Senators Criticize Cheney Cover-Up
Former VP Had CIA Conceal Program from Congress; New Calls for Investigation of Bush-Era Torture
-
Play CBS Video Video Cheney's Top Secret Plan Former Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the CIA to keep a top-secret intelligence program secret from Congress according to a Senate intelligence chairwoman. Kimberly Dozier reports.
-
CIA Director Leon Panetta and Former Vice President Dick Cheney (AP)
-
Who's Who Spy Agency Chiefs A glimpse at those who have headed the Central Intelligence Agency since its inception.
Former Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the CIA to keep a top-secret intelligence program secret from congress, according to Senate Intelligence Chairwoman Diane Feinstein.
She says current CIA director Leon Panetta informed intelligence committees in late June.
"He was told that the vice president had ordered that the program not be briefed to the Congress," Feinstein said Sunday. "We were kept in the dark. That's something that should never, ever happen again."
"To have a massive program that is concealed from the leaders in congress is not only inappropriate; it could be illegal," Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said.
The counterterrorism program was established as the CIA ramped up its hunt for Osama bin Laden. No one has revealed details of the program, but a U.S. official familiar with it told CBS News it was never fully operational.
The official said CIA Director Panetta canceled it when he found it hadn't been reported to Congress.
His decision to kill it was not difficult or controversial, the official said. It was an "on again/off again" program, not one on which the country deeply relied.
No one today called the program illegal. But the CIA could still face tough questioning on another front.
Attorney General Eric Holder is reportedly learning toward appointing a special investigator to determine whether the CIA tortured terrorism suspects. That's prompting bipartisan criticism.
"The military has done a series of independent reports. And I believe that that is sufficient. I don't believe a special commission is necessary," Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ariz., told CBS' "Face the Nation" Sunday.
"I just don't want to see an instance where if the higher-ups gave the order to break the law, that the ones who get punished are the people basically on the front line, the lower-level troops," Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said.
That's exactly what those on the front line believe will happen, according to one former CIA official, Michael Sheuer.
"I think it will pull everybody back from doing anything that smacks of the non-conventional," he said.
He points out that the CIA already encourages every one of its agents to take out personal liability insurance, just in case they're prosecuted, if one White House decides whatever the last one authorized was illegal.
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 97 CommentsIf they would stop doing illegal operations, there would not be a problem no matter who was in power. Rule of Law is the guiding principle and FISA was the law in force. You do NOT wiretap without a FISA warrant...period! There is no ambiguity there at all and they should not pretend that there was.
Have another freedom fry.
Defending the indefensible is a difficult task, and would at least partially account for all the name calling going on here. With nothing positive to say about Cheney, the strategy seems to be to attack the one who criticizes him.
That used to work. Doesn't anymore.
Same goes for anyone, regardless of party. Both major parties are corrupt and have lost sight of the fact that they are supposed to be serving the citizens of America, not themselves, their pet special interest groups, or foreign nationals living here without proper documentation.
They should only be locked up until such time as they are taken to a place of execution to be put to death in the manner prescribed by law.
I would wish for a creative, painful manner to be employed AFTER they had both been subjected to a few rounds of water boarding to learn the access codes to their offshore accounts, thus ending the current recession.
They stole BILLIONS...and they did it by crawling over the bodies of thousands of young Americans and a million Iraqis.
Having been brain-dead for most of his wastrel existance, Bush probably won't even notice when he gets put down like the murdering, thieving, treasonous dog that he is, but hopefully, Darth Cheney (the rabid dog) will really suffer.
Of course, I don't expect any of this to happen.
I would imagine by now, Obama has some inkling of some of what REALLY happened during those eight long years and rightly fears that the country would be torn asunder if the truth were ever to come out.
I really detest their "don't blame us we were only following orders" defense.
How far were they willing to go...are there any morales left?
Hungry good to see you again!
You never answer my question the last 10 times I posted so I will keep asking until you answer it. You told me several times that our prison system is not designed to be a deterrent and punishment system.
So I will ask you again if two people are driving drunk and both have an accident the first person does not injury any one but himself so he gets a heavy fine and loses his license. The second person had the exact same accident and blew the exact same on the breathalyzer but this person had the unfortunate luck of killing his passenger. He now gets 7-10 years in prison for vehicular manslaughter. So how is that not a "Punishment" based on the results of the crime.
I know for an intellectual like you it is hard to answer such a simple question but please do try.
I've answered you each and every time that you've asked this question, and I'm going to keep responding the EXACT SAME way, whether you like the answer or not:
NO - the penal system is NOT a "punishment" system.
It is a system designed to "rehabilitate" the criminal, for assimilation back into society.
Most criminals look at it as "three hots and a cot" - something that they've NEVER had at ANY point in their lives, free medical, education, counseling, etc, etc, etc, as children or as adults.
Tell me how providing people with opportunities and free benefits is "punishment".
I ask you this EVERY TIME you post this nonsense, and all you do is run away.
Why don't you answer me ONE time, instead of "tucking tail" like you always do?
Don't worry I know how to get rid of great intlectual like hungry.
By posting a lot of unsubstantiated BS, having Hungry shoot it down - for the 100th TIME - and then running away, because he has no logical response to my post.
Yep - he "showed me" alright.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 97 Comments