for one-time payments for Social Security recipients.

"It is my view that seniors are going to need help this year, and it would not be acceptable for Congress to simply turn its back," he said.

AP
Add a Comment See all 306 Comments
by cookie1201200 October 14, 2009 12:47 AM EDT
I was amazed when I read that Congress claimed prices would be low enough that sr citizens would not need a cost of living increase. If that is the case they must not believe what they are telling the people since they gave themselves hefty cost of living increases. I work in a grocery store and I see the elderly pinch pennies on the food they buy. I would love to see our congress men and women try one month living on a srs social security check, pay rent or house payments and pay utilites and buy food. For those on medication, it is worse. Someone said they should have planned for their retirements, well to the person who said that, not everyone can get a high enough paying job to be able to save that way. If they could more power to them. When our government officials decide they need a pay raise I feel since it is our money paying them, we should have a right to vote on wheather they get it or not. I voted for the President because I thought he was going to make it better for the poor not worse. Guess I was wrong .
Reply to this comment
by bubazoo August 26, 2009 11:39 AM EDT
The price of energy has gone down, yes,
the price of GAS has gone UP!
so we need the rise in SS to keep up with the ever
rising cost of gas.

I'm talking about GAS to heat our homes,
alot of us still have gas furnaces, stoves, etc.

Besides, Even for those of us who are blind, and cannot drive a car,
we still have to pay for rising public transportation costs. THe people who drive us around, still have to charge us more for the ever rising prices.

...and then Obama wants National healthcare?
so essentially he's saying, he wants everyone to be on Medicare?
so that means..he wants everyone to have a Medicare part D cap of $3,000 a year, or just let us die off if a committee tells us we are going to the doctor too much.
Reply to this comment
by bantamei August 26, 2009 11:07 AM EDT
Blaming it on Obama is juts plain stupid. Nobody to blame but republIEcans who tried and almost suceeded in dismantling the economy.
Reply to this comment
by mrjustice1 August 26, 2009 3:02 AM EDT
MAJOR MISLEADING U.S. GOVT FACTS

THE TRUE, UNDERLYING INFLATION RATE HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER
THAN THE RATE THAT HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY REPORTED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT

Just as the Fed covers up and hides the constantly-escalating money supply increase(by now, for about two years) as the result of its massively printing counterfeit-with-no-backing, or worthless $US fiat currency...

... Washington's inner circle of politicians, the Federal Reserve, other high-up elites, as well as the administration, also continue to cover up and hide
the REAL UNDERLYING INFLATION RATE,
which for many years is or has been, some thirty-five to seventy-five percent higher than the 'officially' reported COLA(cost of living allowance) rise ...

SENIORS: REVOLT, AND PARALYZE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT'S ABILITY TO FUNCTION!

SHUT WASHINGTON DOWN.
SHUT REGIONAL U.S. FEDERAL OFFICES DOWN.
SHUT IT DOWN!

Drink extra prune juice so we can give our lying government leaders and politicians back plenty of what they deserve - a river of the same that they have given us for decades!
Reply to this comment
by trueblueusa August 25, 2009 11:38 PM EDT
Just remember,..A Few Short Years ago,..
Shrub Tried VERY Hard to Invest 50 % of the Social Security Fund , in the Stock Market,(before it collapsed !'
How Quickly People Forget !!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by swin5 August 25, 2009 10:50 PM EDT
The government got it right this time. Excluding the cost of health care, transportation, natural gas and heating oil, food, rent, housing, and clothing, the cost of living did go down.
Reply to this comment
by gusthedog August 25, 2009 9:52 PM EDT
I have only read about the 500 and some that run this country as elected officials. They have done NOTHING for us with Social Security, but use it, and lose it!! Who cares which party is at fault!! We don't have to listen to excuses, but it is about time that we as a nation of Americans get to the task of getting rid of the excuses, blame and bull crap! I didn't work my whole life to listen to this stupid story. Thank you, to my honest working elected (few). What a bunch of rotten apples we have to live with in this world.
Reply to this comment
by caliguy55 August 25, 2009 6:02 PM EDT
President Barack Obama cannot bankrupt the country because it was already bankrupt before he took office. George "Moron" Bush more than doubled the federal debt from $4.5 Trillion to $10 Trillion to pay for his tax cuts for the wealthy and his "war of choice" in Iraq. It's hard to imagine how much better our country would be today, if Bush had been aborted.
Reply to this comment
by lastranger-2009 August 25, 2009 5:27 PM EDT
Let?s see.
These guys have bankrupted social security.
Bankrupted Medicare.
And now they want to run the socialized medical program.
Not!
Reply to this comment
by TNisgoodenoughforme August 25, 2009 4:05 PM EDT
I have no problem admiting I just don't get it....I was born in 1969, I will never see all the money they take out over each check for SS. Why are they still taking it out? If I'm never going to see it then why??
Reply to this comment
See all 306 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook