Portions of Health Bill Advance in House

Committees Approve Tax Increase for the Rich, Public Option in Effort to Get Bill Through by the End of the Month

(AP)  Working day and night, House Democrats advanced major health care legislation through two committees on Friday and struggled to line up the votes necessary to prevail in a third.

But the sense of urgency diminished in the Senate, where bipartisan negotiators ended talks for the week with no indication a deal was imminent and a different group of six Democrats and Republicans announced its opposition to "timelines which prevent us from achieving the best result."

The White House and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are pushing for legislation to clear both houses by August, but the letter said, "we believe that taking additional time to achieve a bipartisan result is critical."

The letter was signed by Democratic Sens. Ben Nelson of Nebraska; Ron Wyden of Oregon and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana; as well as Maine Republican Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe and independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut.

The AP obtained a copy.

Separately, the White House urged Speaker Nancy Pelosi to toughen the emerging bill so it will hold down the future increases in Medicare payments to doctors, hospitals and other providers. The request, in a letter from Budget Director Peter Orszag, came one day after Congress' top budget official warned that as drafted, the legislation fails to slow the growth in health care costs nationally.

The Ways and Means Committee was the first panel to act in the House, voting after midnight to slap a new 10-year tax increase of $544 billion on the wealthy to help finance legislation.

The committee vote was 23 to 18, with three Democrats joining all Republicans in opposition.

In a nearby committee room, the Education and Labor Committee met throughout the night, then took a brief break around dawn before returning to work and approving its portion of the bill on a vote of 26-22.

Republicans failed in numerous attempts in both committees to knock out central portions of the bill, including the tax increases and a requirement for the government to sell insurance in competition with private companies.

Separately, the Energy and Commerce Committee met to consider its part of the bill.

There, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., confronted a pivotal group of moderate to conservative members of the rank-and-file demanding changes, and claiming the votes to block the measure unless they get them.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has vowed to pass health care legislation in the House by the end of the month.

That task grew more demanding on Thursday, though, when the director of the Congressional Budget Office, Douglas Elmendorf, said of the legislation so far, "We do not see the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending by a significant amount. And on the contrary, the legislation significantly expands the federal responsibility for health care costs."

Slowing the rate of growth for health care spending is one of Obama's twin goals for health care, alongside expanding health care to the millions who now lack it.

At its core, the effort involves a requirement for insurance companies to offer policies to all willing buyers, and bars them from charging higher premiums on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions. Legislation would rely on government subsidies to make insurance more available for lower-income individuals and families, and use tax increases as well as cuts in Medicare and Medicaid to pick up the cost.

"I will not defend the status quo," the president said Thursday in New Jersey, where he used a political fundraising appearance for Gov. Jon Corzine to make his latest plea for congressional action.

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee approved its portion of the legislation on a party-line vote earlier in the week.

But Baucus' Senate Finance Committee is days overdue for a promised public drafting session, with no date set to begin.

Baucus has been negotiating for days with Republicans in hopes of achieving a bipartisan compromise. But time clearly is running short, given Obama's personal request for him to deliver a bill by the end of the week.

Baucus and other negotiators ended talks for the week without agreement. "I think it would be prudent for the president to be patient," said Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, urging Obama to abandon his call for legislation to pass both houses by early August.

[tom10mac]

Ted Kennedy is trying to do all he can to push this through before he checks out. He is making references to it as his life work. It's amazing that the closer you get to to being judged for your life actions how your attention turns to doing what you think is right. So, up to this point, Ted Kennedy took as his life work, raping, murdering, ***** mongering, gluttony, drinking to drunkenness, etc. and any other hedonistic pursuit. Now, he's scraping for legacy. He will be dead before any health care reform becomes law.

[750zxrbball]

I could not agree more that our representatives have been reaping the benefits of unmatched health care, unmatched pension, unmatched, perks, unmatched liberty. If they want us to go without health care, LEAD BY EXAMPLE! It will never happen however. They will try to tell us ow important they are and how much work they do. Like the rest of us do not work. BS to all of them both republicans and democrats stink. If you think otherwise you are a fool. They are all for sale. Take away their pay and 90% of them will still run for the office. It is worth that much to them.

[babooph]

The dems are VERY lucky ,most republicans are already bribed to stop the fix-the lobbyists will have to bribe a bunch of dems now-forget govt healthcare -if it supposedly passes it will be CASTRATED!!!

[ceetee9]

Wow, the bill hasn?t even cleared the House and its new projected costs (over the next ten years) have already doubled?up to $2 trillion dollars.

And the beauty of this boondoggle is it does absolutely nothing to solve our runaway healthcare costs. For example:
? It does nothing to investigate why the medical and pharmaceutical industries have enjoyed double-digit inflation for over a decade while millions of us have enjoyed reduced wages or gotten little or no annual increases.
? It does nothing to address the ridiculous number of government regulations that are largely responsible for driving up healthcare costs.
? It does nothing to investigate how it is insurance companies have increased premiums in lock-step at an exponential rate year after year (but there?s no collusion there).
? It does nothing to reduce costs for millions of Americans who will undoubtedly be unable to qualify for the government funded public option.
? It does nothing to ensure those who already can?t afford healthcare insurance are going to pay for a required ?public option.?
? It does nothing to reduce frivolous malpractice law suits that significantly drive up the cost of healthcare.
? It does nothing to reduce government bureaucracy. In fact, it significantly increases it?and we all know how efficient government run programs are and how much money that will save us.
? It does nothing to demonstrate how it will ?not add to our national debt? (according to Pres. Obama) We don?t know how we?re going to pay for the multi-trillion dollar debt all the bailouts have already created so, obviously, adding this additional multi-trillion dollar debt shouldn?t be a problem either. Right?
? It does nothing to eliminate the incestuous relationship the medical and pharmaceutical industries have with government leaders. But we all know there are no favors given for financial support, right?
? And we all know the kind of excellent, well thought out and highly effective and efficient programs that Congress can pass when they don?t read the bills and rush to ram them through.

Wake up America this may be the final nail in the coffin that buries us. If government no longer represents us it is our duty to cast it off.

[Daves1221]

CHOOSING THE USUAL PROFITING INSURANCE COMPANY, OR CHOOSING GOVERNMENT PLAN SHOULD BE UP TO AMERICANS?
The deciding factor in implementing health care for everybody--LEGALLY--in America, is the Publics voice? Those who want to just follow the same old road, can do so with the profit taking commercial insurance. Those who would be satisfied with a government run health care program, can now start demanding it from the lawmakers. Those who see a Universal health care system, similar to most developed countries in Europe, should start informing every Representative and Senate politician starting today. Rationing in places like England, was caused by the major impact of uncontrolled immigration.
Most American working class can do--without-- high premiums, pre-existing condition clauses. deductibles, co-pays that is representative of the wealthy medical care insurers. Whatever pertains to your family, you should start ruffling the indifferent feathers of the people in Washington at 202-224-3121 Just like illegal immigration , we cannot afford anymore to subsidize the business that hire them or the millions of illegal families.

[jsd330]

According to the bill, your choice is limited. You can switch from a private insurer to the government plan, but you can't switch from one private plan to another, or from the government plan back to a private plan.
So what happened to Obama promise he's giving you choices. Once you're on the government plan you're locked in wether you like it or not, your freedom of choice is gone.
Go to IBDeditorials.com click on past 90 days, read "It's not an option"
Over 1000 pages and that came from the first 16, what else is in there, that may take more freedoms away from the American people?

[CBSAYArewayOmmiescay]

There aren't goint to be any options....on page 16 of the Health Care Bill in the Limitations of Enrollment...it makes it ILLEGAL for a private health care insurer to write you a policy on the day the health care bill is passed.

You have a choice of keeping your insurance coverage you now have or buying the government health care hoax....but if you lose your job, you're SOL because it will be illegal to get a plan anywhere but the government THE DAY THIS BILL IS PASSED!