Iran Opposition Derides Election As "Coup"

Opposition Leader Mousavi Calls Results Illegitimate; Former President Khatami Calls It "Velvet Coup" Against Democracy

(CBS/AP)  Last Updated 1:19 p.m. EDT

Iran's embattled opposition leader urged his supporters Wednesday to keep working for "the rights of the people" in his first rallying cry since the regime validated the results of the country's disputed presidential election.

In a fresh show of defiance, Mir Hossein Mousavi reasserted his claim that the June 12 election was illegitimate, and he demanded that Iran's cleric-led government release all political prisoners and institute electoral reforms and press freedoms.

"It's not yet too late," Mousavi, who has slipped from public view in recent days, said in a lengthy statement posted on his Web site. "It's our historic responsibility to continue our complaint and make efforts not to give up the rights of the people."

Mousavi also called for a return to a more "honest" political environment in the Islamic Republic.

Mousavi's defiance was joined by former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami, who called the outcome of elections a "velvet coup against the people and democracy."

The reformist Khatami said the harsh crackdown after the election has undermined the confidence in the nation's rulers.

The comments come after the powerful Guardian Council, Iran's top electoral oversight body, pronounced the election results valid earlier this week - paving the way for Ahmadinejad to be sworn in later this month for a second four-year term.

They also accompanied news that Iran's feared Basij militia asked the chief prosecutor to investigate Mousavi for his role in violent protests that it said undermined national security.

The semiofficial Fars news agency said the militia - known as supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's street enforcers - sent the prosecutor a letter accusing Mousavi of taking part in nine offenses against the state, including "disturbing the nation's security," which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Iranian authorities have barred journalists for international news organizations from reporting on the streets and ordered them to stay in their offices. This report is based on the accounts of witnesses reached in Iran and official statements carried on Iranian media.

Iran's regime says 17 protesters and eight Basiji were killed in two weeks of unrest that followed the election. Mousavi insists the vote was tainted by massive fraud and that he - not incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - is the rightful winner.

"Whether he wanted to or not, Mr. Mousavi in many areas supervised or assisted in punishable acts," said the Basij letter, which also accused Mousavi of bringing "pessimism" into the public sphere.

In another sign of a tightening government clampdown on anyone challenging Ahmadinejad, a reformist political group said Wednesday that authorities banned a newspaper allied to presidential candidate Mehdi Karroubi after he denounced Iran's government as "illegitimate" because of claims of voting fraud.

The closure of the daily Etemad-e-Melli, or National Confidence, is another move by officials seeking to block media and Web sites critical of Ahmadinejad.

Karroubi, a former parliamentary speaker, received only a fraction of the votes in the results announced by authorities and joined Mousavi in demanding a new election. Recently, however, Karroubi has stepped up his independent criticism of the election and could emerge as a leading dissident voice against Ahmadinejad.

On Tuesday, he issued a harshly worded statement that blasted Ahmadinejad's government and pledged to continue challenging its authority. Karroubi's political group, the National Confidence Party, said the newspaper was shut down in response.

"I don't consider this government as legitimate," said the statement posted on Karroubi's Web site. "I will continue the fight under any circumstances and using every means."

Ahmadinejad canceled plans to travel to Libya as an observer at an African Union summit, Libyan officials said. It would have been Ahmadinejad's second trip outside Iran since the election.

Iran's Foreign Ministry said unspecified "preoccupations" kept the president at home. Some African officials had complained that Ahmadinejad's presence at the three-day gathering could divert attention from Africa's problems.

Ahmadinejad on Tuesday repeated the claims that post-election street riots were linked to a "soft revolution" aided by foreign powers.

"Enemies, despite overt and covert conspiracies to topple (the ruling system) through a soft overthrow, failed to reach their goals," state television quoted Ahmadinejad as telling Intelligence Ministry officials.

It's unclear how many people have been detained during the post-election riots and protests, but at least one group, the Paris-based International Federation of Human Rights, claimed at least 2,000 arrests have been made. The figures could not be independently verified because of tight media restrictions.

Iran's cleric-led government has said Ahmadinejad would be sworn in as early as July 26.

State-run Press TV reported Wednesday that a grenade was found in a trash can inside a women's bathroom at a mausoleum in Tehran, and it cited an official as saying the incident was intended "to invoke fear in the minds of the Iranians who participated" in the disputed election.

Amnesty International said Tuesday it was concerned about the possibility that many detainees "could be severely tortured" in custody, and it joined other human rights groups in demanding the immediate release of all political prisoners.

Police chief Ismail Ahmadi Moghaddam said Wednesday that Iranian intelligence officials were seeking Dr. Arash Hejazi, an Iranian doctor who tried to save Neda Agha Soltan after she was fatally shot on the sidelines of one of the demonstrations.

Hejazi, who has since fled to London, told the BBC last week that Soltan - who became an opposition icon after video of her bleeding to death was circulated worldwide - apparently was shot by a member of the volunteer Basij militia. He said protesters spotted an armed member of the militia on a motorcycle, and stopped and disarmed him.

But Ahmadi Moghaddam described the circumstances as a fabrication that had nothing to do with the street riots. He did not elaborate on why officials want Hejazi, but the regime repeatedly has implicated protesters and even foreign agents in Soltan's death.

[YerSoWrong]

They mistakenly thought that religious leaders were moral and secular leaders were not. The checks and balances of a republic are removed when religious authorities (or any one-party system) are permanently in-charge.

This should be obvious, and yet we read the messianic foolishness of some CBS bloggers concerning this-or-that politician, as if he will reign as a beacon of light for the next 1,000 years (or maybe just 8 years), or as if the previous 8 years were without fault.

The American republic is a brilliantly-designed machine, and worth copying elsewhere. I wonder which part of the NeoCon fantasy of exporting this model offends CBS bloggers the most: the idea of a republic, or that Third-World peoples have a right to a republic.

[riddelup]

As far as Iran's election goes, we all know Iran is a theocracy and the elections are irrelevant. Ahmadinejad is a talking head and anyone who replaces him would be the same. The religious leaders should have let whomever be president, but instead in their arrogance insisted on this talking head. Now the people on Iran know their vote was and is worthless and they are angry. The religious leaders of Iran are acting like the Shah. Perhaps they should trade their turbans in for a crown or have they already?

[curiously1]

Next time that ahmadijejad comes to NY to make a speech against the U.S, can someone please slap him around and remind him that he stole an election and killed several innocent folks? Why not just divert his plane to Venezuela, so he can join the "Thugs Summit" with Chavez and Kim junk ill ?!

[YerSoWrong]

In case you receive any of these communications from the planet Earth, the evolution of the modern republic from America to France, to Haiti, to the reaffirmation of a race-neutral citizenry during our own Civil War, to Woodrow Wilson, to confronting the dictatorships of the 20th Century and in our own time, these didn't happen because some bleating imbecile went online to argue for NeoIsolationism and British-Style Dentistry.

It disgusts the rest of us when anyone argues in favor of nonsense.

[YerSoWrong]

Jefferson would disagree with you. Most people here would disagree with you. You know nothing except the anger that has no reference to politics.

[hungry1968-15]

by YerSoWrong July 1, 2009 1:25 PM PDT
I think the documentation of America's role as the promoter and ally of republics throughout the world goes back at least to our own Revolution, to the French Revolution, the US Civil War and the recognition of Haiti.

It has been US policy under both political parties and is commended by everyone who respects the US which very obviously does not include you.

Explain yourself.







You know even LESS about history that I gave you credit for!!

NOWHERE, has ANY administration tried to "export values" to ANY country, ANYWHERE in the world, except for Bush and the Iraq disaster.

By the way, he American Civil War didn't do ANYTHING to "export our values" anywhere, and what does Haiti or the French Revolution, have to do with this conversation? The French Revolution had NOTHING to do with our "values" or our democracy!!

[hungry1968-15]

by YerSoWrong July 1, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
You are such a waste of oxygen. I think everyone on this board knows that you should be treated as such. Explain how you go on living. You are the femme fatale of dictatorships and deserve to lick their boots.






Explain this post genius.

How is my support of America, and ONLY of America, doing anything to bolster dictatorships?

And what makes you think that it's the US's responsibility to single-handedly remove EVERY dictator in the world?!?!?

[YerSoWrong]

I think the documentation of America's role as the promoter and ally of republics throughout the world goes back at least to our own Revolution, to the French Revolution, the US Civil War and the recognition of Haiti.

It has been US policy under both political parties and is commended by everyone who respects the US which very obviously does not include you.

Explain yourself.

[YerSoWrong]

You are such a waste of oxygen. I think everyone on this board knows that you should be treated as such. Explain how you go on living. You are the femme fatale of dictatorships and deserve to lick their boots.

[YerSoWrong]

The fact that you have no idea of what values America represents to the world tells us everything we need to know about you. Jefferson wrote of anyone making the sort of bold assertions that you frequently make, "a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes". Explain yourself, ferret.

[hungry1968-15]

by YerSoWrong July 1, 2009 11:56 AM PDT
I asked the question: Which aspect of the NeoCon agenda is most objectionable? That America has values worth exporting, or that Third-World peoples are human enough to benefit from those values?

Evade this if you wish.






What "values" are you talking about?!?!

What makes you think that we have a responsibility to "export" anything to country's that hate our guts, and want NOTHING to do with us?

[Illuminated1]

In the Honduras we have a president that was thrown out of office by constitutional law there....The supreme court in Honduras has the right to militarily order laws enforced. We don't have such, but I wouldn't mind it if we did too.
The U.S. didn't recognize the legal overthrow of the ex Honduran leader, but does recognize Iran's illegal election....
AM I MISSING SOMETHING HERE?

[YerSoWrong]

You might want to blame the Zionists.

[hungry1968-15]

When did the US government officially recognize Iran's illegal election?

I think you ARE missing something.....

[YerSoWrong]

I asked the question: Which aspect of the NeoCon agenda is most objectionable? That America has values worth exporting, or that Third-World peoples are human enough to benefit from those values?

Evade this if you wish.

[jwesel1]

Why is the opposition acting like sore losers? They think that America is their friend because their knowledge of history is weak. Name one Muslim country that America didn't screw up

[hungry1968-15]

by -----One-American----- July 1, 2009 10:24 AM PDT
Iran's economy won't be getting any better, and in fact will continue to worsen, as the world places more sanctions upon them.

Then when they have had quite enough, the masses will forcibly eject Amadinejad and the Iranian dictatorship.

Kind of like how it will be here in America, when Americans throw out Obama and the Democrats.






Funny, I thought it was the republicans that were thrown out in the LAST TWO elections.

[pepperwood2]

Mr. Mousavi: You just don't get it do you. BO is more concerned about the so-called Coup in a Little Weak Country Honduras that his Socialist Buddy Chavez is upset about.

Whereas a real Coup that is going on in a Powerful Country as Iran he is Out to Lunch. He will need more time when it will make him & his brilliant SOS appear Presidential. We apologize but this BOZO has more important things to take care of Like the Tax & Credit Plan, Gay Rights Priority, & Hate Crimes Bill directed at the Moral Majority. SO SAD!

[mjlewis6]

AT least the Iranian opposition is trying to make changes in its government. Our own Al Gore did not put up much resistance to the 'official' Supreme Court selection of George Bush for President. Look what that has cost our nation in hindsight. It has been expensive not only in the impact on our economy and health, but cost the lives of thousands of Iraqis without bringing to a resolution the very issue that unites all Americans: the 9/11 attack by Al Quaeda and their protection by the Taliban in Afghanistan.

This is one war we need to fight....and the subsequent change to our way of governance should be all votes count and throw out the bad ones and perform full recounts. The theft of Florida votes and disenfranchisement of voters prior to an election cannot be overestimated for its impact on our national character, thanks to the torture legacy of the Bush/Cheney years.

[DaBroiler]

Does that include throwing out the votes of the fraudulent ACORN voters?

[YerSoWrong]

Which aspect of the NeoCon agenda is most objectionable? That America has values worth exporting, or that Third-World peoples are human enough to benefit from those values?

[curiously1]

fariborzzak, the real loser here is the thug regime in iran. They now have zero credibility anywhere on the planet. They are exposed !

[mrzerato]

It is entertainment to listen and read to the neocons talk about what they feel the Obama Administration should do about the events after the election. This is from the same people that would not talk to Iran. Now they want President Obama to be friendly with the Iranian rebellion.

I am sure the Iranian government would have enjoyed to make the USA the object of their hate once again. That falls in line with the conservatives roots to blame all ills on America. Mousavi would have been branded as the puppet of American meddling