MOSCOW, July 6, 2009

Obama Sets Confident Tone In Moscow

President Kicks Off Two-Day Summit With Russian Leader; Predicts "Extraordinary Progress" For Talks

    • Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev, left, welcomes U.S. President Barack Obama, right, on his arrival in the Moscow Kremlin, Russia, Monday, July 6, 2009.

      Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev, left, welcomes U.S. President Barack Obama, right, on his arrival in the Moscow Kremlin, Russia, Monday, July 6, 2009.  (AP/Vladimir Rodionov)

    • President Obama, first lady Michelle Obama and daughters Sasha, left, and Malia, right, after arriving in Moscow, Monday, July 6, 2009.

      President Obama, first lady Michelle Obama and daughters Sasha, left, and Malia, right, after arriving in Moscow, Monday, July 6, 2009.  (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Fast Facts Russia

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

  • Photo Essay President Obama Visits Russia

    President Obama arrived to his first Moscow summit for a series of meetings sure to test his diplomatic skills

(CBS/AP)  President Barack Obama opened his first Moscow summit with confidence on Monday, predicting "extraordinary progress" out of meetings set to test his diplomatic skills on important priorities such as nuclear arsenal reductions and the fight in Afghanistan.

"The United States and Russia have more in common than they have differences," Mr. Obama said he sat down in an ornate Kremlin room with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. "If we work hard in these next few days ... we can make extraordinary progress that will benefit the people of both countries."

With both men eager to reset damaged relations, Mr. Obama's host launched the high-stakes summit with similar good will.

"We'll have a full-fledged discussion of our relations between our two countries, closing some of the pages of the past and opening some of the pages of the future," Medvedev said, through a translator. "It is my hope that it will be possible to tackle successfully" a range of problems from the economy to security and energy and the environment.

The first U.S.-Russia summit since the early part of the George W. Bush presidency presents a challenge for Mr. Obama, with Russia home to a wary public, a two-headed leadership and lingering hard feelings. What much of the world will watch are signs of Mr. Obama's relationship with Russia's two leaders, Medvedev and his mentor, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.

Later, Mr. Obama and Medvedev will announce agreement on the outline of a plan to cut each side's nuclear weapons to as few as 1,500 each, reports CBS News White House correspondent Bill Plante.

Also on the agenda: Iran's nuclear ambitions, U.S. support for neighboring Georgia and NATO expansion to Russia's borders.

Above all - Russia wants to reclaim its status as a superpower.

"The world has changed dramatically and it's trying to find those ways where it can be that super power," analyst Heather Conley told CBS News.

Agreements negotiated ahead of time give Mr. Obama something to take home before the summit even got under way, including the nuclear arms reduction and an agreement from Russia to let the United States use its territory and air space to move arms into Afghanistan for the forces fighting extremists there.

Other side agreements meant to sweeten the talks included a new joint commission to try to account for missing service members of both countries dating back to World War II. Four working groups will look into missing military personnel from World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War and Soviet military personnel still missing from Moscow's 10-year occupation of Afghanistan.

The White House also said that the two countries have agreed to cooperate in the fields of public health and medical research, an arrangement intended to range across public health issues from infectious diseases to promotion of healthy lifestyles to improving global health.

Yet, the two sides remain in a stalemate over the U.S. pursuit of a missile-defense system in Europe. Mr. Obama's administration is reviewing the efficacy of plan, which Bush had pushed hard.

U.S. leaders have expressed hope of getting Russian cooperation on missile defense. But both sides have also shown signs of hardening their positions ahead of the summit.

The basic problem is unchanged: The U.S. contends the program is designed to protect U.S. allies in Europe from a potential nuclear attack by Iran, but the Russians see it as a first step toward a system that could weaken their offensive nuclear strike potential.

"We're going to have to work our way through that," Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, told "Fox News Sunday."

Mr. Obama's distinctive Air Force One jetliner touched down with drizzly gray skies blanketing Moscow. He continued down a formal reception line on the airport tarmac, introducing his wife, Michelle, and their two daughters to the Russian officials waiting to greet them.

The entourage then headed directly to a wreath-laying ceremony at Russia's Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, brilliant sun breaking over the city's center through the days of clouds as they drove in. The president walked slowly behind three high-stepping Russian soldiers, then straightened the wreath's ribbon where they placed it in front of the eternal flame and stood alone briefly.

The summit starts a weeklong trip for Mr. Obama that also features G-8 meetings and a visit with the pope in Italy, and a speech in Ghana.

Mr. Obama's mission in Moscow is two-pronged, divided over two days. Building ties and inking security and cultural deals with the leadership comes first. He will also devote a prominent amount of time to leaders of Russia's civil society to help those relationships, too.

There is plenty of room for improvement. Mr. Obama, who has enjoyed adoring crowds in travels across Europe so far, will face a skeptical Russian population, polling out Sunday shows.

Only 23 percent of Russians have confidence in Mr. Obama to do the right thing in international affairs, according to the University of Maryland's WorldPublicOpinion.org. Just 15 percent of the Russians polled said the U.S. is playing a positive role in the world; most said the United States abuses it power and makes Russia do what the U.S. wants.

"I would like there to be real change, not just talk," said Valentina Titova, a 60-year-old retired economist strolling not far from the Kremlin. "I would like to see American meddle less in other countries. They think they're so superior to others, they put themselves on a pedestal."

Aiming to change attitudes, Mr. Obama will outline his vision for U.S.-Russian relations at a speech at the New Economic School. It is unclear how many people will see it. Russian leaders control the television outlets.

The dominant theme of the summit is security, and Mr. Obama and Medvedev are set to announce progress toward renewing a strategic arms reduction pact that expires in December. The eventual deal could cut warheads from more than 2,000 each to as low as 1,500 apiece.

"At the moment I think we are all moderately optimistic, both the Russian side and the American side, so far as I know," Medvedev said ahead of Mr. Obama's arrival in an interview with Italian news outlets.

As Mr. Obama told a Russian-language news channel in the days before the summit: "America respects Russia. We want to build relations where we deal as equals."

Yet he also caused a stir in Russia by telling The Associated Press last week that Putin has to learn that "the old Cold War approaches to U.S.-Russian relations is outdated." That only elevated the stakes of Mr. Obama's first meeting with Putin, which is set for Tuesday.

Russia and the United States have been allies and adversaries. Obama inherited more of the latter, with relations having tanked in 2008 over Russia's war with neighboring Georgia.

Mr. Obama got off to a solid start, though, with Medvedev during an April meeting in London.

© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 51 Comments
by sam-kiley July 7, 2009 4:03 AM EDT
mr obama a dit..
The United States and Russia have more in common than they have differences," Mr. Obama said he sat down in an ornate Kremlin room with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. "If we work hard in these next few days ... we can make extraordinary progress that will benefit the people of both countries."

sage résolution, faire la paix, discuter et travailler ensembles...ça rendra service aux deux pays et au monde entier,il ya tellement de problémes a resoudre et qui méritent l'attention des usa et la russie ..et tous les pays du monde ... c'est mieux que de se faire la tete..inutilement..il ya plus important..au revoir
Reply to this comment
by Sloughfoot July 6, 2009 11:05 PM EDT
gravyboat4000 splitting hairs, we are.
Reply to this comment
by picklepants7 July 6, 2009 2:25 PM EDT
i wonder what crapy gift oduma brought with him on this trip. some lead laced vegetables from michelle's garden? it would be an improvement.
Reply to this comment
by Sloughfoot July 6, 2009 1:49 PM EDT
The EU was formed for the purpose of crippling America's oversea commerce.
Cancel the missile project, if the EU wants a missile shield let them fund the project.
Russia and the U.S.A. were drug in to Wars through out the 20th Century by family feuds amongst the now EU members. Nether Russia nor the U.S. owe the EU nations any more funding for military or other purposes.

We do owe Russia an apology, I'll make it for our Nation, "I am so very sorry that we trained and armed the Mujaheddin, we were not properly advised as to who could best be our friends".

I don't really wish Russia ill will, however, if I could return all of her sniveling, whining, bellicose satellite countries back to Russia's control and responsibility, I would do so in a New York minute.
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat4000 July 6, 2009 5:31 PM EDT
Russia didn't invade Afghanistan. That was the Soviet Union.

Have a nice day. :-)
by Questionews July 6, 2009 11:10 AM EDT
Hey CBS why do you only allow comments to be posted on positive stories about Obama and his policies. I see that you have actually posted a story about Biden stating that they misjudged the economy "one whole paragraph" but you do not allow anyone to post a comment on that story. I have come to expect this from CBS one of the POTUS' personal news/Advertisement sources.

by nolies74621 July 6, 2009 4:26 AM PDT



I would say that! There's a story right now on CBS "Obama Waffles on Indefinite Detentionabout" about how Obama is changing his tune towards the Gitmo guys. Apparently there's some really bad dudes there & Obama is going to do pretty much what Bush had planned to do with them.
Ease up! There's going to be more stories on Obama doing stupid stuff & news outlets will cover it. Especially if it can embarrass him.

Hail Obusha!!
Reply to this comment
by Jim1900 July 6, 2009 10:49 AM EDT
After the disastrous 8 years of W. and Cheney, Obama has his work cut out for him. There are a lot of areas where the U.S. and Russia can cooperate though, and he will find them.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 July 6, 2009 10:16 AM EDT
by earth562 July 6, 2009 6:52 AM PDT
Hungry,

Where in the world do you come up with this stuff ?






From actually READING the nonsense that you conservative idiots posted on these boards FOR YEARS!!!

All that we've been hearing out of the right is how bad Iran is, what a threat they pose to America, how they harbor terrorists, they want to enslave the world in Sharia Law, etc, etc, etc.

Most liberals have been stating that it's only the REGIME that is the problem, but conservatives wanted no part of reality: in the conservatives eyes, ALL of Iran was radical Islamic extremists, and the WHOLE COUNTRY needed to be nuked into non-existence.

And then the elections happened, and you all awoke to reality: the PEOPLE of Iran are very receptive of "Western ideals", and want a meaningful dialogue with America.

The scary part, is that it took the elections for you clowns to realize what MOST of America knew all along.
Reply to this comment
by prometheus21 July 6, 2009 10:16 AM EDT
The basic problem is unchanged: The U.S. contends the program is designed to protect U.S. allies in Europe from a potential nuclear attack by Iran, but the Russians see it as a first step toward a system that could weaken their offensive nuclear strike potential.

"We're going to have to work our way through that," Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, told "Fox News Sunday."

Considering this didn't even exist, like many of the problems in the world today, until the Bush administration and supporters made it a reality, it's hard to believe that you would have to "work your way" through this. It's entirely unilateral and an unprovoked aggression with respect to Russia.

Why the hell would Russia give any concessions on anything until this is resolved in their favor (unless it was meant as an aggressive act against Russia, in which case, the usual American lies and deception should be rewarded in turn). Complete masters of arrogance, the U.S. government FLOUNDERING IN MASSIVE MASSIVE MASSIVE OVERSPENDING ON DEFENSE AND DEFENSE CONTRACTS leading to MASSIVE, MASSIVE, MASSIVE unmanageable debt leaving it in a MASSIVELY vulnerable position to negotiate almost ANYTHING, never ceases to amaze.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 July 6, 2009 10:22 AM EDT
The ONLY "missile defenses" that we have, should be on OUR BORDERS, protecting OUR nation from attack.

No country in the world could or would object to us doing that.

And THAT is where the whole issue lies - our trying to be the "world protector" or "world police". That's NOT why our nation was founded.
by hower4 July 6, 2009 10:42 AM EDT
by hungry1968-16 July 6, 2009 7:22 AM PDT
And THAT is where the whole issue lies - our trying to be the "world protector" or "world police". That's NOT why our nation was founded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You mean "world aggressor" don't you?
by prometheus21 July 6, 2009 11:06 AM EDT
I would find it hard to believe of course that if the American government isn't willing to drop this missile defense shield in Europe at a THOROUGHLY BANKRUPT UNTIL THE LATTER HALF OF THE 21st CENTURY ASSUMING NO NEW SPENDING expense of the U.S. taxpayer, Russia would find no comparable objection to installing a missile defense shield in Cuba, designed to protect Russian allies like Venezuela and Cuba from a potential nuclear attack from military guerillas and other coup sponsers who might find themselves the recepient of some kind of un-Constitutional trade of nuclear weapons for military backing in the overthrow of Latin American allies of Russia.

That would be EQUALLY entirely reasonable with respect to the missile defense shield from a nation such as Iran that has no nuclear weapons or nuclear weapons program.

Undeniably EQUAL in prospect. And thoroughly sociopathically insane -- which is why relics of the psyopathic Bush administration must be treated as criminal and unjustifiable. All the more so absent of any due process to prosecute. These are VERY DANGEROUS times -- and not all countries have abandoned due process and rule of law to allow it's criminal element to reign -- in fact as expected, they have become VERY UNTRUSTING of a VERY UNTRUSTWORTHY democracy harboring criminal intent, as defined by LAW, both U.S. domestic and internationally.

Who would accept terms from a nation like the U.S. without extraordinary conditions and stipulations guaranteeing compliance with law and agreements (even if the U.S. does not acknowledge a crime through prosecutorial negligence, discretion or due process as has become the cherry-picked status quo via routine violation of our own equal protection clause). My parents always told me to avoid people like that, to stay away from them as far as possible.
by goeswest July 6, 2009 9:57 AM EDT
You war mongering Republicans will never be happy.All you want is more war.If John McCain was President instead of Obama you would be gushing with joy over his trip to Moscow or his willingness to deal with Iran or North Korea,but I know it just burns your butt and drives you nuts that we now have a President who doesnt believe in the Republican mantra of shoot first and ask question later.
After 8 years of the Bush/Cheney terrorist regime,the US has been finally liberated.Give Obama 4 years,hopefully 8 years and you wont believe the great changes that will happpen that will restore the honor of this country in the eyes of the world.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 July 6, 2009 9:11 AM EDT
by hower4 July 6, 2009 6:02 AM PDT
True. I wonder how many people on here would agree with the idea of nuking Russia/Iran/North Korea/France/anywhere else they know nothing about but seems to be un-American.






The conservatives are particularly funny, when it comes to Iran.

When McCain was singing "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran", they were all lining up in lock step, telling us how Iran was the "enemy", they all needed to be nuked, they all wanted to kill every American, they wanted to convert us to Islam, etc, etc, etc.

Then Iran had their election, and all of these conservatives suddenly were very sympathetic to the Iranians cause, they wanted Obama to intervene, they felt the UN wasn't doing enough to help out, etc, etc, etc.


My point is, they don't know WHO to like / love / hate, unless they are TOLD who they are supposed to like / love / hate.

Yet they consider themselves "foreign policy experts"?!?!
Reply to this comment
by hower4 July 6, 2009 9:43 AM EDT
It's not an issue about conservatives, it's about Americans. You have an immediate aggressive reaction against anyone who isn't American. Why is that?
by earth562 July 6, 2009 9:52 AM EDT
Hungry,

Where in the world do you come up with this stuff ?

You obviously have Bush Derangement syndrome
by IrishWench01 July 6, 2009 11:04 AM EDT
People like that just love to hate. It doesn't really matter who or why or even if their animosity is consistant. Its all about spewing the venom.
by hower4 July 6, 2009 12:20 PM EDT
I assume you mean Americans spewing their venom (and their missiles) on the rest of the world, don't you?
by specialty8 July 6, 2009 8:56 AM EDT
I say lets have another million dollar White House party when they return! Party on, us grunts will survive somehow.
Reply to this comment
by hower4 July 6, 2009 9:07 AM EDT
Here's a question....... If you wanted to vote for a President who wouldn't spend YOUR money as if it was their own, who is there?
by hungry1968-16 July 6, 2009 8:56 AM EDT
by hower4 July 6, 2009 5:48 AM PDT
Hi Hungry!!!! You've still not got to grips with sarcasm yet, have you?






These boards are FILLED with conservatives.

More often than not, comments like yours are SERIOUS!

It's impossible to read 'sarcasm' on these boards.
Reply to this comment
by hower4 July 6, 2009 9:02 AM EDT
True. I wonder how many people on here would agree with the idea of nuking Russia/Iran/North Korea/France/anywhere else they know nothing about but seems to be un-American.
by YuSoWrong July 6, 2009 10:13 AM EDT
You're on the receiving end of sarcasm (and who knows what else) every day. Might as well get used to it.
by hungry1968-16 July 6, 2009 8:45 AM EDT
by hower4 July 6, 2009 5:37 AM PDT
They're still commies. Nuke 'em before they nuke us!





The Cold War is over man.

Let it go......
Reply to this comment
by hower4 July 6, 2009 8:48 AM EDT
Hi Hungry!!!! You've still not got to grips with sarcasm yet, have you?
by earth562 July 6, 2009 9:57 AM EDT
The Cold War is NOT over unless you like to ignore the signs.

All a bunch of ex-KGB men running things and hoping to have a comeback of the "good old days "
by clancy49 July 6, 2009 8:40 AM EDT
Anybody notice there were no comments about cheering - adoring - jubilant - Russians greeting the family at the airport? Where are those adoring hopeful crowds that the world sends to the feet of the US President? Where have they gone? Is there no Michelle clothier and shoe worshippers? What is wrong with those Russians?
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 July 6, 2009 8:43 AM EDT
They must have not seen those clouds part with the brilliant sunshine when Obama came into town.
by hower4 July 6, 2009 8:37 AM EDT
They're still commies. Nuke 'em before they nuke us!
Reply to this comment
by pubsnomore July 6, 2009 8:35 AM EDT
It's hilarious how all of the RepigSwine on this board have tons of comments and not one of them actually reads the article.
Reply to this comment
by YuSoWrong July 6, 2009 10:03 AM EDT
RepigSwine. Ha. Typical baby talk.
by OregonJames July 6, 2009 8:24 AM EDT
Will Obama's visit to Moscow make much difference?

If it can reduce our nuclear arsenals by hundreds or perhaps thousands of nuclear weapons, I'd call it a grand success. If the visit can improve the relations and cooperation between our nations in foreign affairs, technology, science, energy, or any other of our vital interests, it has been a successful visit.

What is important is what is good for our country. Even small areas of cooperation between our nations can create tremendous benefits and savings to our nations. For example, the reductions in nuclear weapons alone would save us untold billions of dollars.

As long as Obama does not suddenly turn into George Bush or Dick Cheney, this visit to Moscow will be a great success that will save our nation billions of dollars, and it will improve our relations dramatically.
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 July 6, 2009 8:16 AM EDT
Why does he take the whole family with him everytime he flies around? Is every trip a vacation or something?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 July 6, 2009 8:24 AM EDT
Is this REALLY a concern of yours?!?!
by nolies74621 July 6, 2009 8:44 AM EDT
It should be all of our concerns because you and I are paying for them to travel with the TOTUS. If I do remember niether Clinton nor Bush took the whole fam damily on every trip that they took.
by hower4 July 6, 2009 8:51 AM EDT
What the hell do you think politicians are there for?...... It's to take as much as much of your money as possible and then escape any consequences. The Bush family was massively successful, but Obama is already showing signs of being pretty good too!
by chonder2 July 6, 2009 7:43 AM EDT
NEW anti health care choice adds are appearing on the east coast this morning.No suprise.
Reply to this comment
by nolies74621 July 6, 2009 7:26 AM EDT
Hey CBS why do you only allow comments to be posted on positive stories about Obama and his policies. I see that you have actually posted a story about Biden stating that they misjudged the economy "one whole paragraph" but you do not allow anyone to post a comment on that story. I have come to expect this from CBS one of the POTUS' personal news/Advertisement sources.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 July 6, 2009 7:46 AM EDT
What a joke.

We couldn't comment on ANY of the anti-American rhetoric out of Cheney a few weeks ago, we can NEVER comment on anything having to do with Israel, (since the new format was initiated), and half the stories about the incompetence of the GOP can't be commented on.

But you find ONE story about the economy that can't be commented on, and you think it's some sort of bizarre conspiracy theory?

I think you're a paranoid schizophrenic.



(I'll bet my wild unsubstantiated guess, is a lot closer than yours!)
by nolies74621 July 6, 2009 8:42 AM EDT
I agree somewhat. But you have to admit CBS coddles, and protects the TOTUS. They actually promote his policies. They can never take a unbiased look at his policies. CBS is more of a BHO sales team instead of an unbiased News corporation with an honest, ethical view on how the country is bieng destroyed by one mans expensive agenda. Tell you what think about how wonderful he is again in 1 year.
by YuSoWrong July 6, 2009 10:02 AM EDT
Wild and unsubstantiated guesses are the usual stock-in-trade. Explain yourself.
See all 51 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: