July 17, 2009 11:31 AM

Study: 36% of Blacks in U.S. Obese

(AP)  Nearly 36 percent of black Americans are obese - much more than other major racial or ethnic groups - and that gap exists in most states, a new federal study finds.

About 29 percent of Hispanics and 24 percent of whites are obese, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Thursday. Overall, about 26 percent of U.S. adults are obese.

Racial differences in obesity rates have been reported before, and health officials were not surprised to see larger proportions of blacks tipping the scales.

But the new CDC report is the first to look at the gap state-by-state, finding blacks had significantly higher obesity rates in 21 states and somewhat higher rates in many others.

Experts believe there are several reasons for the differences. People with lower incomes often have less access to medical care, exercise facilities and more expensive, healthier food. In many places, minorities are disproportionately poor.

"Poverty is a very strong driver of obesity," said Kelly Brownell, director of Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity.

Attitudes about weight also are believed to be a factor, said Dr. Liping Pan, a CDC epidemiologist. Researchers cited a 2008 study that found black and Hispanic women had significantly lower odds of being dissatisfied with their body size than white women.

"Black and Hispanics are more accepting of high weight," Pan said, adding that heavy people who are satisfied with their size are not likely to diet or exercise.

However, it could be that over time as people struggle with poverty and environment "they come to accept the higher weights," Brownell said.

Obesity is based on the body mass index, a calculation using height and weight. A 5-foot-7-inch adult who weighs 190 pounds would have a BMI of 30, which is considered the threshold for obesity.

The data comes from a national telephone survey of more than 1 million Americans over the years 2006 through 2008.

For blacks, the highest obesity rate was in Maine, where 45 percent were obese. Tennessee was the state where Hispanic obesity was most common. And West Virginia was the fattest state for whites.

But generally, obesity was most common for both blacks and whites in the South and Midwest.

The study also broke down the groups by gender, and found black women were the heaviest, with 39 percent counted as obese. Black men were next, at 32 percent, then Hispanic women, 29 percent, Hispanic men, 28 percent, white men, 25 percent and white women, 22 percent.

The study is being published this week in a CDC publication, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.



On the Net:

CDC report: http://tiny.cc/PZBTZ

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 31 Comments
by fedupredneck July 20, 2009 9:20 AM EDT
They need to update this study with a ratio of "obese people" and how many are on the welfare rolls. As some other posters pointed out- I get sick of seeing kids and adults spanking thier EBT cards for chips,cookies and soda. I do live in a "ghetto" and it makes me sick what these people spend thier money on. The govt needs to regulate what constitutes "food" for purchase with welfare/EBT. Some have suggested taxing chips and junk food but that won't help when anyone on welfare doesn't pay the tax on them anyways.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan July 20, 2009 7:17 AM EDT
Too much fried chicken!

It's really that simple!
Reply to this comment
by g-gfather July 19, 2009 8:23 PM EDT
Old Chinese proverb.

" No worky no eaty."

There is no free lunch. Dependency on government life support is
suicide. The greater the dependency,the greater will be the famine.
Do something now! Our children's lives are our duty.

Think 1935, I was there and it's coming again,except with out the
know how to survive nor the resources of cohesive families to pull together and get us through. Obesity was not a problem. Learn survival skills,and resources, McDonald's is not one of them!

For all of us,but especially the children. Great-Grandfather.
Reply to this comment
by omnibus66 July 19, 2009 7:42 AM EDT
As bad as the obesity problem is among adults, it is worse in children. And childhood obesity cannot be easily linked to poverty, since todays kids basically get everything they want. Unfortunately what they want is McDonalds, Pizza Hut, video games, and the latest version of the Iphone. They have virtually no interest in healthy food or physical exercise.

They might have nice, slender fingers from all the texting they do, but the rest of their bodies are a medical time bomb that will explode on the health care system sometime in the future. This nation is eating itself to destruction.
Reply to this comment
by jsd330 July 19, 2009 9:43 PM EDT
I see it all the time, the moms driving the kids to soccer, baseball, football practice. When I was a kid I walked or rode my bike to and from practice and sometimes to the games to, if my parents couldn't make it.I made my kids do the same. Kids today don't even want to walk a block, they whine to mommy or daddy to give them a ride.
by emh1701 July 19, 2009 2:28 AM EDT
I would think the obesity rate would be higher for all of us - I have heard higher statistics before this article. Especially since the government's definition of "obese" is anyone who isn't skin and bones. We should all be anorexic, according to them.
Reply to this comment
by howbizarre July 19, 2009 7:30 PM EDT
I disagree. 5'5" and 149 pounds is NOT skin and bones, and it IS in the normal weight range. At 5'5", you would have to weigh 170 pounds to be considered obese - there is NOTHING skin and bones about that (150-170 is considered overweight). At 5'9", 170 pounds is considered overweight, 205 is considered obese. I'd like to see someone 5'5", 170 pounds that you can see any bones on. or someone 5'9" and 205 where you can see bones.
by John_Merritt July 18, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
'But generally, obesity was most common for both blacks and whites in the South and Midwest'.

This is the part I like. Instead of making blanket statements with little substance, taking the above sentence, what does that tell us? Nothing really. What would be interesting is what about those areas of the country (South and Midwest) which contributes to obestiy. Is it lifestyle, environment, climate, poverty, etc. that it a causative effect?

In identifying those contributors to obesity in these specific regions, can be start applying the remedies to this 'preventable' situation. Unless we have building blocks or a blueprint for living for many, they will continue to live in a situation they always have or find more comfortable.

How about a stimulus plan or incentive for people getting healthy? There will be less health care costs, greater productivity, happier people and hopefully families, etc. It seems we are always trying to douse the fire instead of preventing it. It starts at home and it starts in childhood. Unless we all take responsibility for our life choices, no one but ourselves should be responsible for the outcome.
Reply to this comment
by howbizarre July 19, 2009 7:25 PM EDT
I have heard that much of problem in the south is because of the way they cook - lots of fatty, fried food. I'm not sure why the midwest would be heavier than other parts of the US.
by aChangeOfIdeas July 19, 2009 10:03 PM EDT
I agree, I lived in the south for quite a while and they could make the healthiest foods fatty. My favorite was green beans cooked with bacon or some kind of fatty meat substance... very yummy but gosh, I like plain green beans just fine! And so much stuff deep fried, the sweet tea with about half a cup of sugar per glass, yeah... You know, I've lost some weight since I moved "back north", I wonder why.
by rf35 July 18, 2009 9:21 AM EDT
I think it's about time that the government started slapping massive taxes on unhealthy, high-fat, high-calorie junk food. The new taxes can pay for the drain on the medical system that obese people cause. While we're at it, let's hit alcohol, too. Maybe we should add TV to the list...if you can't afford to watch TV, you might get out and exercise more.

Anybody got a problem with that? THEN I HOPE YOU ALSO OPPOSED THE TAXE HIKES ON CIGARETTES!!
Reply to this comment
by aChangeOfIdeas July 18, 2009 9:33 AM EDT
Alcohol is already taxed extra. http://www.ttb.gov/tax_audit/atftaxes.shtml I have no idea where the money goes.
by xlib July 18, 2009 11:06 AM EDT
Absolutely, and, to top that, I think one of the messiah's czars should be responsible for going into each and every home and taking away anyone who has what they deem as unhealthy food. Why should we be responsible for ourselves? Isn't that why we have a benevolent guvmint??
And to take you up on your CHALLENGE I have the AUDACITY to say-let's start with the messiah and yank those smokes out of his two faced mouth.
Got a problem with that???
by aChangeOfIdeas July 18, 2009 8:46 AM EDT
How about a lack of education leads to poverty, and a lack of education also lends itself to poor health choices. Poverty doesn't cause obesity. Poverty and obesity are caused by a lack of education.

Poverty doesn't mean you have to eat unhealthy. These are choices you can make from this week's grocery store circular:
2 Jumbo canteloupes = $4 -OR- 2 48 oz ice cream tubs = $5
8 ears of fresh sweet corn = $1.88 -OR- 4 blueberry turnovers = $3.49
18 eggs = $0.99 -OR- 16 oz bacon = $4.99
1 pound of bananas = $0.79 -OR- 1 pound bag of chips = $3.00

So explain to me again how poverty causes obesity.
Reply to this comment
by displeased July 19, 2009 9:50 AM EDT
Obviously you've never had to pinch pennies. If you went to the store with $5, are you going to buy 2 cantaloupes or are you going to buy some potted meat, ramen noodles, and a cheap loaf of white bread? And for those who say your money can go further at a farmer's market are nuts. I shop at farmers markets and buy natural foods, but only because I can afford it. There was no option of eating this stuff as a kid when we were on food stamps. Education and poverty does have an influence on one's health.
by aChangeOfIdeas July 19, 2009 3:07 PM EDT
Obviously you don't know me. I'm pinching a heck of a lot of pennies right now, being unemployed and working temp jobs. Yes, I do buy the canteloupes, the eggs, and the bananas. Not the corn because we grow our own and can it. Don't tell me I don't pinch pennies just because I happen to keep the internet service (it's awfully good for job hunting and my kids need it for school anyway) I sit down every darn week and figure out how to make my husband's check pay the bills and buy the food. Yes, I do buy the ramen noodles and cheap *whole wheat* bread too. But I stand in line behind the people with the cards (food stamps) and see what they're buying and it's usually not very healthy, sometimes cases and cases of soda and bags of chips filling up their carts.
by debinok1 July 17, 2009 6:43 PM EDT
I am a perfect example of how flawed the BMI is. At 5'5" and in my forties, my acceptable BMI is 125-130. At that weight I am a size 2. According to other more reliable gauges, at 125 I am 20lbs UNDERweight. The BMI needs to be done away with.
Reply to this comment
by emh1701 July 19, 2009 2:30 AM EDT
I completely agree. We need to quit hyping the BMI and use more accurate measurements.
by howbizarre July 19, 2009 2:27 PM EDT
What BMI calculator are you using? fat people won't believe anything that tells them they're fat. IF YOU ARE 5'5", THEN YOUR ACCEPTABLE BMI IS 112-149 POUNDS. Quite a bit of difference from your stated 125-130. The 112-149 allows for those who are small boned to those who are large boned. And the reason you would be a size 2 is that women's clothing retailers have made sizes smaller and smaller to try and appeal to women. 20 years ago and 15 pounds lighter, I was a size 8. Now, I'm 15 pounds heavier, and a size 4. Go figure.
See all 5 Replies
by debinok1 July 17, 2009 6:36 PM EDT
The BMI is an outdated way to gauge weight in anyone, regardless of height, race, or gender. We have better ways to gauge percentage of body fat, those should be used, NOT BMI. Why are we still using a tool that uses height to weight ratio on a set mathematic scale, that is no longer accurate. When they redo this study with more reliable methods, then it can be considered accurate.
Reply to this comment
See all 31 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook