August 4, 2009 7:08 AM

Federal Tax Revenue Plummeting

(CBS/AP)  The recession is starving the government of tax revenue, just as the president and Congress are piling a major expansion of health care and other programs on the nation's plate and struggling to find money to pay the tab.

The numbers could hardly be more stark: Tax receipts are on pace to drop 18 percent this year, the biggest single-year decline since the Great Depression, while the federal deficit balloons to a record $1.8 trillion.

Other figures in an Associated Press analysis underscore the recession's impact: Individual income tax receipts are down 22 percent from a year ago. Corporate income taxes are down 57 percent. Social Security tax receipts could drop for only the second time since 1940, and Medicare taxes are on pace to drop for only the third time ever.

The last time the government's revenues were this bleak, the year was 1932 in the midst of the Depression.

"Our tax system is already inadequate to support the promises our government has made," said Eugene Steuerle, a former Treasury Department official in the Reagan administration who is now vice president of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation.

"This just adds to the problem."

While much of Washington is focused on how to pay for new programs such as overhauling health care — at a cost of $1 trillion over the next decade — existing programs are feeling the pinch, too.

Social Security is in danger of running out of money earlier than the government projected just a few month ago. Highway, mass transit and airport projects are at risk because fuel and industry taxes are declining.

The national debt already exceeds $11 trillion. And bills just completed by the House would boost domestic agencies' spending by 11 percent in 2010 and military spending by 4 percent.

CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller reports that the nation's debt has grown by $1 trillion dollars since President Obama took office.

Meanwhile, two of President Obama's economic heavyweights passively acknowledged over the weekend that middle-class taxes might have to go up to pare budget deficits or pay for the proposed overhaul of the nation's health care system.

The comments created a furor on political blogs and news channels, as the President promised repeated during his campaign that he would never raise taxes on America's middle class. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs tried Monday to lay the issue to rest, CBS News White House correspondent Chip Reid.

Facing a barrage of questions at the daily briefing, Gibbs said the president "has made a very clear commitment to not raise taxes on the middle class."

For this report, the AP analyzed annual tax receipts dating back to the inception of the federal income tax in 1913. Tax receipts for the 2009 budget year were available through June. They were compared to the same period last year. The budget year runs from October to September, meaning there will be three more months of receipts this year.

Is there a way out of the financial mess?

A key factor is the economy's health. The future of current programs — not to mention the new ones Obama is proposing — will depend largely on how fast the economy recovers from the recession, said William Gale, co-director of the Tax Policy Center.

"The numbers for 2009 are striking, head-snapping. But what really matters is what happens next," said Gale, who previously taught economics at UCLA and was an adviser to President George H. W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisers.

"If it's just one year, then it's a remarkable thing, but it's totally manageable. If the economy doesn't recover soon, it doesn't matter what your social, economic and political agenda is. There's not going to be any revenue to pay for it."

A small part of the drop in tax receipts can be attributed to new tax credits for individuals and corporations enacted in February as part of the $787 billion economic stimulus package. The sheer magnitude of the tax decline, however, points to the deep recession that is reducing incomes, wiping out corporate profits and straining government programs.

Social Security tax receipts are down less than a percentage point from last year, but in May the government had been projecting a slight increase. At the time, the government's best estimate was that Social Security would start to pay out more money than it receives in taxes in 2016, and that the fund would be depleted in 2037 unless changes are enacted.

Some experts think the sour economy has made those numbers outdated.

"You could easily move that number up three or four years, then you're talking about 2013, and that's not very far off," said Kent Smetters, associate professor of insurance and risk management at the University of Pennsylvania.

The government's projections included best- and worst-case scenarios. Under the worst, Social Security would start to pay out more money than it received in taxes in 2013, and the fund would be depleted in 2029.

The fund's trustees are still confident the solvency dates are within the range of the worst-case scenario, said Jason Fichtner, the Social Security Administration's acting deputy commissioner.

"We're not outside our boundaries yet," Fichtner said. "As the recovery comes, we'll see how that plays out."

The recession's toll on Social Security makes it even more urgent for Congress to address the fund's long-term solvency, said Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wis., chairman of the Senate Aging Committee.

"Over the past year, millions of older Americans have watched their retirement savings crumble, making the guaranteed income of Social Security more important than ever," Kohl said.

President Barack Obama has said he wants to tackle Social Security next year, after he clears an already crowded agenda that includes overhauling health care, addressing climate change and imposing new regulations on financial companies.

Medicare tax receipts are also down less than a percentage point for the year, pretty close to government projections. Medicare started paying out more money than it received last year.

Meanwhile, the recession is taking a toll on fuel and industry excise taxes that pay for highway, mass transit and airport projects. Fuel taxes that support road construction and mass transit projects are on pace to fall for the second straight year. Receipts from taxes on jet fuel and airline tickets are also dropping, meaning Congress will have to borrow more money to fund airport projects and the Federal Aviation Administration.

Last week, Congress voted to spend $7 billion to replenish the highway fund, which would otherwise run out of money in August. Congress spent $8 billion to replenish the fund last year.

Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees fuel taxes, is working on a package to make the fund more self-sufficient. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which doesn't back many tax increases, supports increasing the federal gasoline tax, currently 18.4 cents per gallon.

Neal said he hasn't endorsed a specific plan. But, he added, "You can't keep going back to the general fund."

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 47 Comments
by marie12914 August 4, 2009 6:17 PM EDT
Why not tax the hell out of these comp.'s that took jobs out of our country? That would give something back!Obama is not something great,but I blame alot of this crap on bush and the Dems should share some of the blame as they could have taken their balls out of bush pocket book and done something other than set back and let him flush us down the toilet!
Reply to this comment
by rhs648 August 4, 2009 6:24 PM EDT
Some of us would rather tax the hell out of people like you. Lets hope you are middle class so there is some income to tax. We can't do it to the poor but we can do it to the middle class. Before you go screaming about republicans, it will be democrats that will be raising your taxes. Or are you simply some jealous poor person who finds it easier to be a parasite on the wealthy and the middle class rather than getting the education and skills for a good job.
by mary-miami August 4, 2009 11:02 AM EDT
Increase taxes to the wealthy. Anyone making $200,000. dollars a year is rich. Middle class is $50,000. down to 25,000. In today's world there are thousands of people who make no more than $20,000. and consider themselves lucky when they see the other half of the population unemployed. It is absurd that the rich have all this money and then criticize others for not "living within their means", when they themselves are the one's spending cash extravagantly. Example: spending $100 for shoes? You could buy a pair of shoes for $50 or even $30. Everything for them is "image". Tax the wealthy.
Reply to this comment
by rhs648 August 4, 2009 3:29 PM EDT
Jealous! Insead of being jealous of the wealthy, go out and create your own wealth. Do what it takes. Get an education, get the right kind of skills, become motivated, save and invest, take risks, give the world something they want, work the necessary 80 hours per week, and take the necessary risks. Let the wealthy have their money. It is not yours.
by culturechang August 4, 2009 10:46 AM EDT
Well, they better go raid some massage parlors and wire tap some escort service phones and generate some more criminals that can run up the cost of govt. That makes sense in govt terms right?
Reply to this comment
by Anti-Zionist_115 August 4, 2009 10:32 AM EDT
by mjvwsr August 4, 2009 9:29 AM EDT
"The recession is starving the government of tax revenue,..."

too bad we can't starve it a little quicker.
-------------------------------------------

AMEN
Reply to this comment
by kevboom August 4, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
We could legalize, regulate, and tax the hell out of marijuana, prostitution, and gambling nationwide. We already allow unregulated private sales of assault weapons in the U.S. I think we'll survive a little pot, sex, and bingo. Just sayin'.
Reply to this comment
by culturechang August 4, 2009 10:46 AM EDT
Gambling is already legal and taxed.

Sex is already out there, but the federal govt is engaged in a War on Sex....and you are paying for it.
by slownewsday_5 August 4, 2009 10:15 AM EDT
AntiSocialist -

Do you think your copy-and-pasted message is that much more important than everyone else's that it warrants saying twenty times in a row? Grow up.
Reply to this comment
by debinok1 August 4, 2009 9:46 AM EDT
Let me see if I am getting this straight.

The Federal Government is taking in less money than they are spending. Nothing new really, thats how we end up with a "deficit".

Yet they still "find" the money to send to Israel, Africa, and any other country deemed "in need". They still find the money to fund "science" and all the "research".

It would seem the most reasonable course of action would be to stop "finding" money for these causes, and put that money to use here.

But then again when has EITHER PARTY in our government been reasonable, especially where OUR MONEY is concerned.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/are-we-confident-our-government-is-working-for-us
Reply to this comment
by au_fait August 4, 2009 9:45 AM EDT
by Benton09 August 4, 2009 7:23 AM EDT
Nobody was more Mexican and open border friendly than Bush and his regime.

sorry clinton was the one who opened the door with NAFTA. It was proposed created during clintons time and was carryover into the next regime.

Additionally now we are seeing what is being expected; the workers (middle and upper class) must support the lazy (welfare). I am for healthcare for workers at reduced cost, but not people who do work and continue to exist on welfare.
Reply to this comment
by grabandgo August 4, 2009 9:40 AM EDT
To:
notsouthern,

I am from NJ!

I could be from Alabama, we will still be paying over 50% in income tax with nobama and his wild spending.
Reply to this comment
by rhs648 August 4, 2009 8:43 AM EDT
Some of you were warned that taxes would go up but chose to ignore the warnings. When tax revenues go down, the politicians take the path of least resistance and raise taxes. It is too hard to cut programs or curtail entitlements. Expanding health care will require more tax money to be raised. The poor pay little, the wealthy have ways to shelter money from being taxed, and the middle class is the easiest to get taxes from because they receive weekly paychecks and lack the means of avoiding taxes. Expanding health care while reducing benefits and rationing procedures and increasing taxes to pay for it won't be in most people's interest.
Reply to this comment
See all 47 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook