July 1, 2009
Obama Should Support Honduras Coup
John R. Thomson: What Happened Was Not A Standard Coup, And Zelaya's Return To Power Would Only Be A Victory For Chavez
-
Play CBS Video Video Honduran President Expelled President Obama expressed concern and called for a peaceful resolution to the political crisis in Honduras, after their army arrested and expelled the Honduran president Kimberly Dozier reports.
-
A demonstrator, with a Honduran flag on his shoulders, stands next to a bonfire near to the presidential house in Tegucigalpa, Monday, June 29, 2009. Honduras' new leaders defied growing global pressure on Monday to reverse a military coup, arguing that they had followed their constitution in removing President Manuel Zelaya. (AP)
-
Photo Essay Military Coup In Honduras President Manuel Zelaya is removed and sent into exile, while his supporters protest the decision
Beware the coup d’état. They often cause more problems than they solve and are never totally peaceful; indeed, they typically trigger bloodshed either during or after the event.
So what should be our view of Sunday’s ouster of Honduran president Manuel Zelaya? We should support it.
The automatic response condemning President Zelaya’s removal by many political leaders in the region reveals the appalling degree to which they have ceased defending democracy. As Roberto Micheletti, chosen by the Honduran Congress to complete Zelaya’s term, observed, “What was done here was a democratic act. Our constitution continues to be relevant, our democracy continues to live.”
This was not the usual whitewash coming from the usual coup leader. Interim president Micheletti was president of the Honduran Congress and is a member, as was Zelaya, of the ruling Liberal party. Micheletti, the Congress, and the Supreme Court are all committed to national elections scheduled for November 29. Those who know Roberto Micheletti confirm that he has no intention of staying in power beyond the end of the current presidential term.
As retired career diplomat George Landau - the former U.S. ambassador to Chile, Paraguay, and Venezuela - observes, “This was not a military coup. The military blocked an attempted civilian coup by Manuel Zelaya, as he defied Honduras’s Supreme Court, its Congress, and his own political party. Instead of calling for his reinstatement in office, we should congratulate the Honduran government on removing the president peacefully.
“So far, Washington and most of the world have missed what is happening in Tegucigalpa. This was a power play by Hugo Chávez and his ALBA colleagues. [‘ALBA’ is a leftist bloc led by Venezuela. Zelaya made Honduras a member in 2008.] We are faced with a battle between democracy and leftist autocrats who have manipulated themselves into permanent power in their countries and want to add Honduras to the list.”
What happened in Honduras was not a standard coup. The Supreme Court ordered the army to remove Zelaya from office. The Congress, albeit after his detention and exile, voted unanimously for his removal and confirmed his constitutionally mandated successor to fill the remainder of his term in office.
Prior to his exile, Zelaya had insisted on a referendum to allow for his reelection in direct violation of the Honduran constitution. In other words, he set out to perpetuate himself in office. Roger Noriega, a former Bush administration official and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, puts it clearly: “Zelaya brushed aside every other institution of the state in insisting on a referendum that would benefit his selfish interests.”
Shredding constitutional prohibitions to presidential reelection has become a popular political ploy in several Latin American countries in recent years. To date, leftist regimes in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela have scrapped constitutional presidential term limits, each time using extralegal ploys to do so. Most recently, Washington’s best friend in the region, Álvaro Uribe of Colombia, has sought a constitutional change to extend his presidency for a third term, but so far he is working within the law.
Supporters call such moves vital for their nation’s peace and well-being; opponents say they reflect presidential hubris and greed. Call the penchant to scrap presidential term limits what you will: The efforts have clearly negated each and every country’s constitution.
In the case of Honduras, President Zelaya stood alone among political, legal, economic, media, and military leaders. Backed by a noisy rabble and funded by Venezuela’s ever-meddling autocrat, Hugo Chávez, Zelaya’s campaign was seen as a way to reverse the defeat of the pro-Chávez candidate in Panama’s recent presidential election.
The ballots for Sunday’s suspended referendum were actually prepared in Venezuela. On Saturday, Zelaya made an abortive effort to storm and steal the ballots from the Honduran military base where they were stored.
President Obama’s statement that Manuel Zelaya “remains the president of Honduras” is his latest foreign-policy gaffe. So far, the U.S. position, reiterated by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, is largely the same as that of such governments as Argentina, Cuba, Ecuador, and Venezuela - none of them supporters of democracy and the rule of law.
It is unfortunately understandable that the Organization of American States (OAS) should roundly condemn Zelaya’s removal from office. Under the leadership of Secretary General José Miguel Insulza, the OAS has moved steadily toward embracing the autocratic Left. In its recent annual meeting, held (perhaps prophetically) in Tegucigalpa, the Honduran capital, Insulza and Zelaya collaborated to end the organization’s suspension of Cuba, despite that country’s blatant disregard of basic OAS charter support for democracy and human rights.
That United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon should stand in support of Zelaya and call for an emergency meeting of the General Assembly underscores once again how feckless the world body has become.
Not one informed Honduran - including members of the media - has opposed Manuel Zelaya’s removal from office. While many regretted the need to do so, all said the move was both legal and necessary, a position supported by Honduran attorney general Luis Alberto Rubí, who had threatened to prosecute Zelaya if he actually held some form of referendum.
American John Park, the former Anglican archdeacon of Honduras and a resident of the Central American country for more than 17 years, summarized the situation succinctly: “What has happened can be called democracy in action. It was not a military coup, but just as a U.S. court may order the arrest of a citizen, the Honduran army acted on the orders of the Supreme Court to arrest a citizen who . . . was flouting the law and the constitution.”
Manuel Zelaya’s attempt to perpetuate himself in power was a naked bid to join the ranks of leftist Latin autocrats. Despite his claims to the contrary, he sought to undermine his country’s constitution in a manner made notorious by his mentor and financier Hugo Chávez. Just as cynical and hypocritical has been reaction of “world leaders,” most notably senior Obama administration figures.
From Caracas, Roberto Bottome, the founder of Veneconomia - which for 30 years has been the country’s leading economic, political, and social analytical group - observed, “The knee-jerkers who have called for Zelaya to be restored as president of Honduras could have taken the time to find out what was really happening. Perhaps, just perhaps, they might have reacted differently once they learned it was Zelaya who was violating his country’s law and the constitution while all Honduran institutions, including the Supreme Court and Congress, had acted in strict observance of those laws and that Constitution.
“Zelaya defied the laws and constitution of his country. He was barred by the constitution - and the Courts - from holding a referendum on any subject in the six months prior to an election. Even so, he pressed ahead with his proposal for a referendum on a constitutional convention that would have allowed him to succeed himself as president.”
Let’s hope that someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue or the State Department will recognize that Manuel Zelaya’s return to office would be an endorsement of chicanery, not a victory for democracy, and that Zelaya’s reinstallation as president would be seen as a major victory for Chávez and his cohorts.
By John R. Thomson
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online.

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 96 CommentsPor favore Omar lo escucho todos los dias, io estoy muy de acuerdo con muchas cosas del Taliban. Bueno hoy he tratado de mandarle a Enrique y Joe pero sus correos me han sido devueltos. por favor si me lo envia se lo agradecere. Gracias y demoles a Hunduras su apoyo. Ayer aparecieron en las fotos de hunduras cubanos y nicaraguenses con una camiseta con El Che guevara. Que le parece. Y si se acuerdan que dijo que era christiano y con el crucifijo en sus manos, bueno Este novo senor quiere tratar la incredivilidad de ese pueblo. Apollemos a Hunduras., mio espanol no es muy bueno escolto a todos por su ayuda. angelo
Omar Moynelo - Con Luisa Fernanda en "El Arańazo"
Omar ahora con la bella Luisa Fernanda, en ?El Arańazo? todas las tardes de 4 a 7 pm por La Kalle 98.3.
We ask Mrs. Clinton help to became a Democratic goverment in Hunduras, if you looks some of the pictures, cubans Nicaraguences and venezolanos are today in Hunduras to kill and made a caos so the new goverment been taking off. I can belive we are making the same mistakes as 50 years ago. Please Mrs. Cllinton if you willing to have a personal discusion I will be glad to do so. I pray to the Lord to support you and give you the power with our support to said NO to Zelaya. Zelaya comment as Fidel try to used the same filosofic of they are Christian, but we all know what is behiend. I hope some one can send you my comments and for you to made the right dicession. Sorry I am sick and I lost how to made better comments.
angelo
Rather than arrest or impeachment, he was deposed and exiled... this is not a democratic process.
It is not a matter of guilt; nor if he is a good administrator or not; or if he is ?right wing? or ?left wing? politically. It is a question of due process - of which he was denied. That is the issue.
In a broader sense, Obama, and many other democratic governments are indeed obliged to object on these grounds alone. Left unchallenged, this type of behavior returns us to the hypocritical and deceitful practices of Viet Nam, Iran, the Cold War and Iraq. Wherein the overthrow or disposition of any leader that did not suit our national interests was seen as acceptable ? without regard to form of government ? democratic or otherwise.
Don't worry, Obama and his Robots already have plans to follow the lead of Chavez!
Some of you people on these boards seem to think that our president should run every country. You same people go on and on about having small government. Quite the oxymoron.
We need to concentrate on home.
If scrapping term limits "negated each and every country's constitution", why the hell didn't Thomson object when Dubya illegally wiretapped every american citizen, squashed free speech by creating "free speech zones" (cages to prevent protesters from begin able to "peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"), lied to Congress and the People to get approval to launch an illegal war which killed almost 5,000 US soldiers, etc., etc. ?
If scrapping term limits "negated each and every country's constitution", why the hell didn't Thomson object when Dubya illegally wiretapped every american citizen, squashed free speech by creating "free speech zones" (cages to prevent protesters from begin able to "peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"), lied to Congress and the People to get approval to launch an illegal war which killed almost 5,000 US soldiers, etc., etc. ?
And, Obama just announced they will continue the Wire Tap program and are meeting with AT&T to be the lead TeleCom company to do it!
After 30 years, Americans are still paying the price of the decisions taken 30 years ago. If Honduras becomes a dictatorship, I have no doubt that what happened to Mr. Carter will also happen to Mr. Obama.
On this matter and at this point President Obama does not speak for me.
Nobody in the goverment here gives a tin whistle about ours.
The international community and media has seriously misjudged events in Honduras and have behaved like predatory jackals with crocodile tears.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB8/nsaebb8i.htm
On 22 August 1973 the Christian Democrats and the National Party members of the Chamber of Deputies voted 81 to 47, the resolution titled Declaration of the Breakdown of Chile?s Democracy that asked the military to put an immediate end to breach[es of] the Constitution . . . with the goal of redirecting government activity toward the path of Law and ensuring the Constitutional order of our Nation, and the essential underpinnings of democratic co-existence among Chileans.
There wasn't really a coup in Chile either and Nixon was definitively right to support it, ordering the CIA to depose President Allende ... in 1970.
Of course we know what happened next. A perfect democracy under Pinochet.
We, the people of Honduras feel abandoned by the international community! We have just acted to defend our laws, our freedom, our democracy. No coup has taken place here, but a lawful destitution of a corrupt megalomaniac who used socialism as a crutch to support his ultimate goal of staying in power indefinitely under strict compliance of Chavez's so-called socialist franchise!
Long Live Democracy, Long Live our Freedom, long Live the Rule of Law.... Long Live The Republic of Honduras!
We are a right center country with most clear thinking Democrats saying they are somewhat conservative!
Obama LIED and he will never get re-elected!
In my opinion you are very unreasonable or undemocratic in your views. You talk about your freedom, but fail to respect the rights of Mr Zelaya, the democratically elected president of your country-Honduras. By Mr Obama, the democratic way of removing Mr Zelaya is though proper impeachment process, which gives him the opportunity to defend himself by the Honduran congress or senate. Taking or forcing him out early in the morning by the military on the orders of the Supreme Court is not the proper process. At least, here in the USA, the Supreme Court could not give such an order, it would be illegal. Only Congress can sack or impeach the president if found wanton. So, I wish you could be reasonable to see that Mr Obama only wants things to be done properly and democratically. Mr Obama seems to be agreeing with Mr Chavez because, in this case Mr Chavez is right - Mr Zelaya was forced out undemocratically, without due process.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 96 Comments