August 19, 2009 7:10 AM

Israel Keeps Iran Strike on "The Table"

(AP)  Israel dug in its heels Monday in a disagreement with the United States over a potential military strike to thwart Iran's progress toward a possible nuclear weapon, as the visiting American defense chief urged patience.

"We clearly believe that no option should be removed from the table," Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said pointedly, following discussions with U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

"This is our policy; we mean it," Barak continued. "We recommend to others to take the same position, but we cannot dictate it to anyone."

While the United States also reserves the right to use force if need be, the Obama administration is playing down that possibility while it tries to draw Iran into talks about its disputed nuclear program and other topics. Gates said Washington still hopes to have an initial answer in the fall about negotiations.

"The timetable the president laid out still seems to be viable and does not significantly raise the risks to anybody," Gates said.

Israeli leaders and a significant share of the population fear the U.S. is prizing outreach to Iran over its historic ties to Israel and appears resigned to the idea that Iran will soon be able to build a nuclear weapon.

President Barack Obama says he has accepted no such thing.

The question of how to deal with Iran's rapid advancement toward nuclear proficiency has become one of the most public differences between new administrations in Jerusalem and Washington, despite overall close relations.

Both Barak and Gates said time is short, and Gates stressed that any negotiations would not become cover for Iran to run out the clock while it perfects a nuclear weapon.

"I think we're in full agreement on the negative consequences of Iran obtaining this kind of capability," Gates said. "I think we are also agreed that it is important to take every opportunity to try and persuade the Iranians to reconsider what is actually in their own security interest. We are in the process of doing that."

Gates's brief visit to Israel was partially aimed at dissuading Israel from a pre-emptive attack on Iran's known nuclear sites, although Israel has never announced any specific intention to do that. Barak's no-options-off-the-table comment, uttered three times, seemed to indicate Gates made no visible headway in getting Israel to soften its line.

Obama pledged a new outreach to Iran during last year's presidential campaign. Aides say the recent election-related political upheaval in Iran has complicated, but not derailed, that effort.

Moreover, the United States argues that a strike would upset the fragile security balance in the Middle East, perhaps triggering a new nuclear arms race and leaving everyone, including Israel and Iran, worse off.

On Sunday, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton implicitly urged Israel to set aside any plans it might have for attacking Iran, saying she hopes the Jewish state understands the value of American attempts at diplomacy.

Speaking on NBC's "Meet The Press," Clinton also said she would not reveal any specifics of a possible "defense umbrella" to protect Mideast allies against an eventual Iranian bomb.

The umbrella idea, which Clinton offhandedly mentioned last week, has fueled Israel's uncertainty over U.S. policy under Obama even though Clinton later backpedaled.

Iran says it is merely trying to develop nuclear reactors for domestic power generation. The U.S. and much of the rest of the world believes the Islamic regime is trying to build a nuclear weapon.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had said Sunday he hopes to work out key policy disagreements with the U.S. during a series of meetings with high-profile American envoys. Gates was the second of a parade of Americans coming to Israel this week, and the only one for whom Israel's expansion of Jewish settlements was not a primary topic.

Israel is under heavy pressure to freeze construction in Israeli settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, land the Palestinians want for their eventual state and capital. Netanyahu has so far resisted, and the issue is a growing sore point between the U.S. and Israel.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by harold neale July 27, 2009 2:49 PM EDT
Why Israel is scared ofIran or other neighbours. Have they,the Israelies, done anything wrong or rotten during the past 61 years.
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses2009 July 27, 2009 12:24 PM EDT
Iran is a boil on the earth's backside.
Reply to this comment
by mjlewis6 July 27, 2009 12:15 PM EDT
Destruction of facilities would be an act of war, no doubt.

EVEN if the facility was clear of personnel...and NO DEATHS occurred..
The pre-emptive strike is a kind of prelude to war, and there is little likelihood of peace thereafter.

Who would choose that for Palestine as an alternative to a negotiated peace settlement?

Who would choose that for Israel, the only democracy in the middle east that has been in a state of war with its arab neighbors with the exception of Jordan and Egypt?

Who would choose war instead of peace and the development of Palestine?

Ask yourself who does not want the Palestinians to have a state?

Palestine is being Used and Destroyed since it is close to Israel and occupied in part.

Palestine has two enemies: the one that supports their liberation at the expense of fighting Israel to destroy it, the other the Israeli who seeks to control his enemy by having them fight eachother and controlling them through trade.
Reply to this comment
by rocketjl July 27, 2009 10:43 AM EDT
More and more, I feel that Obama is not talking for me on the world stage. He can apologize for the blunders he makes and the backdoor deals of a lot of crooked politicians, but it is clear the old professionals in foreign lands are getting a real chuckle out of this kid. Is he try to make America a socialist Islamic nation??????????
Reply to this comment
by quickly101 July 27, 2009 10:24 AM EDT
I would point out the Bible states those who support Israel will be blessed and those who don't won't but I doubt it would be believed by many in this country. Our President who has gone all over the Arab world apologizing for past American mistakes is catering to the muslims. But you muslims who think you will crush Israel will be in for quite a surprise, the one true God is their protector, and someday you will find that out.
Reply to this comment
by olherb-2009 July 27, 2009 9:19 AM EDT
Let us send Iran nuclear weapons.
Reply to this comment
by andouzy July 27, 2009 8:10 AM EDT
Since the end of era Bush US has become a coward country.When US was able to contain China USSSR and its allies, today We see US fearing a tiny Iran compare to USSR AND CHINA as it is not posssible.No doubt that fear of Iran will trigger arm race in the middle eas.The first day Iran will detenate its first nuke , Iraq, Egypt,Syra, Arabia saudi ,Yemen , Libya , Algeria and etc... will work to get their NUKE
US will not be able to prevent that move , yet as it has failed with North Korea.The US embrella that Hillary has proposed is the most stupid. remember that during the first gulf war more than twenty US soldiers who were taking their dinner where by a SCUD which patriot system failed to stop!!!!alos their many killed in Israel and arabia saudia because of the failing of patriot system!!! The Scud was an old missile with a conventionnal warhead but it will not be the same thing if Iran missile has a nuke warhead knowing that the absolute umbrella does not and will not exist as showed by the first gulf war
Obama is destroying not only US power but US influence in the middele east.US cannot try to prevent North korea to develop its nuke program when It has failed with iran
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook