July 20, 2009 7:07 AM

Air Pollution in Womb Linked to Low IQ

(AP)  Researchers for the first time have linked air pollution exposure before birth with lower IQ scores in childhood, bolstering evidence that smog may harm the developing brain.

The results are in a study of 249 children of New York City women who wore backpack air monitors for 48 hours during the last few months of pregnancy. They lived in mostly low-income neighborhoods in northern Manhattan and the South Bronx. They had varying levels of exposure to typical kinds of urban air pollution, mostly from car, bus and truck exhaust.

At age 5, before starting school, the children were given IQ tests. Those exposed to the most pollution before birth scored on average four to five points lower than children with less exposure.

That's a big enough difference that it could affect children's performance in school, said Frederica Perera, the study's lead author and director of the Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health.

Dr. Michael Msall, a University of Chicago pediatrician not involved in the research, said the study doesn't mean that children living in congested cities "aren't going to learn to read and write and spell."

But it does suggest that you don't have to live right next door to a belching factory to face pollution health risks, and that there may be more dangers from typical urban air pollution than previously thought, he said.

"We are learning more and more about low-dose exposure and how things we take for granted may not be a free ride," he said.

While future research is needed to confirm the new results, the findings suggest exposure to air pollution before birth could have the same harmful effects on the developing brain as exposure to lead, said Patrick Breysse, an environmental health specialist at Johns Hopkins' school of public health.

And along with other environmental harms and disadvantages low-income children are exposed to, it could help explain why they often do worse academically than children from wealthier families, Breysse said.

"It's a profound observation," he said. "This paper is going to open a lot of eyes."

The study in the August edition of Pediatrics was released Monday.

In earlier research, involving some of the same children and others, Perera linked prenatal exposure to air pollution with genetic abnormalities at birth that could increase risks for cancer; smaller newborn head size and reduced birth weight. Her research team also has linked it with developmental delays at age 3 and with children's asthma.

The researchers studied pollutants that can cross the placenta and are known scientifically as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Main sources include vehicle exhaust and factory emissions. Tobacco smoke is another source, but mothers in the study were nonsmokers.

A total of 140 study children, 56 percent, were in the high exposure group. That means their mothers likely lived close to heavily congested streets, bus depots and other typical sources of city air pollution; the researchers are still examining data to confirm that, Perera said. The mothers were black or Dominican-American; the results likely apply to other groups, researchers said.

The researchers took into account other factors that could influence IQ, including secondhand smoke exposure, the home learning environment and air pollution exposure after birth, and still found a strong influence from prenatal exposure, Perera said.

Dr. Robert Geller, an Emory University pediatrician and toxicologist, said the study can't completely rule out that pollution exposure during early childhood might have contributed. He also noted fewer mothers in the high exposure group had graduated from high school. While that might also have contributed to the high-dose children's lower IQ scores, the study still provides compelling evidence implicating prenatal pollution exposure that should prompt additional studies, Geller said.

The researchers said they plan to continuing monitoring and testing the children to learn whether school performance is affected and if there are any additional long-term effects.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 33 Comments
by billpl-2009 July 21, 2009 1:38 AM EDT
...or does it mean, smart parents move out of congested urban areas
Reply to this comment
by quickly101 July 20, 2009 11:20 AM EDT
Tell this to big oil and coal. In reality they could care less about the average man or woman. I would like to live to see the day these were replaced with wind, solar, or nuclear power. But the wealthicans will make sure they keep spewing forth their filth into our air for decades to come.
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 11:50 AM EDT
"Tell this to big oil and coal"

In all fairness to Biggoil and Biggcoal, how healthy and smart do you think little children people would be if their mommies spent sub-zero winter nights in unheated homes?
by ass_u_me July 20, 2009 11:12 AM EDT
New Research Points to Potential Dangers of Carrying Babies in Urban Areas With Dirty Air

Wow, what a leap of logic. Toxic fumes, essentially poison, being breathed into a pregnant woman's body, and it affects tissue living inside her. Impossible!
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 11:45 AM EDT
I agree - it's all junk science!
by xlib July 20, 2009 11:03 AM EDT
fred_mertz-did a search using dogpile and there are a number of sites that have excerpts of his book. Try doing a search yourself. I just love how you libs resort to name calling.
Just go to dogpile.com put in john holdren and ecoscience and cruise the sites.
Notice, I didn't call you name except lib. Try it, you might be able to enter a discussion or two.
Oh yea, I keep forgetting, you libs don't discuss, you name call and try to destroy.
My bad.
Say, what your take on the thugs green jobs czar, v
Reply to this comment
by mikethek July 20, 2009 10:59 AM EDT
Do a study that includes pregnant women who reside on Fifth Avenue. Bet the results would run counter to these.
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 11:04 AM EDT
There's no pollution on Fifth Avenue.
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 10:58 AM EDT
'249 children of New York City women who wore backpack air monitors for 48 hours during the last few months of pregnancy.' - - -


I think the weight of the backpack air monitors pulled their shoulders down, compressing their spine, and caused increased pressure on the burp canal, which made their kids stupid.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 July 20, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
I think my IQ went down after reading this article. Not to mention some of the comments.
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 10:03 AM EDT
Dr. Michael Msall, said the study doesn't mean that children living in congested cities "aren't going to learn to read and write and spell."


Then, how do you explain Linseed Lowhands?
Reply to this comment
by govwatch2 July 20, 2009 10:01 AM EDT
Yeah, right!!! Like we never had low IQ until air pollution. These "scientist" must have been born in Shanghai.
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 9:54 AM EDT
How, exactly, are festuses in the womb exposed to air pollution?
Do they have windows down there?
Reply to this comment
by xlib July 20, 2009 10:18 AM EDT
My God, are you an example of a product of the ayers/obama educational system/?
Geesh, go talk to your mom or dad.
See all 33 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook