June 23, 2009
Why Republican Infighting Matters
Thomas Sowell: Hae You Noticed That Savvy Conservatives Win While Fumbling Moderates Get Clobbered
A Gallup poll last week showed that far more Americans describe themselves as conservatives than as liberals. Yet Republicans have been clobbered by the Democrats in both the 2006 elections and the 2008 elections.
In a country with more conservatives than liberals, it is puzzling - in fact, amazing - that we have the furthest left president of the United States in history, as well as the furthest left speaker of the House of Representatives.
Republicans, especially, need to think about what this means. If you lose when the other guy has all the high cards, there is not much you can do about it. But when you have the high cards and still keep taking a beating, then you need to rethink how you are playing the game.
The current intramural fighting among Republicans does not necessarily mean any fundamental rethinking of their policies or tactics. These tussles among different segments of the Republican party may be nothing more than a longstanding jockeying for position between the liberal and conservative wings of the party.
The stakes in all this are far higher than which element becomes dominant in which party or which party wins more elections. Both the domestic- and foreign-policy direction of the current administration in Washington are leading this country into dangerous waters, from which we may or may not be able to return.
A quadrupling of the national debt in just one year and accepting a nuclear-armed sponsor of international terrorism such as Iran are not things from which any country is guaranteed to recover.
Just two nuclear bombs were enough to get Japan to surrender in World War II. It is hard to believe that it would take much more than that for the United States of America to surrender - especially with people in control of both the White House and the Congress who were for turning tail and running in Iraq just a couple of years ago.
Perhaps people who are busy gushing over the Obama cult today might do well to stop and think about what it would mean for their granddaughters to live under sharia law.
The glib pieties in Barack Obama's televised sermonettes will not stop Iran from becoming a nuclear terrorist nation. Time is running out fast and we will be lucky if it doesn't happen during the first term of this president. If he gets elected to a second term - which is quite possible, despite whatever economic disasters he leads us into - our fate as a nation may be sealed.
Unfortunately, the only political party with any chance of displacing the current leadership in Washington is the Republican party. That is why their internal squabbles are important for the rest of us who are not Republicans.
The "smart money" says that the way for the Republicans to win elections is to appeal to a wider range of voters - including minorities - by abandoning the kinds of positions Ronald Reagan held and supporting more of the kinds of positions that Democrats use to get elected. This sounds good on the surface, which is as far as many people go when it comes to politics.
A corollary to this is that Republicans have to come up with alternatives to the Democrats' many "solutions," rather than simply be naysayers.
However plausible all this may seem, it goes directly counter to what has actually happened in politics in this generation. For example, Democrats studiously avoided presenting alternatives to what the Republican-controlled Congress and the Bush administration were doing, and just lambasted them at every turn. That is how the Democrats replaced Republicans at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.
Ronald Reagan won two elections in a landslide by being Ronald Reagan - and, most important of all - by explaining to a broad electorate how what he advocated would be best for them and for the country. Newt Gingrich likewise led a Republican takeover of the House of Representatives by explaining how the Republican agenda would benefit a wide range of people.
Neither of them won by pretending to be Democrats. It was precisely the Republican "moderates," Bob Dole and John McCain, who lost disastrously to Democrats who had been scarcely known at first but who knew how to talk.
By Thomas Sowell
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online.

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 30 CommentsPlease take a little time away from your overpaid position at that rag you call a publication and enroll yourself into a couple of classes. First I would suggest 'Political Science 101'. There you will learn the difference between 'conservative' and 'reactionary'.
Yes, Americans are, for the most part, conservative. What you fail to understand is that the republican party is no more 'conservative' than the democratic party is 'radical'. While the democratic party has managed to move to and remain 'center-left', the republican party has shifted to the far right.
Sir, although most Americans are fiscally conservative, you and yours frighten us. Your party has adopted a reactionary agenda that is so unpopular you must lie to the country to sell your snake oil.
If you want to resurrect the rotting corpse of the republican party, I suggest you start preaching moderation. Your attitude is the very mindset that has brought the GOP to it's deathbed.
Eh? Who in any position of higher authority in the last administration ever served in an armed conflict? Bush, safely tucked away in the Texas Air National Guard? Cheney, who had "other priorities?"
Maybe there is a 12-step program for drinkers of the Repugnican Kool-Aid dispensed from the last occupant of the White House.
(SIGH) So much BS to reply to, so little time...
Texasman
And the comment, "Just two nuclear bombs were enough to get Japan to surrender in World War II. It is hard to believe that it would take much more than that for the United States of America to surrender" is just absurd. Two nukes on this country and we would probably vaporize most of the Arab/Islamic world.
More than 4500 servicemembers dead, almost a hundred thousand seriously injured, hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis murdered, $1 trillion wasted on a totally unnecessary war that you b*astards knew was entered into on false pretenses - because you are the ones who worked hardest to lie us into it.
Our daughters under Sharia law? "Turned tail"?
My only question is why you and your cohorts are not in prison - and for that, you should kiss Obama's b*tt every day, because that is where you belong.
I can't believe that an article this sick and evil is printed under the CBS imprimatur. Perhaps it's time to boycott them.
There is a special circle in hell reserved for you and your kind.
If they republicans go futher right wing then they already are they will go off a politcal cliff and be irrelavent for a extende period of time. They got us into one uncessary land war and getiing us into a ground war in Iran is not a good move.
GWB made his axsis of evil speach and then invaded Iraq without ever considering the effect on some of the more mentally unstable leaders. This helped motavate Iran and North Korea to build WMD. They are under the illusion that they are next on the list of countries that we will invade. GWB accerated the day when a set of unstable leaders will get a nuclear weapon. The opotions we have are now very limited unless we plan to use nuclear weapons. He has made the world a much more dangerious place. I guess its not dangerious enought for Sowell.
thomas sowell- you are an idiot.
another far right wing liberal neocon self labeling themselves as conservative, a joke.
http://www.tsowell.com/
I think if the use of a nuclear weapon on USA gets traced back to eithe country they will be turned into a glass parking lot. The major concrn is do they care if they get distroyed or are they to wacked out too care?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 30 Comments