Tiller Shooting Suspect Pleads Not Guilty
Scott Roeder Faces Murder Charges in Death of Kansas Doctor; Expected to Enter Plea
-
-
Scott Roeder, left, attends his preliminary hearing in court in Wichita, Kan., Tuesday. Roeder, 51, is charged in the death of Dr. George Tiller. (AP Photo/Jaime Oppenheimer)
-
This undated booking photo released by the Sedgwick County Jail shows Scott Roeder, 51, who is expected to enter a plea Tuesday to first-degree murder charges in Sedgwick County District Court in Wichita, Kan., in the death of late-term aborion provider George Tiller. (AP Photo/Sedgwick County Jail)
-
The man accused of killing Kansas late-term abortion provider George Tiller has pleaded not guilty.
Authorities say anti-abortion activist Scott Roeder, 51, also threatened two ushers who tried to stop him during the May 31 shooting in the doctor's church in Wichita. Roeder is charged with first-degree murder and aggravated assault in the slaying.
He pleaded not guilty to all charges on Tuesday after witnesses gave chilling testimony at a preliminary hearing. A judge ordered Roeder held on $20 million bond and set a trial date for Sept. 21.
Tiller was the target of protests at his Wichita clinic. He practiced as one of the nation's few providers of late-term abortions and was shot in both arms by an anti-abortion activist in 1993.
Gary Hoepner, an usher at Reformation Lutheran Church, was the first witness called Tuesday in the preliminary hearing. Hoepner said he and Tiller were making small talk when he saw a man come in a door, put a gun to Tiller's head and shoot him.
An emotional Hoepner said, "I wasn't sure if it was a cap gun or what. And then George fell to the ground and I just said in my mind 'oh my God."
He said he followed the shooter, who he identified as Roeder, out of the church but stopped after Roeder warned him.
"'I've got a gun and I'll shoot you,"' Hoepner recalled Roeder saying. "I believed him and I stopped."
Hoepner tried not to think about his testimony before Tuesday's hearing.
"I've tried to put it out of my mind as much as possible because I know I'm going to have to relive it," Hoepner told CBS News Kansas affiliate KWCH.
Prosecutors have to convince Sedgwick County District Judge Warren Wilbert they have enough evidence to merit a trial.
Tiller, 67, had been the target of regular protests for most of the 36 years he performed abortions at his Wichita clinic, where he practiced as one of the nation's few providers of late-term abortions. He was shot in both arms by an anti-abortion activist in 1993, and the doctor had been repeatedly threatened over the years.
It is unknown how many people the prosecution might call for Tuesday's hearing, but the witness list has 220 names, mostly law enforcement officials.
Also on the list are members of the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue; Roeder's ex-wife and son; Tiller's wife, Jeanne, who was singing in the choir when her husband was shot; and Rachelle "Shelley" Shannon, who shot Tiller in 1993.
In rambling jailhouse interviews, Roeder has talked about the notion of justifiable homicide against abortion providers, but he has refused to discuss any facts of his case.
Roeder has told The Associated Press Tiller's shooting was justified, but never has claimed a role in the slaying.
If Roeder is convicted of first-degree murder, he faces life in prison with the possibility of parole after 25 years.
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- It's amazing that some people believe that a feutus that's moving around in the mother's womb isn't a living baby. Yes unborn is unborn but it's a baby not yet born. Just like all of us were babies in our mother's womb 1 day, 1 week, 1 month before we were born. Face it it's a baby and it's alive.
- Reply to this comment
- Saturn5 - I am not convinced that an unborn child is incapable of feeling pain. Are you?
- Reply to this comment
- This guy is just one of many that prove that modern conservatism is a very serious mental illness.
Typical right wing looney. - Reply to this comment
- Well..unlike the one in Georgia a few years ago, this guy didn't put bombs in the clinic. I don't know the whole story, was the doctor one of them late term abortion doctors?
- Reply to this comment
- OMG, I'm rolling on the floor - DaVicar5 -- I like you!! ROTFLMAO!!
- Reply to this comment
- where are all the god freaks spewing their usual BS around? Maybe they are at Red Lobster firing down 10lbs of shrimp. Heretics!
- Reply to this comment
- The whole problem is the Kansas courts. Even if he is sentenced to life in prison, or even the death penalty, Kansas doesn't recognize the death penalty. He'll sit up in El Dorado prison (the Kansas spa) and have 3 meals a day, TV, tennis, a gym and live better than we do. BTK (Dennis Rader) is living better than he did when he wasn't incarcerated. Kansas prisons are a joke!!!
- Reply to this comment
- The guy is totally nuts. Even Randall Terry, the anti-abortion "king" won't have anything to do with him. This isn't really about whether or not he took an abortion doctor off the streets -- this is about the fact that he stalked Dr. Tiller, went to his place of worship, and shot him in the back of the head, execution style, in front of Tiller's granddaughter and other family members. This was premeditated murder, plain and simple!!!
- Reply to this comment
- filthy COWARD!Gunned down an unarmed man with no warning and will now beg out of his justice!!Absolutely DISGUSTING
- Reply to this comment
-
- At first I thought you were talking about the disgustingly cowardly act of hacking apart an unarmed, unborn child inside the supposed safety of the mother's womb. Regardless, gunning down an unarmed man is an act of a coward -- and is reprehensible murder.
- Romansone-Interesting choice for a screen name. Let's see...Romans....The Coliseum...Lions and breathing humans eaten by said lions. Anyway, not your business if a WOMAN decides that a pregnancy is not healthy for her or the cells in her body. Mind your own business.
- Have you ever seriously thought about what occurs during one of these legal operations? As another human being on this planet, don't you think it's our responsiblity to look out for those who can't protect themselves? I'm not talking here about the times when abortion is necessary -- and there are many of those, and they are needed, and that is the decision of the mother (and father). I'm talking about the rest of them that could have been viably carried through to birth.
- Again Romans, if this entity is truly unborn, it means that it cannot sustain life outside the woman's womb. The woman does have the right to make the choice. Not you or me, not the law. I am sorry you are so against choice, but it is a part of our laws and we need to abide by them. If you are a man, you really shouldn't have any involvement in the matter, even if you donated your part. It is truly a matter of the woman's right to choose. I will always defer to our personal rights over religious rights. I don't mean to assume you are religious or not, but usually anti-choice people use religion for their reasoning. Of all rights, our right to privacy should always be protected. You can be totally against pro-choice, but you still have no right to make public policy or law from your personal beliefs. Would I have an abortion, probably not, but that is my choice. The law recognizes it as a baby when it could have sustained life outside of the woman's body and I say that is fine. I don't consider it butchering or anything else, but that a woman realizes that bringing a unwanted life into this world would be cruel since at that point is alive and may suffer greatly. I am sorry if I have offended you.
- Actually, Saturn05, Romans one is Romans chapter 1 -- a suggested read. Next, a new born baby cannot "sustain life outside the mother's womb", either -- it is totally dependent on someone else, so your argument has no basis. Thirdly, I am not against choice in the case of the life of the mother. You need to read my last post more carefully. Finally, laws don't equal morality. With your attitude we'd still have widespread segregation in this country -- it was once "public policy" and "law", too. People challenged the law, the status quo, and were right to do so, in order to seek justice for everyone.
- I am torn here. One on hand, he killed a human being. On the other hand, he most likely saved many unborn lives. I don't know what to think of this.
- Reply to this comment
-
- Really! Unborn. Does that term not have any meaning to you? How could anything unborn have more value than a born, living, breathing, able to sustain life on their own human? Really!
- For those of you who don't really understand what late term aboraton is let me try to explain.
A woman who has carried her baby yes she wanted the child you don't wake up at 8 months and say my foot hurts I am going to get an aboration that is for the right wing nuts to lie again. They go in for an exam and find that the child is not viable and their lives are at risk. That said they are given a choice to try to go full term and when the child comes out it dies within most likely minutes and the mother feels the full loss of her child or she chooses to remove her child early so she is not at risk.
Seems to me most people just don't get it and maybe they should stay out of it.
But this guy should die for his crime.
- This guy needs an all expense paid trip to a gurney with a needle stuck in his arm.
I am sick of these terrorist stalking our streets. Enough already excute him. - Reply to this comment




