June 3, 2010 10:35 AM

Mark Sanford's Wreckage

By
CBSNews
(National Review Online)  Jim Geraghty writes The Campaign Spot for NRO.

Few political scandals have been so ready-made for the late-night comics as the Wednesday confessions of South Carolina governor Mark Sanford. The punchlines write themselves with every detail - the governor's opposition to "stimulus," the initial explanation of hiking the Appalachian Trail, the travel to a distant country to visit a mistress on Father's Day. The subject of the scandal even said, presumably unintentionally, that he was "crying in Argentina."

But underneath the wreckage of the most spectacular implosion of a gubernatorial rising star since - well, Eliot Spitzer - is a man, and a family, and a group of staffers and former staffers shocked and a little wounded by the crash's metaphorical shrapnel. Inside South Carolina and out, the press conference thoroughly stunned those who once thought Mark Sanford was a great governor, a great boss, and in fact, a great husband and father too.

Jason Miller served as Governor Sanford's campaign manager and deputy chief of staff until 2007. "This is a sad day for everyone who knows and is friends with the Sanford family," Miller said shortly after Sanford's announcement. "Mark, Jenny, and their four boys are some of the best people you could ever know, and it was gut-wrenching to watch today's press conference because nobody - nobody - saw this coming. This would be tough enough to deal with for a normal family, let alone a very public family that's going to have this story on the front page of tomorrow's newspaper and leading every newscast."

At first glance, Sanford - who has made as many enemies among the state's Republicans as he has among Democrats - would seem to be prime fodder for impeachment. He departed the state, a state where power has to be officially transferred to the lieutenant governor, for several days, and remained incommunicado. He almost certainly used state resources to get to the airport for his tryst. He lied to his staff and allowed them to mislead the public on his behalf.

The first reaction of a Republican strategist with deep ties to the state was, "He's going to have to resign. It's South Carolina." The strategist noted that Sanford's foes in the state legislature were among those fanning the flames of "Where is he?" questions yesterday.

Miller thinks that his old boss can survive the controversy. "This will definitely cause considerable short-term public-relations damage, but this will eventually fade into the background. While a handful of questions remain outstanding, this only festers and continues to worsen if there's some remaining issue of malfeasance, and I believe Sanford put that to rest in his press conference. The media storm will be painful to weather in the short term, but it will pass. What the governor has to do now is show that he is a steady hand at the wheel when it comes to his official duties and start working on repairing his home life."

Fred Wszolek, a veteran political consultant who lives in Sullivan's Island, S.C., notes that as much as the state's political players may want Sanford gone, they may dread his replacement even more: "If Sanford resigns, Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer would take over, and most of the rest of the state's political establishment doesn't want him becoming governor. First they don't want him running the state in general, and then there are a congressman, an attorney general, and at least two state legislators who want to run for governor in 2010, and none of them want Andre Bauer to be running as a quasi-incumbent." Those who seek to run the government may even find the post-scandal Sanford more to their liking: "It's a weak governorship to begin with institutionally, and he's now so weakened that he's now completely beside the point. Now all he's got is the bully pulpit."

Those who thought of Sanford as presidential material find those dreams over, of course. And those who were inclined to like what the man stood for in his political life are left to reconcile stunning revelations about his life outside politics.

"I am a little thrown by it," Wszolek said. "I expected it was something far wackier. I didn't think it would reflect on his character, I thought it would reflect on his sensibility. If he had said he was surfing off the coast of Argentina, I would have nodded and said, 'Yeah, that's Mark Sanford.'"

Wszolek notes that one of the things that made Sanford unique was his history of keeping hard promises. Running for the House in 1994, he pledged to serve only three terms, to take no PAC money, and to oppose all tax increases. He remained in the Air Force Reserve while serving as governor. It would have been much easier to accept the stimulus funds and leave the unfunded-mandate issue to his successor, but he didn't.

"This guy has always been about whatever he says as a public official, you can trust . . ." He takes a long pause. "And then there's this."

By Jim Geraghty
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online

National Review Online
Add a Comment
by speakinup22 July 7, 2009 12:16 PM EDT
cbsantispin - I'm a conservative, and I would agree with your statement. If the Republicans allow this guy to stay, they have a double standard.

On the other hand, I think Ted Kennedy should never have been elected for what happened to Maryjo K, and that Kennedy Jr in the House should never have been allowed to stay as he has a addiction.

There are WAY too many politicians that are ill fits for our representation.

I'd like to think you'd agree, but somehow, I believe yo'd stick to the far left mantra and say the Kennedys are an exception.

please, prove me wrong.
Reply to this comment
by cbsantispin July 2, 2009 7:54 AM EDT
People who have done far less have their reputations and lives destroyed, this guy will escape with a few blemishes and no punishment, the Republican double standard now clear and evident to everyone who cares to notice it makes you want to vomit.
Reply to this comment
by imnho June 30, 2009 3:54 PM EDT
People in glass house should refrain from throwing large rocks. I don't think his sex life is my bussiness, but his hypocrisy is a little like John Mitchell(of Watergate fame. He is saying," do as I say not as I do."
Reply to this comment
by ianlou June 29, 2009 3:47 PM EDT
In South Carolina, all Mark Sanford has to do is breakdown at a church pulpit and beg forgiveness for his weakness; Scream "I have sinned, I have sinned"
Flash a phone number at the bottom of the TV screen, and he'll have his war chest filled for his next election.

His only real mistake was having an affair with a foreigner instead of a cousin or somethin...
Reply to this comment
by Benton09 July 4, 2009 5:01 PM EDT
Or he could just repent at a NASCAR race to BubbaVille.
by speakinup22 July 7, 2009 12:18 PM EDT
Or sister in law, like Jackie O and Bobby ?

He did the right thing, apologizing. But he should also leave.

As should all that are less than honorable to their spouses, as well as those that are addicts, and those that break the law.
by gosstom June 29, 2009 5:29 AM EDT
If this clown can recover, it will be the greatest miracle since the Ressurection. If he does recover and starts his own religion, I'll be his first convert, cause this guy is smoken'!!!
Reply to this comment
by cs4466 June 27, 2009 9:47 AM EDT
Of course he can recover. The republicans/neocons don't care about hypocrisy in their ranks. They just want to preach about the ill morals of others. The party of ultimate hypocrisy has long, long lost it's moral standing to speak authoratively to anyone about anything. In their irrelevance, they see little damage could be done by keeping Sanford in their ranks. After all, they have nothing left to lose.

Now if Sanford were a Democrat, there would be Hell to pay. Literally.
Reply to this comment
by MohatmaJeebus June 26, 2009 2:46 PM EDT
Unreal. I guess only the other party is subject to the measure of "Moral legitmacy" as Sanford called it as he pointing his hypocritical finger at Clinton calling for impeachment. If only such rank hypocrisy were a crime.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso29 June 26, 2009 9:22 AM EDT
Hmmm interesting...except...those who think he can weather this storm are his cronies and allies. His cronies and allies are not the ones to decide--the people in SC will decide this. Let's see--he loses the Dems, of course. If the substantially black pop in SC could be mobilized to vote and the state checked in voter suppression--it could go to a Dem.

On the other hand, Sanford lost any who wanted funds for education, lost any who were/are the morality police...it appears whether he has a future or not, depends more on what the public thinks of him than it does on what compatriots who may also be doing the same kinds of things--think of him.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook