July 24, 2009 5:34 PM

Obama Unveils "Race to the Top" Contest

(AP)  Using money as bait, President Barack Obama challenged states and school districts Friday to raise their academic standards, improve teacher quality and allow more innovation if they want a chance at roughly $5 billion in new grants.

Obama said the broad goals are to give every child a chance to succeed and to boost the educational foundation of the nation's economy. Yet the "Race to the Top" program is also specifically targeted at expanding reforms the administration wants, such as linking teacher pay to how well students do on tests.

"This competition will not be based on politics or ideology or the preferences of a particular interest group," Obama said in an appearance at the Education Department. "Instead, it will be based on a simple principle: whether a state is ready to do what works."

The president added: "Not every state will win and not every school district will be happy with the results. But America's children, America's economy, America itself will be better for it."

Obama said the states and districts that apply for money will be evaluated by clear criteria, with rewards going to those that adopt strong standards and common tests; that get high-quality teachers in the classroom; and that allow expansions of charter schools, which are public schools that operate with more independence. He endorsed the idea of linking student achievement to teacher pay - a hotly debated idea in education - but said it should be just one factor in compensation.

As he has with other domestic priorities, Obama said reforming education has been talked about without enough action for years.

Speaking of the need to improve academics nationwide, he said: "We have no choice. And I'm absolutely confident that we can make it happen."

The $5 billion education fund, part of the economic stimulus law enacted this year, is seen as Obama's shot at revamping schools over the next couple of years.

A state will have to meet a series of conditions to earn points and boost its chances. Some of those conditions are controversial, especially among teachers' unions, which make up an influential segment of Obama's Democratic base.

For example, the administration says it will not award money to states that bar student performance data from being linked to teacher evaluations. Several states, including California, New York and Wisconsin, have such a prohibition.

But there are also elements the unions will embrace; states can earn points by submitting letters of support from state union leaders.

The Obama administration is using the stimulus not only to help schools ride out the recession but to try to transform the federal government's role in education. Education Secretary Arne Duncan envisions the dollars going to perhaps 10 to 20 states that can serve as models for innovation.

The $5 billion fund might not seem like much, considering the stimulus bill provided $100 billion for schools. But the fund is massive compared with the $16 million in discretionary money Duncan's predecessors got each year for their own priorities.

Moreover, the fund has taken on added importance because in many states, the bulk of the stimulus money is being used to fill increasingly larger budget holes, and not for the innovations Obama wants.

A report from the Government Accountability Office earlier this month said school districts are planning to use the money mostly to prevent teacher layoffs.

"Most did not indicate they would use these funds to pursue educational reform," the report said. The GAO is the investigative arm of Congress.

Already, the promise of an extra $5 billion has helped Duncan prod state legislatures to do the administration's bidding.

For example, he warned Tennessee lawmakers they could lose out on the money if they kept blocking a bill to let more kids into charter schools; within weeks, the bill was enacted and signed into law.

"It's amazing the amount of progress, literally, without us spending a dime," Duncan said.

The Education Department will gather public comment on its rules for the $5 billion fund for the next 30 days; applications will be available in October, and the first round of money should be awarded early next year.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by sjc_1 July 25, 2009 1:04 PM EDT
All schools can be the best schools, but not with the Every Child Left Behind mess from Bush. Bush turned a potentially good program into a union busting crusade that left the public school system in shambles...just as intended.
Reply to this comment
by npkppprc July 25, 2009 7:22 AM EDT
You can't possibly rate a teacher by how students do, some students don't learn at the same level as others, is the teacher supposed to ignore 45 students out of a class of 50 and spend extra time on the students that are falling behind? Many of the problems lie at the students homes and parents that don't participate. Don't expect the teacher to solve those problems. Hell we give diplomas to high school students that don't speak or write english, how did they pass the tests??? Guess will have to leave testing up to Sotomayor.
Reply to this comment
by NinthSt78 July 25, 2009 3:34 AM EDT
It's a refreshing change to see a "do-er" with a more academically-oriented point of view. Let's not forget what Hillary said in her book, though, EDUCATION = EXPECTATIONS.
Reply to this comment
by John_Merritt July 24, 2009 6:48 PM EDT
I think it is great we want to challenge the educators to be the best so they can lead our children into the future. So they can inspire them to be the best for themselves and for society. The question I have is this, "Are OUR schools properly equipped with what they need to make this happen?"

It appalls me to look at some of these school district throughout the landscape of this country who are outdated and unsafe in many respects and not geared for a proper learning environment. Since we do not have too many 'shovel ready' projects underway, I suggest that each state reassess their needs for schools in those areas that need it the most.

Since property values have plummmeted, may I suggest you build schools that are 21st century schools so our children KNOW around the corner something better is awaiting them. Mind you, these schools will not be completed for a couple years, but let's start building them. During that two year hiatus teachers and students can be acquiring the tools that will make us competitive and ready to dominate the educational systems throughout the world.

That is where we need to be. For the children, for our businesses, for the communities and for society. Start building the schools and let's get people hopeful and back to work. There is no delay, unless you want to make it so. We tend to overthink thinks. We need to make it simple, concise and complete; unlike our healthcare bill.
Reply to this comment
by koko98-2009 July 25, 2009 1:14 AM EDT
How funny, property taxes in California are mandated to be lower by Prop. 13, a bad economy makes things worse. Stop living in your taxes are too high fantasy world and take a look at what it really takes to build a school.
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook