September 22, 2009 11:11 AM

Are Republicans the Economic Pessimists?

By
CBSNews
(National Review Online)  Larry Kudlow is NRO's Economics Editor and host of CNBC's The Kudlow Report. He also is author of the daily blog, Kudlow's Money Politic$

Are Republicans too pessimistic about the economy? I put this question to Sen. Jim DeMint (R., S.C.) this week, and it would be hard to describe his response as optimistic. The senator trash-talked Vice President Joe Biden's recent defense of the stimulus in the New York Times, and he warned that any economic rebound will be short-lived because of the runaway spending-and-borrowing plans of the Obama administration.

Truth be told, respected economists like Donald Marron, Keith Hennessey, Bruce Bartlett, and Kevin Hassett have all carefully chronicled the fact that the Obama stimulus package does not feature any real fiscal multipliers. They say the bulk of the package consists of transfer payments to individuals and states, along with tax credits that will produce no real incentive effects to spur economic growth.

But the fact remains that numerous signs are now pointing to economic recovery. And the GOP needs to craft a smart political response to this. Obama and Biden will surely take credit for the better economic news, just as any White House would. It's the way the political game is played. But Republicans have to play the game, too.

A tremendous summer rally is going on in stocks, and it's being driven by better corporate profits and improved leading indicators - including a possible upturn in housing starts and sales, and a major downward spike in weekly initial jobless claims. So you have to believe the stock market is calling the tune for recovery.

And while politics are not everything, I do believe that the shrinking prospects for Obamacare have been a big contributor to the stock market's recent surge. This sweeping new government insurance plan would lead to high-tax-and-spend-and-borrow-and-regulate nationalized health care, a big economic negative. Ditto for nationalizing energy through cap-and-trade-and-tax. If these initiatives fail, it is very bullish for stocks and the economy.

Meanwhile, a global stock market rally strongly suggests that a global economic recovery is in the cards. (The Bank of Canada has even declared Canada's recession over.) The biggest gainers are coming out of Asia, especially China. But the larger economies of Europe, Japan, and the U.S. are also producing large market gains.

The rise in world commodity prices, especially Dr. Copper - a metal that has a Ph.D. in economic forecasting - bolsters this bullish view. So does a steeply upward-sloping yield curve in the U.S. Treasury market. And so does the very bullish action in corporate bond prices, where declining yields have narrowed the interest-rate differences with Treasuries all the way back to pre-Lehman-AIG-credit-collapse levels. This is yet another sign that business credit and profits are improving.

Most demand-side strategists fail to understand that businesses, not consumers, are at the heart of the economic story. People forget Say's Law of Markets, which argues that we produce in order to consume. So if industrial and service production levels are poised to rise - because of an improvement in profits - then consumer and family incomes also will rise to provide the spending stimulus.

And the recent rise in consumer savings is a good thing. Keynes was very wrong about this. Nowadays, higher consumer savings are channeled through the financial system into business investment, which translates to the purchase of computers and heavy equipment that will spur economic growth. Economist Jerry Bowyer keeps reminding me of this, and I try to convince my demand-side friends that they are barking up the wrong tree when they trash consumer-savings rates.

And we can't forget monetary policy. During a recent town-hall meeting, Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke noted that the Fed "put the metal to the pedal" in order to avoid a second Great Depression. So there's an enormous volume of newly created money out there that's ready to be put to work through economic spending and investing. Down the road there's an inflation threat from this money, but not now.

Bernanke himself is predicting 1 percent growth in the second half of 2009, but he may be too cautious. It could be 2 or 3 percent growth - which is subpar for a recovery, but ain't chopped liver either. That's what stock markets are signaling.

Senator DeMint told me during our interview that the economy is getting better mainly because of the corrective forces of free-market capitalism in the private free-enterprise sector, and not from all this government spending and borrowing. Abstracting from the Fed's big stimulus effort, he's right.

But the White House is going to take credit for economic recovery anyway, and that's the newest political challenge for the GOP.

By Larry Kudlow
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online

National Review Online
Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
by dimonds2000 August 27, 2009 10:41 AM EDT
Money has been printed left and right to cover the bailouts so that means Inflation - NO matter what party is in power but the health care bill will only add to the problem.
Reply to this comment
by smoknmirrors July 31, 2009 9:20 PM EDT
by cydygitt1 July 31, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
"Capitalism is good, greed could be if everyone participated in the profit sharing; excessive greed destroys everybody."
-------------------------------

Exactly how does the record profits from the GREEDY for-profit insurance/pharmaceutical industry that keeps raising premiums much faster than wages or inflation and keeps adding to the UN-insured/UNDER-insured roles, help average Americans that want to stay healthy?
-----------
Provides an incentive to stay alive long enough to walk on their graves?
Reply to this comment
by John_Merritt July 31, 2009 9:58 AM EDT
'Are Republicans the Economic Pessimists?'

I have reasoned that you can throw just about anything and it will stick on the wall. Throwing money at the problem will stimulate things, but will it sustain the economic engine? The answer is no, all it does is create a new set of problems.

OSU in the first comment on this subject nailed it. Our deficit is unsustainable and it it going to require more than just the 70% of the GDP that the consumer contributes to; to pull us out of this morass.

The problem this time is that the consumer is only going to join the party when they feel very comfortable in their situation again. Once burnt, twice shy. Except this is not the first time the consumer has suffered a recession in the last 20 years. By my count there are at least 3 periods this has happened since 1990.

If I am a 40 year old and I have experienced a recession 3-4 times in the last 20 years causing me great distress, do you think I would have learned something about myself, and those who are supposed to be helping me and my neighbors? Namely the government. We have become contributors and obstructionists to the American way of life because we have legislation and policy so egocentric (all about me), that after awhile people don't want to play with you anymore.

That is where we are at. The economy will improve. The consumer will improve, but I believe you have seen the last of a great many Americans participate in your game anymore. Capitalism is good, greed could be if everyone participated in the profit sharing; excessive greed destroys everybody. If not their life, than their dream. Have a good day.
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 July 31, 2009 11:32 AM EDT
"Throwing money at the problem will stimulate things, but will it sustain the economic engine?"
----------------------------

Not if we follow the typical republiCON ideology of throwing more and more MONEY at the out-of-control military/industrial complex, since that only makes more wealthy 'defense' contractors at our expense, while protecting corporate American interests around the world.

Since this 'Great Recession' is different and caused by turmoil in housing and finance rather than manufacturing or weak consumer spending, we have needed a new kind of recovery. For 60 years, policymakers have relied on a series of simple tools for combating slowdowns and promoting growth: the Fed cuts interest rates, government slashes taxes, and a deregulated Wall Street provides easy money. All of which spurs debt-fueled consumption and the movement of goods and services around the globe. The last several recoveries were not sustained because they were based on bubbles, they were led by consumption, and they enhanced inequality.

It means eschewing the blunt economic instruments we've always used and focusing resources and rhetoric on strategic sectors: renewable energy/green technology, infrastructure, broadband, and health care. It means making investments to run vital systems more intelligently and efficiently, thus creating a new infrastructure on which the private sector can work its magic.

We need a new kind of recovery, and government intervention to jumpstart the right sectors in this global economy that has helped offshore so many "liveable wage" jobs from American shores. So yes, throwing MONEY at certain sectors will sustain our 21st century economy, since we cannot afford to continue to subsidize BIG OIL and the fossil fuel industry any longer, or not have REAL health care reform to the for-profit insurance/pharmaceutical industry.
by cydygitt1 July 31, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
"Capitalism is good, greed could be if everyone participated in the profit sharing; excessive greed destroys everybody."
-------------------------------

Exactly how does the record profits from the GREEDY for-profit insurance/pharmaceutical industry that keeps raising premiums much faster than wages or inflation and keeps adding to the UN-insured/UNDER-insured roles, help average Americans that want to stay healthy?
by hungry1968-16 July 31, 2009 9:12 AM EDT
"Are Republicans the Economic Pessimists?"







No.

They are the CAUSE of ALL of our economic problems.

"Pessimist" makes them just sound like innocent bystanders that are worried about our economy, rather than the architects and saboteurs of the fixes, that they REALLY are.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 July 31, 2009 9:11 AM EDT
"Are Republicans the Economic Pessimists?"







No.

They are the CAUSE of ALL of our economic problems.

"Pessimist" makes them just sound like innocent bystanders that are worried about our economy, rather than the architects and saboteurs of the fixes, that they REALLY are.
Reply to this comment
by proudmilvet July 31, 2009 1:01 AM EDT
Funny how the Republicans were'nt Pessimistic About the Economy When Bush Tossed It Into The Crapper! They Convieniently Forget About The Last 8 Years Of Total GOP Stupidity, Greed & Mismanagement. Now That Obama Has Been President For a Whopping 6 Months & 10 Days, Because He Hasn't Fixed Everything Yet That He Inherited From Bush, They Are Trying To Blame The Whole Sh**ty Mess On Him! Republicans...As Welcome As A Turd In A Punch Bowel!!
Reply to this comment
by cranialnerves July 30, 2009 7:24 PM EDT
It must have been painful for the National Review to admit things are looking better. Optimism from a right-wing rag? The base isn't going to like this.
Reply to this comment
by revlin1 July 30, 2009 6:46 PM EDT
Is the MAINSTREAM MEDIA too "UNREALISTIC" and in LALA land as they underreport the real news to the American people. All the spin, lies, DEM siding and Obama fatuation....is enough to make America sick. And, it wouldn't matter is you were a Repub or ??? Just being an American right now oughta make anyone a pessimist with this Admin.
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 July 31, 2009 11:06 AM EDT
Typical rant from the marginalized, southern, white, evangelical minority party of 'NO,' that has NO NEW IDEAS or SOLUTIONS, AND DEFINITELY no vision for the FUTURE -- just old 20th century "ronnie the rat" raygun ideology that gave us the bush/cheney depression!
by noloyalisti July 30, 2009 3:20 PM EDT
Republicans, the champions of the Reaganomics disaster of trickle-down, deregulation and privatization were WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING. They are a complete failure and are no longer wanted in America. They are an embarrassment and frankly there is no excuse for supporting them.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 August 2, 2009 4:16 PM EDT
Republicans were and are as wrong about everything just like Bill Kristol's dad was about the former Soviet Union. The neo con's batting average was SO poor, they should have been discredited and ignored forever.

David Stockman knew that Reaganomics was a con. He said so later on that his idea was to cut spending FIRST, run a surplus and THEN you could talk about tax cuts. Reagan wanted nothing to do with any of that, he just wanted tax cuts that bloated the debt so there could be no more social programs.
by flagwavrblue July 30, 2009 2:27 PM EDT
Are Republicans the Economic Pessimists?
DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

If McCain was elected then the economy would be all peachy-keen no matter what the real economic conditions. Of course the Republicans want the democrats to fix the economy, but they reserve the right to whine and moan while the real work is being done and the real leadership is manning the helm.
Reply to this comment
See all 24 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook