KABUL, June 22, 2009

U.S.: No More Fighting Near Afghan Homes

To Prevent Civilian Casualties, Top General Will Order Troops Not To Engage Militants Hiding In Houses

  •  (CBS/AP)

  • Fast Facts Afghanistan

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(AP)  The top U.S. general in Afghanistan will soon formally order U.S. and NATO forces to break away from fights with militants hiding in Afghan houses so the battles do not kill civilians, a U.S. official said Monday.

The order would be one of the strongest measures taken by a U.S. commander to protect Afghan civilians in battle. American commanders say such deaths hurt their mission because they turn average Afghans against the government and U.S. and NATO forces.

Civilian casualties are a major source of friction between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the U.S. The U.N. says U.S., NATO and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians in the Afghan war last year.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took command of international forces in Afghanistan this month, has said his measure of effectiveness will be the "number of Afghans shielded from violence," and not the number of militants killed.

McChrystal will issue orders within days saying troops may attack insurgents hiding in Afghan houses if the U.S. or NATO forces are in imminent danger and must return fire, said U.S. military spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith.

"But if there is a compound they're taking fire from and they can remove themselves from the area safely, without any undue danger to the forces, then that's the option they should take," Smith said. "Because in these compounds we know there are often civilians kept captive by the Taliban."

McChrystal's predecessor, Gen. David McKiernan, issued rules last fall that told commanders to set conditions "to minimize the need to resort to deadly force."

But McChrystal's orders will be more precise and have stronger language ordering forces to break off from battles, Smith said.

In the most recent civilian deaths case, a May 4-5 battle between U.S. and Afghan forces and militants in western Farah province killed dozens of civilians. A U.S. report last week said U.S. forces killed an estimated 26 civilians. However, Karzai's government says 140 were killed, while an Afghan human rights group says the number is about 100.

In the latest violence, a suicide bomber on a motorbike killed seven civilians Monday when he drove into the center of an eastern Afghan city and set off explosives.

It was unclear who the bomber was targeting when he detonated a bomb on his motorbike in front of Khost city's electric power headquarters and then explosives on his body a few minutes later, said Kuchi Naseri, a spokesman for the governor of Khost province. The Interior Ministry said seven people were killed.

There were no military or police nearby, Naseri said, but added the later blast may have been planned to hit police or officials rushing to the scene. Another 30 people in the area were wounded, he said.

In southern Kandahar province, meanwhile, another suicide bomber killed three Afghan soldiers in an attack on a convoy of troops inspecting a highway bridge for explosives. The attacker drove a car into the convoy and it exploded, said Zadi district Police Chief Niaz Mohammad Serhadi.

Serhadi said two civilians were also wounded in the blast, along with five other soldiers.

In eastern Nangarhar province, an explosion at a weapons cache killed a 6-year-old boy and wounded 20 others, police said.

It was unclear what sparked the chain reaction of explosions in caves used to store weapons and other material collected from insurgents on the outskirts of Jalalabad city, said Nangarhar province police spokesman Ghafor Khan.

"We are still investigating the incident. It is possible that the explosives ignited on their own," Khan said.

The caves where the weapons were stored were about 100 yards (meters) away from a village, and the blast shot some shells or other items into the residential area, Khan said. Two soldiers who guarded the cache were among the wounded.

© MMIX The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by mcintoshlou June 22, 2009 8:51 PM EDT
its about time, the idiot conservative were bombing anything that

moved and calling it a war, its really just another republi'con'

instigated massacre, when did republi'con's become sub human?
Reply to this comment
by babooph June 22, 2009 5:38 PM EDT
Seems we went to that hell hole to get Bin Ladin ,after the govt. there would not give him up-he could have been killed years ago in some airstrike-this could all be for nothing.US "news" is not the only entity that can fake pix.
Reply to this comment
by speakinup22 June 22, 2009 4:28 PM EDT
Who in the HELL made this STUPID decision ?

This is like giving "kings-X" to anyone that is fighting our troops.

The civilians being killed was definitly regretable, but whenever you have a two way shooting gallery, people are going to get hurt.

Who EVER made this decision should flat out retire.

This WILL cost more lives not less.

If this came from Barry, I want EVERYONE in the US to know it, because it will signal exactly when his presidency became toast.
Reply to this comment
by mcintoshlou June 22, 2009 8:53 PM EDT
the war against terror was lost the day that the idiot

bush/cheney decided to become terrorists themselves, thru torture,

we should get out, and we should start minding our own business
by zonkzilla June 22, 2009 4:09 PM EDT
"Why did Obama invade Afghanistan and dismantle our entire military?
The terrorists now control the US and we are all slaves to Islam.
First Obama allowed 9-11 to happen, then he invaded Iraq based on lies and invaded Afghanistan. America is now a socialist country where private companies are illegal. That is what we get for letting the courts appoint Obama as President."
LOL
(you Obama haters are definitely out there)
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat3000 June 22, 2009 3:46 PM EDT
by antoniof123 June 22, 2009 10:36 AM PDT
Let's just leave.

Stop getting involved let China handle it from now on.
_______
9/11.

"China"?

lmao
Reply to this comment
by government_control June 22, 2009 3:37 PM EDT
First obama handcuffed the CIA, and now the army. Nov 7, 2008, the date america surrendered the war on terror.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 June 22, 2009 1:36 PM EDT
Let's just leave.

Stop getting involved let China handle it from now on.
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses0004 June 22, 2009 1:06 PM EDT
War is hell, people die.
------------------------
More WILL now because of this policy.
We should be enabling our troops, not disabling them.
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat3000 June 22, 2009 12:52 PM EDT
I bet our forces just LOVE this.

And the militants will just use civilians in their homes more often now.

War is hell, people die.
Reply to this comment
by hamiltongrad June 22, 2009 5:32 PM EDT
Gravyboat: sure, but it is worse to end up killing the very people you need to help . The key here is to stop the Cycle of Violence in Afganistan and IRAQ. If we stop shooting bullits, perhaps they will too.
See all 11 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: