July 30, 2009 11:07 AM

Dems Call for Texting While Driving Ban

By
CBSNews
(AP)  Democratic lawmakers called for states to ban texting while driving or face cuts in highway funds, citing the need to reduce driver distraction and potential highway deaths and injuries.

"When drivers have their eyes on their cell phones instead of the road, the results can be dangerous and even deadly," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who unveiled the legislation Wednesday with Democrats Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Kay Hagan of North Carolina.

Fourteen states and the District of Columbia have passed laws making texting while driving illegal.

Some critics have questioned whether the laws could be enforced, whether there is enough data to warrant such bans, or if reckless driving statutes already cover texting behind the wheel.

Steve Largent, a former Oklahoma congressman who leads CTIA - The Wireless Association, said his organization supports "state legislative remedies to solve this issue. But simply passing a law will not change behavior. We also need to educate new and experienced drivers on the dangers of taking their eyes off the road and hands off the wheel."

The Governors Highway Safety Association, which represents state highway safety agencies, said it does not doubt the dangers of texting and driving but does not support a ban because it would be difficult to enforce.

"Highway safety laws are only effective if they can be enforced and if the public believes they will be ticketed for not complying. To date, that has not been the case with many cell phone restrictions," said Vernon Betkey, the highway safety association's chairman.

The proposal follows a series of studies showing the dangers of operating handheld electronic devices while driving.

In a study released earlier this week, the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute found that when drivers of heavy trucks texted, their collision risk was 23 times greater than when not texting. Dialing a cell phone and using or reaching for an electronic device increased risk of collision about six times in cars and trucks.

The Virginia Tech researchers said the risks of texting generally applied to all drivers, not just truckers.

The lawmakers also cited a separate report by Car and Driver magazine that found that texting and driving is more dangerous than drunken driving.

Texting has grown from nearly 10 billion messages a month in December 2005 to more than 110 billion in December 2008, according to CTIA, the cellular phone industry's trade group.

The legislation would require states to ban texting or e-mailing while operating a moving vehicle or lose 25 percent of their annual federal highway funding. It would be patterned after the way Congress required states to adopt a national drunken driving ban.

The transportation secretary would be required to issue guidelines within six months of the measure becoming law, and states then would have two years to approve the bans on texting and driving.

States could recover highway funds by passing the legislation following the two-year period.

The bill would target the activity in a moving vehicle and not prohibit a driver from texting or e-mailing in a stopped car.

AP
Add a Comment
by barbaram99 July 30, 2009 7:18 PM EDT
Common sense is there just people fail to use their heads. The car is not for multi tasking. The same gomes for drivers of buses,trains etc. The duties of drivers are to drive. That means hands on the wheel, Eyes on the road and mind on the road. It means no talking on the phone,texting,etc while driving as it not for multi tasking. Safety first. Children should be taught to mind when in the car.
Reply to this comment
by sy2502 July 30, 2009 2:53 PM EDT
What surprises me is not whether they want to pass a law about texting while driving, but that people actually need a law to prevent them from doing it! Really, people don't understand all by themselves that texting while driving is too dangerous? Do we need to pass a law that forbids you from driving blindfolded too or do people get that one all by themselves?
Reply to this comment
by xlib July 30, 2009 11:25 AM EDT
We need a texting czar.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq July 30, 2009 11:00 AM EDT
Yeah, but the federal gov't??

Banning texting??

This is an absurd abuse/use of federal power..

This is a states' issue.
Reply to this comment
by AOCGUY July 30, 2009 12:05 PM EDT
Agree that this is a state issue but so is state highway funding. _ Solution, states decide on their own how to deal with driving distractions and forfeit federal funding for state and county road projects.
by cranialnerves July 30, 2009 10:34 AM EDT
No doubt, Republicans will be against this. It's just what they do.
Reply to this comment
by Benton09 July 30, 2009 10:46 AM EDT
They'll exempt 'texting mistress HO's' though. I'm sorry...'Soul Mates' in Sanford's case.
by xlib July 30, 2009 11:26 AM EDT
Would this include spitzer and his high class ho's?? You know, the industry he vowed to close, the one where he made jail times for johns even harsher?? You all remember spitzer, right???
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook