August 2, 2009 4:04 PM

King Salmon Failing to Return to Spawn

(AP)  Yukon River smokehouses should be filled this summer with oil-rich strips of king salmon - long used by Alaska Natives as a high-energy food to get through the long Alaska winters. But they're mostly empty.

The kings failed to show up, and not just in the Yukon.

One Alaska river after another has been closed to king fishing this summer because significant numbers of fish failed to return to spawn. The dismally weak return follows weak runs last summer and poor runs in 2007, which also resulted in emergency fishing closures.

"It is going to be a tough winter, no two ways about it," said Leslie Hunter, a 67-year-old store owner and commercial fisherman from the Yup'ik Eskimo village of Marshall in western Alaska.

Federal and state fisheries biologists are looking into the mystery.

King salmon spend years in the Bering Sea before returning as adults to rivers where they were born to spawn and die. Biologists speculate that the mostly likely cause was a shift in Pacific Ocean currents, but food availability, changing river conditions and predator-prey relationships could be affecting the fish.

People living along the Yukon River think they know what is to blame - pollock fishery. The fishery - the nation's largest - removes about 1 million metric tons of pollock each year from the eastern Bering Sea. Its wholesale value is nearly $1 billion.

King salmon get caught in the huge pollock trawl nets, and the dead kings are counted and most are thrown back into the ocean. Some are donated to the needy.

"We do know for a fact that the pollock fishery is slaughtering wholesale and wiping out the king salmon stocks out there that are coming into all the major tributaries," said Nick Andrew Jr., executive director of the Ohagamuit Traditional Council. "The pollock fishery is taking away our way of living."

Since 2000, the incidental number of king salmon caught has skyrocketed, reaching over 120,000 kings in 2007. A substantial portion of those fish were bound for western Alaska rivers. If those fish had lived, an estimated 78,000 adult fish would have returned to rivers from the Pacific Northwest to Western Alaska.

Efforts to reduce bycatch are not new. In 2006, bycatch rules were adopted allowing the pollock fleet to move from areas where lots of kings were being inadvertently caught, thereby avoiding large-scale fishing closures. Then, 2007 happaned, and it was back to the drawing board.

Last April, the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, the organization that manages ocean fish, passed a hard cap on the pollock fishery. Beginning in 2011, the portion of the fleet that participates in the program is allowed 60,000 kings a year. If the cap is reached, the fishery shuts down. Those who don't participate have a lower cap - 47,591 fish.

The loss of the kings is devastating village economies. These are the same Yukon River villages where spring floods swept away homes, as well as boats, nets and smokehouses. There's no money to buy anything, Andrew said.

"It is crippling the economy in all of the rivers where we depend on commercial fishing for income," he said.

Bycatch plays a role but is not the only reason for the vanishing kings, said Diana Stram, a fishery management plan coordinator at the council.

Herman Savikko, an Alaska Department of Fish and Game biologist, agreed. He pointed to changing ocean currents, plankton blooms and even the carnivorous nature of salmon. River conditions could be changing, too, he said.

A lot isn't known about what happens to king salmon in the ocean, Savikko said. "Once the fish enter the marine environment it just is a big black box," he said.

In a good year, Kwik'pak Fisheries L.L.C. in Emmonak on the lower Yukon employs between 200 and 300 people. This summer, only about 30 people have been hired. Kwik'pak is the largest employer in the region.

(AP/Sam Harrell, Daily News-Miner)
(Left: This undated photo shows women moving king salmon around the drying racks at a fish camp on the lower Yukon River in Alaska.)

General manager Jack Schultheis said when the king fishery was shut down, the summer chum salmon run was curtailed as well, even though a good number of chums were returning to the river.

The lower Yukon villages are economically devastated, he said.

Fishermen used to get between $5 million and $10 million from the fishery. Last year, it was $1.1 million.

That means instead of making between $20,000 and $30,000 in the 1970s, fishermen are making just a few thousand dollars now, and that in villages where fuel costs $8 a gallon, milk is $15 a gallon and a T-bone steak costs $25, he said.

It's hard to see the villages in such economic hardship but the Yukon should be managed conservatively until the problem of the disappearing kings is better understood, Schultheis said.

"For 50 years, it was an extremely stable fishery," he said.
By Associated Press Writer Mary Pemberton

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by wormed August 2, 2009 11:11 PM EDT
Has anyone stopped to think that the Asian fleet long ago figured out the tuna migration and has completely wiped it out. We all know that salmon, especially king salmon, is a mainstay in their diet. Has anyone even considered that they may be wiping out our salmon stocks? In this age of technology, they're probably sitting on top of the massive schools and just mopping them up. Just a thought.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 August 2, 2009 9:24 PM EDT
by AlabamaBrainTrust August 2, 2009 8:07 PM EDT

I'M A CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN....


Is there a reason why you had to state that? Who cares?


Wait....what am I saying? This is AMERICA! hahahahaha!
Reply to this comment
by hamiltongrad August 2, 2009 8:29 PM EDT
This is the dummest thing you have written so far, you are always drilling for comments. The truth is, that the fish we eat is good for us, lowers cancer risk, increases brain power, makes our arteries stronger, no matter where it comes from, or who sells it. idiot.
Reply to this comment
by Theyrealltaken August 2, 2009 7:52 PM EDT
Mrs. Palin told us why she quit: It was boring! Just like a teenager who doesn't last through the summer.
Reply to this comment
by Theyrealltaken August 2, 2009 7:51 PM EDT
Mrs. Palin told us why she quit: It was boring! Just like a teenager who doesn't last through the summer.
Reply to this comment
by mrjustice1 August 2, 2009 7:23 PM EDT
Any others feel that mankind does not deserve to dominate this precious planet?

Will some brilliant scientist or even angry religious fanatic find the way to eliminate this destructive monster called man or **** sapien?

The more human population that is destroyed, killed, disappears, etc, the better for other DESERVING lifeforms - flora and fauna - which do not destroy the planet!
Reply to this comment
by DonaldSutherland August 2, 2009 7:01 PM EDT
The Bering Sea, particularly off US territorial waters, is the fisheries bread basket for Japan and other countries. The US Factory Fishing Industry operating in US waters is basically a self regulating industry with a weak US National Fisheries oversight. Todate there are no Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the pollack fishery and Salmon along with other Marine Protected Species are impacted by overfishing in this area. It is time to dry dock this factory fishing industry not only in the US but globally. Everytime you bite into a McDonald or Berger King Pollack filet of fish sandwich which come from factory fishing in the Bering Sea think about this.

Donald Sutherland
Hopkinton, MA
Reply to this comment
by debinok1 August 2, 2009 6:20 PM EDT
The White man called the Indians savages, yet look at the destruction the savage white man has loosed on this continent. Sadly the Indians had the right idea, while the White men only had interest in profit. I guess not much has changed.
Reply to this comment
by SouthwestisBest August 2, 2009 7:30 PM EDT
You do know that the 'Indians' migrated themselves onto the US Continent, and during that migration two things happened, one they brought with their dogs germs that caused the extinction of many of North America's native animals. They also hunted to extinction many of the larger cats, mastadon and mammoths with the spears they brought with them. Not to mention that they warred with each other over territories and food sources for thousands of years killing off each other's villages.

Please, this is not a white man, red man issue. It is a natural progression of nature's laws.

A large decimation of the North American population was decimated before any Europeans hit the contienent because female genes became weak because there was no source here for milk to feed babies and therefore women had to nurse their babies three or four years. Their mortality rate decimated the female population. That's why native Americans kept raiding each other's unit to steal females.

And then of course when the first domesticated animal from Europe up through South America hit the continent their germs literally ripped through the native population killing millions.

Nature's laws, not man's laws make environmental changes. Just like the Sahara desert used to be as green as the Fertile Crescent, but natural climactic changes turned it into desert.
by hamiltongrad August 2, 2009 6:19 PM EDT
Saddam OIL Terorrist Evil- Kuwaitt set on fire in 1991 settles into our water ways.


All the terrible pollution set off when Saddam in 91 burned the oil fields, combined with the terrible toxic dust set up as a world cloud of debris in NYC attack has finally come home to roost. The Islamic terrorists are responsible.
Reply to this comment
by John_Merritt August 2, 2009 5:05 PM EDT
I have always been a believer of the philosophy 'follow the money'. When there are natural and/or made opportunities for economic betterment of a few, many times they will turn a blind eye to the many.

This is not a political statement because greed crosses all party lines. In this particular case, entire communities are negatively impacted because of possibly a few people who may be benefitting handsomely because of 'sweetheart deals'. These negotiation took place long before Sarah Palin took office and I applaud her because this is one of the many areas that she has honed in on.

Greed and corruption were her mantra and that is what got her elected. She went against the 'elite' of the state of Alaska, and she is presently paying the price for her belief that ALL should share in the benefits of the good state. Little wonder she quit, because they dragged her family into it, 'they' crossed the lines of fair play.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 August 2, 2009 6:11 PM EDT
What nonsense!!!

She QUIT, because she was corrupt, and brought tons and tons of heat on herself because of her highly unethical acts, and her corrupt and incoherent manner of running the governor's office.
by SouthwestisBest August 2, 2009 7:02 PM EDT
Prove it, Hungry. You got any proof on those keys of that typewriter?

One fact? Just one?
See all 20 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook