July 27, 2009 9:26 PM

AP: Public Option Nixed from Health Bill

(AP)  After weeks of secretive talks, a bipartisan group in the Senate edged closer Monday to a health care compromise that omits two key Democratic priorities but incorporates provisions to slow the explosive rise in medical costs, officials said.

These officials said participants were on track to exclude a requirement many congressional Democrats seek for businesses to offer coverage to their workers. Nor would there be a provision for a government insurance option, despite President Barack Obama's support for such a plan.

The three Democrats and three Republicans from the Senate Finance Committee were considering a tax of as much as 35 percent on very high-cost insurance policies, part of an attempt to rein in rapid escalation of costs. Also likely to be included in any deal was creation of a commission charged with slowing the growth of Medicare through recommendations that would take effect automatically unless overturned by Congress.

"We're going to get agreement here," Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the Finance Committee chairman, said Monday. "The group of six really wants to get to 'yes."'

Obama has outlined two broad goals for legislation he is struggling to win from Congress: expansion of health insurance coverage to millions who lack it, and reining in increases in costs.

Like bills drafted by Democrats, the proposal under discussion by the six Finance Committee members would bar insurance companies from denying coverage to any applicant. Nor could insurers charge higher premiums on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions.

But it jettisons other core Democratic provisions in a reach for bipartisanship on an issue that has so far produced little.

The effort received a boost during the day from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, normally a close ally of Republicans. In a letter to committee leaders, the business group called for the panel to "act promptly, preferably before" the Senate's scheduled vacation at the end of next week. In doing so, the business organization dealt a blow to the Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and other GOP lawmakers who have called repeatedly for Democrats to slow down.

In yet another boost for the drive to enact legislation, PhRMA, which represents drug companies, has purchased more than $500,000 worth of television ads to air during the week in nine states.

Obama's top domestic priority has suffered numerous setbacks in recent weeks, and Republicans have stepped up their criticism. A Senate vote has been postponed until September. Administration and Democratic leaders hope to show significant progress before lawmakers begin their monthlong recess in hopes of regaining momentum.

In the House, the leadership sought to allay concerns among the rank and file. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said, "We're on schedule to do it now or do it whenever," when asked whether the House would complete its bill before lawmakers leave at the end of the week for their summer break.

In the Senate, officials stressed that no agreement has been reached on a bipartisan measure, and said there is no guarantee of one. They also warned that numerous key issues remain to be settled, including several options to pay for the legislation. They spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to discuss matters under private negotiations.

They said any legislation that emerges from the talks is expected to provide for a nonprofit cooperative to sell insurance in competition with private industry, rather than giving the federal government a role in the marketplace.

Obama and numerous Democrats in Congress have called for a government option to provide competition to private companies and hold down costs. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said during the day, "I don't believe that the president has come down (on) one versus the other in terms of denoting co-ops equal to or above public option."

One of the senators involved in the talks, Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, confirmed that co-ops are the preferred approach. "It's safe to say that'll probably remain in the final document," she said.

Officials also said a bipartisan compromise would not subject companies to a penalty if they declined to offer coverage to their workers. Instead, these businesses would be required to reimburse the government for part or all of any federal subsidies designed to help lower-income employees obtain insurance on their own.

"We don't want to undermine (employer coverage) or create a perverse incentive where employers potentially drop coverage because their employees can get subsidies," Snowe said.

Democratic-drafted legislation in the House includes both a penalty and a requirement for companies to share in the cost of covering employees.

The senators involved in the negotiations are all members of the Senate Finance Committee, and include Baucus and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the senior Republican. Others participating are Democratic Sens. Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico, and Republicans Snowe and Mike Enzi of Wyoming.

They have met for hours in recent weeks in Baucus' office, joined by aides and outside advisers such as actuaries summoned to explain arcane details of insurance. Douglas Elmendorf, head of the Congressional Budget Office, has also attended.

Baucus has been under intense pressure from the White House and Senate Democrats in recent weeks to convene the committee to vote out legislation. He has so far declined to do so, opting to give the bipartisan negotiations as much time as needed to succeed.

Several Democratic officials have said he recently pledged to Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., that the committee would meet next week to vote on legislation, a timetable that implies time is growing short for the bipartisan group to wrap up its work.

Much of the cost of the proposal would come from curbing the growth in fees to insurance companies and other providers under Medicare.

But congressional aides in both parties as well as lobbyists said a proposal limiting Flexible Savings Accounts to $2,000 annually is also a strong possibility. FSAs permit the use of pretax income to pay for items such as health care and child care.

Negotiators also are considering fees on the manufacturers of medical devices and on the makers of both brand name and generic drugs coming onto the market.

To cut down on the cost of the bill, the bipartisan group may include only one year of a long-term plan to adjust reimbursement fees under Medicare.

Officials said the legislation under discussion in a series of private meetings would likely cost under $1 trillion, include an expansion of Medicaid, and provide federal subsidies for individuals and families up to 300 percent of poverty to spread health care more broadly.

Individuals would have a mandate to buy affordable insurance.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 147 Comments
by Serving_you August 14, 2009 4:34 PM EDT
Oh I forgot, for all of you out there that placed meaningful blog entries and comments thank you. That little rant was not directed towards you. I would also like to thank those of you that placed references so that we can complete a little more research. It is greatly appreciated.
Reply to this comment
by Serving_you August 14, 2009 4:17 PM EDT
I must say that you are all a bunch of silly ass people. We sit here in places like Afghanistan giving you the freedom to complain about everything we are here to defend. I am sorry but I will tell you that I am embarrassed to call you my country men/women. You sit there on your little computer and blame each other. You slander the Democratic party, You slander the republican party. You take advantage of the freedoms I PUT MY LIFE ON THE LINE FOR. You criticize our government, our people, and make your selves look like jack ***** all so that you can talk trash to someone else. You don't care about health care. You don't care about gun laws. You care about yourselves our country was founded on SELFLESS SERVICE. Where is yours? Where are you contributing, do you truly consider sitting on your fat lazy ***** complaining that you don't get enough or you are ok with Socialism "where is my hand out". I will tell you this socialism has destroyed countries that were stronger than the state of ours right now. Ohh social security has worked great for 75 years. Hey idiot have you not heard that social security is in the hole. You people don't even know what the hell you are talking about. I sit here at Forward Operating Base Orgun-E watching my fellow Americans Die like my two brothers on the 4th Of July non the less and all you can worry about is where is my hand out, my party is better than your party. Obama sucks, no he doesn't. Wake up America all of you greedy bastards are the reason we are in the toilet. It is not Bush, It is not Obama. It is all of you not paying a bit of attention to anything that goes on around you. A bunch of selfish little children you are. I am embarrassed to be over here putting my life on the line for all of you ungrateful little pricks.
Reply to this comment
by glgemlo July 30, 2009 3:07 PM EDT
The day ALL of Congress -House-Senate- Republicans-Democrats- EVERYONE,
has the same Health Care coverage as the working class in the US., our Health Care problems - solutions will magically be resolved.
Let CONGRESS get REAL.
Reply to this comment
by kenhamlett July 29, 2009 3:32 PM EDT
NOW we have the outline for a new betrayal of the American people. The Senate not liking anything that threatens the unbridled profits of big medicine and insurance counters tell their preferences on how to gut the entire plan. Is this to give hope to all of the uninsured and under insured people of this country? Of course not. The Senate plan opens up more ways to exploit the people and to hell with the sick and injured.
It looks like we will have a new roster of candidates to be removed from office in 2010 and 2012. They just never learn. I will start the response with an early Good Riddance to the supporters of this Senate alternative.
Reply to this comment
by Warmonger101 July 29, 2009 9:27 AM EDT
I wish Obama would have said this:

THE ISSUE ISN?T ABOUT ME. I HAVE GREAT HEALT CARE COVERAGE.

I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE YOU THE SAME GREAT COVERAGE I HAVE. IF I?M UNSUCESSFUL, IT ISN?T BECAUSE I DIDN?T TRY.

ASK YOUR CONGRESSMAN, OR SENATOR TO EXPLAIN WHY CAN?T YOU HAVE THE SAME COVERAGE THAT THEY DO.

IF YOU HAVE SERVED YOUR COUNTRY, AS A POLICE OFFICER, A FIREMAN, A SOLDIER OR AS A CITIZEN WHO HAS SUPORTED YOUR COUNTRY A LIFETIME, ASK WHY CAN?T YOU HAVE THE SAME QUALITY HEALTH CARE COVERAGE AS YOUR LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVE.

ASKED THEM TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY HAVE?..AND YOU DON?T.

IF THEY CAN?T EXPLAIN IT TO YOUR SATISFACTION, THEN YOU MUST ASK YOURSELF, DO THESE PEOPLE WHO WOULD DENY ME ACCESS TO THE SERVICES THAT ARE AVAILABLE TO THEM CONSIDER ME A 2ND CLASS CITIZEN.

ARE THIS INDIVIDUALS TRULY REPRESENTING YOU OR YOUR FAMILY?
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 July 28, 2009 10:49 PM EDT
Without a public option and large employer mandate there is NO reform...period. Don't pretend that some non profit coops are going to do a darn thing, because they will NOT and everyone knows it.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti July 28, 2009 7:26 PM EDT
Hey cydygitt1, I think you must get the Hightower Lowdown (you used congress critters). I sure wish a LOT of these people on here read that publication.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti July 28, 2009 5:03 PM EDT
Why are we STILL putting up with greedy, rich, right wing corporations rationing our health care? Why are we still paying for the rich to have health care while 47 million do not. When are we going to stop their evil corporate ways? First we have to admit this is a fascist country, I guess.
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 July 28, 2009 6:08 PM EDT
Research Firm Cited by GOP Is Owned by Health Insurer ...Jul 22, 2009 ... The political battle over health-care reform is waged largely with ... is that the Lewin Group is wholly owned by UnitedHealth Group, ... Lewin Group, Insurer-Owned Consulting Firm, Often Cited in Health Reform Debate ...
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/.../AR2009072202216.html
by noloyalisti July 28, 2009 3:04 PM EDT
I am outraged that the white wing wackos who run the big, greedy, rich, uncaring corporations are forcing us to pay for health care for the rich. I am SICK of it.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 July 28, 2009 3:00 PM EDT
by endurorob July 28, 2009 10:11 AM EDT

You are losing it Hingry. You did not dispute even one of his claims. All you did was call him names. That is generally the reactionof someone in an indefensible position.







You want me to dispute the rumors and accusations being FABRICATED and spread by the Fixed News channel and spread by lemmings like Joe?

Here you go enduro - dispute this: There are purple giraffes on Mars.

Much like Fox News and the nonsense they fabricate, this statement is unprovable, correct?

Now do you realize how foolish your post sounds?
Reply to this comment
See all 147 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook