July 14, 2009 12:59 PM
- Text
The Sotomayor Hearings Expose The Judicial Activism Myth
(US News)
By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.
U.S. senators frequently spend way too much time belaboring the obvious or posturing during opening statements before they start questioning Supreme Court nominees. But today's statement by Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island is a surprising exception. In his statement, he laid bare the fallacy of judicial restraint, used by conservatives to pretend that conservative-leaning judges don't make new law, whereas "activist" liberals do:
For all the talk of "modesty" and "restraint," the right wing Justices of the Court have a striking record of ignoring precedent, overturning congressional statutes, limiting constitutional protections, and discovering new constitutional rights: the infamous Ledbetter decision, for instance; the Louisville and Seattle integration cases, for example; the first limitation on Roe v. Wade that outright disregards the woman's health and safety; and the DC Heller decision, discovering a constitutional right to own guns that the Court had not previously noticed in 220 years. Over and over, news reporting discusses "fundamental changes in the law" wrought by the Roberts Court's right wing flank. The Roberts Court has not lived up to the promises of modesty or humility made when President Bush nominated Justices Roberts and Alito.
I have railed about the fallacy of judicial restraint in this space before. After covering the Supreme Court and Justice Department for a radio network in the 1990s, I became convinced that all judges, whether liberal, conservative, or moderate, bring their chosen reasoning into arriving at judicial decisions. Neither side is immune from blurring personal political proclivities with their rulings as judges. It's just that conservatives try to pretend they are. The pretense is pass? and needs to go.
--Check out our political cartoons.
--Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our new digital magazine.
--On Facebook? Become a fan of the Thomas Jefferson Street blog.
By Bonnie Erbe
U.S. senators frequently spend way too much time belaboring the obvious or posturing during opening statements before they start questioning Supreme Court nominees. But today's statement by Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island is a surprising exception. In his statement, he laid bare the fallacy of judicial restraint, used by conservatives to pretend that conservative-leaning judges don't make new law, whereas "activist" liberals do:
For all the talk of "modesty" and "restraint," the right wing Justices of the Court have a striking record of ignoring precedent, overturning congressional statutes, limiting constitutional protections, and discovering new constitutional rights: the infamous Ledbetter decision, for instance; the Louisville and Seattle integration cases, for example; the first limitation on Roe v. Wade that outright disregards the woman's health and safety; and the DC Heller decision, discovering a constitutional right to own guns that the Court had not previously noticed in 220 years. Over and over, news reporting discusses "fundamental changes in the law" wrought by the Roberts Court's right wing flank. The Roberts Court has not lived up to the promises of modesty or humility made when President Bush nominated Justices Roberts and Alito.
I have railed about the fallacy of judicial restraint in this space before. After covering the Supreme Court and Justice Department for a radio network in the 1990s, I became convinced that all judges, whether liberal, conservative, or moderate, bring their chosen reasoning into arriving at judicial decisions. Neither side is immune from blurring personal political proclivities with their rulings as judges. It's just that conservatives try to pretend they are. The pretense is pass? and needs to go.
--Check out our political cartoons.
--Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our new digital magazine.
--On Facebook? Become a fan of the Thomas Jefferson Street blog.
By Bonnie Erbe
Popular Now in Politics
- Obama campaign launches "truth team"
- Santorum leads in Romney's home turf of Michigan
- Sarah Palin revs up CPAC faithful
- Mitt Romney wins Maine GOP caucuses
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Ann Coulter riles up the CPAC crowd
- Mitt Romney wins CPAC straw poll
- Romney takes on hecklers at Maine town hall
- Santorum infers straw poll-rigging at CPAC
- Immigration speaker sparks controversy at CPAC
- Battle over contraception rule wages on
- What Does 'GOP' Stand For?
- Gov. Jindal prepping for national stage
- Romney on Obama: I will "knock him on his heels"
- Health Care Bill: What's In It?
- Rick Santorum: No longer such a long shot
- CPAC: Anti-Obama beats pro-Romney
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- 28 cancer medications in dangerously short supply
- 3 tech approvals announced by Justice Department
- UN Security Council visits Haiti to review mandate
- EU open to talks but won't scrap carbon tax
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Diane Aulger induces labor weeks early to let dying husband Mark hold baby
- 2012 Grammys: Red-carpet arrivals
on CBS News






