WASHINGTON, July 8, 2009

Bomb Materials Smuggled into Fed Buildings

Test of Security Measures Reveals Lax Screening, Sleeping Guards, GAO Report Says

  • Play CBS Video Video Fed's Security Breach

    The federal protective service guards 9,000 facilities and more than a million federal employees. But some serious questions are rising about how secure those buildings really are. Bob Orr reports.

  •  (CBS/AP)

(CBS/ AP)  Last updated at 7:05 p.m. EDT

Federal investigators had no trouble smuggling bomb-making materials past ill-trained and poorly supervised guards at federal buildings, senators were told at a hearing Wednesday.

"This is the broadest indictment of a federal agency I have ever heard," Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., said at a Homeland Security Committee hearing on the performance of the Federal Protective Service, the office responsible for the safety of some 9,000 federal facilities. "This is really serious stuff."

The committee, chaired by Lieberman, heard how Government Accountability Office investigators on 10 occasions carried the components for an improvised explosive device through checkpoints monitored by FPS guards. In all 10 cases the bomb-making materials went undetected.

CBS News correspondent Bob Orr reports that the components only cost $150 per bomb, and took just four minutes to assemble.

Mark Goldstein, the GAO's director for physical infrastructure issues, said the investigators proceeded to assemble the material - made up of a liquid explosive and a low-yield detonator - in restrooms and walked freely around the facilities with the IED in a briefcase.

He said that in some cases the bathrooms were locked but employees working in the buildings opened them up for the visitors.

The IEDs, which Goldstein said contained actual bomb components but with concentrations below trigger points, were smuggled into 10 level IV facilities - buildings housing more than 450 employees with a high volume of public contact - in four major cities. They included offices of a U.S. senator and representative and agencies such as the departments of Homeland Security, State and Justice.

"In this post-9/11 world that we are now living in, I cannot fathom how security breaches of this magnitude were allowed to occur," Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, top Republican on the committee, said.

The FPS, Goldstein concluded, "is an agency in crisis." In addition to the smuggling operations, the GAO cited examples of a night guard being found asleep after taking the pain killer prescription drug Percocet, and a guard failing to recognize or properly x-ray a box containing handguns at the loading dock of a facility. One guard supposed to have been at his post was caught using government computers to manage a private for-profit adult website.

The report also found that 411 of the 663 guards deployed to a federal facility had at least one expired firearm qualification, background check, domestic violence declaration or CPR-first aid training certificate.

While the FPS requires that all prospective guards complete 128 hours of training, including eight hours of x-ray and magnetometer training, in one region the service had not provided the x-ray or metal detector training to its 1,500 guards since 2004.

Gary Schenkel, the FPS director, said the report "caused us all grave concern" and that within three hours of receiving the study he had ordered regional directors to increase inspections and outline steps they would take to improve guard performance. "It's purely a lack of oversight on our part," he acknowledged.

He also explained that the FPS's full-time workforce had decreased from 1,400 in 2003, when it became part of the new Department of Homeland Security, to 1,236 today, and that the agency had had to reschedule training and equipment purchases to avoid greater cuts. The FPS has a budget of about $1 billion and, in addition to full-time employees, uses about 13,000 contract security guards.

Schenkel said his office would also require the FPS's 11 regional directors to conduct more random searches of packages, increase oversight of contract guards, and carry out overt and covert inspections of screening processes.

Lieberman said the committee had originally planned to go public with the findings after the GAO issues a second report later this summer, but the conclusions "were so disturbing that we decided to air them immediately to accelerate the critical work of turning the FPS around." He said he planned to introduce legislation responding to the service's shortcomings.


© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 48 Comments
by jhenry3107 July 31, 2009 6:20 AM EDT
You donot need actual vouchers or coupons to partipate in this program. All dealers are required and government will
reimburse the fees for the clunkers

Jhenry
Blogger
www.cashforclunkersfacts.info
http://www.cashforclunkersfacts.info
Reply to this comment
by ajjaxtheleast July 9, 2009 1:40 AM EDT
A non-article,,,

First if THEY want us they'll get us,,,,,

This "article" merely talks about IED's in a briefcase,,
meaning the bad man would be happy with killing in
numbers of 10, 20, 50 people,,,to do that he wouldn't
have to slink into a building and assemble his IED
sitting on a toilet,,,all he'd have to do is get
on a bus,,,which would allow the carnage to be more
publically visable enhancing the fear-instilling
aspect of his day's handy-work.

News would have been sneaking enough bomb-making
material into a building that would bring the building
down killing 500 or more people,,,,why didn't the
"investigators" try it?,,,,If they truely ARE invest-
igators they DID try but couldn't and since this didn't
fit their boogie-man-is-after-you article they're
failure to do so isn't included.

As far as bringing down a building it would'nt be
from explosives brought into a building,, a passing
van or truck would do the job,,,Again why didn't the
"Investigators" try gathering together enough
bomb-making material to bring down a building and
assembling a hugh "bomb" inside a truck and driving
it next to a building?,,,,,And again they may have
tried but couldn't even purchase or "steal" the raw
materials to start with and this didn't go
along with the story.
Reply to this comment
by Snerdguy July 9, 2009 12:22 AM EDT
As someone who used to be a federal employee with the Defense Department, I believe I am qualified to say that the public is incredibly ignorant regarding how their federal government really works. People joke about the constant waste and foul ups of the government. But, they can't seem to grasp that it isn't the federal worker who is at fault. It's the incompetent management.

Those guards were doing what their bosses allowed. They were sloppy and inefficient because their managers didn't care enough to even check on them occasionally let alone arrange for them to have appropriate training for their jobs. This isn't an exception. Throughout the government, it's pretty much the rule.

Our federal government is very unique in that anybody can become a boss just by playing the internal politics. Intelligence is not as important as who you hang out with. There are many federal managers with important, even life and death, responsibilities who are utterly clueless. The workers do their best to keep the government running. They often work around bad managers. But, they can only do so much.

Bomb making materials could likely be slipped though the security of nearly any federal facility because managers are more concerned about show than go. Those security guards are not the problem. They are just a symptom of a much bigger problem. In the government, there are too many bosses and too much incompetence and nobody, right up to the President himself, cares enough to try to change how things are done.

By the way, if terrorists were really a threat, they could have easily bombed many federal buildings by now. So who keeps stirring this pot?
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo July 8, 2009 11:23 PM EDT
Bomb Materials Smuggled into Fed Buildings
Test of Security Measures Reveals Lax Screening, Sleeping Guards, GAO Report Says
----
What a complete waste of tax dollars. The security measures and the idiots testing the security measures.

Now what agency is monitoring the testers of the security measures?

And what agency is in charge of the monitoring agency?
Reply to this comment
by bokoo143 July 8, 2009 6:56 PM EDT
This is just another false flag that will be the platform for more of our freedoms to be taken from us by our government. Most people, with the brainwashing from all our media sources will be urging our leaders to fix the problem they created and our government will be all too happy to comply by putting more restrictions on us just as they planned and have done for over 70 years now. We will of course foot the bill.

All citizens need to come together and listen to people such as Ron Paul and a few others. Open your eyes and start paying attention. Encourage others to wake up and pay attention, talk to your friends and family and ask them what they think about the latest news of the day?

Our government is going to take away our Constitution and Bill of Rights. There is a plan for One World Government, One World Bank, One World Currency, One World Leader, and they are getting closer every day. I give us maybe two years before it is announced to the world as fact, just google Bilderberg and the New World Order for starters. Or just ignore what is happening and feel warm and fuzzy that someone in Washington is taking care of it for you.

Sure go ahead and call me nuts, but I'm a wide awake nut.
Reply to this comment
by bradkt1 July 8, 2009 8:21 PM EDT
Okay...you're a wide-awake nut. Say hello to the nice men in the white coats for me...and you'd better behave or they are going to make you listen to endless loops of Preisdent Obama's speeches. Pretty soon, you'll be chanting "Yes we can! in your sleep.
by gunownerdan July 8, 2009 5:18 PM EDT
MORAL OF THE STORY: It would have been even easier to smuggle bomb materials into the world trade center.
Reply to this comment
by prelgovisk July 8, 2009 4:53 PM EDT
The Congress, Senate & Obama are all outraged...

...until it comes time to make the budget, hire twice as many guards and pay them good salaries to attract quality security personal.

Then they glower at the security providers, wondering why they can't train people on minimum range to operate inadequate equipement in high traffic areas.

The Congress holds the purse strings. They can vote and spend all they want on security. But they will look to blame others. The last place they will look for the cause of the problem is among themselves.
Reply to this comment
by Joe_NY_15 July 8, 2009 3:44 PM EDT
Charlie, what does this have to do with the lax security ? that they were busy and not looking at the monitors ?
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 July 8, 2009 2:58 PM EDT
When a new President is elected the Federal employees stay never changed unless some illegal problem that effect the government ie: Linda Tripp, well there are Republicans in federal jobs and democrats in the past administration,who have continued with tenure, if any of you have worked in a office the disgruntled ones could have gotten wind of this and leaked this when the office of Government Accounting Office did not intend to have it happen we got Cheney lovers in the CIA who knows how many in the FBI so good luck Americans with all these reports they had to be leaked by a person who dislikes the present government. How many are feeding information to the wrong guy,just because they can. Imagine the worst and you got the worst.
Reply to this comment
by whatdableep July 8, 2009 2:46 PM EDT
People - Read, Richard Marcinko's book Red Cell about his testing tactics for supposedly secure locations when he was involved with testing security at military bases and other locations. You will see that our money is being wasted on lies and fallacies. Read it - it is a Good Book.
Reply to this comment
by whatdableep July 8, 2009 2:45 PM EDT
People - Read, Richard Marcinko's book Red Cell about his testing tactics for supposedly secure locations when he was involved with testing security at military bases and other locations. You will see that our money is being wasted on lies and fallacies. Read it - it is a Good Book.
Reply to this comment
by jetranger7 July 8, 2009 2:35 PM EDT
Ya ~ figures, ever try applying for one of these jobs,, they only go after those that have that so-called higher education that think they entitled to have this type of job because they have a higher education, as usual these are the very ones that are the problem with this country, these idiots with their so-called higher education are the very ones responsible for the many problems that excist in this country today, and it really shows, more often than not, they are the dead-beats of the work society, their clueless, ignorant and think they are entitled to this type of lazy atmosphere, and expect to be paid for doing as little as possible, while they defend themselves with one excuse after another, they think they don't have to actually work, because they went to a place of higher education, this country is one hell of a mess because of these types of people !
Reply to this comment
by stinger1z July 8, 2009 2:26 PM EDT
RayRay had to go get his lunch and was sleepy when they came through. I saw the clips on CNN. I bet if some girl came through he'd be hitting on her and asking for a cell phone number, but still ignorant of doing his job. Same problem with TSA, undereducated personnel who don't take the responsibilities seriously.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan July 8, 2009 1:53 PM EDT
Now everyone can be seen as a potential terrorist, for our protection of course!
Reply to this comment
by jsf14 July 8, 2009 1:28 PM EDT
Most of the "security" checks I've observed seemed designed not to maintain security but rather to make us feel that security is being maintained.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan July 8, 2009 1:24 PM EDT
Don't mind them, they are just practicing for the next "false flag" terrorist attack.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 July 8, 2009 12:55 PM EDT
"Don't let all that national security stuff impress ya too much, eras. Its just a buncha geeks try'n to be macho."


txgrouch will call me a sl*t again for saying this, but I just about peed my pants over that one. : )
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 July 8, 2009 12:11 PM EDT
by harpoot July 8, 2009 8:56 AM PDT
LOL!! You really think they don't know what a joke the security really is? Don't tell me you believe all that crap Bush/Cheney spouted?


I don't know what crap you are talking about as far as Bush/Cheney goes, nor do I care.

What I do know is that no one KNOWS anything for SURE, unless they are told.

And I do know that your media couldn't keep their mouths shut even if everyone's lives depended upon it.

I'll admit I had a good laugh though, over the news report that a military plane mistakenly flew nuclear weapons across two states. : ) Who the hell in their right mind wants the world to know about a screw up like that?
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey July 8, 2009 6:54 PM EDT
[I'll admit I had a good laugh though, over the news report that a military plane mistakenly flew nuclear weapons across two states. : ) Who the hell in their right mind wants the world to know about a screw up like that? ]

the people that want to change the policy that allowed that to happen ... that's who.

two scenarios ... both start where they mistakenly fly some restricted weapons around when they shouldn't.

the first case is where only the two lowest level guys know about it ... and fully realize they're in deep *#$&@ if anyone finds out.

the second one is where it's publicly leaked that this happened.

which one do you think is more likely to change the policy ... and which one is more likely to lead to nothing being done at all?

yea ... keeping it all under wraps is always the best idea ... and why not make it so that only one person should be able to decide what is and isn't under the wraps.
by mljohns00 July 8, 2009 12:08 PM EDT
Let the guard sleep. The other ones, who were awake, didn't catch anything, either.
Reply to this comment
by culturechang July 8, 2009 12:04 PM EDT
Well, all federal employees should be cavity searched daily....morning and lunchtime.
Reply to this comment
See all 48 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: