August 3, 2009 2:31 PM

Gitmo Cases Referred to U.S. Prosecutors

(AP)  Dozens of Guantanamo Bay detainee cases have been referred to federal prosecutors for possible criminal trials in the nation's capital, Virginia and New York City, officials told The Associated Press on Monday.

The Justice Department's strategy of holding trials in East Coast cities could be a sharp departure from a Pentagon plan to hold all Guantanamo-related civilian and military trials in the Midwest.

The politically volatile decisions about where and how to try Guantanamo Bay detainees ultimately will rest with President Barack Obama as he tries to meet his self-imposed January deadline for closing the island prison.

Obama administration officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss internal deliberations, said Attorney General Eric Holder met privately last week with the chief federal prosecutor in each of the East Coast areas to discuss the preparations for possible indictments and trials in those districts.

One official said prosecutors and military lawyers are now reviewing the individual cases. The work is aimed at indicting individuals in civilian courts, but final decisions have not been made on the cases and some of the inmates whose cases were referred could still end up before military commissions instead.

Officials said the districts which have been referred Guantanamo cases are: Washington, D.C.; the Eastern District of Virginia, which has a courthouse in Alexandria, Va.; the Southern District of New York, which is based in lower Manhattan in New York City; and the Eastern District of New York, which is based in the New York borough of Brooklyn.

Each district has experience prosecuting high-profile terrorism cases, and each courthouse has high-security facilities for holding particularly dangerous inmates.

Yet the plan to hold terror trials in those cities may run afoul of a separate initiative being considered to build a courtroom-within-a-prison complex in the U.S. heartland.

Several senior U.S. officials said the administration is eyeing a soon-to-be-shuttered state maximum security prison in Michigan and the military penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., as possible locations for a heavily guarded site to hold the suspected 229 al Qaeda, Taliban, and foreign fighters now jailed at Guantanamo.

The president has said some detainees will be tried in civilian courts, some in military commissions, and some will be held without trial because they are simply too dangerous but the evidence against them cannot be aired in any courtroom.

The proposed Midwest facility would operate as a hybrid prison system jointly operated by the Justice Department, the military and the Department of Homeland Security.

This plan, according to three government officials, calls for:

• Moving all the Guantanamo detainees to a single U.S. prison. The Justice Department has identified between 60 and 80 who could be prosecuted, either in military or federal criminal courts. The Pentagon would oversee the detainees who would face trial in military tribunals. The Bureau of Prisons, an arm of the Justice Department, would manage defendants in federal courts.

• Building a court facility within the prison site where military or criminal defendants would be tried. Doing so would create a single venue for almost all the criminal defendants, ending the need to transport them elsewhere in the U.S. for trial.

• Providing long-term holding cells for a small but still undetermined number of detainees who will not face trial because intelligence and counterterror officials conclude they are too dangerous to risk being freed.

• Building immigration detention cells for detainees ordered released by courts but still behind bars because countries are unwilling to take them.

Both the Justice and Pentagon plans face legal and logistical problems.

If a significant number of civilian trials were to be held in the Midwest, the government might have to send in prosecutors and judges experienced in terrorism cases, and lawyers for the detainees could object to the jury pool.

Such a plan would also require an expensive upgrade of the facilities in Kansas or Michigan, and it's unclear if there is enough time for such work under the president's deadline.

But trying them on the East Coast could generate more of the kind of public opposition that led Congress earlier this year to yank funding for bringing such detainees to U.S. soil until the administration produces an acceptable plan for shuttering the Guantanamo facility.

The Obama administration has already transferred one detainee to U.S. courts - Ahmed Ghailani was sent to New York in June to face charges he helped blow up U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998.
By Associated Press Writer Devlin Barrett; AP Writer Lara Jakes contributed to this report

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 12 Comments
by from_the_north August 4, 2009 5:49 AM EDT
This is another absolute mess Bushy got us into - it is time to try these prisoners before a court, find them guilty or not and stop making American tax payers pay for this stupid prison - it costs millions!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by ramos1129 August 3, 2009 5:14 PM EDT
To jsklinemn:
Very interesting. We have now officially given citizenship to these folks even though we pulled them from the battlefield as prisoners who attempted to kill us. They're now citizens entitled to all the perks and possibilities our legal system provides. See the Obamanation is coming to pass. We soon may yet see the desecration of our flag, and the nullification of our constitution and bill of rights. Remember, we are NOT a Christian nation, but instead; we are a Muslim nation according to his most highness; Mr. Obama. You lefties ought to be really enjoying this.
-----------------------------------------------------

You are so wrong. Over 90% of these guys are in Gitmo because someone turned them in for the $25,000 bounty. That is why, when they get a halfway decent hearing, over 95% are released.

As to the ones who are to be idicted and tried. Experience logic shows that over 90% of them will not be indicted because the folks hearing the case will not go along with the government's evidence. Of those who are indicted and go to trial over 90% of them will be acquited and have to be released somewhere.

Will some of those released actually go join AQ? Very probably. What would you do in their shoes? Would you want payback?

BTW,I am a service disabled vet with two navy vet sons and every one of my brothers are vets. We love this country.
Reply to this comment
by mjlewis6 August 3, 2009 3:37 PM EDT
Just be sure to include facilities for other associated war criminals yet un-named or not indicted and insure those facilities are more hardened for former BUSH OFFICIALS for re-directing our Armed Forces into Iraq rather than prosecuting the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan to locate Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

We are fighting this war to this day due to their redirection of our armed forces towards a strategic interest rather than any WMD or nuclear weapons building....Had we a proper choice regarding liberating countries....we could have easily choosen CUBA which is only 90 miles from our coastline and a vast number of sympathetic citizens there willing to change their government....

So, were there no oil in Iraq.....there would be no invasion.
Reply to this comment
by Benton09 August 3, 2009 4:00 PM EDT
Oil up sharply today to apx. $71.00 a barrel...how long till it reaches that $100 mark again? Can't wait till technology takes emphasis off of oil for transportation. It'll be a sad time for the Dinosaur Party (R).
by jumkey August 3, 2009 4:43 PM EDT
Liberals liberals liberals, it's always the liberals.
by Nivlac_Skcaj August 3, 2009 3:31 PM EDT
Nobody is going to get out of Leavenworth. So you weak pansies can forget trying to ratchet up the fear. We in the Midwest understand the sounds made by weak human beings and are sick of the crying. Send them to Leavenworth and you will never hear from them again. If they want to start a terror cell in Leavenworth, good, can't think of a better place for it.
Reply to this comment
by debinok1 August 3, 2009 2:58 PM EDT
They are all for dumping them in Michigan or Kansas but if they try to put them on the East Coast, look out. So do the reasons they do not want them on the East Coast not apply in Michigan or Kansas, or do the majority not care as long as it is "not in my back yard". Kansas happens to be "my back yard" and if there is a some kind of danger having them on the East Coast, then the same "danger" applies here.
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace August 3, 2009 2:56 PM EDT
Hey jsklinemn,
"......may....."

Show me how to predict the future? Fyi....Americans nolonger watch the 'Fear Factor' show on TV.
Reply to this comment
by jsklinemn August 3, 2009 2:50 PM EDT
Very interesting. We have now officially given citizenship to these folks even though we pulled them from the battlefield as prisoners who attempted to kill us. They're now citizens entitled to all the perks and possibilities our legal system provides. See the Obamanation is coming to pass. We soon may yet see the desecration of our flag, and the nullification of our constitution and bill of rights. Remember, we are NOT a Christian nation, but instead; we are a Muslim nation according to his most highness; Mr. Obama. You lefties ought to be really enjoying this.
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace August 3, 2009 2:58 PM EDT
hey jsklinemn,
I did not know American Justice system and Jails for Hard Cores are so weak for these Criminals.
by jumkey August 3, 2009 4:43 PM EDT
Wow, you're a nut. We gave citizenship to who now?

Crazy stuff.
See all 12 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook