August 3, 2009 5:47 AM

Crowded Classrooms Expected for Fall

(AP)  Like a seesaw on the school playground, falling state budgets are pushing class sizes higher.

The recession is forcing districts to lay off teachers even as the economic stimulus pumps billions of dollars into schools. As a result, classrooms across the country will be more crowded when school starts in the fall.

Patti Hathorn, a fifth-grade teacher in rural Pinson, Ala., is expecting 29 or 30 students, making it the biggest class she's taught. Many of her students at Kermit Johnson Elementary are learning English or are in special education.

"You may have a child that needs you, that needs that adult figure, to spend the extra five minutes with them. If you have five or six extra kids, that five minutes is gone," Hathorn said.

It's the same story in small communities such as Pinson and Wapakoneta, Ohio, and urban areas including Los Angeles and Broward County, Fla. In many places, classes will have well over 30 kids.

There is no official data on class sizes for the upcoming year; many states and districts have not finalized their budgets. A survey this year by the American Association of School Administrators found that 44 percent of school districts expected to increase class size.

Educators and parents worry the larger classes will keep kids from learning.

"The issue is how this affects kids and what price this generation is going to have to pay," said John White, principal of Mulholland Middle School in Los Angeles, where the district has laid off more than 2,000 teachers.

Classes in Los Angeles are expected to grow by two kids in fourth through 12th grades. Middle school classes will have 35 kids on average; juniors and seniors will have about 43 kids in each class. Kindergarten through third-grade classes will rise by four kids to 24.

Very large classes can keep teachers from teaching because their time is spent keeping order. Crowded classrooms also increase the chance that struggling students may fall through the cracks.

"I certainly won't say there's a magic number because it depends on the nature of the student group," said Jeremy Finn, education professor at University at Buffalo-SUNY. "But in the elementary grades especially, there's a certain point at which teachers can't do what they were trained to do."

Just as there's a downside to bigger classes, there's an upside to smaller ones, he said.

Research has shown that younger children, those in kindergarten through third grade, perform and behave better in smaller classes. Benefits are strongest for minority and poor children, Finn said.

There is evidence that being in small classes early on improves a student's chance of graduating from high school or taking the SAT or ACT college entrance exams.

Most often cited is a large-scale, four-year study of smaller class sizes in Tennessee in the 1980s. The study found that by eighth grade, children who had had smaller classes in kindergarten through third grade had substantial advantages in all subjects over their peers who had been in larger classes.

Others dispute the importance of smaller classes; the debate is far from settled.

Researcher Eric Hanushek called it "kind of silly" that advocates still rely on 20-year-old data from Tennessee. He pointed to other studies that showed small to negligible benefits for kids in small classes.

"All the research suggests the number of kids is much less important than who is teaching the class," said Hanushek, a senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. "In the face of budget problems, allowing class size to move a little bit makes all the sense in the world."

"In fact, to the extent you put ineffective teachers into classrooms, you're much better off by keeping larger classes with effective teachers," he said.

The trouble with this recession is that kids may wind up with larger classes and ineffective teachers.

Mass layoffs are reshuffling teachers into grades or subjects they may never have taught, or taught long ago. Administrators are being pushed back into the classroom after years away from teaching.

At Coweeman Middle School in rural Kelso, Wash., one teacher who has taught math for 30 years has been reassigned to special education, principal Randy Heath said. In fact, every teacher who is endorsed to teach special education is being switched to those classes, regardless of whether he or she actually has taught it, he said.

"We're being forced to make decisions that we know are not good for kids," Heath said.

Money from the economic stimulus has reduced the number of teacher layoffs, but job losses are still widespread. Although the stimulus provided an unprecedented $100 billion for education, that's not enough to cover state and local budget shortfalls.

The stimulus boosted federal spending and helped restore cuts in state budgets, sources that together provide about 56 percent of school dollars. It did not make up for local tax revenues, which give schools the rest of their money.

Local revenues have been socked by the recession and may dip even lower because property assessments tend to lag behind a recession.

"It's a little hard to tell whether this upcoming school year or the one after is going to be more difficult," said Mike Casserly, executive director of the Council of the Great City Schools, a coalition of the biggest urban public school systems.

This school year, Cheryl James of Sacramento, Calif., plans to volunteer in her 12-year-old son's school to help teachers facing bigger class sizes at his middle school.

James expects his classes to get bigger because of teacher layoffs and retirements, but she doesn't yet know by how much.

"If you have more people in the room - trying to get their hand up, trying to get their question answered, trying to get someone to stop kicking the back of their chair - there are going to be more problems," James said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 13 Comments
by TheMasses2009 July 27, 2009 2:49 PM EDT
I know!
Let's just print MORE money ...............
Reply to this comment
by poochie44 July 27, 2009 1:03 PM EDT
It's too bad teachers that can't teach are still around yet the really good teachers are let go. I can think of a few teachers at our local school who are not teaching the kids a thing but they're kept because they have tenure.
Our class sizes are doubling and the teachers are taking pay cuts in an already low pay base. This shouldn't be happening. Our kids deserve so much better.
I feel sorry for the kids in the oversized classes that need so much more attention. They're not going to get it because the teachers won't have the time or resources to assist them.
Reply to this comment
by sy2502 July 27, 2009 1:23 PM EDT
Look, there is no money, ok? If your family lost the job and you had no money coming in, you would have to make adjustments to your life style, whether you like them or not, until you get another job. Yeah, it's a bummer you can't go to the fancy restaurant once a week anymore. Yeah it's a bummer you can't go on a shopping spree every weekend anymore. You don't have to like it. But since money doesn't appear out of thin air just for your convenience, you have to make do with less anyway. So our schools will have to make do with bigger classes until something changes with the government and they stop spending like drunken sailors. You don't have to like it, but it has to happen.
by aChangeOfIdeas July 27, 2009 12:45 PM EDT
It's not just about hiring new teachers, a lot of districts are getting rid of teachers they already have. A district near me eliminated 60 teachers this year, which is huge considering the district only has 5600 students. Oh, and for those of you crying about "illegals", I would guess that this district has none... less than 1% at most. I know that is an issue in other areas but the economy is affecting schools everywhere.
Reply to this comment
by dnamj July 27, 2009 12:04 PM EDT
Seriously, how much does it cost to hire some teachers? Is this less important that making sure Goldman Sachs jerks get their bonuses? This sucks.
Reply to this comment
by Meg003 July 27, 2009 11:10 AM EDT
proud_churchgoer Do you have good private schools in your area? My kids are in excellent public schools. Our local private school is expensive, and not very good. It is designed for students who cannot pass the rigorous public school.
Reply to this comment
by proud_churchgoer July 27, 2009 11:12 AM EDT
I homeschool my children.
by squeakof2006 July 27, 2009 9:29 AM EDT
No, they need to tighten immigration. How many of those kids come from illegal parents? If America wants a better future, it starts with better education. The students aren't getting a better education with that many students in a class. Citizenship of the student and at least one parent should be required before a student can start school. It would keep the class sizes down in a lot of areas. Cut a few sports programs or raise ticket prices. That could be used to cover at least part of a teacher's salary. Districts need to protect the integrity of the classroom. It's time to get creative, not to cut public education.
Reply to this comment
by proud_churchgoer July 27, 2009 9:36 AM EDT
Those illegal parents mow my lawn, clean my house, and they dont mind doing windows for reasonable prices. Lets just do away with public education.
by poochie44 July 27, 2009 12:59 PM EDT
A friend of mine stopped teaching in Southern California because 1/2 her class was made up of illegals and it was hit or miss whether they would show up for school or not. She was so frustrated because these kids would get so far behind yet be expected to go on to the next grade.
by proud_churchgoer July 27, 2009 8:49 AM EDT
We should do away with public education all together. It would save so much tax money.
Reply to this comment
by HGOODGUY July 27, 2009 11:20 AM EDT
SPOKEN LIKE THE IGNORAMUS THAT YOU ARE!!!!
by dnamj July 27, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
Pride goeth before a fall.
See all 13 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook