July 28, 2009 8:19 AM

How To Hasten Al Qaeda's Demise

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  Juan Zarate is a CBS News consultant and former Deputy National Security Adviser for Combating Terrorism.


With bombings in Iraq and Jakarta and the ongoing challenges from militants and terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan, there is no doubt terrorism remains a serious global threat, even where counterterrorism efforts have been successful overall. This is precisely why we should not let partisan debates about investigating post-9/11 policies inadvertently distract us from seizing a strategic opportunity: al Qaeda is on the ropes, and we must do everything we can to hasten its demise.

Al Qaeda is in decline because its senior leadership is being methodically destroyed, its primary safe haven is being undermined, its strategy is failing, and its ideology is being rejected within Muslim communities around the world. We must now hasten al Qaeda's demise while containing the post-al Qaida terrorist threat and the violent ideology that it spawned. Imagining the end of al Qaeda is not foolhardy. It's a realistic way of ensuring that day arrives.

Though al Qaeda seemed resurgent from 2005 to 2007, and remains a dangerous threat to the Homeland and in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, it is losing the broader war.

• We are dismantling al Qaeda's hard-to-replace core leadership while its planners worry more about spies in their midst than launching the next strategic attack;

• Funding is sparse with a demoralized donor base, likely forcing al Qaeda to make tough budget decisions and shortchange long-term projects, like their WMD programs;

• Al Qaeda and its affiliates have failed to regain strategic footholds in Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf, East Asia, and the Levant;

• Its regional satellites in North Africa, Central Asia, and East Africa, though dangerous, have not become the strategic outposts that would threaten the West directly; and

• A number of al Qaeda's major strategic plots against the United States and Europe since 2006 have been disrupted through intense intelligence and law enforcement cooperation. Importantly, all quarters in Muslim communities are now openly challenging al Qaeda.

Some in the so-called jihadi community deconstruct the violent ideology and ask critically what al Qaeda's agenda has achieved. Ex-jihadis in the London-based Quilliam Foundation and Muslim scholars in Singapore's Religious Rehabilitation Group have organized to counteract the ideology and activities of violent extremists. Al Qaeda's radically exclusionary ideology and violent tactics, victimizing even Muslim civilians, have led to its rejection. The slaughter of civilians again in Jakarta's hotels will not endear violent extremists in the most populous Muslim society in the world.

This crisis of legitimacy matters, leading to reduced support and funding.
President Obama has a unique opportunity to put a dagger through the heart of al Qaeda's narrative that the West is at war with Islam, which most Muslims still believe. His very person breaks all the stereotypes of a racist and hypocritical United States Al Qaida relies upon to sell their snake oil.

Al Qaeda's statements after the President's election - calling him a "house slave" leading a "Zionist conspiracy" responsible for perceived atrocities in Gaza and Pakistan -- prove it is worried. The battle of ideas manifested itself vividly when bin Laden and Zawahiri each came out with statements right before the President's Cairo speech intended to taint him and his message. President Obama has a chance to undermine the most fundamental dimension of the extremists' narrative upon which their strategy is based.

In Iraq, which bin Laden once called the "golden and unique opportunity" to wage a central battle against the United States, al Qaeda is in retreat. Its dream of an "Islamic State of Iraq" to serve as a platform for regional expansion was repulsed by its supposed core constituency - Sunni Arabs in the heart of the Middle East. Al Qaeda's senior leadership no longer mentions Iraq, where local resistance with American backing has it in retreat.

Al Qaeda's focus has shifted to Afghanistan and Pakistan, where the core leadership will make its last stand. Yet the Pakistani government and people have awoken to the threat of Talebanization and al Qaeda in their midst. With the American surge in Afghanistan, the long anticipated Pakistani military campaign in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas FATA) will add directly to al Qaida's woes.

Given the history of al Qaeda's patience and resilience, these trends can change without continued focus. We must pressure al Qaeda on all fronts now: disrupting plots; destroying its core leadership; pressuring Iran to hold the al Qaeda leadership in its custody; regaining momentum in Afghanistan; supporting Pakistanis and Iraqis' denial of safe haven; and empowering regional and credible actors to contain al Qaeda's nodes.

Ensuring the end of al Qaeda requires that we not allow the growing penchant for second-guessing and politics regarding post-9/11 policies to chill our counterterrorism operations and cooperation with foreign counterparts. Now is not the time to do lasting damage to our efforts to dismantle al Qaida while we attempt to expiate perceived sins of the past.

A world without al Qaeda is undeniably safer. Al Qaeda is the heart of the global Sunni terrorist movement focused on attacking the West and developing WMD. While the end of al Qaeda will not end terrorism or the allure of its ideology, it is a necessary step to disable the global terrorist movement.

The great danger in what transpired recently in Jakarta is that it portend an attempted resurrection of the ties between Southeast Asian terror networks and al Qaeda. It is time to finish the job of destroying our common enemy when al Qaeda is down but not yet out.

By Juan Zarate:
Special to CBSNews.com

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 64 Comments
by tbbaot July 29, 2009 11:54 AM EDT
No mention of the airstrikes by drone aircraft of high level leaders. It must be scarry for them wondering if they will be next if they go outside, or hide out in a safe house. This is having an enormous result.
Reply to this comment
by prelgovisk July 29, 2009 11:25 AM EDT
Eye-opening novel set in Afghanistan helped me understand the complexities of the conflict: "Veiled Freedom"

http://www.**********/Veiled-Freedom-Jeanette-Windle/dp/1414314752
Reply to this comment
by Razzl July 29, 2009 8:59 AM EDT
"the growing penchant for second-guessing and politics regarding post-9/11 policies..."

Oh, there you go Juan, you were doing okay with a theme that would get no disagreement from anybody until you had to get in some neocon dig for torture. Apparently anybody who used the fruits of democracy and exercised our obligations as citizens to put a stop to all of Dick Cheney's illegal and immoral activity at the ballot box weren't serious about our beliefs, we were just playing some game of "second-guessing" you neocon geniuses...
Reply to this comment
by JBARON79 July 28, 2009 6:10 PM EDT
So explain why you are NOT going to defend the article also that you ARE! I would say that makes you a liar..........


Huh, I though English was the national language over there.
Fine, thousands of operatives killed, numerous leaders dead, captured or in hiding, financial problems for Al Qaida, some of the local populace turning against Al Qaida for the suicide bombings. All valid points. I would go on but I have to leave work and meet up with friends for a beer and bocce ball.
You probably know about bocce ball living in the UK but I highly doubt you know anything about friends. Friends like accountability not charlatans.
Insult me all you want, YOU CAN NOT BACK UP YOUR CLAIM! PERIOD!
Reply to this comment
by JBARON79 July 28, 2009 6:11 PM EDT
F*%k, I did it again. Sorry all, I do not sit on this site all day like baby howe4.
by p_syrus July 28, 2009 5:57 PM EDT
This article implies a false premise; that somehow a public examination of post 911 actions would interfere with prosecuting war against Al Qaeda. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The resources required for acting against Al Qadeda do not overlap with those required for a full public inquiry. The "worst" that could happen is that documents long-buried out of a sense of political expediency would become public knowledge and illuminate the actual motivations of prior leadership. Nothing in that endangers the war against terrorism, albeit it may endanger the continued liberty of former officials, especially the political agents, from the prior administration.
Reply to this comment
by p_syrus July 28, 2009 5:57 PM EDT
This article implies a false premise; that somehow a public examination of post 911 actions would interfere with prosecuting war against Al Qaeda. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The resources required for acting against Al Qadeda do not overlap with those required for a full public inquiry. The "worst" that could happen is that documents long-buried out of a sense of political expediency would become public knowledge and illuminate the actual motivations of prior leadership. Nothing in that endangers the war against terrorism, albeit it may endanger the continued liberty of former officials, especially the political agents, from the prior administration.
Reply to this comment
by JBARON79 July 28, 2009 5:14 PM EDT
LOL!
Busted, you can't back it up.
Fine I defend the ENTIRE article, now answer!

I think I am going to cry over your harsh insults:)
I will leave you alone so you can insult someone else, obviously that is all you can do
Reply to this comment
by JBARON79 July 28, 2009 5:23 PM EDT
Whoops, thought I was posting a comment under howe4 brilliant thoughts
by hower4 July 28, 2009 5:27 PM EDT
Stop being a child. You said you couldn't defend the article, so obviously I'm not going to believe you now.
See all 26 Replies
by noloyalisti July 28, 2009 4:57 PM EDT
Since this knucklehead STILL thinks we are winning a military victory over Al Quada, I have to break the news that you don't kill mosquitoes with hand grenades.

How about stopping our wars of terror to steal their oil. How about building schools and hospitals instead of blowing them up. Or instead of giving taxpayer money to war profiteers, we give it them.

Who are the REAL terrorists, Americans?
Reply to this comment
by rugby65 July 28, 2009 2:36 PM EDT
Is Al Qaida a military force for any one country. If not we are street fighting a bunch of thugs. This should not be a military action any more. We are not fighting an Army. It is no different than the street thugs we have in our major cities at the present time. The only difference is our police are fighting this battle. Why not let their police force and national guard handle that issue. Bring out troops home and surround our borders and stop the influx of unwanted criminals entering the United States. Thousands of our US citizens are homeless right now and there is no hope in sight for this to improve any time soon. Somebody has to wake up and address the US issues quickly are mankind on this planet will perish and soon.
Reply to this comment
by curiously1 July 28, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
AZ - we finally found some common ground. We both agree that AQ is a threat to everyone. We are not so far apart after all !
Reply to this comment
See all 64 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook