August 3, 2009 6:14 PM

Nixon's Past, Palin's Future?

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  It worked for Richard Nixon. So why shouldn't it work for Sarah Palin?

"It," of course being the depiction of the media - especially the "media elite" - as a pack of troublemakers who rarely let the facts stand in the way of their pursuit of a biased, and likely pro-big government, agenda.

As politics goes, taking a swing at the phonies in the Fourth Estate is a relatively cost-free political exercise. The press - we're usually referred to these days as "the media" - nearly always finish near the bottom of public opinion polls, a smidgen higher than lawyers. In the face of attacks by irked politicians, what interest group is going to rush to the defense of the media? First Amendment lawyers. You get my point.

So it was that during her final speech as Alaska Governor, Palin used the occasion to cuff the press in prime time. After paying tribute to the Alaskans serving in the United States military, Palin contrasted the troops' sacrifice with the ignoble hijinks of those unnamed scribblers and bloviators.
And first, some straight talk for some, just some in the media because another right protected for all of us
is freedom of the press, and you all have such important jobs reporting facts and informing the electorate, and exerting power to influence. You represent what could and should be a respected honest profession that could and should be the cornerstone of our democracy. Democracy depends on you, and that is why, that's why our troops are willing to die for you. So, how 'bout in honor of the American soldier, you quit making things up. And don't underestimate the wisdom of the people, and one other thing for the media, our new governor has a very nice family too, so leave his kids alone.

Now, that's the way to deliver payback. For her core of supporters, dreaming of the 2012 elections, and for conservatives, who tend to believe reporters push a liberal agenda, Palin articulated the raw rage against the elites that has punctuated her 11 months on the national political scene. So it was that Palin, sometimes referred to as one of Ronald Reagan's political offspring, had gotten in the last word in a manner that Nixon would have admired.
Of course, when it came to exploiting popular resentment against the press, Nixon played that game as well as any politician, before or since. Even before the tumult later in the decade, when the counterculture and war in Vietnam dominated headlines, Republicans had complained of liberal bias in media coverage of the Kennedy-Nixon presidential race in 1960. And after losing the 1962 California gubernatorial contest to incumbent Pat Brown, Nixon's frustration boiled over.

Holding what he described as his last press conference, Nixon launched a meandering 16 minute soliloquy oozing with self-pity and contempt for the unfair way he said the media had treated his campaign.

He opened a hastily-called news conference by observing that "now that all the members of the press are so delighted that I have lost, I'd like to make a statement of my own." He went on to say:

"I believe Governor Brown has a heart, even though he believes I do not. I believe he's a good American, even though he feels I am not. I'm proud of the fact that I defended my opponent's patriotism. You gentlemen didn't report it, but I'm proud that I did that. And I would appreciate it for once, gentlemen, if you would just print what I say."....

"I leave you gentleman now and you will write it. You will interpret it. That's your right. But as I leave you I want you to know -- just think how much you're going to be missing. You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference, and it will be one in which I have welcomed the opportunity to test wits with you."

Watching the speech, Brown was reported to have told his wife that Nixon would regret that statement his entire life because the press was never going to let him forget it. While Brown was right - the press never did let Nixon forget his outburst - it mattered little. Turns out that this was not his final press conference. Within a few years, a "new Nixon" was back on the stump campaigning for Republican candidates and in 1968, he won the presidency.

Back to Palin. Was this her final press conference? Don't bet on it. Although no longer on the government payroll, she promises to remain prominent on national issues. Unlike Nixon, who came of age in the post-World War 2 era, the proliferation of social media tools now at Palin's disposal means that she's not as reliant on remaining in the good graces of the media to get her message out.

Along with Barack Obama, Palin remains one of the most fascinating politicians on the scene. And like moths to a flame, the media can't resist the attraction. One day after her final day in office, in fact, MSNBC reported on its "Palin Chronicles" special that the now-private citizen was about to open a new Twitter account.

The media may not love her, but I don't know why that should bother Palin. One way or another, they can't get enough of her.


By Charles Cooper

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 30 Comments
by xlib July 29, 2009 10:52 AM EDT
Keep that drum beating the thug will reward you. As for all the slams on Palin and her lack of brains, I mention one name-joe biden.
Tell me lemmings, to what end are you and your media doing this? I mean, why the fixation.
Geez, I would think you would want to keep up on the here and now.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso29 July 29, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
The biggest difference between Palin and Nixon is that Nixon could actually THINK and ARTICULATE what he was thinking. He also knew the issues. Who knows where Sarah will end up--but much she suffered (not all_ at the hands of the media was her own fault--while she is gone and before she comes back--she just might want to learn what the President and VP really do, What the major issues decided by the SCOTUS has been, what direct diplomacy, the Bush doctrine and nation building are, maybe a bit of geography and learn to at least pepper her rhetoric with a few salient bits of policy--because the fact is--the reason SArah Palin became fodder for the media was that McCain appeared to choose her as a token, and those who suspected that she was a token for women and HRC really became convinced of it--when she gave interviews and came off sounding like a Beauty Contestant idiot.

Sarah is smart--but somewhere along the way, she must prove she also is intelligent--and she can start by actually learning how to make coherent sentences and knowing what she is talking about. Because while her base loves the one liners, jibes and rousing neo con , right winging rhetoric--it will not cut it for the rest of us.

And the rest of America--is where the votes that will get anyone in the White House, are.
Reply to this comment
by creeper00 July 29, 2009 10:09 AM EDT
Boy, CBS, you had to dig really deep to come up with this comparison. There is so little similarity between Nixon's speech and Palin's that your entire story is baseless. Nixon was supposedly quitting politics. Palin has made it clear she has no intention of doing so.

Slow news day?
Reply to this comment
by creeper00 July 29, 2009 9:40 AM EDT
Boy, CBS, you had to dig really deep to come up with this comparison. There is so little similarity between Nixon's speech and Palin's that your entire story is baseless. Nixon was supposedly quitting politics. Palin has made it clear she has no intention of doing so.

Slow news day?
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 July 28, 2009 11:01 PM EDT
Palin is not all that bright and that fact will become even more apparent day by day the more people hear her speak. We already suffered a not too bright person in GWB, I do not think the majority of people think that is a good idea...ever.
Reply to this comment
by excoachken July 28, 2009 9:18 PM EDT
Nixon's past/Palin's future a perfect match because neither exists any longer.
Reply to this comment
by cameraphone July 28, 2009 7:39 PM EDT
Pick and choose your Constitutional Amendments. Yes on Guns, No On Press Freedom.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 July 28, 2009 6:55 PM EDT
In the face of attacks by irked politicians, what interest group is going to rush to the defense of the media? First Amendment lawyers. You get my point.
*************************************
I ALWAYS defend the "press." It is one of the cornerstones of democracy. Let American's not have a free and open press for a while, like China, or North Korea, for a while, and then they might understand its importance. Anyone who listens to this drivel about the big bad media are just plain ignorant of what a treasure our free-press is.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti July 28, 2009 3:07 PM EDT
The difference is that I would not call Nixon white trash.
Reply to this comment
by O_ReallyFactor July 28, 2009 10:57 AM EDT
What a stupid story. Give it a rest will ya. Palin is now old news.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti July 28, 2009 12:17 PM EDT
I really can't believe we are still talking about this Bimbo wacko religious nut who could have been vice-president. Oh my God, is how far America has sunk?

By the way, although Nixon was an insecure and frightened little man (like most Republicans), at least he was educated and smart (unlike the joke of Palin).
See all 30 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook