ANCHORAGE, June 24, 2009

Palin Pays Alaska For First Family Travel

Alaska Governor Reimburses State For Trips Made With Her Children

  • Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has been under fire for taking business trips with one or more children, but she has now reimbursed Alaska.

    Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has been under fire for taking business trips with one or more children, but she has now reimbursed Alaska.  (AP)

  • Photo Essay Sarah Palin

    Alaska's youngest and first female governor tabbed to be McCain's running mate.

(AP)  Gov. Sarah Palin has paid more than $8,100 to reimburse Alaska for the costs associated with nine trips taken with her children.

Palin's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, says the governor paid $8,143.62 to the state on June 19 for the nine trips, some with more than one of her five children, taken between January 2007 and February of this year. The payment was due Tuesday.

An ethics complaint had alleged Palin abused her power by charging the state when her children traveled with her. The Alaska Personnel Board found no wrongdoing, but Palin agreed to reimburse the state for trips found to be of questionable state interest.

Van Flein and state administrative director Linda Perez sent The Associated Press copies of the check and other documents of the transaction.

The board's investigator, Timothy Petumenos, said in his report that state rules give little guidance to determine ethical standards for travel by the governor's family. But he interpreted the law to require that the state pay only if the first family serves an important state interest.

Van Flein noted that Palin had followed historical practices on first family travel and that her travel requests were processed by the same administrators who processed requests for predecessors, Frank Murkowski and Tony Knowles.

"No one challenged Gov. Murkowski's or Governor Knowles' travel practices," Van Flein said in an e-mail. "The rules were, and are, being changed in midstream for Governor Palin. However, as noted in the agreement at the time 'the Governor wants to exceed minimum legal standards."'

Anchorage resident Frank Gwartney, a Democrat, filed the complaint in late October. It closely followed a report by The Associated Press that Palin charged the state more than $21,000 for her three daughters' commercial flights, including events where they weren't invited, and later ordered their expense forms amended to specify official state business.

Palin was the Republican vice presidential candidate when the complaint was filed and after the February settlement she called the grievance "an obvious political weapon."

As part of the settlement, the Alaska Department of Law was asked to develop specific rules clarifying when the state should pay for a governor's family travel. That effort is under way, with the goal to have a final draft by the end of the year, according to Judy Bockmon, an assistant attorney general.

Also on Tuesday, the governor's office announced the 15th dismissal of an ethics complaint against Palin or one of her staff. It alleged Kris Perry - director of the governor's Anchorage office

worked on state time to benefit Palin's interests during and after her vice presidential run.

The governor's office said the complaint was filed even after Perry obtained an opinion from Perez, her ethics supervisor.

"It is outrageous to file an ethics complaint against a state employee who sought and obtained ethics guidance in advance," Mike Nizich, Palin's chief of staff, said in a statement. "This is not about ethics. This is not about holding the governor or state employees accountable. This is pure harassment




© MMIX The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
by picklepants7 June 25, 2009 10:24 AM EDT
that's cool. i'll be waiting for the obama clan to reinburse the american taxpayers for michelle and the kids' european vacation, they weren't invited or nesessary were they? oh wait, obama is a dem with no ethics. nevermind, we're stuck with the bill and the obama kids got a free vacation out of it. like her or not, at least palin has ethics. the dems thought they had her, but she was found not guilty, nice try haters.
Reply to this comment
by ladypirate2 June 26, 2009 4:32 AM EDT
That's exactly what I've been saying! Nothing is said when Obama takes Michelle and the girls with him and the taxpayers are stuck with the bill! I think ALL politicians, including the president, should have to reimburse their state or country when they take their families with them on trips! It's not right that one should have to, though, and the rest be allowed to get by without it!
by ladypirate2 June 25, 2009 3:11 AM EDT
Everyone jumps on Governor Palin when she takes her family with her on her trips and charges her state with the cost but absolutely nothing is said when other politicians do the same thing! At least she has reimbursed her state. Shouldn't the other politicians be made to reimburse their states, too? She shouldn't be the only one! Governor Sanford of SC should be forced to reimburse his state for his trips to Argentina to see his girlfriend, too!
Reply to this comment
by dcobamaeye June 24, 2009 8:17 PM EDT
to all you Sarah bashers...dont you have a country to save? What about human rights, Oh those rights only apply to you.
Reply to this comment
by theygottago June 24, 2009 7:37 PM EDT
Hello.....did ya read the article? The Alaska Personnel Board found no wrongdoing, but Palin agreed to reimburse the state for trips found to be of questionable state interest. Not to mention that two of her predessors Frank Murkowski and Tony Knowles did the same thing. I ask you, if it were not Sarah Palin, would we even be talking about this? No! The Libs are scared to death of this woman and I think she has guts and where are her defenders?
Reply to this comment
by ladypirate2 June 25, 2009 3:23 AM EDT
I am one of her defenders! I've been defending her since September! You are right! If this were anyone but Sarah Palin nothing would be said about her taking her family with her on her trips! If she were a man and a democrat we wouldn't even hear a word about it! He also wouldn't have to reimburse anything because they wouldn't ask him to! Politics is still a "good ole boys" club just as it always has been! Especially if they are democrats!
by pvperson3 June 24, 2009 6:41 PM EDT
Yeah, she's so "innocent" that she keeps being forced to repay money she grafted from her state and party. If putting your children and husband on your expense account at every turn is OK, then why doesn't every governor do it? Because they know it's un-ethical and crooked, that's why?
Reply to this comment
by ladypirate2 June 26, 2009 5:15 PM EDT
They do but no one says anything to them about it and no one ever files any complaints about them for this! They get by with it!
by mikekleber June 24, 2009 5:48 PM EDT
WHO CARES!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by mikekleber June 24, 2009 5:47 PM EDT
WHO CARES! ! ! !

SHE SHOULD HAVE NEVER CHARGED THE TRIPS TO BEGIN WITH
Reply to this comment
by ladypirate2 June 26, 2009 5:12 PM EDT
Neither should any politician charge their state or country for taking their families with them on their trips, but they do! They all do, including the president, and yet it seems that Sarah Palin is the only one who has to reimburse her state! Nobody ever files any complaints against any of the rest for this, at least none that we hear about! That seems unfair and a little one sided to me!
by John_Merritt June 24, 2009 5:31 PM EDT
Eventually, EVERYTHING comes out in the wash. Whether it is bleach or detergent to be used, the dirt will always come to the surface. I love Sarah and her family, even though she may not be 'seeing clearly' on a few things. But thats OK. At least she is not a coward, and she always TRIES to do the right thing. Don't you Sarah?
Reply to this comment
by lawyertom1 June 24, 2009 5:13 PM EDT
There are still major questions about the Palins' home in Wasilla. Was it built for free by the contractors who got the sports center job? Graft appears to be rampant in Alaska.
Reply to this comment
by mikethek June 24, 2009 5:25 PM EDT
How can you tell when a politician is lying?

Their lips are moving.
by bassinapple June 24, 2009 4:32 PM EDT
So basicaly she is quilty of loving her children, and wanting them to be with her when she travels. I say flog the woman.
Reply to this comment
by docpeter1953 June 24, 2009 4:40 PM EDT
I second that.

Lets have the vote.
by texanforlogi June 24, 2009 6:11 PM EDT
She has to take her daughters with her on trips--when she leaves them at home they get pregnant.
by mikethek June 24, 2009 4:23 PM EDT
Just curious - did Obama reimburse the US Gov. for the family trip a couple of weeks ago to Paris & London? They took both 747s so that Obama could come back separately by himself while the rest of the family (including mom in law) could go sightseeing.
Reply to this comment
by sed81650 June 24, 2009 3:24 PM EDT
I thought the amount owed was more than $10,000. Did they say some trips were okay?
Reply to this comment
by vrick_silvah June 24, 2009 3:01 PM EDT
The Question is "why did she charge her chldrens tickets to the state of Alaska to begin with?". The lady got plenty of money in her bank account,but its pretty obvious that she tried to charge the state and was hoping noone would notice. unfortnately Sarah, someone with ethical values noticed and made you cough up the money which you shouldn't have taken out and robbed the state from in the first place. There's really no reason for this article as she didn't do anything spectacular. She just paid back money to Alaska that she stole. It's a good thing she isn't in the whitehouse because we wouldn't want to find out how much she would've hid underneath her blouse. She is a typical republican who doesn't want to save people money, but instead collect, steal, and create more problems for the citizens of america.
Reply to this comment
by credibility2 June 24, 2009 2:58 PM EDT
So long is it going to take for all of the Dems who abuse this type and other forms of using taxpayer funds to entertain their family? It's only a story when it involves a Republican. Dems get dismissed and excused.
Reply to this comment
by staycalm June 24, 2009 2:49 PM EDT
This woman sure did get under people's skin. I've heard countless people talk about her unfitness to take over the Presidency should something happen to the President however they don't seem to have any problem with foot-in-mouth Biden being "a heartbeat away". The only other time I saw this kind of reaction to a woman was in high school when all the plain girls ganged up on the beautiful one with everything going for her. Could fully grown rational adults actually be...jealous?
Reply to this comment
by VEGAS-GANGSTERS June 24, 2009 2:49 PM EDT
Looks like someone is trying to cover her own a** in case this comes up again in 2012. Nice try Sarah, but anyone with half a brain can see through this. Also she seems to think that people will overlook the fact that she is a moron just because she paid off her debt? Negative.
Reply to this comment
by Henri_Rochard June 24, 2009 2:40 PM EDT
Yeah, Palin paid up... After the Ethics Board took a look at her family trips.
Reply to this comment
See all 24 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (490 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: