AP/ July 24, 2009, 8:13 AM

Minimum Wage Hike Raises Recession Fears

A federal minimum wage increase that takes effect Friday could prolong the recession, some economists say, by forcing small businesses to lay off the same workers that the pay hike passed in better times was meant to help.

The increase to $7.25 means 70 cents more an hour for the lowest-paid workers in the 30 states that have lower minimums or no minimum wage. It also means higher costs for employers who feel they've already trimmed all their operating fat.

"How will they absorb the increase?" said Rajeev Dhawan, director of Georgia State University's Economic Forecasting Center. "They will either hire less people or they will do less business."

More than in any period before, businesses are likely to lay off employees and reduce hours, further fueling the economic slump in states seeing double-digit unemployment rates, fiscal conservatives and some economists say.

Minimum wage advocates counter the wage bump will keep more working poor afloat, and say more increases are needed to help stimulate consumer spending and strengthen businesses in the long run.

Click here to read CBSNews.com's Declan McCullagh explain the minimum wage debate.

It's an old policy debate that resurfaced when Congress passed the increase two years ago and has taken on urgency as the nation's fiscal funk has deepened.

In the end, it's the workers and their employers who find themselves caught in the middle.

At Bench Warmers Bar and Grill in the southeast Kansas farming town of Chanute, owner Cathy Matney has decided to let some of her dishwashers go rather than pay all 22 of her employees more.

"It's bad timing," said Matney, whose waitresses and cooks will have to pitch in with scrubbing pots and pans. "With the economy like this, there's a lot of people who are out of work and this is only going to add to it."

Ryan Arfmann, who owns a Jamba Juice shop in Idaho Falls, Idaho, will be cutting hours to his staff, which is made up largely of college students, high schoolers and homemakers who want to make a few bucks.

"Am I going to fire anybody, no," Arfmann said. "But kids understand there's going to be hours cut."

Arfmann said he wishes the increase was spread out over a few more years, to make it easier for him to absorb the costs. He also is concerned that he'll end up having to give everybody raises just to maintain pay differentials between employees.

"People who are already getting paid above $7.25 are going to feel like they need raises as well," he said. "It's harder for me to reward employees that are doing well because of minimum wage being so high."

Backers of the increase say it's long overdue for millions of the nation's working poor. Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., authored the 2007 minimum wage legislation, which increased pay for the first time in a decade.

"A higher minimum wage helps working families' budgets and results in increased spending on local business, which is good for everyone," Miller said in an e-mail. He did not say whether he would have pushed to raise the minimum wage in an economic climate like the current one, and he did not immediately respond to a message left Thursday with his spokesman.

Miller's view is a tough sell to employers of minimum wage workers - from hotels to daycares to burger chains - who find themselves having to cut larger paychecks as their revenues continue to shrink. The effects could be especially harsh in the seven states - Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee - where the pay increase coincides with double-digit unemployment.

"Wherever you have the higher unemployment rates, that's where the business conditions are bad - and that's where a minimum wage increase will have an impact on the negative side," said Dhawan, the economist at Georgia State.

Dhawan said the strain could be felt equally in metropolitan areas, where fast-food chains and franchises employ large numbers of minimum wage workers, and in smaller towns where the bulk of the work force may be concentrated in one, low-earning sector.

Fewer workers employed, meanwhile, reduces the amount of money in circulation - dampening any consumer spending spike the wage boost could have created, Dhawan said.

"The increasing power from the higher wages will be swamped by the losses from the people who lost jobs," he said.

Marilynn Winn, an Atlanta woman who earns $6.75 an hour - a couple of dimes more than the current $6.55 federal minimum - driving cars between auto auctions, worries the pay boost could lead her boss to make cuts, especially to older workers like herself.

Still, she said she'd be grateful for the raise if she gets to keep her job.

"We could use more, the more the better," said Winn, 58.

Sara Campbell, who earns roughly $786 a month cleaning event spaces in Atlanta, said she's unlikely to spend any money she gets from the minimum wage increase, especially since she worries her hours will get cut.

"You never know," she said. "You might lose your job. They might start laying off and if they lay off, I'll have something saved up."

Played out across enough businesses, that pattern could stunt economic recovery nationwide, said Moody's economist John Lonski.

"You're going to get fewer jobs created," said Lonski, who predicted national unemployment would peak at 10.5 percent in the first quarter of 2010. "It's not a backbreaker for the U.S. economy, but it doesn't help stabilize employment, especially since most businesses now suffer from much lower than expected sales."

It's hardly the first time a wage increase has prompted doom and gloom predictions from economists, who point to conventional business thinking that supports the idea that higher costs plus lower revenue equals a shrinking work force.

More upbeat predictions suggest the wage increase could actually play a role in turning around the nation's finances. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis said Thursday that the wage increase will generate an extra $5.5 billion in consumer spending over the next year.

Economists have largely overlooked the positive effect on consumer buying power, according to Holly Sklar, senior policy adviser for Let Justice Roll, a national campaign aimed at increasing the minimum wage to $10 by 2010.

A further wage increase could eventually become a reality: One of President Barack Obama's campaign promises included raising the minimum wage to $9.50 an hour by 2011.

"You can't have an economy that's based heavily on consumer purchasing power, and at the same time, not pay the consumer enough to live on," Sklar said.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
114 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sassfam says:
Let me get this straight. Struggling minimum wage workers are going to prolong the economic downturn more than the looting by Hank Paulson, et al; Bush, et al; various stimulus programs (none of which seem to benefit the struggling minimum wage workers...), and banks and financial institutions who are miraculously showing new profits this quarter?

We're not that stupid.
Or are we?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dancingmoon says:
According to the US government, the estimated poverty threshold for 2008 is:

1 Person $10997
2 People $14060
3 People $17165
4 People $22017

Even with the $0.70 increase to $7.25, annual salary based on 40 hours/week and 52 weeks in a year comes to $15080.

Barely above the poverty line for 2 people and still below the poverty line for 3 and 4 people.

The US government also reports that for data collected for the years 2005-2007, the median monthly rental cost was $781. That's $9,372 for a year.

Towers Perrin estimates that for 2009, employers who offer health insurance coverage will pay 78% of that coverage. The remaining 22% will be covered by employees in addition to deductibles, co-pays etc. Per Towers Perrin, family coverage is $14244 which translates to about $3,100 annually for the employee in premiums alone.

So out of the $15,080 annual salary we deduct off the top $9372 plus $3100 or $12472 which leaves $2,608 left for the rest of the year.

Oh wait. The average cost of auto insurance is $1,872.

Deduct that from the $2608 left over after rent and health insurance and you're left with $736 for the year to cover all your other bills.

Of course it could be argued that minimum wage jobs don't offer health care anyway so you could add the $3100 back to the $736 for $3836 for the year to cover other expenses.

Ooops! Forgot child care so the worker can go to the minimum wage job. Day care costs average between $3380 to $10787 a year for just one preschooler, according to the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies.

Even if we take the low end cost of $3380 out of the $3836, now we're down to $456 for the year to cover other expenses.

Or $38 a month for groceries, clothing, school supplies, gasoline, car payments (even old clunkers have payments due), or busfare etc.

Not all minimum wage workers are teens working for extra spending money. Many of these workers are adults trying to support families on a minimum wage.

And minimum wage workers are NOT all lazy bums. Many, if not most, work much harder than most of us will ever work. They deserve to be able to survive on their wages.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
John_Merritt says:
I can understand the need for people to make more money, but right now we have too many people that are not making any money.

For the average low wage paying job, this boost in pay for the existing employees is going to calculate to $1,560 yearly based on a 2080 work year. However, it is going to cost small and medium sized businesses revenue they don't have, and it will require them to reduce costs, services or benefits in other areas to meet those needs.

It also means they won't be able to hire any NEW employee's and may require them to reduce the hours worked for existing employee's. No new hires, no new jobs. No payroll to pay the existing workers, less hours or benefits worked for the existing employee's.

We are running in circles with no clear cut plan to get people back to work. If inflation is not problematic right now according to the economists, than cost of living increases can be curtailed for awhile. However, to diffuse or douse any new job creation because of measures that do not need to happen during a recession/depression is counter productive. The same would be true for raising taxes on people as well.

This administration's plan is sorely lacking on many fronts. They are sitting on a bundle of cash and their 'shovel ready' projects are sitting idly with the shovel in the garage and not in the ground. Get with it Washington and get your head out of the sand and into the game.

Sign me: I hope and pray we make it through this mess in one piece.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
estai777 says:
When I graduated from college 1980 I made 8.00 an hour at a job that was somewhat specialized but not any more difficult than what someone now would make about 12-15 an hour doing.
29 years later people are making less than 8.00 an hour.
With inflation this is a horrible fact. The greedy at the top are to blame.
The biggest pyramid scam in the nation is the corporate structure.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lami987 says:
Even if those clueless conservatives and economists were correct, so be it. We as a society must not sacrifice minimum wage earners to benefit those who earn more. If necessary it only makes sense to cut earnings of the well to do to compensate for increases in minimum wage. Certainly this is something the conservatives would never do. They would welcome all the increases in executive pay even to the tune of multimillion dollars but they would never agree to minimum wage increases. If it weren't for the democrats in congress our minimum wage would still be $5.15/hour. Republicans in congress has been fighting against any increase in minimum wage for decades. At the same time they are against any welfare for the poor but are for all corporate welfare.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pw08-2009 says:
American business is out to screw the American worker, so this recession fear is completely expected. I will work to NOT do business with as many of the TARP companies as possible in the future.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
johnrusselll says:
For the third year in a row, congress has increased the minimum wage. Most union jobs are indexed to the minimum wage. A 10% increase in middle class wages [typical family of four] is an increase of income tax of between 20 and 25%. Because the increase in minimum wage devalues the dollar by requiring more dollars to buy a given union product or service, the result is that governments, both federal and state, end up taking a greater percentage of what you earn. Increasing minimum wage makes us more dependent on our government.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lovegetpeace says:
All 36 Receissions since 1776 were caused by Greed in Wall Streets and None by Minimum Wage Hikes.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lovegetpeace says:
All 36 recessions since 1776 were caused by Greed from Wall Streets and none by Minimum Wage Hikes.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mary-miami says:
High School kids are not the only ones earning a miserable seven dollars an hour. In Miami,Florida there are adults working for this amount at supermarkets. Lately some hamburger places will only hire youngsters and that's wrong, because the people who really need to work are the parents paying the rent. Rents are approx. $800. a month for a one bedroom. Do the math. These people end up asking for food stamps. Forget going to college, there's no money. Forget consulting a doctor, dentist, or optometrist. It's immoral to have only the rich population living a good quality of life. As far as you rich owners giving lay-offs go, it was already happening with Bush at the whitehouse. Bush caused this Depression and the layoffs.
www.marymiami.wordpress.com
reply
See all 114 Comments