Iran Vows To "Smash" Opposition Protests

New Election Protests Erupt, Demonstrators Clash With Police

(CBS/ AP)  Hundreds of young men and women chanted "death to the dictator," confronting police wielding batons and firing tear gas in the capital Thursday as opposition activists sought to revive street protests despite authorities' vows to "smash" any new marches.

For days, supporters of opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi have been calling for new protests in Tehran and other cities on Thursday, their first significant attempt to get back on the streets since security forces crushed massive demonstrations nearly two weeks ago in Iran's postelection turmoil.

Tehran governor Morteza Tamaddon warned that any new march Thursday would meet the same fate.

"If some individuals plan to carry out any anti-security actions by listening to calls by counterrevolutionary networks, they will be smashed under the feet of our aware people," he said, according to the state news agency IRNA in a report late Wednesday.

Thursday afternoon, a stepped-up number of uniformed policemen along with plainclothes Basiji militiamen stood at intersections all along Revolution Street and at nearby near Tehran University, some of the sites where protests were called.

Still, a group of around 300 young people gathered in front of Tehran University and began to chant, "Death to the dictator," witnesses said. Many of them wore green surgical masks, the color of Mousavi's movement.

Police charged at them, swinging batons, but the protesters fled, then regrouped at another corner and resumed chanting, the witnesses said. Police chased them repeatedly as the protesters continued to regroup, the witnesses said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they feared government retribution.

Within an hour, the number of protesters grew to about 700 and marched toward the gates of Tehran University, the witnesses said. A line of policemen blocked their path, but they did nothing to disperse the gathering as the protesters stood and continued to chant, the witnesses said.

At another location, on Valiasr Street, around 200 protesters gathered, and police fired tear gas to disperse them, but the demonstrators sought to regroup elsewhere, the witnesses said.

Soon after the confrontations began, mobile phone service was cut off in Tehran, a step that was also taken during the height of the post-election protests to cut off communications. Mobile phone messaging has been cut in the country for the past three days.

They were the first such protests in 11 days, since the crackdown — though it did not compare to the hundreds of thousands who joined the marches that erupted after the June 12 presidential election, protesting what the opposition said were fraudulent results.

The calls for a new march have been circulating for days on social networking Web sites and pro-opposition Web sites. Opposition supporters planned the marches to coincide with the anniversary Thursday of a 1999 attack by Basij on a Tehran University dorm to stop protests in which one student was killed.

Ahead of Thursday's planned march, authorities appeared to have taken a number of other steps to prevent participation, including the halting of SMS messaging. The government also closed down universities and called a government holiday on Tuesday and Wednesday, citing a heavy dust and pollution cloud that has blanketed Tehran and other parts of the country this week.

Mousavi and his pro-reform supporters say he won the election, which official results showed as a landslide victory for incumbent hard-liner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared the results valid after a partial recount and warned that unrest would not be tolerated.

In the crackdown since the election, at least 20 protesters and 7 Basijis were killed.

Police have said 1,000 people were arrested and that most have since been released. But the state-run English language news network Press TV quoted prosecutor-general Qorban-Ali Dorri Najafabadi saying Wednesday that 2,500 people were arrested and that 500 of them could face trial. The remainder, he said, have been released.

Arrests have continued over the past week, with police rounding up dozens of activists, journalists and bloggers.

In the latest detentions, a prominent human rights lawyer Mohammad Ali Dadkhah was taken away by security forces from his office Wednesday along with his daughter and three other members of his staff, the pro-opposition news Web site Norouz reported. A former deputy commerce minister in a previous pro-reform government, Feizollah Arab-Sorkhi, was also arrested at his Tehran home, the site reported.

A large number of top figures in Iran's reform movement, including a former vice president and former Cabinet members, have been held for weeks since the election.

Iranian authorities have depicted the postelection turmoil as instigated by enemy nations aiming to thwart Ahmadinejad's re-election, and officials say some of those detained confessed to fomenting the unrest. Opposition supporters say the confessions were forced under duress.

[curiously1]

Toolmangler, I understand your point but keep in mind that this regime in Iran will eventually become a threat to all of us in the west. We've got to do the least we can to help out the freedom fighters. It's in our own interest as well.

Jschmidt27, well said brother. The thugs need to be isolated and embargoed. You cannot treat these thugs as a ligitimate government. All they are is baton swinging, razorblade slashing thugs, and they ought to be treated like the animals that they are, period !

[daffy64]

Sheesh, you'd think the ultra-conservatives in the USA would LOVE the way the Iranian government runs.

After all, aren't they conservatives, backed by religious leaders, trying to stamp out liberals?

[tunaatlast]

somebody needs to put a bullet in R's head and all the religous leaders of Iran. If Iran wants nuclear bombs, we need to give him three, from the belly of americas bombers.
send them back to th stone age.

[tunaatlast]

but wait a minute, the Iranian people can't own weapons. They don't have the "RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS"

[noloyalisti]

Iran = US. Both countries either have nuclear weapons (US) or want them and both appear to be run by religious extremists.

Of course the US is the only country to ever use nuclear weapons on people. Maybe the US should be bombed back to the stone age before we use them again (or start more invasions for oil).

[ToolMangler1]

by noloyalisti July 9, 2009 12:51 PM PDT
Iran = US. Both countries either have nuclear weapons (US) or want them and both appear to be run by religious extremists.
Of course the US is the only country to ever use nuclear weapons on people. Maybe the US should be bombed back to the stone age before we use them again (or start more invasions for oil).



Thats fine with me! Go ahead and try! How good are you at digging?

[YuSoWrong]

If the US and Iran look the same to you, check your vision.

[noloyalisti]

Wow, the Iranian government learned much from the criminal regime of George Bushoccio and his anti-democratic torture supported, the Republican party.

"Free-speech" zones, not allowing dissent, taking out CIA agents and other government workers who exposed you crimes against the Constitution. Maybe we can learn some democracy from Iran. US = Iran?

[YuSoWrong]

Spoken like a ... well, we know what you are.

[modonnel21]

The changing national demographics in Iran will ensure that the existing government will eventually be replaced -- forcibly or otherwise. I would suggest that Adolf Ahmadinejad and the satanic cleric Khamenei begin shopping for new real estate -- perhaps a cozy little place in Pyongyang?

[ToolMangler1]

100% agreement...
Ahmadamnutjob doesn't realize that the thinking peoples of the world view him in the same context as they do, Kim'sill

[hower4]

Why are the American media not reporting that the US has finally released the 5 Iranian diplomats after more than 2 years of illegal imprisonment and probably torture?

Americans don't like being shown what America really stands for, do they?

[jschmidt27]

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/world/middleeast/09release.html

"The Iranians, whom the Americans accused of being senior operatives of Iran?s Quds Force, an elite unit of Iran?s Revolutionary Guards, have been a point of contention for the United States, Iran and Iraq ever since they were seized in a predawn raid in the northern Kurdish city of Erbil in January 2007."

Accussed of helping to kill our soldiers. Torture? Prove it or keep your remakrs to yourself.

[hower4]

They were released without charge after years of illegal imprisonment! In civilised countries everyone is innocent until proved guilty...... IS AMERICA CIVILISED OR NOT?

You won't answer that of course, because you know the real truth of American morality and justice.

[ToolMangler1]

"Americans don't like being shown what America really stands for, do they?"


It depends on whom is doing the 'finger pointing'.

[hower4]

No, it doesn't depend on who's 'finger pointing' at all. It's very simple..... do Americans believe in truth and justice or not?

[jschmidt27]

for on the spot news of what is going on in Iran try : http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/latest-updates-on-iran-election-protests/

[jschmidt27]

The demonstrators will need to learn that to stop the vigilantes they need to take the batons away from them and beat them with it. Of course easy for us to say. I would like to hear more from our President other than he is 'deeply concerned'. Iran needs to be isolated. No talks, no diplomatic channnels, nothing. Until they recognize the evil of their ways. How about a total embargo. Get that passed by the UN. Good luck.

[ToolMangler1]

I would rather that Obama stays "Deeply concerned" as opposed to us becoming embroiled in the political process that ultimately will decide Irans fate for the forseeable future. Russia has as much to lose in this as we do but you don't see them jumping into the 'fray'...
Its easy to get into a fight any time we want, Getting out is where we have problems, (isn't that right shrub?)

[curiously1]

What I don't get is why aren't the western countries and Israel descarmbling cell phones and internet in Iran? Why not give the freedom fighters the slightest help by at least giving them the means to communicate with one another? What are we so fearful of the thug mullahs?

[ToolMangler1]

We have to be careful, We did that for Afghanistan when the Russians occupied the country and you see the thanks we get. They got mad because we didn't 'rebuild' their country and give them billions in aid after they/we ran the Russians out.
You need to remember that 'Todays "Freedom Fighter" may be "Tomorrows Terrorist"!!!!!!!

Besides, we have done enough meddling in the Mid East to last for the rest of 'this' century...

[prometheus21]

At the planned time for gatherings, there was so far no sign of demonstrations in Tehran. Groups of uniformed policemen stood at intersections and plainclothes Basiji militiamen were seen all along Revolution Street and nearby Tehran University, some of the sites where protests were called.

I was just wondering how FREAKING LONG a repetitive propaganda campaign that repeats at length about nothing new or relevant can continue. This isn't a news story anymore by any stretch of imagination. This is like a media diary mind-**** that has reached such a saturation point that it's dripping with the mundane.

And what's really frightening is the utter lack of transparency to report on what's painfully obvious, the total proclivity. It's like the American Propagandist has an agenda and here it is, in your face. Your constitutional guarantee for a free press doesn't mean ****. AIPAC and friends aren't going to stop, particularly while they thrive at U.S. taxpayer and Constitutional expense, and there's nothing you can do about it except wonder why the real story right in your face about media influence and involuntary taxpayer buy-in towards the destruction of their own free press guarantees will never see the light of day when it matters most.

[YuSoWrong]

There's a group of fine fellows who meet in the Alabama woods who share your sentiments. They also share a lot of other things. Maybe you could get a summer share and go antiquing.

[YuSoWrong]

Let's catalogue the people who share your feelings: Aryan Nations, the KKK, the American Nazi Party, a couple of prison gangs, a couple of holocaust-deniers and the Jihadists currently at war on six continents.

Proud company to keep, perhaps the finest you've associated-with? Don't know the full depths of your secret friendships.

[speakinup22]

This is PERFECT ! The Ayatollah is trying to use the very tactics against his own people that he uses against us.

Talk about stupid. This WILL foment an underground against his government. Sheese - I knew that the Ayatolla and Ahmadinejad were stupid, but I didn't think they'd want to kill themselves for nothing.

Thanks Ayatollah baby, and no thanks to Barry.

Unfortunately the underground will remember Barry's lack of action. Voting Present in this case is voting "nay".

[antoniof123]

What Obama is doing will work better than what the Republicans have done in the past or did you forget We'll go it alone.

That went well didn't it ask the dead in Iraq thanks for lying to us GOP we haven't forgot it.

[YuSoWrong]

The Israelis are war refugees living in the land of their ancestors. Obsession with Israeli (read=Jewish) specialness comes more from their haters than from these people themselves.

[thusspokezara]

Dear Supreme Leader of Iran, remember that President Obama is "apalled" by your behavior, that he is "concerned" by the crackdown, that he is "bearing witness," and that he is "waiting to see how things play out." So try to keep your rhetoric down as you go about conducting mass arrests, executions, persecutions. If you play your cards right, you still may be invited to the White House.

[Sloughfoot]

Islam will not tolerate the existence of "Freemen".

[curiously1]

And Israel will smash the nukes and the thugs will be nukeless, but no worries, they have razorblades and batons and they sure know how to kill their own people.

[akinos2009]

What about Israel and the nukes? How many nukes do they have and how did they get them. Why are they so kept out of any discussions?